I've been seeing this term pop up a few times lately-- are the LLMs starting this trend?

Came here to say this... been using Claude enough to smell it's descriptive style a mile away...

"Compliance is not inherited from an upstream engine; it is measured, section by section, against the specification text... Private by construction. No telemetry, no update pings, and no AI assistant or AI-style web APIs. Safe browsing checks a top-level navigation's host against a local SHA-256 blocklist before it is fetched — the check never leaves your machine"

Can't overstress how much I hate this

What's surprising is, even though you hit all of the things that were signaling AI, this still reads like something a human wrote. I wonder why?

Literally threatening to kill your spouse tops it:

"a book about surviving the death of a spouse"

We're so far from an understanding of all the interconnected systems and how they function that I'd be concerned about the other things the patient suddenly has no urge to do, perhaps, say, eat, recreate...

Well, there are those inverse etfs that you could go long on, but I'm not sure how well their swings correlate to what they're trying to track

It means everything and it means nothing

Speaking of boy genius, but I can't help but think of the aliens universe's megacorporations lately.

Oh you better believe they spent more than 20k on that

I have a friend who wrote a sentence of two into an AI song generator and he couldn't wait to show me the sentimental song "he wrote" that "helped him put down the music in his head"

So perhaps these people heavily using AI have somehow gaslit themselves into this fantasy that they're really connected to this ghost in the machine and they're legit programmers doing good work

I had a package held up for over 2 weeks because my mail carrier (USPS) "saw a deer" and flagged it undeliverable NO ETC due to unleashed / dangerous animal.

I think it's also strongly due to the process that AI PRs are being rejected. For one, they usually have:

Little utility
Overly invasive changes
Bloviated PR text that sounds legit but it absolutely full of shit and self-justifying
Outright lies on metrics or testing
And an author that feels offended you "caught them" and degenerates into just a huge name calling event or a "no I dint" "yes you did" "OK, I did a little" "No you did a lot" "OK, fine I did a lot but its still worthwhile" "No its not your patch to make shiny materials slightly more correctly shiny (arguable) broke our entire rendering engine" (an actual godot PR)

So once you see the telltale signs of an AI PR, it becomes a burden to just see if "this time it's not crap".

It is shit more often than not and to save time and sanity of the real devs, the entire request is tossed into the trash

This

Fedex up 1 pt in afterhours trading, UPS holding even

Don't many of these models process tokens at like 5 / sec on something like a 5060ti?