Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Futurama Movie Set For November 27

Posted by kdawson on Tue Jul 31, 2007 01:15 AM
from the on-a-bender dept.
kevin_conaway writes "TV Squad informs us that the new Futurama movie will be available on November 27. The show will return as a full-length, high-def film sold on DVD. It will be followed by three additional films, and each film will be divided into four episodes, each to be aired on Comedy Central. So, that's 4 DVD movies or 16 new episodes."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Oblig. (Score:5, Funny)

    by Jack Malmostoso (899729) on Tuesday July 31, @01:18AM (#20053683)
    Good news everyone!
    • Re:Oblig. (Score:5, Informative)

      by kimvette (919543) on Tuesday July 31, @01:22AM (#20053727)
      (http://kim.biyn.com/)
      I, for one, welcome Groening as our overlord!

      Matt & David & Co.: if any of you are reading this I want to say THANK YOU for hanging in there and making these DVDs happen. Here's to hoping to the return of Futurama to full production! :) I will be buying at least five or six copies of this to be handing out as gifts to try to help increase popularity of (and thusly demand for) the series.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Oblig. (Score:4, Insightful)

        Just to give my 2 Quatlus on the issue of it coming back to "full production," I think the future (not to jinx it) may be kind of bright. Comedy Central bid really high for the rights to air episodes of Futurama and they are going to have the three movies broken up into a series of episodes. Given that it has a built in fanbase and is easily much higher in quality than the -- what, 10 new shows they debut each year that fail miserably? (I put my money on Lil' Bush, that Body Shop show, and that show about the Halfway House not coming back next year) My prediction if Futurama is going to be a smash for comedy central. And given that, it's not hard to imagine they'll want to comission a new season after that.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Oblig. by dspratomo (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @10:02PM
      • Re:Oblig. by omfgnosis (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @04:49AM
        • Re:Oblig. by Crunchie Frog (Score:3) Tuesday July 31, @04:57AM
        • Re:Oblig. by omfgnosis (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @05:04AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Oblig. by omfgnosis (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @05:08AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Oblig. (Score:5, Funny)

        by 0xdeadbeef (28836) on Tuesday July 31, @07:21AM (#20055723)
        (http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Friday November 23 2001, @04:14PM)
        I was with you until you used a racist slur against people from Mongolia. Seriously, is that fucking necessary?

        Oh, sure, you bleeding hearts whine about the poor oppressed Mongols now, but you'll be shitting your pants and crying for your mama when the horde is breaching your walls.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Oblig. by Dragonslicer (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @02:21PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Oblig. by aichpvee (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @08:48AM
        • Re:Oblig. by Arthur B. (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @09:07AM
          • Re:Oblig. by aichpvee (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @09:15PM
        • Re:Oblig. by kanabal (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @10:00AM
        • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Oblig. by ahecht (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @11:25AM
      • Re:Oblig. by Dog-Cow (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @11:37AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Oblig. by Zackbass (Score:3) Tuesday July 31, @02:00AM
    • Re:Oblig. (Score:5, Funny)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 31, @02:04AM (#20053985)
      Sweet zombie Jesus!
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Oblig. by glindsey (Score:3) Tuesday July 31, @09:18AM
      • Re:Oblig. by TheQuantumShift (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @10:35AM
        • Re:Oblig. by hguorbray (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @04:56PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Oblig. by FlashBuster3000 (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @02:07AM
    • Re:Oblig. by g0rAngA (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @02:29AM
    • Re:Oblig. (Score:5, Funny)

      by waynemcdougall (631415) on Tuesday July 31, @04:09AM (#20054597)
      (http://www.clsnz.org/)

      The show will return as a full-length, high-def film sold on DVD.

      But does it come in a convenient suppository format?

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Oblig. by Citizen of Earth (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @12:10PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Oblig. (Score:4, Informative)

      by robably (1044462) on Tuesday July 31, @04:44AM (#20054755)
      Just saying, but "Good news everyone!" was always the herald of really bad news. The tag should be !goodnewseveryone.

      I'll get my coat.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Oblig. by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @04:49AM
    • Re:Oblig. by Blakey Rat (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @07:54AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Oblig. by garry_g (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @11:57AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Finally (Score:2)

    by gertin (1063236) on Tuesday July 31, @01:19AM (#20053693)
    I missed Nixon.
    • Re:Finally by friedo (Score:3) Tuesday July 31, @01:26AM
    • Re:Finally by Blakey Rat (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @07:58AM
      • Re:Finally by k_187 (Score:3) Tuesday July 31, @08:34AM
      • Re:Finally by Kadin2048 (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @09:43AM
        • Re:Finally by megaditto (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @10:48AM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Finally by phaggood (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @11:36AM
    • Re:Finally by MonkeyBoy (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @01:44AM
      • Re:Finally by User 956 (Score:3) Tuesday July 31, @01:46AM
        • Re:Finally by MonkeyBoy (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @02:07AM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • ...Giggity giggi- oh, wait...

    Seriously though, this is fantastic news and makes it a lot more real in my mind. I hope they leave those god damned clone kids out of it though :)
  • Finally (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Tykho (1133421) on Tuesday July 31, @01:31AM (#20053797)
    Life is worth living again!
    • Re:Finally by elrous0 (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @09:54AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • About damn time (Score:2, Flamebait)

    by sqrt(2) (786011) on Tuesday July 31, @01:49AM (#20053889)
    With the Simpsons ending, perhaps a successful release of these DVDs will help get the series back into full production. It was really far too brilliant to end after only 4 (3 production) seasons. I've been so angry with Fox ever since they canceled it and allowed the mind numbingly stupid show Family Guy back. Futurama is so much more deserving than that show. But it's never too late to start making good decisions.
  • The Velour Fog (Score:5, Funny)

    by jomama717 (779243) * <`moc.oohay' `ta' `717lemmam'> on Tuesday July 31, @01:50AM (#20053901)
    (Last Journal: Wednesday June 20, @12:01PM)
    I only hope Zapp Brannigan plays a major role - he steals the show in my book. Best Shatner parody ever.
  • Oh thank GOD! (Score:5, Funny)

    by doyoulikeworms (1094003) on Tuesday July 31, @01:59AM (#20053951)
    That saved me a trip to the suicide booth!
  • misnomer (Score:1)

    by nedder (690308) on Tuesday July 31, @02:12AM (#20054049)
    Good 'ol "high def DVD". Fishier than 1000 year old anchovies.
    • Re:misnomer (Score:5, Funny)

      by bob8766 (1075053) on Tuesday July 31, @02:30AM (#20054135)
      I wasn't even going to bother getting this DVD, until I saw the Hypnotoad. Now I want 10 copies!
      [ Parent ]
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:misnomer by Giddeon Fox (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @02:39AM
      • Re:misnomer by Enderandrew (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @03:19AM
        • Re:misnomer (Score:5, Informative)

          I don't know why I even bother responding to an AC troll, but 480i is standard definition. Standard definition is also 4:3 aspect ratio.

          A DVD can put out a native widescreen 480p picture, which was the bare minimum for the original HD specs. Most high-def TV shows are broadcast in 720p, and the new high-def movie formats are 1080p, but most high-def TVs can't even support 1080p. There is no single resolution that defines HD content.
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:misnomer by @madeus (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @05:21AM
          • Re:misnomer by Cancel-Or-Allow (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @07:16AM
            • Re:misnomer by qualidafial (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @06:35PM
          • Re:misnomer by snicho99 (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @08:26AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:misnomer by thegrassyknowl (Score:3) Tuesday July 31, @08:42AM
    • Re:misnomer by Belacgod (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @07:54AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • All I've ever heard from anyone about Futurama is that is should have continued.

    I've heard rumors for ages, but this one looks pretty solid.

    Yay!
    • Re:About time by ducomputergeek (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @02:43AM
    • Re:About time by TheRaven64 (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @08:15AM
  • by wizzahd (995765) on Tuesday July 31, @02:35AM (#20054153)
    "He'll be as strong and flexible as Gumby and Hercules combined!"

    "Gumbercules?! I love that guy!!"
  • Yay (Score:5, Funny)

    by Safiire Arrowny (596720) on Tuesday July 31, @02:37AM (#20054171)
    (http://hateatron.com/)
    I'm happier than a snake in a sugar-cane field.
    • Re:Yay by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @09:25AM
  • Big Deal (Score:2)

    by ZiakII (829432) on Tuesday July 31, @02:42AM (#20054199)
    You can all bite my shiny metal ass.
    • Re:Big Deal by LordBafford (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @06:13AM
  • I never really.. (Score:5, Interesting)

    by daydr3am3r (880873) on Tuesday July 31, @02:45AM (#20054215)
    (http://www.tangental.net/)
    ..understood as to why Futurama never really took off to the mainstream as Simpsons did. Especially with the declining quality of the latter and the pretty much consistent high quality of the former. Must be the sci-fi tag that works like a repellant: "Oooh I want gonna laugh you know, but can't, it's sci-fi fer christ's sakes!..."
    • Re:I never really.. by neglige (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @03:15AM
    • Re:I never really.. by Zelos (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @03:41AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:I never really.. by oohshiny (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @03:43AM
    • Re:I never really.. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by dakameleon (1126377) on Tuesday July 31, @03:44AM (#20054469)
      Lack of instant broad family appeal. The Simpsons has a character everyone can identify with, but Futurama has quirky characters that aren't as broad in their reach. I for one say Futurama is far funnier, but then I land smack-bang in its target audience, so I would wouldn't I.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:I never really.. (Score:4, Informative)

      by cowboy76Spain (815442) on Tuesday July 31, @03:45AM (#20054477)
      Because it was a little too geeky. Many of the jokes involved references to sci-fi movies or series, or scientific / mathematical theory (for example this list [lycos.es] (spanish)). Most people won't get what is about a 7-11 clerk in a box, but you know it is the shield from "Dune". Or that a aleph-sub-0 cinema would have a countable infinite number of rooms.

      Also, many of the jokes are more subtle than those usual to the Simpsons, and probably people won't want to look at a cartoon and have to think harder to understand its humour.

      That said, I am already waiting on it.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:I never really.. by kramulous (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @05:57AM
      • Also, many of the jokes are more subtle than those usual to the Simpsons, and probably people won't want to look at a cartoon and have to think harder to understand its humour.
        I'm not convinced; I think you've mistaken "specialist" humour that's more reliant upon knowledge of a particular area (including its pop-culture references) for genuine "subtlety".

        The Simpsons *did* contain subtle humour in some areas. Whereas I feel Futurama's was very reliant upon parodying retro science fiction cliches and the old "aspects of present-day society given a futuristic twist" school of sci-fi comedy.

        For my money, Futurama *never* felt like it would have the same universal appeal that The Simpsons managed so effectively. That's not to say that it was bad, but dakameleon put his (her?) finger on it very well when he said that The Simpsons had more characters people could identify with [slashdot.org].

        FWIW, I feel that The Simpsons actually has more creativity and freedom than Futurama. On first glance you'd expect the opposite, as being set in a fantasy future it has the freedom to do anything. In reality, it's quite tied by its retro sci-fi roots and reliance upon parody, both of which limit it creatively and in terms of audience appeal.

        This probably sounds like I think Futurama sucks; I don't. It's all relative- but there are sound and legitimate reasons why it's not- and never will be- as well-loved as The Simpsons.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:I never really.. by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @07:17AM
      • Re:I never really.. by Chris Mattern (Score:3) Tuesday July 31, @08:10AM
    • Re:I never really.. (Score:4, Informative)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 31, @04:27AM (#20054677)
      I didn't see this answer in the previous replies to your question.

      Fox set up Futurama to run at 7PM EST / 6PM CST. This was on a Sunday. Fox had football running on Sundays. With the exception of the west coast, most of the country never saw the show. Many times they joined the show already in progress at approx 20 after, so no one could know what was going on. Too many football games went past their time slot.

      Plus, there are those that attended church on Sunday nights, so they never saw an episode. While living with the parents, it was a requirement to attend church on Sunday nights. I never caught the show unless I was sick or after I had moved out. So I never got a chance to see the entire run until Adult Swim started showing it.

      So for a few, other things were going on on Sunday nights. For many others they never got a chance to see the show due to Fox's use of a 7PM time slot on a day they had football scheduled until 7PM, but typically it ran until 7:20.

      No promotion behind it. All I remember ever seeing commercials for was Simpsons and King of the Hill.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:I never really.. by 00schneider (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @05:05AM
    • Re:I never really.. by Don_dumb (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @06:42AM
    • Re:I never really.. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Lord Ender (156273) on Tuesday July 31, @08:37AM (#20056515)
      (http://127.31.33.7/)
      To fully appreciate Futurama
      • You need to have read Asimov and Heinlein
      • You must have seen pretty much all of ST:TOS
      • You must have a college-level understanding of physics ("no fair! you changed the outcome by measuring it")
      • You must have some understanding of American political history (President Nixon, etc.)
      • You must know a bit about digital technology ("Don't worry, Bender. There's no such thing as 2.")
      • Tou must not take religion too seriously ("sweet zombie Jesus!")

      This is all true for the majority of my friends (who I know from engineering school or my career in software). However, my girlfriend's friends and my family can only check off one or two items on that list. They'll get a few laughs, sure. But even though The Simpsons and Family Guy are mediocre by comparison, those two shows never leave the majority of people thinking "I don't get it..." Futurama is just a masterpiece with a small audience, so it has less earning power.

      The good news is that with Video over IP finally becoming cheap, HTPCs starting to catch on, and the popularity of DVD sales and rentals; the cost of entry to the TV show market is plummeting. The future looks good for shows like Futurama :-)
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:I never really.. by cmorgan47 (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @08:40AM
    • Re:I never really.. by crabpeople (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @11:19AM
    • Re:I never really.. by jesterzog (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @05:59PM
    • Re:I never really.. by DerekLyons (Score:2) Wednesday August 01, @02:52AM
    • Re:I never really.. by voxel (Score:1) Wednesday August 01, @05:42PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • At last! (Score:2, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 31, @02:47AM (#20054229)
    Finally, a good show on TV.

    Random celebratory quote:

    "The Elders tell of a young ball much like you. First he bounced 3 meters in the air... Then he bounced 1.8 meters in the air. Then he bounced *4* meters in the air."
    • Re:At last! by Altus (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @01:06PM
      • Re:At last! by qualidafial (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @06:21PM
  • Eggggselllent. . . (Score:2)

    by noewun (591275) on Tuesday July 31, @02:51AM (#20054249)
    (Last Journal: Tuesday September 23 2003, @04:07PM)

    Oh, wait: wrong series.

  • Me too (Score:1)

    by wamerocity (1106155) on Tuesday July 31, @02:54AM (#20054259)
    (Last Journal: Sunday September 09, @11:55PM)
    I am seriously so glad they are bringing this show back. I remember when I completely stopped watching the Simpsons after I found out about this show in the second season, then I watched it nonstop. The character are just classic, and it's a lot grittier than the simpsons by far.

    Favorite quotes:

    Zapp: "Congratulations Leela. Now you're officially my woman. Kudos! I can't say I don't envy you."

    Zapp: "Kiff, have the boy lay out my formal shorts." Kiff: "The Boy sir?" Zapp: "YOU Kiff, YOU lay out my formal shorts."

    Dr. Zoidberg: "Love? Love is not known here. I am simply looking for a female swollen with eggs to accept my genetic material" Fry: "You and me both brother!"

    Fry: "Oh! Why couldn't she be the OTHER type of Mermaid, which the fish part on top, and the lady part on the bottom!"

    • Re:Me too (Score:5, Funny)

      by CrazyTalk (662055) on Tuesday July 31, @06:33AM (#20055339)
      Here's mine (from memory, may not be 100% accurate):

      "God Lord! Thats over 150 atmospheres of pressure!

      How many atmospheres can the ship withstand, professor?

      Well it's a spacship. So anywhere between 0 and 1."

      I think the number of people in the general population that would get that joke is one reason the series was canceled.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Me too by digitalhermit (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @06:54AM
        • Re:Me too by IndustrialComplex (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @08:22AM
          • Re:Me too by Babbster (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @05:58PM
        • Re:Me too by Chris Mattern (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @08:35AM
        • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Me too by QuantumPion (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @12:08PM
        • Re:Me too by Altus (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @01:08PM
        • Re:Me too by CrazyTalk (Score:2) Thursday August 02, @09:01AM
    • Re:Me too (Score:5, Funny)

      by proverbialcow (177020) on Tuesday July 31, @09:41AM (#20057385)
      (Last Journal: Sunday March 13 2005, @09:45PM)
      Fry: Whatcha doing Bender? Building yourself a wife?
      Bender: Part of one.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Me too by GungaDan (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @01:07PM
    • Re:Me too by qualidafial (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @10:10AM
      • Re:Me too by qualidafial (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @06:24PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • One thing I have been wondering about is if the series will add or remove some material? I guess some people would complain if they first bought the movies, and then found additional material on the series DVD release. If so, I would probably buy both. Remember that it was the good DVD sales that brought Family Guy back.
  • Theese news made my day!
  • Don't forget (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Dachannien (617929) on Tuesday July 31, @03:22AM (#20054365)
    (http://www.unity08.com/)
    Rumor has it that one or more of these DVDs will feature a very special full-length episode of Everybody Loves Hypno-Toad.

    All glory to the Hypno-Toad!

  • Networks (Score:5, Interesting)

    Will the networks ever learn? They never marketed the show properly, and that is why it failed, just like why Family Guy failed the first time around.

    Often they bail very early on a show that could be successful (like Drive this year, or Firefly) before they ever give the show a chance to succeed. If you don't market a show, people don't know it exists, and they aren't going to watch it. The weird thing is that there is quite a bit of start-up cost in getting an animated show running with an animation shop. 16 episodes is more than a half-season slate. I don't know why they don't just bring it back as a mid-season replacement on Fox, see how it goes, and hopefully just bring the show back for good?
    • Re:Networks by jellomizer (Score:3) Tuesday July 31, @04:01AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Networks by mgblst (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @05:07AM
      • Re:Networks (Score:4, Insightful)

        Ummm? The reason Family Guy was brought back was because it got HIGH ratings on Comedy Central and TBS, as well as HIGH DVD sales. It was canceled because it was poorly marketed, and no one saw it before it was initially canceled.

        And take a show like Firefly. They only aired like 6 episodes total, in different time-slots, out of order, and never advertised the show. They aired a whopping 4 episodes of Drive, which got good reviews from pretty much every critic on the planet, and it was canceled.

        I'm not a big fan of TV, and I was never a Whedon fan. I really hated Buffy and Angel, but Firefly was a damned good show. It sold like man on DVD to the point where they made a movie. Initial ratings aren't always indicative of the quality of the show. Jerry Springer was the highest rated show on the entire planet for a while, and so was Baywatch. And sometimes really good shows how poor ratings because no one knows anything about them. Even though Firefly sold well on DVD and was critically acclaimed, most people still haven't heard about the show.

        That is poor advertising on the part of the network.

        Jericho is another fine example. The network canceled it because of "poor ratings" and it had a huge fan-base who spent money out of pocket to take out an ad in Variety, and ship tons of peanuts to the network demanding the show be brought back. How were the ratings so poor with so many fans?

        The Neilsen ratings often don't pick up on people who record shows with their DVR, and they also don't account for the people who watch the show on CBS.com so the ratings really didn't accurately reflect how large of a fan base the show actually had. If the networks were "experts" as you put it, they wouldn't lose so much money every year developing all these new shows that bomb. They wouldn't have canceled shows like Futurama, Firefly, Family Guy or Jericho in the first place when market demand for these shows was so high that they made more money after cancellation than before.

        I know a guy (we're not close friends, but we have spoke on a few occasions) who wrote Grosse Point Blank. (Great friggin' movie) and he kept getting approached by the networks to do some TV work. He had some great stories. No one wanted to touch anything new, because it wasn't established and they had no way to determine if it would be successful or not. However they kept asking him to make "The Next Friends" show, because Friends was huge at the time. Every week when the new movies came out, whatever was big in the box office, they'd tell him to clone that.

        Just because someone has money, that doesn't make them an expert. Far from it. As Kevin Smith said, "Hollywood is the only place where you fail upwards."
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Networks by dcollins (Score:3) Tuesday July 31, @07:22AM
        • Re:Networks by Gulthek (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @07:58AM
          • Re:Networks by TheNumberless (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @12:22PM
            • Re:Networks by Gulthek (Score:2) Thursday August 02, @07:56PM
        • Re:Networks by lixee (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @07:59AM
          • Re:Networks by everphilski (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @08:26AM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Networks by Hatta (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @08:53AM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Networks by nomadic (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @09:05AM
    • Re:Networks by rherbert (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @07:33AM
    • Re:Networks by barzok (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @07:41AM
      • Re:Networks by Enderandrew (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @08:14AM
        • Re:Networks by barzok (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @09:16AM
          • Re:Networks by LMacG (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @10:13AM
    • Re:Networks by cmdr_tofu (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @08:13AM
    • Re:Networks by Atriqus (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @08:27AM
    • Re:Networks by Enderandrew (Score:2) Tuesday July 31, @04:36AM
      • Re:Networks by kannibal_klown (Score:1) Tuesday July 31, @07:17AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Translations? (Score:1)

    by cowboy76Spain (815442) on Tuesday July 31, @03:48AM (#20054491)
    I know maybe it is to soon to ask, but there is any information about possible translations to other languages (ok, to Spanish, I don't care if it is not translated to French or German). Being a DVD release it means it will reach a smaller public, and I fear that they don't think that it is worth to translate it from English.
  • Futurama Movie Trailer! (Score:5, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 31, @05:39AM (#20055015)
    The trailer shown at the comic-con is online: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEtZHOj4vHo [youtube.com]

    Cancelled by the 'Box Network'!
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Great... (Score:2, Funny)

    by knoll99 (1126749) on Tuesday July 31, @07:43AM (#20055939)
    Maybe Fox will prempt Futurama yet again by slipping some lousy NFL highlights video into the Futurama DVD jacket instead.

    Terrific news about 16 new episodes though! Katay Sagal needs the work.
  • Kittens ... (Score:2, Funny)

    by The Sith Lord (111494) on Tuesday July 31, @08:17AM (#20056277)
    ... give Morbo gas.
  • just yesterday i was on imdb looking for some info and came across the futurama movies and i was wondering about scooty puff jr. suuuuuuuuuuuuuuucks!
  • High-Def cartoon? (Score:2)

    by Joe Snipe (224958) on Tuesday July 31, @10:33AM (#20058131)
    (http://www.slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Wednesday March 21 2007, @10:06AM)
    Can anyone explain to me what the purpose is behind a HD cartoon?
  • I'll buy the DVDs (Score:1)

    by recharged95 (782975) on Tuesday July 31, @11:39AM (#20059195)
    (Last Journal: Friday September 17 2004, @04:10PM)
    And everyone can bite my shiny dollar.
  • informative links (Score:1)

    by Floydius (811220) on Tuesday July 31, @02:07PM (#20061443)
    (http://www.floydius.com/)
    Gotfuturama [gotfuturama.com] and the interview they link, at RottenTomatoes [rottentomatoes.com]. (minor spoilers there, if you can call them that)
  • Between now and then it is on Adult Swim five nights a week. Catch it there, or buy it on DVD. :)
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Wrong again idiot! (Score:3, Insightful)

    by thegrassyknowl (762218) on Tuesday July 31, @08:45AM (#20056639)
    Who gives a fuck about the definition of HD in resolution terms.

    As long as it's good enough to see Amy's obscene tattoo it's high def enough for Futurama
    [ Parent ]
  • by guamman (527778) on Wednesday August 01, @12:21PM (#20073819)
    To the individuals that decided this post was trolling: Do you realize that "Wrong again idiot!" is a quote from a Futurama episode? It was supposed to be humorous.
    [ Parent ]
  • 10 replies beneath your current threshold.