Demonoid Torrent Tracker Shut Down by CRIA 222
An anonymous reader writes "As of Tuesday, 25th September 2007, Demonoid is currently down, with no prior warnings from any moderators of the site. Both the main torrent page and the forum (fora) are no longer accessible. It is still possible to ping and trace the IP address of the site and it locates itself as in Canada. As of 6:45pm EST on 9-25-07, SSH and SMTP services are no longer active.
Torrentfreak.com has since reported this is due to legal actions from the CRIA (Canadian Recording Industry Association) who ordered Demonoid's ISP to shut down the site."
Finger in the dyke... (Score:5, Insightful)
it had to be said (Score:5, Funny)
ouch. that hurt just to say.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Finger in the dike... (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
I was wondering why I got so aroused by his first sentence.
This action is akin to putting a finger in the dyke, but there are thousands, if not millions of other holes.
Re:Finger in the dike... (Score:5, Informative)
actually that is not true, look it up in a dictionary and you'll see that dike and dyke are synonims.
and from another
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
- Zapp Brannigan
Re:Finger in the dyke... (Score:5, Funny)
I would appreciate it if you could point me to the direction of an available one.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The funny thing is, I used Demonoid a lot. But I most
Re: (Score:2)
Couldn't resist (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
there is some debate here on the demonoid shutdown (Score:5, Informative)
Re:there is some debate here on the demonoid shutd (Score:5, Funny)
Re:there is some debate here on the demonoid shutd (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No details yet... (Score:5, Insightful)
IRC log of convo with seanap of Demonoid. (Score:4, Informative)
For tl;dr types: Torrentfreak made it up, the box is down for unknown reasons. Nobody knows yet. Sorry.
Re:IRC log of convo with seanap of Demonoid. (Score:4, Informative)
Starting Nmap 4.20 ( http://insecure.org/ [insecure.org] ) at 2007-09-26 09:54 Eastern Daylight Time
Initiating Parallel DNS resolution of 1 host. at 09:54
Completed Parallel DNS resolution of 1 host. at 09:54, 0.00s elapsed
Initiating System CNAME DNS resolution of 1 host. at 09:54
Completed System CNAME DNS resolution of 1 host. at 09:54, 0.00s elapsed
Initiating SYN Stealth Scan at 09:54
Scanning demonoid.com (209.44.123.21) [1697 ports]
SYN Stealth Scan Timing: About 6.25% done; ETC: 10:03 (0:07:43 remaining)
Completed SYN Stealth Scan at 10:01, 401.57s elapsed (1697 total ports)
Warning: OS detection for 209.44.123.21 will be MUCH less reliable because we did not find at least 1 open and 1 closed TCP port
Initiating OS detection (try #1) against demonoid.com (209.44.123.21)
Host demonoid.com (209.44.123.21) appears to be up
Interesting ports on demonoid.com (209.44.123.21):
Not shown: 1690 filtered ports
PORT STATE SERVICE
21/tcp closed ftp
22/tcp closed ssh
80/tcp closed http
123/tcp closed ntp
443/tcp closed https
8000/tcp closed http-alt
8080/tcp closed http-proxy
Device type: general purpose
Running: Linux 2.6.X, OpenBSD 4.X, Sun Solaris 10|8|9
OS details: Linux 2.6.17.13 (Slackware 11.0, x86), OpenBSD 4.0 (CURRENT) macppc, OpenBSD 4.0 (sparc64), Sun Solaris 10 (SPARC), Sun Solaris 8 (SPARC), Sun Solaris 9 (SPARC), Sun Solaris 9 (x86), Sun Solaris 9 or 10
OS detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at http://insecure.org/nmap/submit/ [insecure.org] .
Nmap finished: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 405.503 seconds
Raw packets sent: 5164 (229.400KB) | Rcvd: 76 (3496B)
It looks like all the ports are firewalled off by the ISP. So while it's not confirmed, it's pretty obvious to anyone knowledgeable in network admin that the ISP firewalled off all the ports at someone's behest. Perhaps the CRIA, perhaps even Deimos himself.
Re: (Score:2)
What about that makes you think the ISP closed it off? I don't see a comparison of TTLs from when it worked to when it didn't, and 99% of the ISPs out there, if they're going to close something off, aren't going to send icmp-port-unreachable, they're just going to drop the packet. If I were the non-alarmist type that was also willing to make completely unfounded guesses, I'd say it looks like the box had some problems and came up in a single-user style mode with TCP connectivity.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
If you get a "closed" response, that means something is answering for that IP. The ISP is unlikely to do this in the event of a takedown, they'll just cut access. Even if they didn't completely cut access and only disallow inbound, they still would more than likely drop the packet instead of returning ICMP port unreachable responses. SYN scans these days are rarely any more penetrating than a regular TCP connect(). If I had a remote box, I'd do my best to make sure it had some kind of connectivity even in s
Re:IRC log of convo with seanap of Demonoid. (Score:4, Interesting)
Without going into a treatise on the reliability of Nmap results, let me point out one thing. As well as getting a closed result for HTTP, you're also getting the same result for NTP, FTP and at least one HTTP proxy service. If you're assuming that the "closed" result for Port 80 means that it's running a web server but that the port is being blocked, then you also have to assume that it's running as an NTP server. An NTP server isn't something you enable by accident and I doubt the Demonoid server is connected to an atomic clock and providing time services to the rest of the network. So that and the other unexpected ports indicate a strong possibility that your results are inconsistent and useless.
So while it's not confirmed, it's pretty obvious to anyone knowledgeable in network admin that the ISP firewalled off all the ports at someone's behest.
I would say that someone who assumes a certain explanation is correct based only on running Nmap against a host in a different country is probably not quite as knowledgeable in the field of network administration as they may think.
Re: (Score:2)
I doubt the Demonoid server is connected to an atomic clock and providing time services to the rest of the network.
Running an NTP server is an indication of nothing more than a professional administrator who wants accurate time on that machine. It's not inconsistent with the other results in the slightest.
It depends on the configuration but a common default for clients of distant time services is to act as an ntp server also. A server needs to run on the client so that round trip packet times to the d
Too bad... (Score:2)
Let's hope they manage to get back online.
Re: (Score:2)
Probably 99% of the site benefit to me.
I was so glad to find a source for the comics I grew up with (Adam Strange and others)... most of which either are or should be out of copyright after 45 to 50 years. The only way to get them hard copy would have been prohibitively expensive if even possible since many issues are not for sale often.
that's what makes it absurd (Score:5, Insightful)
The copyright Nazis don't give a shit about 90% of what's there and 90% of the people using Demonoid don't give a shit about any of the stuff the copyright Nazis give a shit about.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Speculation (Score:5, Informative)
Are You Sure? (Score:4, Informative)
Must be a hardware glitch (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
how is getting a MAC address obtaining information illegally? If getting a MAC is illegal then getting the payload portion of a IP packet would also be illegal.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
'Entrapment' is a single edged razor.
Re: (Score:2)
I highly doubt that. ISPs want you to buy their service, but they don't actually want you to use it for anything other than light web and email usage. I use Rogers and they are probably one of the worst offenders when it comes to throttling BitTorrent traffic. I can easily get 700-800kb/sec with certain web sites or ftps, yet I usually only get 25-50kb/sec with BitTorrent if I'm lucky. If ISPs loved Bit
Interesting. I just checked this morning... (Score:2)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demonoid_(BitTorrent) [wikipedia.org]
That's the word I'm seeing. And according to the article, this is essentially speculation.
Hurts, but there are other trackers. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Actually, I would believe this is hardware failure before them being shutdown. Demonoid is always goin down for something.
What's really going on... (Score:5, Informative)
irc://irc.p2p-network.net/demonoid
#demonoid
Without torrent is there a need for high speed? (Score:2)
For my needs (EQ, email, occasional funny video) a $17 AT&T DSL account would be fine. It's okay because of occasional torrent related surges that I keep my $55 cable line.
Re: (Score:2)
Put simply, it doesn't matter if bittorrent vanishes overnight, there's still massive amounts of redundancy in terms of ways to get the content bittorrent provides, stopping bittorrent wont stop demand and as a result it sure as hell aint gonna stop supply.
what a joke (Score:2, Informative)
Are you dumb? P2P services like Soulseek and E-Mule are showing no signs of being even remotely effected by all this bullshit, and as long as P2P exists and the popularity of video hosting sites like YouTube and Google Video remains unchallenged, there will be a need for high speed.
This whole article is poorly researched in any case:
http://www.thecircuitbox.com/demonoid/ [thecircuitbox.com]
Demonoid shit: (Score:5, Informative)
Ok folks, here it is. Demonoid is down. It has been for around 1 day 2 hours. The reason is down is unkown. It hasnt been RAIDed, shutdown, terminated, deleted, burned, mamed, or thrown under a bridge. There have been speculation as demonoid.com whereabouts. Well the rurmors are false. A no name site in Netherlands has a blog about Demonoid.com being down. As I don't speak douche, I can not translate. However TorrentFreak Decided upon there own free will to further spread this and rumors. Torrent freak has known to be a sleazy site they post false rumors and hope they turn out true. They do this in order for money and popularity. Quite sad isn't it. To prove this is quite easy:
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:00.54] ((
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:00.54]
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:00.54]
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:00.54]
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:00.54]
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:00.54] ((
[05:26] *seanap*
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:00.54] (ernesto) hi
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:01.01] (ernesto) it's ernesto from TF
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:01.05] (seanap) hello
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:01.27] (ernesto) brb 1 min
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:01.28] (seanap) are you part of the staff there?
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:02.01] (ernesto) I'm the staff
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:02.03] (ernesto) hehe
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:02.32] (seanap) that article is completely false.
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:02.39] (ernesto) well, I based my story on a respectable source
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:02.47] (ernesto) but I doubted it
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:02.55] (ernesto) so what's going on then?
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:03.05] (seanap) there hasn't been word yet
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:03.44] (seanap) the 2 IRC ops that are usually in contact with Deimos haven't been around
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:03.45] (ernesto) last time demonoid staff said it were hw problems you relocated to CAN
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:04.11] (ernesto) they said my story was false then too
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:04.20] (ernesto) but it turned out not to be
[05:26] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:04.46] (seanap) well i'm saying we as site and IRC staff haven't heard anything.. and we'd be the first people to hear
[05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:05.18] (ernesto) perhaps Deimos doesn't know it?
[05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:05.21] (ernesto) yet
[05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:05.28] (seanap) so i don't think you should be reporting unconfirmed things, the IRC is going insane.. almost double the amount of users in a day
[05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:05.32] (ernesto) that was exactly how it happened last time
[05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:06.04] (ernesto) nu.nl is the biggest news source in NL
[05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:06.12] (ernesto) they might have inside info
[05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:06.21] (seanap) form who?! we are the inside
[05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:06.22] (ernesto) from the isp or the CRIA
[05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:06.41] (ernesto) the ISP probably firewalled the servers
[05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:06.52] (ernesto) after some seriuos legal threats
[05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:07.04] (ernesto) it's not unlikely
[05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:07.16] (seanap) no its not, but it's not.. confirmed
[05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:07.31] (ernesto) as long as you can't explain what's happening this is all I have
[05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:07.16] (seanap) no its not, but it's not.. confirmed
[05:27] *seanap* [09/25/07 - 18:07.31] (ernesto) as long as you can't explain what's happening this i
Re: (Score:2)
Why is Slashdot posting rumors? (Score:2)
If you read what the people behind Demonoid say, they're not sure what is happening right now.
Just because one site on the Internet decides to post non-sense, Slashdot shouldn't chase after it.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Legal? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Legal? (Score:4, Informative)
At this point the only thing we know is that demonoid was hosted in Canada, is currently down and the admins of the website haven't made any official comment.
It simply makes no sense that CRIA would be responsible for this. The Canadian MPAA would make more sense as I believe they haven't blundered into the situation the Canadian professional music industry has.
Re:Legal? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Different? Doesn't seem like it. (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
While true, there is the whole issue of who has access to the bits. Burning a copy of a CD is a unicast operation in which the bits are copied onto media for which a levy has been paid. Nobody else has access to the data. Torrenting is a multicast operation in which the bits are made publicly available, onto media which (for the most part) no levy has been paid.
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
For the most part, CRIA is ignored.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I really appreciate how the MAFIAA is saving us all the costs on judges, juries and executioners.
Who needs an expensive legal system when the MAFIAA will find you guilty for free?
Re: (Score:2)
We'll see what Demonoid's operators are made of, if this is true. Who knows, maybe they'll relocate to Sweden.
Just to clarify (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:CRIA Sut Down by Pirates (Score:5, Informative)
Geez slashdot is turning into DIGG where every moron can post "the truth"
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, and there's no self correction facility (Slash it?)
Re:CRIA Sut Down by Pirates (Score:4, Funny)
And as far as comments and moderation go, Digg's level of discourse is about what you'd expect from an MMORPG.
Re:CRIA Shut Down by Pirates (Score:2)
...and on that note, you have a booger hanging...
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
You must be new here...
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:CRIA Sut Down by Pirates (Score:5, Insightful)
Geez slashdot is turning into DIGG where every moron can post "the truth"
You get a hearty second from me on this. It just seems that a lot of stuff on Slashdot these days is FUD and fearmongering. Just this week we had a big story on how evil Apple was going to deliberately brick your iPhone if you unlocked. I am not an Apple apologist or fanboy by the way and I own no Apple products, not even a iPod.
The real story apparently was that Apple tested its new firmware update on the iPhone on some unlocked iPhones and found that it bricked them. Apple decided to warn people - "Hey, if you unlocked your iPhone, you better skip this firmware update". Of course no good deed goes unpunished and the tin foil hat brigade swung into full force about how "evil Apple" had deliberately decided to brick unlocked iPhones in conjunction with some sort of unholy alliance with AT&T. Sadly, the truth seems to have been lost in this discussion.
Then we have the story that Slashdot had to update from earlier this week about how some open source program supposedly sent all kinds of private information to evil overlords who would use it in nefarious ways before the update arrived that said that the program in question only sent a few bits of information that in no way could identify its user. All you have to do any more these days is post something untrue but sure to ruffle some feathers and it shows up immediately.
I hate to break it to you... (Score:3, Insightful)
Apple's reason for the iBrick announcement was FUD (Score:2)
Classic FUD.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm sorry you're too much of an nutjob to recognize it.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, at least that means for once the CRIA is doing something useful! Now, where are those tigers??
Re:hmm (Score:5, Informative)
"That's neither here nor there as its legal to download and upload music thanks to the CD tax."
Misinformation like this is contributing to the problem.
As you've demonstrated, this doesn't prevent folks from trying to claim that uploading is legal. The most common argument is that since the default operation of P2P software is to automatically redistribute what's downloaded, then if downloading is a legal act, then anything that happens (including the redistribution) as a result of the downloading must, in turn, be legal. However, this would not even pass the laugh test in court.
Re:CRIA orders ISP to disconnect? Or a judge? (Score:4, Insightful)
If there were in fact a judgement, given the speed of our legal system, it would be shut down three years from now.
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, if the infringed party feels that the infringing party is unduly harming them, they can ask the judge to issue a temporary injunction from operations. However, in that case, the site can remain o
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I had problems like that, both monday and yesterday, on other sites as well. EZTV-EFnet site is one of those.
Lets remember several TV series are starting a new season this week. It is also likely these servers just got overloaded and crash&burned.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
You rely on the fact that it's a private tracker, and most (>99%) don't expect you to seed 1:1 for every torrent.
Get in on one earlier and seed it 2:1 or more. You don't have to stop at 1:1, you know. I've done torrents where I only seed
Re: (Score:2)
1:1 isn't required at any private site I know of. Usually .8:1 or even .7:1 is good enough -- as you say, it's impossible for EVERYONE to have 1:1, but when you're dealing with huge volumes of data like demonoid is (and of course some people who just leech and then let their accounts get canceled) keeping a decent ratio is perfectly doable. I obviously can't check my demonoid ra
Re: (Score:2)
The details are scarce here. We only have the word of one source that the CRIA is involved at all. Given the state of such shaky evidence, wouldn't the next hypothesis be that it is not legal troubles at all?
I mean, backhoes have been attempting the take down of the internet for quite some time. (Those
Re:I hate Torrents (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
Download bandwidth is essentially free to the ISP.
However, upload bandwidth costs the ISP serious money, they pay so much per gig, and therefore it is a major operating expense. And that's why they limit uploads, and why your upload cap is usually so much smaller than your download cap.
So it's not the downloaders that are the problem, it's the uploaders. If you're going way over 1:1, sad to say your generosity is con
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
So in addition to the cost differential, they're trying to balance it according to probable demand -- which of course makes good sense. You're right, most people would be seriously pissed if the norm was fast uploads but slow downloads!
Re: (Score:2)
Find us a more efficient distribution mechanism and we'll use it.
Re: (Score:2)
Postage + Disk_Cost
and
average_postal_transit_time
The above conditions would only really be efficient for large amounts of data. Where large amounts of data is relative to your bandwidth and other fellow sharers.
* I omitted the sender's bandwidth on the the extremely far reaching assumption that the file sharer uploads enough back to the network as he downloads.
* This is a gross exaggeration and meant more for humor than real wor
Re: (Score:2)
Postage + Disk_Cost < ISP_Monthly_Fee/Seconds(current_month) * download_time_in_seconds
and
average_postal_transit_time < download_time_in_days
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
But: I just want to say that I really hate torrents and torrent users. It is because of you that there are GB caps and severe upload restrictions on my internet access.
Yes. Evil users. Look, they actually use the bandwidth they pay for!
it is highly unlikely that the ISPs will ever become more generous in what they give the consumer.
You need a slap with the cluebat. It isn't a matter of generosity. It's a matter of contract law. You pay for a service. ISP has to deliver service. If I buy a book at Amazon, it's not generosity that makes them deliver it to my house, it's the fact that they have to, because that's the service they offer and collect money for.