Net Still Not At Olympics 191
angkor writes "It's two years later and the net is still largely shut out of the Olympics It seems like we were talking about this in relation to the last Olympics yesterday."
The key elements in human thinking are not numbers but labels of fuzzy sets. -- L. Zadeh
The Olympic Board (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:The Olympic Board (Score:3, Informative)
1. They seem to like exclusive area licenses. (why go exclusive?? You can get more money out of two groups non-exclusive, I'd think, but I know people will pay good money for exclusive licensing..) As the article said (or perhaps another article), they're testing this year with the Swiss to see if they can geographically limit the access.
2. The costs. How much bandwidth would they eat up?? Gobs. And heaven knows that it already costs the IOC a fortune to run the Olympics, and they likely wouldn't be able to recoop all of the costs on something like this. While the host city pays for a lot of this stuff, I imagine eventually they'd draw the line.. Kinda like the $300 some million dollar opening ceremonies.
Personally, I don't want to see live streaming. I want to see archived streaming. Two events at the same time that you're interested in really sucks, and typically that means the network's gonna cover a third event you don't give a damn about.
Just my ideas, but I realize they may be inherently flawed.
.
Re:The Olympic Board (Score:2)
Of course even when they are renegotiated, it won't make a bit of difference.
Re:The Olympic Board (Score:2, Funny)
That kind of exclusionary thinking is downright un-American! Can't we have the US being comprised of idiots AND the broadcasters being absolutely out of touch?
CBC (Score:1, Interesting)
* <simpsons>with implied oral consent, not express written consent.</simpsons>
Re:CBC (Score:4, Interesting)
http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/172941.html
Once again, it doesn't matter who's right... it matters who has more money. As long as you can buy... I mean *lobby* the CRTC and/or a good number of MPs, you can just get the offending law changed.
Re:CBC (Score:1)
a lot of people get free direct tv in canada because we buy the equipment, bur the access card, and pull signals at will. its all legal to do, we just cant talk about the show at the watercoller the next day.
i crave was shut down do to lawsuits launched in the us by us networks and the nfl.
Re:CBC (Score:2)
And the thing about 'divulging what you see' is common myth, but not true either.
The deal with satellite TV has generally been this:
Many satellite broadcasters do NOT have license to sell their service within Canada.
Now.. in Canada, a company can get you for descrambling, or 'stealing' their service.. but the thing is..
Many of these companies CANT sue you, because you ARENT stealing because it is ILLEGAL for them to sell it to you anyway.
It's a grey area of law; don't kid yourself into thinking it's totally legit; it's not.
You are correct. Icrave was incorporated in the US, and was sued in the US. What they were doing was legal by canadian law.
*All* CBC's web broadcasting is off until Feb 24 (Score:2)
Try any of the "live" broadcasts [www.cbc.ca] and you'll find that CBC have suspended their web broadcasts entirely, until February 24th. The IOC enforcing srict rules over "their content" is one thing; forcing a public broadcaster to roll over and muzzle their entire output is quite another.
Gratuitous comments about the power & corruption of the IOC too obvious to even bother with...
Astra 2E Sattelite (Europe) (Score:1)
I wouldn't like the idea of the Olympics being overly connected to the outside world, at least not without compartmentalization. Heh. We 0wn Y0UR G01Ds WE 1z 33LE3T.
Geez... (Score:3, Insightful)
Irony (Score:1, Redundant)
(I Have No Joke, I Just Like To Say)
Hypocritical bullshit (Score:4, Insightful)
The Olympics are nothing more than a greed fest, as this little tidbit from the featured article points out:
'Nuff said.
Re:Hypocritical bulls*** (Score:4, Funny)
The old "amateurs only" thing was so only the idle wealthy (or those who had wealthy benefactors) could participate. Now, the NBA players can participate, too!
Hypocritcs and Nazi ? (Score:1)
I saw a very deep and complete journalistic inquiry today on TV about Olympics.
It seems that CIO/IOC are very near to ALL dicatorships in the World : In Africa and in Korea, but also with old est-Germany, dictator Ceaucescou (Roumania) and Samaranch president of CIO was *very* near to Franco dictator in Espagna. Ok, well, this could be one thing.
But there is more. They only paid PR and "image correctors" when the subject was about Salt Lake city corruption, or about Kim-Yung(?) that pretends he created taekuando(?) (which is wrong in fact it was invented by another Corean, now in exil in Canada !) : His daughter got money from Salt Lake city, 'his sport' was admitted to the Olympics while a really more widespread sport (Karaté) is totally ignored.
And even more, "Sion 2006" in Switzerland was from FAR the best candidature, but Turin was choosen : Even organisators from Turin were surprised to win for 2006 ! And then we saw that Samaranch, IOC president is a GREAT and OLD FRIEND with Fiat (the car fanufacturer) owner, who resides and come from... Turin ! What a coincidence !
And there was also what said a very known US sportsman that was in the CIO but left it because of corruption, dictatorship and so on.
Well, it was really interesting, but also disgusting about the CIO. And I say that even if I live in Switzerland, country of the CIO,
80 kilometers away from the CIO siege. Really I hope it will change in the following years...
:-)
Re:Hypocritical bullshit (Score:3, Interesting)
GPL-like license for the depecition of
their image in competition? Anyone can show
images of the althlete in competition provided
that they don't restrict the ability of others
to distribute the image to others, something
like that.
jeff
Re:Hypocritical bullshit (Score:5, Interesting)
I live in Salt Lake. As a citizen, I don't mind the world "shitting in my backyard" -- I'm no xenophobe and I welcome diversity. However, as a taxpayer, I've been quite outraged by most of the crap that's gone on these past few of years.
There's too much to bitch about, but my personal favorite was the $450,000 spent to give every bloody city employee an official 2002 Winter Games jacket.
Then there's all the cloak-and-dagger security bullshit going on around here. I work at the Univerity of Utah, and I'm working from home for most of February because it's too damned tough to get to campus! There's 3 black military choppers constantly flying overhead. A guy I work with was accosted by the Secret Service. He's foreign -- looks and sounds foreign -- and made the mistake of biking up to the hill overlooking the stadium to take a few digital snapshots. He was questioned, his pictures were deleted, and he was released.
Meanwhile, all of the on/off ramps into the city are totally un-guarded. Mostly industrial areas, the lots underneath these bridges are perfect places to park large trucks (which is normal anyway) full of explosives. I guess nobody cares about the mere visitors to Salt Lake -- only the corporate sponsors at the venues.
And what's it all for? So Budwiser and Nike can pimp their wares without any trouble. You really think that if this many people gathered for a non-commercial event (a protest perhaps), that they'd enforce a 45-mile radius no-fly zone around the event? No fucking way. This is all about selling stuff, people. I just feel bad for the businesses downtown that are effectly shut down due to the strict security perimeter.
If you want to read some independent local SLC journalism, I encourage you to read the City Weekly: http://www.avenews.com/index.html
Yeah -- I'm bitter. The TV in my house will be off for the month of February. The networks won't be getting my eyeballs (they lost them at Sydney).
Re:Hypocritical bullshit (Score:1)
Wow, to think that I thought that the american media was way out of line at Sydney. I had no idea! I definitely won't be watching this time.
Re:Your personal experience of the Olympics(tm) (Score:2, Insightful)
Your story helps eliminate any regrets and/or moments of self doubt regarding my feelings. I understand the Toronto Bid Commitee is thinking about charging up the machine for 2012. Yipes!
Re:I wouldn't be too down on the security (Score:3, Insightful)
Remember folks, we're all paying for this crap every time we spend a single penny in a world megacorp (and when we pay taxes). The olympics aren't about sports anymore (have they ever been ?); they're about the sheep effect : if you can convince enough weak minds to see and hear your crap, a whole bunch of other people will blindly follow them around and soon you have a worldwide mob of brainwashed credit-card-carrying fools. TV, music, fast-food and religion, it's all the same.
Re:I wouldn't be too down on the security (Score:2)
The olympics are just another parade of fake people getting richer that's where I see the internet streaming broadcasts being useful. Sure everyone gets to see the favorite for the gold on TV, what we don't see is that the vast majority of athlete's there realy aren't much better than most of us; seriously most olympians are not some kind of engineered super-human,
And yes everyone found the money thing offensive, but the problem is things still have to be paid for to hae the olympics, and if the IOC don't get it some other bunch of dirtbags will anyways
Re:Hold on, let me see if I have this straight (Score:2)
Or we could just not watch and let their revenue stream dwindle down. Being shallow capitalists, that would probably hurt them more then a few broken bones.
Re:Hypocritical bullshit (Score:2)
Gotta vent somewhere, eh?
Re:Hypocritical bullshit (Score:2)
Swimming, track, skiing, speed skating, etc., are all sports where the Olympics is seen as the be all end all of the sport. As far as hockey and sports where professionals are allowed to play, I'd rather watch the Stanley Cup finals anyway. (Although it is nice to see people from other countries besides the US and Canada play.)
Re:Hypocritical bullshit (Score:3, Insightful)
So where does all of the money generated by the Olympics go?? The IOC.
The Olympics has never been about showcasing up and coming talent. I don't know where you got that Idea. The no pros rule was instituted because of one particularily talented athelete who defeated some wealthy *sshole.
I forget the guy's name right now, but one of the contestants against Thorpe in 1912 became IOC director and was responsable for denying Thorpe his medals.
His medals were taken for playing Minor league baseball two years earlier for $60 a month. Ironically, many atheletes, Thorpe included, stated that they had made more money playing College Football than Semi-Pro baseball.
The real issue is this: Shouldn't the IOC be looking at the benefits of the Olympics reaching a larger audience as opposed to their profitability??
~Jason
Yesterday.... (Score:5, Funny)
Well, of course. This is slashdot. We probably were talking about it yesterday.
Protect revenue? (Score:2, Interesting)
Granted, this is NBC we're talking about, (which has all but given up on nbci.com ) but many streams now feature ads before they start to run.
They themselves admit that sports, next to pr0n, drives traffic--so why not use the relationship NBC has with MSN (barf) to sell me a Team Canada Patrick Roy jersey after streaming to me his five best saves?
The Chinese will host in 2008.
Yes, I dig movie88.com too!Re:Protect revenue? (Score:1)
If only... dear Patrick has decided not to play in the Olympics. Doesn't pay well enough I guess. =(
Our goalies are Belfour, Brodeur and Joseph.
Re:Protect revenue? (Score:2)
By the way...movie88 is a Taiwanese company.
Re:Protect revenue? (Score:1)
Technically Taiwan ( Chinese Taipei ) is a part of China
Re:Protect revenue? (Score:2)
Re:Protect revenue? (Score:1)
Unfortunately, neither can 90% or more of the sites that are out there. That being said, a little Olympix Pr0n and you might make a fair bit of change. :)
what would it take... (Score:2, Interesting)
toddg
Re:what would it take... (Score:4, Funny)
The investors would not like that.
Re:what would it take... (Score:2)
And you'd get arrested and thrown in jail for being a "terrorist" because you've obviously got those hidden cameras to test security.
Re:what would it take... (Score:2)
Iron Grip (Score:1)
Re:Iron Grip (Score:1)
Anyway, I don't want to be too negative. I hope the rest of the games go well. Salt Lake City is under an enormous amount of pressure to put on a good show, especially given the utter debacle of the 2000 Olympics. I'm at least hoping for some good hockey (if NBC can be convinced to broadcast any during waking hours).
Re:Iron Grip (Score:4, Funny)
I didn't know that Belgarion could ice skate!!!
Re:Iron Grip (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Iron Grip (Score:2)
OK, let me put it on the net for you (Score:2, Funny)
Now you are up to date with your World Wide Web Olypic News!
Re:OK, let me put it on the net for you (Score:1)
Any bets on if or when the olympics will again be the pillar of integrity?
AWG
My money is on 3018. See my 10th-great grandchild to collect.
Wireless Acess to Results (Score:1)
Why can't I get wireless results and news updates for olympic events? I can go to any of the bloated/javascript required sites to get results, but not really anything small and simple that can be loaded on my Palm! The closest I've come is Yahoo [yahoo.com], who has a pretty light page.
And how about wireless updates? SMS? Even short e-mails that I could send to my phone? Doesn't exist. I'm pretty sure they had this kind of thing for the 2000 Summer Games, but I guess the US just isn't with it.
Re:Wireless Acess to Results (Score:2)
It's not available in the USA, of course - it's only available in the UK, France, Germany, Sweden, Italy, Spain, Belguim and the Netherlands. You could always try signing up using one of the the European numbers. It's being done with Eurosport [eurosport.com], a pan-European free-to-air (over satellite) sport channel - the info is here [eurosport.com]. Of course, I'm assuming that the OP is American, which isn't necessarily true, but the point that this service is only provided in Europe stands.
No Suprise Here. (Score:4, Interesting)
Eventually I believe all broadcasts of any kind (be it data, voice, radio, TV, etc.) will be linked to the net and this will disappear. As televisions and computers merge (a not-too-distant possibility in many wealthier households) television and internet companies will merge. We've already seen that with AOL/Time Warner haven't we?
When ABC, CBS, BBc, etc. begin to merge with broadband vendors, we'll see internet TV replace mainstream TV, but untill then, people with money will fight to keep the little man (in this case the net), out of his business.
Is this really surprising? (Score:1)
The modern Olympic games are about:
a) competition between amateur atheletes
b) the spirit of global friendship
c) Incredible advertising and product placement opportunities
d) making as much money as you can fit down your bloated gullet
e) all of the above
I guess I put option e) in there because I'm not a complete cynic yet; but lets face it... the games *are* commerical...
Don't like figure skating? Too bad... (Score:1)
I'd love to watch the biathalon [nbcolympics.com]. Cross country skiing alternated with crack rifle shooting. Ever try to shoot a tiny target while your heart is racing a mile a minute? It's not as easy as it sounds. Unfortunately, I have yet to see more than a thirty-second clip of the sport in the last few Olympics.
You'll see more this year. (Score:4, Interesting)
Happily for you, this year an American seems to have a good chance at a biathalon medal, possibly a gold. So that means that most likley they will be broadcasting the biathalon to a much greater extent - or at least his portion of it. They had a longish ad about it last night after the opening ceremony which seems to indicate a good chance at least of some coverege.
Probably the coverage will be fairly short, but hopefully you'll see SOMETHING.
Re:You'll see more this year. (Score:2)
Interesting theory, but the US was a lead-pipe cinch to get the Gold in basketball, and NBC did not air a single game in its entirety. IIRC, they did not show ANY game of ANY team sport without interruption.
Warning: ranting tirade coming. Skip to the next post if that bothers you...
This year, I started to watch during the pair's figure skating (or whatever the hell you call it.) A Canadian duo was skating to "Shine On You Crazy Diamond" by Pink Floyd... sounded cool enough to watch for a few minutes. I gotta say that I just don't get TV skating coverage. I mean, here you have (usually) really good music, while beatiful women dance around on a pair of metal slivers in sexy little costumes, and they have a trio of commentators jabbering away through the whole fucking thing like we're watching a football game or something! STFU! We can see that she hit the landing right, we don't need you to tell us. I would turn the sound off, but the music is part of the show, dammit. It's supposed to be art, not fucking golf. Stop talking!
A premium pay-per-view olympic coverage which provided access to all games, commentary free, would be worth plenty to those who actually like watching this stuff.... but because NBC failed once (with their half-assed and ill-conceived "Triple Cast"), we won't see anything like that any time soon.
All wrong - nevermind (Score:1)
Sorry about thet, I guess you really won't see much covereage, if any.
The IOC is evil (Score:1, Offtopic)
Re:The IOC is evil (Score:2)
also did anyone catch the french with their half french half US flags? that was nice. mayeb they don't hate us after all. the comments I've seen so far seem to be the usual slashdot conspiracy crap. enjoy the games, root for the home team when they're in an event, root for the underdog when they're aren't.
Re:The IOC is evil (Score:2)
But the IOC folks took it. It's funny - the Olympics are clearly about money (corporate sponsors) and its OK to have McDonalds emblems posted all over the place, but it's not ok to have political emblems? What if the US gov wanted to pay to support an event, then could a flag be positioned as such? My point is, if you're going to sell out in one way, is it right/fair to not sell out in other ways?
There's a good reason for that (Score:5, Insightful)
Perhaps you would be happy for the Stars and Stripes to be plastered all over this year's Winter Games, but would you be so happy if China was to push its political agenda just as vigorously when they host the Summer Games in 2008?
No, I didn't think so.
Re:There's a good reason for that (Score:2)
It takes so many bribes to get the Olympics hosted in a particular city/nation, that, yes, the nation should be able to make a political statement if they like - the host country has already paid for it. Now, if the IOC wasn't corrupt, and based their location decisions on something other than where they received "gifts" from, then your claim would cary more weight.
Re:There's a good reason for that (Score:2)
Not exactly the Olympic movement's finest hour.
Actually, the 1936 Olympics included one of the Olympic movement's finest hours, if not the finest. Jesse Ownes [jesseowens.com] won 4 gold medals. He broke three world records and tied a fourth in 70 minutes.
At the same, time his performance disproved Hitler's Aryan philosophy and much other racist nonsense as well.
The examples of excellence in the Olympics tend to overcome every attempt to demean the events with politics and commercialism. If anything, the examples of excellence show up politics and commercialism for they shams they frequently are.
Re:There's a good reason for that (Score:2)
I suspect the Chinese will do the same thing at the 2008 Olympics in Beijing and the world will let it happen.
However, there's something subversive about all this display of individual excellence that undermines ideology. There a moving story [go.com] of how Owens' German rival in the long jump congratulated Owens in full view of Hitler after Owens defeated the German for the gold medal. Owens said later, "You can melt down all the medals and cups I have and they wouldn't be a plating on the 24-karat friendship I felt for Luz Long at that moment. Hitler must have gone crazy watching us embrace."
The future of the world must be in peaceful competition and the Olympics is a step in that direction.
Re:There's a good reason for that (Score:3, Insightful)
Yet, take for instance the opening ceremony. I managed to watch the first 5 minutes that it took to finish my pizza which I almost threw up listening to the crap that the nbc commentators were spitting out of their mouths. After this I just briefly turned the tv on to see the countries entering(only part I was really interested in since there's a couple dozen friends of mine marching under different flags).
Every other comment was an indirect reference to 9/11. Add this to the fact that the athletes entrance was interrupted over half a dozen times by commercials and I pretty much gave up on any faith that there was any decency left in the games.
As much as I managed to watch it, it was pretty much clear that the original olympic ideals were gone.
Whatever happended the olympic games promoting peace and harmony instead of drawing parallels to terrorism, doing live broadcasts from a warzone(american gi's in kandahar) in the middle of the opening ceremony, pointing out the axis of evil when iran marched in, turning the olympic village into a concentration camp or doing a live memorial service for what in Bush Jr's head amounts to war casualities. Then again 75% of the above was probably due to nbc and not visible to those in foreign countries.
As a matter of fact. As soon as the bribery scandal came into public knowledge they should've disqualified slc and given the games to sweden that got second place. I would trust the swedish to live up to the expectations of olympic spirit more than americans.
Salt Lake City website (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Salt Lake City website (Score:2)
Re:Salt Lake City website (Score:1)
Re:Salt Lake City website (Score:2)
Oh well... (Score:3, Insightful)
Sure it's all driven by greed, and it's easy to take a cynical view, but what's new? Money and power have always been nearly synonymous. Corporate fat cats milking the Olympics for profit is only to be expected. We may not like it, but at least we can still watch for free.
What surprises me is that any geeks care about this. I don't view the Internet as the medium of choice for hugely popular events and promotions. It just doesn't scale as well as television. A couple more generational upgrades of bandwidth and more sophisticated multi-casting technology and I might be convinced to lament the lack of Olympics coverage.
Re:Oh well... (Score:2)
However, there is enough of a market to make money narrowcasting over the net.
Re:Oh well... (Score:2)
I don't watch the Olympics, but my sports nut wife does. (Don't worry, she does have some redeeming qualities!) Last Olympics she watched almost everything via webcast. The time delays between the events and the broadcast in the US stunk, and the network only ever showed the big-ticket sports which had US athletes in contention for the gold. I'm not sure how she's getting her fix this time.
Value of Content (Score:5, Insightful)
.News is getting more generic. For example there is News Blaster [columbia.edu], a bot that uses AI to generate news summaries based analysis of stories over several days. It is actually semi decent, and better then at least half the writers out there.
The end result is to devalue local writers and generic content. having something like this for Slash would probably inprove content no end.
This trend has been going on for years, and of cours the IOC is being conservative with broadcasts, since these make up the majority of their income. Why should they give away their bread and butter free?
Personally I would not mind if they made things like this available online a week after the fact. Same thing for other venues, like court trials, etc. Then folks will be able to see it if they want, but there is no conflict with the interests of the broadcasters. Deals could be made.
Well, they USED to b webcast... (Score:1, Interesting)
It was all barely bigger than a postage stamp, and the sound was bad, but yes, you COULD watch basically whatever you wanted.
That's really why this whole thing bothers me. The IOC isn't just preventing technology from going forward as fast as it should, but rather they have actively retarded the spread of webcasting.
Paid for by the tax payer (Score:2, Interesting)
No olympics on nbc right now (Score:1)
The campaign for real-time TV (Score:1)
*This message recorded live earlier*
Just yesterday... (Score:1)
Yeah, and until they slap the olympics all over the 'net, that's how much attention I'm going to pay to the olympics too; Such that once every four years I hear they're starting vaguely soon or something.
I don't have cable, or satellite TV; I don't even have an antenna. In fact, the only device in my AV system with a tuner is my VCR.
Until the olympics is on the web, I won't be watching. And it has to be free, too, since I'm not going to pay to view what is essentially a big happy advertisement for the countries which are flush enough with cash and spare resources which they are not spending on the starving, illiterate, and so on in their home country, and instead can blow it on training specialized athletes and shipping them (in some cases) around the world to compete with other specialized athletes.
Of course, I'll watch it if it's free; Some of those athletes are quite amazingly impressive. I just don't feel like giving money to it.
Rebroadcast Charges (Score:1, Informative)
Being that I live on the extreme South Texas border with Mexico, we actually have Mexican television stations along on our cable system. And during the Olympic Opening Ceremonies, there was at least 2 of the 5 Mexican stations available broadcasting the cerimonies (one in its actual entirety).
For those U.S. viewers who watched the ceremonies on N.B.C., you actually missed quite a bit during commercial interruptions. Did you even know that other groups actually performed? The Dixie Chics being one of the more recognizable names.
--OptipleX02
Olympics? What olympics. (Score:2)
This year, that did not happen.
Thus, this is not the olympics.
I refuse to consider these games _olympic_ games.
Of course, that aside, yes, the games should of course have a net-feed. It will, given some time. I guess they've got a demand for everything going smooth, and that nobody really can deliver the necessary bandwidth for net-wide feeds yet.
Re:Olympics? What olympics. (Score:1)
Greece is trying to push for this for the 2004 games, with moderate success so far.
More info at http://www.olympictruce.org
alex
Re:Olympics? What olympics. (Score:4, Informative)
Re:Olympics? What olympics. (Score:2)
This year, that did not happen.
Thus, this is not the olympics.
I refuse to consider these games _olympic_ games.
Yeah! And they should be held in Olympia.
And they shouldn't have any of these silly-ass modern winter sports either.
I refuse to consider these games Olympic either.
crazy canucks ;) (Score:1)
How to make the Olympics more exciting (Score:1)
2. Allow every type of banned drug to now be used, including illegal stimulants and hallucinogens
3. Unban Tonya Harding from figure skating
Who gave them contorl of the olympics? (Score:1)
I just want to know who gave control of the olympics to these bozos?
It is my understanding that the olympics were started in Greece over a thousand years ago.
I think some sort of democratic system should be put in place to control the olympics so that this type of crap doesent happen.
I personally am boycotting them.
I can't believe the /. crowd... (Score:5, Insightful)
But, seriously folks... Have some respect here. The Olympics are a wonderful event--and probably the crowning moment of many of the copetitors lives, no matter if the win anything or not.
That fact that thousands of athletes are coming together from a plethora of countries to compete in a fair, civil way is definitely no small feat. Not to mention that the people competeing in the Olymipics, by and large, have trained for most of their life to get there.
Just because they won't allow webcams and the IOC takes bribes, somehow "the Olympics suck"?! Give me a break. Forget about sticking it to "the man" for a moment, and enjoy what is a wonderful event that millions of people worldwide cherish for *the event itself*. Nobody cares about the IOC, or the Nike commercials. I watch the Olympics because of the competition and spirt of the games--that's all.
Of course...since I'm not bitching about something or another, I'm sure I'll get modded down for being "Offtopic" or something. Feh.
-Jayde
Re:I can't believe the /. crowd... (Score:2)
I am in agreement with the majority of the Slashdot readership (for once, heh
There was one Touched By An Angel episode that sticks out in my mind (yes, I watch that show.) It was about a grumpy old man who worked as a broadcaster. As they went through the show, they showed different parts of his past. Back in the 50's, this guy had worked at a TV network and realized that it was going to change people's lives. He started making a list of all the things he wanted to direct for TV. He finally got his chance to direct a few years later, and found a beautiful black lady singer to sing a patriotic song on his show. The sponsor, however, nixed the black lady for a white girl -- even though the white girl couldn't sing. The sponsor insisted that since "his mother was from Georgia", she wouldn't appreciate a black woman singing, and he threatened to drop his sponsorship. The director caved, and he then became just a "hack" instead of being a cutting-edge, popular TV director.
We are those same pioneers on the Internet. We are the ones who see the true power of what is being born through a network of computers. We also see how greedy profiteers ruined what could have been some great ideas. It's not saying that commercialism is completely bad; it's saying that when you let commercialism take over what you love, it's a bad thing.
The Olympics don't suck; they've just been taken over by a bunch of leeches who don't care about the love of sports. This is perhaps why I watch Touched By An Angel -- sometimes I need to be reminded that there are good people in this world trying to make the world a better place. That's something the IOC forgot about a long time ago.
Re:I can't believe the /. crowd... (Score:2)
BTW, the white girl that couldn't sing was my little sister. And she actually sings very well, she has won several awards for her singing. In the words of Jon Lovitz - "Acting!". FYI, Touched By An Angel is filmed in Salt Lake City, I wonder if the Olympics are interfering with their shooting schedule (they sure are interfering with everything else around here).
Re:I can't believe the /. crowd... (Score:2)
While I can't possibly identify with the obsessive-compulsive desire to devote one's entire life to compete in a sport (WTF is it with this whole "sponsorship" thing, anyway?), I can respect such a person's talent and decision.
However, when these people bow to the forces that be and (for example) don't publish their own diaries on their own competitions, I lose respect for them. They should, in front of the cameras -- the world -- cast off the leash. But none do. Why? It's for the fame. They could go elsewhere to compete, but they simply don't.
So, you see, it's not that the IOC and Nike and Ford are the only evil Olympic forces. The athletes themselves knowingly sell their own souls.
For that reason, the Olymics do indeed suck.
Oh, lighten up (Score:2)
They are selling shoes.
There seems to be an attitude among some on /. that commerce is somehow evil by its very nature. When you grow up, you may learn that all this commerce is what makes civilization possible.
"Not to mention Kermit The Damn Frog!!!" --Jimmy James
Re:Oh, lighten up (Score:2)
You're telling me the "official" laws of physics somehow follow the Olympic venues around the world? I couldn't break a world record at some other place?
Oh, you meant to say, "...possible to realize their dreams of participatiing in the world's most televised -- and most heavily endorsed -- sporing event."
Look, if these athletes were up-front and simply say, "I'm in it for the money and glory", I wouldn't be so caustic about this whole issue. The entire pretense of noble grandure associated with these athletes just kills me!
When you grow up, you may learn that all this commerce is what makes civilization possible.
Yeah, and if you belive the commercials, commerce fights terrorism, too. Be patriotic and buy a Ford Explorer! :)
Re:Oh, lighten up (Score:2)
First of all, most of them are very up-front about being in it for money and glory.
Secondly: Yes you would. Admit it.
Any athelete will tell you that they would be thrilled about having their picture on the front of a Wheaties box. I wish more /.ers would admit that they work with technology for the money and the bragging rights among their geek friends.
Wow... until 2008, even...! (Score:2)
Wow. That's six years from now. Six years ago, we were in early 1996 (yes, the year of "push" technology and Ellison's NC's.) It's incredible to realize how much the Internet has changed in six years, and in another six years, who knows what will happen? I don't think TV will be dead, but the way we watch TV will dramatically change.
These long Olympic contracts are out of touch with reality. The reality is that the computing world is rapidly changing. In six years I imagine that wireless Net access everywhere will be common and that a lot of people will be using Tablet PCs and PDA's. If these people can't stream the Olympics from their local PPV server, they won't watch it, and the Olympics will not be a huge deal.
Perhaps we're seeing that the peak of excitement for the Olympics has already passed (a few decades before this, even.) The long, unbreakable contracts are going to make the Olympics even less of an event than it already is. Either the IOC is going to have to re-negotiate before 2008, or else they will alienate their remaining viewers.
Money and Power (Score:2, Interesting)
I'd be very surprised if the IOC didn't get a freaking ton of money from the "official" distribution of olympic broadcasting.
From the money side, the IOC can use the dough. We already know that they are funded in part by the media. The media want nothing more than to protect their interests and ability to sell advertising. I would guess that this is one of the reasons why there isn't a great deal, if any, Intenet coverage of the games (in a live format, anyhow).
As another poster has commented, there *were* live feeds several years ago of the summer olympics. What happened? I would suggest
Also, I imagine that there is considerable reluctance on the part of the reporting organizations to put out media that can easily be reproduced around the world without their consent.
I suppose I can't really blame them for the lack of interest in doing anything on the net. There's no significant monetary benefit to the networks distributing the information (at significant cost, mind you) on the net when they have guarantees on advertising and IOC revenues doing things traditionally. Besides, it helps to maintain the value of their current media outlets.
Anyhow, that's my 2 cents.
Oh yeah, the Olympics. Whatever (Score:2)
Re:Oh yeah, the Olympics. Whatever (Score:2)
Why can't we play? (Score:2)
Re:Why can't we play? (Score:2, Interesting)
Acutally, we (I'm assuming you're also Canadian due to the reaction on Canada winning the gold in Bridge) have what's called Skills Canada [skillscanada.com]. It's not quite so open as the Olympics, as the competitors must be under 22 years of age, and some events are restricted to high school students. It's not a total geek event, but it has it's share of tech events, such as website design, PC Software Specialists, PC Hardware and Networking, CADD and graphic design. Some of the non-techie events include plumbing, carpentry and even aircraft mechanics. These competitions take place annually, with provincials in every province. The winner of each provincial contest moves up to the Canadian Skills Competition. Every even-numbered year is a World Skills qualification year. The gold medallists from every event move up to Team Canada and go to the worlds the following year.
I've had the honor of representing New Brunswick for each of the 2 years we've sent a team to the Canadian Skills Competition in Web Design. The first year, my teammate and I placed 2nd, and last year we placed 4th. This is probably as close to a coding event as they'll have for now, but it's still an incredible event. The 2002 competition will be in Vancouver in late-May and/or early-June, and it's open to the public.
Olympics Suck website... (Score:2)
Olympics Suck [olympicssuck.com]
MISQUOTE! (Score:2)
"When technology allows us to add the same model (of licensing on the Internet as television), we will push that as quickly as possible," Aikman said.
What Aikman actually said was:
"When technology allows us to add the same model (of licensing on the Internet as monk written manuscripts), we will push that as quickly as possible".
-
Here's what's fucking brilliant: (Score:2)
Obviously in the long run NBC is worried about losing these viewers, but because of bad timing (the big switch just happened 12/31), they have not had time to do anything about it yet, so San Francisco gets screwed.
On a positive note... (Score:2)
Anyway, here's a more positive observation about Olympics coverage: after watching tonight's broadcast on NBC, it's looking like this year's TV coverage is going to be an order of magnitude better than any US Olympic coverage in the last 20 years. They're showing competitor, competitor, competitor with almost no features, soap operas and sob stories and drastically scaled-back jingoism.
(I was just interrupted by my wife coming in to say, "I can't believe how much better the TV coverage is!" ;-)
Apparently, the Sydney broadcast was such a disaster with male viewers that they came up with the bright idea of treating it as a sports event.
RealPlayer clip of the opening ceremonies (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:year (Score:1)
Change your date format here [slashdot.org].
Re:greedy rat Bastards (Score:2)
FWIW, I guess the tickets for events at the Winter Games are less expensive than the summer games, the event I am attending tomorrow (luge) has very reasonably priced tickets, at $45, and IIRC the Hockey tickets are ~$100. Granted the tickets for the Opening Ceremonies were rather steep (the tickets my family had were $875, I couldn't justify spending that much), but it was a cool show. I watched the fireworks display from my front lawn and it was quite spectacular.
There are even events that are (almost) free. You can go to Snowbasin [snowbasin.com] and with a lift ticket purchase you are allowed to ski up to watch the events being held there. I hope to get up there and watch some Super G and downhill skiing (check HERE [snowbasin.com] for more information).
Argue if you will that the Olympics are too commercialized, but bitching about the ticket prices isn't going to work for these Olympics.