"Sorry, but the opinion of a nobody on slashdot isn't a measure whether someone "understands" what science is or not"

I am a scientist, with masters degrees from an Ivy League school in both nuclear science and operations research. Your comment that science is just a hobby is dismissive, arrogant, and ignorant. If not for science, we would not have cellphones, cars, or any other modern conveniences. Science is based on a combination of theory and experimental proof.

Science is performed by humans, who are flawed, so science is as imperfect as humans are, but it is the best process that we have for ascertaining truth about the natural world. Perhaps don't be so dismissive of others and their profession and education. BTW I work with scientists, some of whom have saved literally millions of lives in Africa through vaccines that they developed there - scientists who could have become rich from their work but chose instead to help others.

Sorry, but you clearly do not understand what science is. And the claim that "every life is sentient" is circular because you are saying that all life is sentient and sentience is life. Finally, there is no evidence that primitive life, such as a bacterium, is sentient - any such claim is an absurd conjecture.

"Every living thing know what I'm talking about, the chatbot has no idea."

You are referring to sentient. That is not how scientists try to define life. Not all life is sentient - e.g. a bacterium is not sentient.

Hi - did you read my article?

What is "happiness"?

Be careful - the criteria might be met by a AI bot...

One can define "complex adaptive system", but "life" - no. And "sentient" is something else, but a lot of life is not sentient. Here is an article I wrote about this: https://medium.com/@cliffberg/...

Last night clocks went back to RETURN TO STANDARD TIME. Daylight savings time is what we had all summer.

And while we are all back to the office, now everyone around us is chattering all day long. No thanks.

Half the population has an IQ under 100. So the number sounds about right.

They would love to extend their snooping from the phone to the laptop.

That is a good point!

The most popular is often the worst. Consider:

• McDonalds hamburger - definitely not the best - far from it.
• Bud beer - definitely not the best - far from it.
• ...

Yes indeed. When they abandoned their engineering culture, they abandoned their product and their customers.

Yes, in my experience you are right. Except in the domain of aerospace sometimes.

Maybe because "hacking" is not how real long-lasting code is written. Durable expandable maintainable code is not "hacked together" - it is engineered, which takes time - more than a day at a hackathon.

"Free" at the cost of enduring obnoxious commercials!