Slashdot Charity Buyers Donate Over $10,000 To the EFF 119
The Slashdot 10 Year Anniversary Charity Auction for the EFF is at an end and the numbers are in. We are still waiting for payment on one of the six items, but the grand total for the auctions is $9186.83. The big surprise was the anonymous reader who bought the Swag Bag AND the Low UID: he decided to donate an extra $1200 beyond his bids! Thanks to Daniel Peacock (who bought Hemos's burnt copy of Watchmen) and Michael Ravnitzk who bought Triton, the case of the first x86 that ran Slashdot in Feb 1998. He then turned around and told us to shelve it, to try to sell it again later. Instead he got a box of shirts. We're still waiting for payment on the email address, but hopefully nobody would be so crappy that they would scam a charity auction. And lastly, we would like to give special thanks to the
University of Advancing Technology (here's a Coral Cache link) who paid $3,550.00 for that hyperlink you just read past. They wanted to express their support for Slashdot and for the EFF, and I think both of us appreciate it. Thanks to everyone who bid on items and congratulations to the winners. And the rest of you - don't feel bad that you missed it. You can always make a donation later - the EFF does good work. Tell them Slashdot sent you.
Did low UID purchaser get a ## or ### ? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
yep, 3 digit uids have no cachet (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
So Mae Ling Mak won't even look your way.
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
ORLY? (n/t) (Score:2)
Damn (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Damn (Score:4, Insightful)
Re: (Score:1)
Why would anyone pay to get a link saying 42?
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Ha. Funny. I'll tell you what, though, I'd donate some money - hundreds of dollars at least - to a good cause of slashdot's choosing if they would permanently fix the moderation so that moderation isn't anonymous; everyone could see *exactly* who modded what up or down, your average moderator or a slashdot editor/authority. The "low UID" and so forth are essentially useless and require nothing of slashdot either; but they could actually earn a donation fro
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
- Someone finds a sarcastic joke unfunny and it gets modded "troll" or "flamebait."
- 3 people think I'm funny and I get a nice "+5, Funny" but one person thinks I'm not that funny and hits me with a "-1, Overrated." What crap. The guidelines say "focus on promoting, not demoting" but I don't think anyone reads those. Everyone just wants to form Slashdot into what they want to see, not realizing that it's (everyone hold hands now) all our differences that make Slashdot great. I see ide
Re:Damn (Score:5, Insightful)
This wouldn't fix the system at all, it would make it worse than useless.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Citation? Or are you just rambling here?
I'd support the EFF but ... (Score:5, Funny)
[ ] I like big monopolies
[X] I'm Canadian and not represented by the EFF in any which way shape or form
[ ] The EFF tried to kill my daddy
[ ] I'm paid by the EFF so donating to the EFF is like donating to myself
[ ] Hey look!
However,
[ ] I've started an equivalent EFF in Canada
[ ] I Joined the equivalent EFF in Canada
[X] I Bought an EFF hat at Defcon
[X] I Lost said hat at Toorcon the same year
[X] I Bought another hat off their website
[ ] I Regret dealing with the EFF
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
* I am assuming I do not have multiple personalities that lie to each other.
(I realize that my statement of "Canadians care more" will be marked as flamebait, but prove me wrong, d*mnit!)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
So is Cory Doctorow, who worked hard for us for many years and is still an EFF fellow.
So we do care, though I won't pretend that most of our focus remains in the USA.
Re: (Score:2)
[ ] I like big monopolies
[X] I'm Canadian and not represented by the EFF in any which way shape or form
[ ] The EFF tried to kill my daddy
[ ] I'm paid by the EFF so donating to the EFF is like donating to myself
[ ] Hey look!
However,
[ ] I've started an equivalent EFF in Canada
[ ] I Joined the equivalent EFF in Canada
[ ] I Bought an EFF hat at Defcon
[ ] I Lost said hat at Toorcon the same year
[ ] I Bought another hat off their we
Re:I'd support the EFF but ... (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:1, Informative)
EFF? (Score:1, Interesting)
-1: Not funny (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
did I read that right? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:did I read that right? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
2. Choose the auctioned object that suits you the best.
3. Fail to account for the massive traffic your choice will generate.
4. ???
5. Profit!
Re: (Score:2)
"please sir, may I have some more?"
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Nice of UAT (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
too little ? (Score:2)
you dont (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:too little ? (Score:4, Informative)
you lack vision (Score:2)
additionally, in local and general sense, the internet is what is making all people to get informed about anything h
exactly (Score:2)
Congratulations University of Advanced Technology. (Score:3, Funny)
UAT (Score:4, Funny)
It's almost right, which is pretty good, by Slashdot editing standards
Re: (Score:1, Funny)
Extra bandwith cost from Slashdotting: $???? (Thousands? millions?)
Getting your name messed up by CmdrTaco himself: Priceless!
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
This might be useful during congressional testimony.
A view from a cynical bastard. (Score:5, Insightful)
I don't mean to make accusations, but where's the money going. I didn't see anything on the links.
Are the administrators buying Mercedes Benz's with their "pay"?
Just asking.
P.S. I have plenty of karma - don't be shy about modding me down. I'm using my karma for good - I think.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:A view from a cynical bastard. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:A view from a cynical bastard. (Score:5, Informative)
Check parent. (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
$10,000 (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
(at least at the billing rate that the lawyer who handled my gripe site C&D letter analysis charges).
-nB
Anonymous Coward (87) (Score:1)
Since when do anonymous cowards have UIDs?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Since when do anonymous cowards have UIDs?
Rush Limbaugh raises $4,200,200 6 days (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Oh I know, some idiot astroturfer who just signed up today. Silly me. Weird kind of astroturfing though.
AC's are good now? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
The University of Advancing Technology is NOT (Score:1)
Only /.ers (Score:1)
Goatse (Score:1)
hohoho (Score:2, Funny)
The EFF thanks you (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Google results shows 1 posting from netelder (655766):
http://www.google.com/search?q=site%3Aslashdot.org+netelder [google.com]
Following this link now shows things slightly differently with the UID 655766 being taken by "netolder [slashdot.org]" whilst the archive still shows the old one.
The new netelder [slashdot.org](41) now has no comments.
I did wonder how the transplant would occur, and tbh now I think I wouldn't want to leave my comments behind and do it this way.
resigned to a long uid forever
Re: (Score:2)
I wondered a bit about how the transplant would work, too. I would've wanted to work with the slashdot folks a little slower and see if I could persuade them to do things right. Maybe I could write the SQL for them, or something. :) But it sounds like this guy had so few comments he may not have felt it was worth it.
I for one think it's really cool, and I was one of the first bidders on the auction, and if I'd won I wouldn't have been anonymous about it. I would've bragged not just about the low UID,
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Ah, it does show the winner! For some strange reason I suffered from the delusion that I had looked and that it concealed everyone's ID, including the winner.
Anyway, kudos to netelder. I personally think this makes him cool, and I was the first to put myself down as a friend of his new account.
Re:Anonomous Reader = netelder (Score:5, Insightful)
With all the concern about the right to remain anonymous on
But hey, your curiousity is sated. What do you care. Mod me troll, mod me whatever you like. I think it was irresponsible and inconsiderate to do that.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
They might have requested anonymity so people don't ridicule themabout paying for the low UID. Well, actually, it doesn't matter why they requested anonymity. The fact of the matter is that they did. It's a little rude to point out their account when they explicitly wanted to keep it hidden.
It's not like GP promised to keep it a secret. The slashdot editors did, and they kept their promise. GP doesn't owe netelder anything, and you can hardly pretend that mentioning someone's slashdot uid is a breach of courtesy. It's not like he posted his phone number.
Re: (Score:1)
I think it was irresponsible and inconsiderate to do that.
Come on - do you think any self-respecting Slashdotter wouldn't know full well that this would be easy to discover and the winner would be outed within minutes in the comments?
Besides, there's no shame in buying a low /. UID at a charity auction. It's doing something that's cool, to get something that's, well, arguably cool.
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
It's pretty much standard Slashdot behavior after all.
Re: (Score:1)
netelder confesses (Score:1)
I've been supporting the EFF on and off for years, and thought that this would be a fun way to encourage others to go out of their way to join the cause. I don't really have a use for the low UID because:
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Google Cache of a post of his [64.233.167.104]
Regular Slashdot link (not sure if this will ever be updated to say 41) [slashdot.org]
Re: (Score:1)
On another note, lookout dabman (462) [slashdot.org], I am coming for you.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Regards,
Paul