Slashdot Log In
Futurama Movie Set For November 27
Posted by
kdawson
on Tue Jul 31, 2007 01:15 AM
from the on-a-bender dept.
from the on-a-bender dept.
kevin_conaway writes "TV Squad informs us that the new Futurama movie will be available on November 27. The show will return as a full-length, high-def film sold on DVD. It will be followed by three additional films, and each film will be divided into four episodes, each to be aired on Comedy Central. So, that's 4 DVD movies or 16 new episodes."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Futurama Movie Set For November 27
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 308 comments
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
Oblig. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Oblig. (Score:5, Informative)
(http://kim.biyn.com/)
Matt & David & Co.: if any of you are reading this I want to say THANK YOU for hanging in there and making these DVDs happen. Here's to hoping to the return of Futurama to full production!
Re:Oblig. (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.myspace.com/mygreatestheist)
Re:Oblig. (Score:5, Funny)
(http://slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Friday November 23 2001, @04:14PM)
Oh, sure, you bleeding hearts whine about the poor oppressed Mongols now, but you'll be shitting your pants and crying for your mama when the horde is breaching your walls.
Re:Oblig. (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Oblig. (Score:4, Funny)
Morbo: Belligerent and numerous
Re:Oblig. (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.clsnz.org/)
But does it come in a convenient suppository format?
Re:Oblig. (Score:4, Informative)
I'll get my coat.
Finally (Score:2)
Let me be the first to say... (Score:2)
(http://www.gfunk007.com/ | Last Journal: Saturday May 27 2006, @04:33AM)
Seriously though, this is fantastic news and makes it a lot more real in my mind. I hope they leave those god damned clone kids out of it though
Finally (Score:5, Insightful)
About damn time (Score:2, Flamebait)
Re:About damn time (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.parallelrealities.co.uk/)
That's news to Matt Groening.
FINE! (Score:5, Funny)
The Velour Fog (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Wednesday June 20, @12:01PM)
Re:The Velour Fog (Score:5, Funny)
Whaddya mean, "parody?" Zapp plays it straight!
Re:The Velour Fog (Score:5, Funny)
Re:The Velour Fog (Score:5, Funny)
Re:The Velour Fog (Score:5, Funny)
You're obviously confused and aroused.
Oh thank GOD! (Score:5, Funny)
misnomer (Score:1)
Re:misnomer (Score:5, Funny)
Re:misnomer (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.enderandrew.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday July 03, @11:44PM)
A DVD can put out a native widescreen 480p picture, which was the bare minimum for the original HD specs. Most high-def TV shows are broadcast in 720p, and the new high-def movie formats are 1080p, but most high-def TVs can't even support 1080p. There is no single resolution that defines HD content.
About time (Score:1)
(https://archiejones.no-ip.org/)
I've heard rumors for ages, but this one looks pretty solid.
Yay!
There will be a million unnecessary quotes, but... (Score:2, Funny)
"Gumbercules?! I love that guy!!"
Yay (Score:5, Funny)
(http://hateatron.com/)
Big Deal (Score:2)
I never really.. (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.tangental.net/)
Re:I never really.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:I never really.. (Score:4, Informative)
Also, many of the jokes are more subtle than those usual to the Simpsons, and probably people won't want to look at a cartoon and have to think harder to understand its humour.
That said, I am already waiting on it.
Is "specialist" humour more "subtle"? IMHO, no. (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://babelfish.alt...%2F%2Fslashdot.jp%2F)
The Simpsons *did* contain subtle humour in some areas. Whereas I feel Futurama's was very reliant upon parodying retro science fiction cliches and the old "aspects of present-day society given a futuristic twist" school of sci-fi comedy.
For my money, Futurama *never* felt like it would have the same universal appeal that The Simpsons managed so effectively. That's not to say that it was bad, but dakameleon put his (her?) finger on it very well when he said that The Simpsons had more characters people could identify with [slashdot.org].
FWIW, I feel that The Simpsons actually has more creativity and freedom than Futurama. On first glance you'd expect the opposite, as being set in a fantasy future it has the freedom to do anything. In reality, it's quite tied by its retro sci-fi roots and reliance upon parody, both of which limit it creatively and in terms of audience appeal.
This probably sounds like I think Futurama sucks; I don't. It's all relative- but there are sound and legitimate reasons why it's not- and never will be- as well-loved as The Simpsons.
Re:I never really.. (Score:4, Informative)
Fox set up Futurama to run at 7PM EST / 6PM CST. This was on a Sunday. Fox had football running on Sundays. With the exception of the west coast, most of the country never saw the show. Many times they joined the show already in progress at approx 20 after, so no one could know what was going on. Too many football games went past their time slot.
Plus, there are those that attended church on Sunday nights, so they never saw an episode. While living with the parents, it was a requirement to attend church on Sunday nights. I never caught the show unless I was sick or after I had moved out. So I never got a chance to see the entire run until Adult Swim started showing it.
So for a few, other things were going on on Sunday nights. For many others they never got a chance to see the show due to Fox's use of a 7PM time slot on a day they had football scheduled until 7PM, but typically it ran until 7:20.
No promotion behind it. All I remember ever seeing commercials for was Simpsons and King of the Hill.
Re:I never really.. (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://127.31.33.7/)
This is all true for the majority of my friends (who I know from engineering school or my career in software). However, my girlfriend's friends and my family can only check off one or two items on that list. They'll get a few laughs, sure. But even though The Simpsons and Family Guy are mediocre by comparison, those two shows never leave the majority of people thinking "I don't get it..." Futurama is just a masterpiece with a small audience, so it has less earning power.
The good news is that with Video over IP finally becoming cheap, HTPCs starting to catch on, and the popularity of DVD sales and rentals; the cost of entry to the TV show market is plummeting. The future looks good for shows like Futurama
At last! (Score:2, Funny)
Random celebratory quote:
"The Elders tell of a young ball much like you. First he bounced 3 meters in the air... Then he bounced 1.8 meters in the air. Then he bounced *4* meters in the air."
Eggggselllent. . . (Score:2)
(Last Journal: Tuesday September 23 2003, @04:07PM)
Oh, wait: wrong series.
Me too (Score:1)
(Last Journal: Sunday September 09, @11:55PM)
Favorite quotes:
Zapp: "Congratulations Leela. Now you're officially my woman. Kudos! I can't say I don't envy you."
Zapp: "Kiff, have the boy lay out my formal shorts." Kiff: "The Boy sir?" Zapp: "YOU Kiff, YOU lay out my formal shorts."
Dr. Zoidberg: "Love? Love is not known here. I am simply looking for a female swollen with eggs to accept my genetic material" Fry: "You and me both brother!"
Fry: "Oh! Why couldn't she be the OTHER type of Mermaid, which the fish part on top, and the lady part on the bottom!"
Re:Me too (Score:5, Funny)
"God Lord! Thats over 150 atmospheres of pressure!
How many atmospheres can the ship withstand, professor?
Well it's a spacship. So anywhere between 0 and 1."
I think the number of people in the general population that would get that joke is one reason the series was canceled.
Re:Me too (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Sunday March 13 2005, @09:45PM)
Bender: Part of one.
Any differences in the releases? (Score:2)
(http://www.ki.se/ | Last Journal: Tuesday August 28, @07:06AM)
Wohoo! (Score:2)
(http://slashdot.org/-- | Last Journal: Thursday September 18 2003, @11:15AM)
Don't forget (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.unity08.com/)
All glory to the Hypno-Toad!
Mmm! (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://www.poromenos.org/)
--HypnoToad
Networks (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.enderandrew.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday July 03, @11:44PM)
Often they bail very early on a show that could be successful (like Drive this year, or Firefly) before they ever give the show a chance to succeed. If you don't market a show, people don't know it exists, and they aren't going to watch it. The weird thing is that there is quite a bit of start-up cost in getting an animated show running with an animation shop. 16 episodes is more than a half-season slate. I don't know why they don't just bring it back as a mid-season replacement on Fox, see how it goes, and hopefully just bring the show back for good?
Re:Networks (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://www.enderandrew.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday July 03, @11:44PM)
And take a show like Firefly. They only aired like 6 episodes total, in different time-slots, out of order, and never advertised the show. They aired a whopping 4 episodes of Drive, which got good reviews from pretty much every critic on the planet, and it was canceled.
I'm not a big fan of TV, and I was never a Whedon fan. I really hated Buffy and Angel, but Firefly was a damned good show. It sold like man on DVD to the point where they made a movie. Initial ratings aren't always indicative of the quality of the show. Jerry Springer was the highest rated show on the entire planet for a while, and so was Baywatch. And sometimes really good shows how poor ratings because no one knows anything about them. Even though Firefly sold well on DVD and was critically acclaimed, most people still haven't heard about the show.
That is poor advertising on the part of the network.
Jericho is another fine example. The network canceled it because of "poor ratings" and it had a huge fan-base who spent money out of pocket to take out an ad in Variety, and ship tons of peanuts to the network demanding the show be brought back. How were the ratings so poor with so many fans?
The Neilsen ratings often don't pick up on people who record shows with their DVR, and they also don't account for the people who watch the show on CBS.com so the ratings really didn't accurately reflect how large of a fan base the show actually had. If the networks were "experts" as you put it, they wouldn't lose so much money every year developing all these new shows that bomb. They wouldn't have canceled shows like Futurama, Firefly, Family Guy or Jericho in the first place when market demand for these shows was so high that they made more money after cancellation than before.
I know a guy (we're not close friends, but we have spoke on a few occasions) who wrote Grosse Point Blank. (Great friggin' movie) and he kept getting approached by the networks to do some TV work. He had some great stories. No one wanted to touch anything new, because it wasn't established and they had no way to determine if it would be successful or not. However they kept asking him to make "The Next Friends" show, because Friends was huge at the time. Every week when the new movies came out, whatever was big in the box office, they'd tell him to clone that.
Just because someone has money, that doesn't make them an expert. Far from it. As Kevin Smith said, "Hollywood is the only place where you fail upwards."
Translations? (Score:1)
Futurama Movie Trailer! (Score:5, Informative)
Cancelled by the 'Box Network'!
Great... (Score:2, Funny)
Terrific news about 16 new episodes though! Katay Sagal needs the work.
Kittens ... (Score:2, Funny)
talk about coincidence (Score:1)
(http://zeos386sx.blogspot.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday February 17 2005, @02:43AM)
High-Def cartoon? (Score:2)
(http://www.slashdot.org/ | Last Journal: Wednesday March 21 2007, @10:06AM)
I'll buy the DVDs (Score:1)
(Last Journal: Friday September 17 2004, @04:10PM)
informative links (Score:1)
(http://www.floydius.com/)
Re:No nightly reruns? a la Simpsons (Score:2)
(http://kim.biyn.com/)
Re:Wrong again idiot! (Score:3, Insightful)
As long as it's good enough to see Amy's obscene tattoo it's high def enough for Futurama
Re:Wrong again idiot! (Score:2)