Microsoft Resurrects the Title of President 112
theodp writes: Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella promoted General Counsel Brad Smith to president and chief legal officer Friday, the first time Microsoft has had a company-wide president since 2002. Smith has been Microsoft's point person on convincing Congress of America's tech-worker shortage, an assertion that is disputed by others. At a 2012 forum on STEM education and immigration reform, Smith discussed "producing a crisis" to galvanize action on Microsoft's National Talent Strategy, which calls for increasing the number of H-1B visas to ostensibly make up for U.S. children's lack of CS-savvy. Coincidentally, a real national K-12 CS and tech immigration crisis emerged shortly thereafter, thanks to the efforts of new deep-pocketed nonprofit organizations like Code.org (headed by Smith's next-door neighbor) and Mark Zuckerberg's FWD.us PAC. Smith is a Code.org Board member and a FWD.us 'Major Contributor'. "We took this idea of connecting immigration to education last fall," Smith explained to the Daily Princetonian in 2013, "and when I started in September, we were the only ones talking about it. To have the White House endorse it, to have it embodied in the Senate Bill, to have people in both houses of Congress supporting it means that potentially this is a magic moment for some important steps for education reform as well." While crying crisis wolf to further its agenda has worked well for Microsoft, a Federal judge recently overturned 'emergency' tech immigration changes enacted by Homeland Security in 2008, saying that "the 17-month duration of the STEM extension appears to have been adopted directly from the unanimous suggestions by Microsoft."
Oh no (Score:2, Insightful)
Another linkfest anti-education diatribe by Theodp. How much is theodp paying to get this garbage posted here?
Re: (Score:2)
come to JeBus (Score:2)
Re:come to JeBus (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
He said the same to me. He was so happy that my son died. He was very clear that he didn't want Microsoft employees to have children.
Re: (Score:2)
Forget to tick the post anonymously button?
Re: (Score:1)
When you promote a lawyer to President ... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:When you promote a lawyer to President ... (Score:5, Insightful)
That's quite interesting and also explains the changes we have seen lately - transition from a company providing a necessity to a company that spies on the users.
Re: (Score:2)
When you promote a Marketing hack to President, you are no longer a tech company. What you are saying is that technology is not longer your highest priority.
FTFY - Dogbert Correctness Committee
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Could condense summary to "theodp writes"... (Score:2)
I'm detecting a certain sameness to the stuff that theodp has been posting. Anyone else notice it?
Whatever it takes to get more H1B's in (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:Whatever it takes to get more H1B's in (Score:5, Insightful)
I'd much rather have skilled people just being sponsored for green cards, and then allowed to compete. But guess what - Microsoft and Facebook and all these companies aren't actually interested in that, they want H-1Bs. Gee, wonder why that could be.
Re: (Score:2)
What do I mean? Well, they want the ability to pay lower wages, if not third world wages, without actually having to move their operations lock stock and barrel to India or wherever else, and thus having to pay either in the sho
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:1)
And they want to sell their products in captive markets protected by the government making importing the products from elsewhere where they sell it cheaper (or even give it away free in some cases) illegal.
They'll stop when they've pumped the wealth out of the richer companies and no one can afford to pay any more.
Re:Whatever it takes to get more H1B's in (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3)
>It's kind of odd that we have this huge shortage of STEM workers, while at the same time, we have tens of thousands of unemployed STEM workers
It's a huge shortage of competent STEM workers. I get a slew of resumes every week from unqualified STEM workers who should damned well stay unemployed.
How do you know they are incompetent? Did you interview them? Or are you just going by the fact that they didn't meet your job requirements which specify expert level competency in three dozen different skillsets, some of which are on software written and used only at your company, and others of which require 10 years of programming in 5 year old languages? You see, most STEM workers in the U.S., would answer truthfully, but headhunting agencies in India will gladly lie to you about having all of those req
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
return to working "hundreds"
For the readers here that don't live in Seattle, that typically means working 16 hours per day Mon-Thur and 12 hours per day Fri-Sun for a total of a hundred hours per week. That is standard for a Seattle-area startup.
A timely story by theodp (Score:5, Insightful)
But, the summary sounds just a wee bit similar [slashdot.org] to
this one [slashdot.org].
And this one [slashdot.org].
Oh, and there's this one [slashdot.org].
Not to mention this one [slashdot.org].
Maybe you missed this one [slashdot.org]?
Or how about this one [slashdot.org]?
Because Theodp [slashdot.org] doesn't have [slashdot.org] any sort of agenda [slashdot.org], does he [slashdot.org]?
Nahhh... [slashdot.org]
At least they're relevant, even if biased. (Score:1)
Even if there is some bias, at least those submissions are relevant to technology. We should be thankful that they're at least about software and the software industry. There's a Slashdot imitation site, called SoylentNews, which has a particular user (gewg_) who repeatedly submits extremely biased, far-left submissions. These often link to sketchy articles and sites that even fellow lefties think are way too questionable, and not to be taken seriously. Even worse, most of these submissions have absolutely
none of the articles are about technology (Score:2)
it's ALL about USA POLITICS, mostly immigration politics.
usa immagration policies ARE NOT TECH NEWS. and extremely boring for someone who has no interest in moving to USA. like, wtf, is this news for nerds or news for "I wanna move to USA from Calcutta" ? da fuq?
Re: (Score:2)
Who gives a shit? I like the fact that companies are stressing how important learning to code is to kids in K-12. What agenda are you trying to imply other than "coding is good"? I support teaching children at least the basics of coding.
The only thing you could be pushing is that companies want more H1-B's so they can get cheap coders, but the fact that they're trying to get coding into basic education goes against exactly that.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Separate H1Bs (Score:5, Interesting)
As someone who has benefited from the STEM extension, it is strange that they are targeting this, instead of fixing the H1b issue.
I got my doctoral degree in STEM, and did not get my H1b in the lottery system the first time. If I was forced to leave, the US would have spent nearly half a million dollars on my education, and got one year of tax (not counting my research work, which is freely available to anyone) in return.
Like most people making use of the STEM extension, I am being paid as much or more than my US co-workers. This isn't a "consulting" gig where I am forced to work for my company at sub-standard wages under pain of getting kicked out of the US - STEM graduates have been educated in renowned US universities, and I had four job offers by the time I graduated.
I think there should be a different H1b tracks for people who are hired "internally" i.e. the person is already in the US, and was educated here (people who currently benefit from the 17-month STEM extension), and the other type of H1b that I hear exists (where a company brings in people from overseas purely to do a job).
Re: Separate H1Bs (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
dont take this wrong, I am happy that you were able to get the education you did, however I just think that money (americans money) would be better spent on educating americans
Re: (Score:2)
why is the US government spending half a million on someone to go to school here when we have some groups here in america that have a 50% failure rate? dont take this wrong, I am happy that you were able to get the education you did, however I just think that money (americans money) would be better spent on educating americans
Send that one to Donald Trump . . . he will make a field day out of that one for the rest of his campaign, however long that might last. Meanwhile, Hilary Clinton said she was "So, Sorry!", and that she "wasn't thinking" when she gave the guy half a million.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
im sorry but.... what???
"Get your lips away from the crack pipe" :-)
Re: (Score:1)
It's called basic research, which is what fuels most of the high-tech industry and is one of the things that the rest of the world would die to get their hands on. You fund the top research, so that your universities get to the top, get the best people, spin off the best startups, attract VC money etc. It's very much a game of reputation which you win by providing the best resources, i.e. reasonable salary and great labs. If the National Science Foundation or the Department of Defense would spend that same
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
There is jackass. There are different Visa programs: O-1 and EB-1. How the fuck did the US government spend $500,000 on your education? Unless you are talking about research grants, in which case they would be available to other researchers, not just you. Move along troll.
O-1 is an extremely hard category to get a visa under. EB-1 is not a visa, it is a permanent residence stream (which is what my employer can file for my green card under, IF they choose). Again, EB-1 is extremely hard to get a green card under - it is for exceptional researchers who are presented as such valuable resources that the country would suffer a significant loss if they weren't allowed to remain (hint, most Ph.D. holders are not, despite what their lawyers might argue).
As for who was eligible for
Re: (Score:2)
Funny you should suggest this. From Microsoft "Bait and Switch" Could Mean a Huge Increase in Foreign Tech Workers [motherjones.com]: "The company proposed a novel workaround: If the federal government would raise the H1-B cap by 20,000 additional visas and make available an equal number of additional green cards, Microsoft said it would be willing to pay nearly four times the usual fees, handing over $10,000 per H-1B visa and $15,000 per green card. It called its proposal the National Talent Strategy because the additional
Meet Brad Smith (Score:1)
Our new scapegoat.
Re: (Score:1)
I've learned the hard way that scapegoats are in big demand. Just remember to leave your self worth at the door.
lol, sure... (Score:3)
Smith has been Microsoft's point person on convincing Congress of America's tech-worker shortage, an assertion that is disputed by others
It's an assertion that's been proven to be utter horseshit. FTFY, BTW.
Re: (Score:2)
Whoop Dee Doo (Score:2)
I think I speak for many of us when I say, "Who gives a shit?"
So they renamed or reshuffled some titles for the goobers at the top, so fucking what?
If they hadn't put out a press release that slashdot promptly regurgitated, I'd have never known anything had happened.
"Stuff that matters" indeed.
sucks to be Scott Charney, I guess... (Score:5, Interesting)
After all that bluster about security and privacy, ten years of "Trustworthy Computing" and Scott Charney poised to head to some White House role as the voice of Microsoft, it's all fallen apart. Scott's sidelined, TwC effectively disbanded and it's security and privacy groups laid off or rolled into the Windows group, and all the new hot noise and hubub is about sending Brad to grow the army of sheltered Satya-style bro-grammers to churn out even more shit code. So much for the idea of BETTER products; We'll just brace for MORE of the same minimally-tested, designed-by-assumption, cloud-based/bing-telemetry-sucking, insecure dreck. Woohoo.
The H1B debate is irrelevant; when the direction and mission of the enterprise is so fundamentally disorganized, orthagonal to real-world business use cases, and requires dismantling national labor legal structures, the "need" for more tech workers to get there is a nonsequitur. Microsoft is looking at Google in 2015, with the same curious lack of understanding as IBM looked at Microsoft in the 1990's -- not understanding the landscape itself had changed, and vigourosly agitating for more mainframe system programmers. More H1Bs would make the same difference to Microsoft now as IBM then.
Re: (Score:1)
Do they offer B1H's over there?
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe the fact that Xbox has a ver close replacement (Ps4 runs most of the same games) had something to do with that backtrack. In contrast, with Windows there exists no almost equivalent replacement and by what I mean a OS that runs the same software. Older Windows version