First Short Bitcoin ETF To List On NYSE (coindesk.com) 44
An anonymous reader quotes a report from CoinDesk: Investment product provider ProShares is set to list the U.S.'s first exchange-traded fund (ETF) allowing investors to bet against the price of bitcoin (BTC). The ProShares Short Bitcoin Strategy (BITI), which is designed to deliver the inverse of bitcoin's performance, will start trading on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Tuesday, ProShares announced Monday. The ETF will allow investors to hedge their bitcoin exposure, which may prove particularly pertinent given the sharp downturn in crypto markets of late.
ProShares was the first firm to list a bitcoin futures ETF in October, a factor which saw the world's largest crypto hit an all-time high of around $68,900 in the subsequent weeks. Bitcoin investors will be hoping the listing of a short bitcoin futures ETF does not have a similar effect on the world's largest crypto in reverse. Bitcoin's price dropped below $20,000 for the first time since Dec. 20 on June 18, falling as low as $17,800 the following day.
ProShares was the first firm to list a bitcoin futures ETF in October, a factor which saw the world's largest crypto hit an all-time high of around $68,900 in the subsequent weeks. Bitcoin investors will be hoping the listing of a short bitcoin futures ETF does not have a similar effect on the world's largest crypto in reverse. Bitcoin's price dropped below $20,000 for the first time since Dec. 20 on June 18, falling as low as $17,800 the following day.
Too bad... (Score:3)
Just a few days too late.
Not at all too late (Score:1)
Just a few days too late.
Until Tether collapses, you have not even seen the bulk of BTC unwinding.
I would say $6k is a realistic target, but honestly it's probably lower than that.
Don't take this as advice when to buy though as crypto is just too random for me to be able to offer any kind of solid advice as to a real low. I personally will probably stay out of crypto altogether no matter how temping the gyrations may be, until I see at least six months of predictable and reasonable price behavior, along wi
Re: (Score:3)
Probably for the same reason stocks "recovered" briefly in 1929 before the total crash: Because the big traders bought them up to trick people into "buying the dip".
And hey, it worked back then...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A week later, when people "bought the dip", the big trader flushed their stocks, leaving their dupes to take the fall.
Re: (Score:3)
But stocks, especially broad portfolios, don't rely on greater fool investing. The underlying assets have value. Crytpo is entirely a greater-fool treatise. And so the two are not the
Re: (Score:2)
In 1929, stock prices and the value of the company they represented were completely discoupled. Like back in dot.com where you had companies with stocks worth billions that didn't make a cent of turnover yet, let alone profit. It's like with a lot of overinflated bubbles: As soon as someone has to withdraw and doesn't find someone to buy his lot and allow him to realize the profit (or even loss), the thing breaks down.
That's the fun bit about such constructs: Until you actually have to monetize it, i.e. pul
Re: (Score:2)
For exchange-traded stocks there is a *very* deep market. Depending on the trading platform you use, you can see it. I don't pay much attention to it for stocks. But for bonds, the depth of market is very important an
Re: (Score:2)
They certainly ain't the same and yes, the stock market is VASTLY bigger than the crypto one. But there is not just more potential customers, there's also way more different stocks being traded. There's only a few thousand "serious" crypto traders compared to the millions that deal in stocks, but there is also only a rather manageable amount of crypto currencies compared to the impossible to really comprehend flood of stocks.
Your stock example doesn't work though. Yes, you'd pick up stocks in Exxon because,
Where is the triple-short ETF? (Score:3)
It would be interesting to see what would happen with a highly leveraged short ETF.
Re: Where is the triple-short ETF? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
> It would be interesting to see what would happen with a highly leveraged short ETF.
Uh, buy this with leverage and see for yourself?
Re: (Score:2)
Much as I hate Bitcoin (Score:5, Insightful)
We don't have to allow anti-social behavior in our economy out of some strange obligation to the free market.
Re: (Score:2)
They could start by having some stricter rules on shorting. You should only be able to short using shares you can actually borrow, not imaginary ones. I am talking about naked short selling which is supposed to be illegal, but there are still loopholes.
But, yeah, despite the fact that I understand the arguments that it can provide liquidity, or like here for hedging other positions, I don't like shorts. Not as much as I don't like high frequency trading of course.
That won't work in your post shows why (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
shorting should be illegal. It creates perverse incentives that wealthy investors can exploit. Rich folk have been caught multiple times undermining a business they hold a short position on. Essentially corporate sabotage.
Short selling, including short option trading, is a conventional, regulated securities market technique. It "thickens" markets by restraining sharp upward price movements and, by creating "short interest" or bulk amounts of borrowed shares that at some point have to be repurchased to be given back to lenders, also damps down sharp down moves.
But a short ETF in a pure speculative fake asset with no value behind it? Things are about to get...interesting.
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
So you're saying Bitcoin is going to die soon because of this?
Seems like a fine result to me.
No, shorting outs fraud and does the SEC's job for (Score:5, Informative)
profit. I recommend you watch The China Hustle [wikipedia.org] which does a great job showing how this works in an 80 minute documentary format.
There are absolutely exceptional short sellers who publicly post their research. Hidenburg Research [hindenburgresearch.com] is one of the best and has a free email list. I'm pretty sure the documentary mentions Muddy Waters, and there are others like the Bear Cave [substack.com] which I also subscribe to. These people are top tier journalists who put their money where their mouth is. It's a fucking public service and they get almost nothing but hate for it.
But, as I said, they wouldn't exist at all and there would be no need if the SEC did their job (this is mostly due to being criminally underfunded, as if that's not by design), but congress has exemptions for their own insider trades. As St. Carlin said, It's a big club and you ain't in it. [youtube.com]
Re: (Score:2)
But rick folk boosting a business that they hold a long position on is a-ok, why exactly?
Re: (Score:2)
Short ETFs for "commodities" can be a healthy tool and manage risk-- it is a lot like a put option which can have purposes beyond thinking a stock will go down (or trying to force it down).
Re: (Score:2)
shorting should be illegal. It creates perverse incentives that wealthy investors can exploit. Rich folk have been caught multiple times undermining a business they hold a short position on.
Driving should be illegal. It creates an incentive to escape from a robbery quickly. Criminals have been caught multiple times using cars to get away from bank robberies.
Here's the thing: undermining a business due to a trading position (any trading position be it short or otherwise) is already illegal. Holding a short position on one company is no more or less an incentive to undermine said company than holding an investment position in a competitor.
So no, shorts should not be illegal. We shouldn't be some
Re: (Score:2)
Which companies that didn't deserve that were actually damaged in any way by short sellers?
Re: (Score:2)
Question (Score:5, Funny)
Is there a block chain to short block chains?
Proof that the markets are just legal gambling (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
Shorting != "The Stock Market"
And as others have said, the advantages of being able to maintain short positions are not worth the amount of outright fraud that happens with them, in my opinion.
Re: (Score:2)
Futures markets (Score:2)
If you want to short bitcoin or ether, open a futures trading account on Ameritrade. Use the paper trading to get a feel for how it works. Once it makes sense, it is so much simpler and price efficient and no management fees.
The structuring of futures as contracts is weird at first (to me it was), but then it clicks and is easy to track and follow costs, gains and losses. There's no "shorting" per se, you simply have a net holding of contracts +2, +1, 0, -1, -2. When you're at 0, you've settled. And tax tr
That's it, that's the bottom... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
"but Bitcoin might rally to 40K from here"
For the Emperor!
Re: (Score:2)
I'm more worried for those who short GME than BTC. Devastating margin calls seem like a much more likely scenario for them.
Time to go long, I guess (Score:1)