Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Programming graffiti (Score 2) 26

I have a friend who wrote a sentence of two into an AI song generator and he couldn't wait to show me the sentimental song "he wrote" that "helped him put down the music in his head"

So perhaps these people heavily using AI have somehow gaslit themselves into this fantasy that they're really connected to this ghost in the machine and they're legit programmers doing good work

Comment Re:aaaand now I'm curious (Score 2) 26

I think it's also strongly due to the process that AI PRs are being rejected. For one, they usually have:

Little utility
Overly invasive changes
Bloviated PR text that sounds legit but it absolutely full of shit and self-justifying
Outright lies on metrics or testing
And an author that feels offended you "caught them" and degenerates into just a huge name calling event or a "no I dint" "yes you did" "OK, I did a little" "No you did a lot" "OK, fine I did a lot but its still worthwhile" "No its not your patch to make shiny materials slightly more correctly shiny (arguable) broke our entire rendering engine" (an actual godot PR)

So once you see the telltale signs of an AI PR, it becomes a burden to just see if "this time it's not crap".

It is shit more often than not and to save time and sanity of the real devs, the entire request is tossed into the trash

Slashdot Top Deals

All theoretical chemistry is really physics; and all theoretical chemists know it. -- Richard P. Feynman

Working...