Slashdot Log In
Firefox Accepting Feature Suggestions for Version 3
Posted by
Zonk
on Sat Oct 14, 2006 09:33 AM
from the i-would-like-a-pony dept.
from the i-would-like-a-pony dept.
Krishna Dagli writes to mention an article over at Ars Technica discussing the Firefox team's call for feature suggestions. Version 3 of the software is already in the works, and the team members are looking to the community for ideas on where to go next. From the article: "The wish list is long indeed, and it provides an insight into the desires of the browser community, and a look at the open source development process. While closed-source projects often ask their user community for feedback on requested features, the process is not usually open to the public. For Firefox 3, anyone can both suggest new features and comment on other people's suggestions. The feature requests are divided into categories, such as browser customization, privacy features, security, history, download manager, and other areas. There are suggestions for features found in other competing browsers, such Safari, IE 7 beta, and Opera. IE7 seemed to be featured most prominently, with requests for "low-rights mode," as well as more cosmetic features like skins that mimic Microsoft's browser."
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Firefox Accepting Feature Suggestions for Version 3
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 422 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
OS Logo? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:OS Logo? (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.revis.co.uk/)
The above comment is funny. In fact, it's geek humour. This being slashdot we like:
Geek humour.
Corrections to the article.
Massivly technical explanations on related subjects that enlighten us.
Things we do not like:
Moderators who are too used to Digg and mod down anything they personally don't like, even if it's factually correct and/or relevant and/or insightful humour, having the gall to cancel out the mod points of someone who, despite only getting given points every few months, still thought the comment was funny enough to mod up.
May I direct your attention to the setting which allows you to apply a penalty of -lots'o'points to anything marked as "funny" so that you personally never see anything entertaining again.
Thank you for your attention. That is all.
Re:OS Logo? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:OS Logo? (Score:5, Funny)
It's Weaselgate, damnit.
Firefox needs some work on the popup front. (Score:5, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Monday October 02 2006, @08:42AM)
In keeping with my request to allow for intuitive suppression of the nasty ""do you want to remember password for this site?" popups, they should put an option on the system prompts that you can click to make them go to the status bar from then on: "Do you want future such popups on the status bar instead?"
I love how Firefox nicely diminishes popups that come from intentional design of web programmers, but the way Firefox itself throws annoying hard-to-get rid of popups needs some work.
Re:status line (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.wirespring.com/)
Keep it simple ... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Keep it simple ... (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.phpgd.com/)
Re:Keep it simple ... (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://slashdot.org/)
If such a feature is included, I would like to be able to turn it off. My firefox very, very rarely crashes (once every few *months* Java or Flash bring it down). If you're having crashing problems, you should start up a new profile and re-install your extensions one by one to see which one is causing you the grief.
Re:Keep it simple ... (Score:5, Insightful)
Plugins
Run plugins as a independent process, that talks with firefox via a socket or something like this. If a plugin crash it doesn't take firefox with it. It also allow one to kill a locked or high load plugins and keep surfing.
Run plugins as a independent process, so that when they leak memory, that memory will be freed when the tab or window is closed.
Run plugins as a independent process, so that when a plugin refuses to shut down (like acroread), the browser can forcibly kill it.
Stability and resource-utilization improvements
Put each document into an independent process (not thread: separate forked process) so that:
When a document causes Firefox to crash, the whole browser won't be taken with it.
When a bug in Firefox stomps on memory it doesn't own, other documents in memory are not corrupted.
When a document causes Firefox to leak massive amounts of memory, closing that tab or window will free up the wasted memory.
When a bug in Firefox or a script on the page locks up (infinite loop or whatnot), the whole browser will not hang up, just the one document. Closing the tab or window kills the aberrant process. This is also an issue for DNS lookup; the browser always freezes completely during DNS lookup. Make this affect only the document being loaded.
Obviously, this also means that the Firefox main UI should also be in a separate process, and you should use IPC and sharing of window-system resource IDs and handles to communicate between UI and document processes.
When the UI crashes, restarting the UI can sweep up documents that find themselves unattached and re-present them undisturbed.
Cross-site scripting and buffer overflow exploits have a much harder time hacking into information for other documents, because they are inaccessible in separate processes.
Re:Keep it simple ... (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://minion.sourceforge.net/)
I'm happy for many features to be in extensions and a lean, mean version to be provided for those who want it. I'd also like a "bloated" browser as well, full of plugins that are considered useful, carefully maintained, and also checked to make sure they all work well together.
Re:Keep it simple ... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Keep it simple ... (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Friday November 21 2003, @06:04PM)
Re:Keep it simple ... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Keep it simple ... (Score:5, Insightful)
- Barebones, browser only, users must install their own extensions. Most geeks will want this one.
- Some common and supported extensions preinstalled to support features included in competing browsers. Most people will want this one.
Re:Keep it simple ... (Score:5, Insightful)
Stability. (Score:5, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Tuesday May 29, @09:14PM)
With extensions, Firefox does pretty much anything that anyone could want in a browser. I'd like only two things from Firefox 3:
1. More stability and less memory usage. On both Windows and OS X, Firefox can swallow all your system resources if you leave it running long enough and do enough browsing. On my machines, the program also crashes, infrequently but regularly, most often when a page it's loading is corrupted by a network error. Spend the effort on finding memory leaks and bugs instead of adding gewgaws.
2. Without changing the functionality of the interface or its basic elements, make it prettier. The buttons look big, garish, and way too colorful; look at Safari for one example of a better way. (I use a skin to make my Firefox installs look much like Safari, but I think a more professional/more beautiful interface could inspire more people to switch.)
supress password popups with one click. (Score:4, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Monday October 02 2006, @08:42AM)
Re:supress password popups with one click. (Score:5, Funny)
(http://robots.org.uk/)
I doubt they will do this though. The password popup window already contains too many buttons: [Yes], [No] and [Never for this site]. End-users are already instantly paralyzed when they see a window with three buttons, like a deer in the headlights of an onrushing car. Adding a fourth button will make their brains melt out of their ears.
More focus on easy to use security will be nice (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.revis.co.uk/)
It could seriously kick off use of GPG amongst the non-geeks for authentication (mostly) and encryption (past a critical mass). I don't believe it would be that difficult to explain to normal IT literate (ie, already uses Firefox or Opera) the benefit of signatures in evading blame and establishing trust.
Semi-on-topic, on the security front Firefox 2 fixes [revis.co.uk] the bug with tab icon handling that allows fingerprinting of Firefox 1.5 [revis.co.uk] by tracking isolated
Webmail? (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://thesoftworld.com/cory/)
No need to thank me, it was a Slashdot post that tipped me off.
History: When I closed a window (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.twoshortplanks.com)
I can't count the number of times I've closed a tab and then wanted it back later in the day, but been unable to find the url because I've actually had it open on my desktop for several days (so it's not in yesterday's history.) Being able to sort history by "close time" as well as "open time" would be really useful.
Maybe this could be a firefox extention. Hmm.
Why are we even bothering... (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.revis.co.uk/)
It even supports active X! Active X! None of the true internet experience will be lost to you now.
Less = More (Score:5, Interesting)
They're feeling the heat from IE7, and loaded v2 up with many of the features I already had using some extensions. But not everyone wants the extras...
So I say on to FF devs:
Less equals more, remove the bloat and bring back our lightweight, secure browser and let us customize it how we want it to be.
my suggestions (Score:5, Interesting)
-- figure out some way of supporting drag-and-drop file uploads better
-- better editors for textareas (maybe support Mozex officially and find some way of letting users embed their favorite editors right in the page)
-- integrate better with Thunderbird and other Mozilla applications
-- replace the cumbersome XPCOM programming model (IDL compiler and all that) with something that's more like the Objective C object model and runtime
An automatic porn suggester (Score:5, Funny)
(http://slashdot.org???? | Last Journal: Saturday August 12 2006, @03:06AM)
Per site Shockwave Flash disabling!!! (Score:5, Insightful)
Per-plugin memory accounting (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.jimrandomh.org/)
Different password handling (Score:5, Insightful)
Wait until the password has been accepted before offering to save it.
Other than that. Slim it down to the bare minimum and let people customize it with extensions.
4 things (Score:5, Interesting)
for(;;) alert("Please restart your browser.");
2. Make hotkeys work everywhere, all the time. (You know when you hit CTRL+L and nothing happens)
3. Make it possible to open javascript links in new tabs.
4. Support for soft hypens [unicode.org].
Re:4 things (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://scorch.quickfox.org/)
Moving forward, not standing still (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Moving forward, not standing still (Score:5, Informative)
(http://members.surfeu.fi/kklaine/primebear.html | Last Journal: Tuesday March 15 2005, @01:16PM)
1. Open up all the tabs you want to open on startup.
2. Go to Options and click "Use current pages" in the Home Page Location setting.
You can also enter them by hand in this field by separating tabs with a |.
JavaScript links (Score:5, Insightful)
It's all too often when I middle-click a link to open in a new tab, only to get the tab being "Untitled" and the URL starts with "javascript:". Is it too much to ask that Firefox detect a javascript link and prevent it from opening in a new tab (or window, but usually I catch those), and merely run the javascript?
Lasers, people! (Score:4, Funny)
better "bookmark this page!!!" (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://www.popularculturegaming.com/)
Active X Support (Score:4, Funny)
My suggestions (Score:3, Insightful)
2.Better ways to find extentions that are leaking resources.
3.If a URL being displayed results in "host not found", "cant contact server" or an error such as 404, it should not be added to the history. Also, URLs should only be added to the history once they get past that step and actually recieve a "200 ok" reply from the server with a piece of data or something. (i.e. if I press escape to cancel loading before it actually loads, it shouldnt go in the history)
4.Bring back MNG support.
5.Better security features. I want to see a world where (once a small amount of initial setup is taken care of), encrypting and/or signing an email is as simple as clicking a button on the email compose form with the program doing the rest. (although this feature is probobly more a thunderbird feature than a firefox feature)
Apparently (Score:5, Interesting)
My two biggest requests would be
1. An option to enable an *ABSOLUTE* restriction on new content windows. Even with the 'pop up blocker' fully enabled some sites still manage to open new windows. I would like these FORCED into new tabs, always, NEVER permitting additional content windows to open (dialogs for FF itself, preferences, etc would still be acceptable)
2. An interative javascript debugger, that includes the ability to run scripts in a 'step mode', override/block the execution of specific js statements (or force conditional branches), and change the contents of variables.
3. An ability to prevent detection of the absence of specific plugins, enabling the user to take control back of media served by websites (eg, "Sorry, you dont have Microsoft DRM-enforcing plugin X, so we wont serve this media to you" - the ability to force the site to just give the URI to the browser, and let the *USER* decide how to retrieve it and what to do with it from there)
DragDrop and Proper Focus/Blur Please!! (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.musecube.com/l0ungeb0y/ | Last Journal: Monday February 09 2004, @06:38PM)
This is a HUGE issue as it prevents Drag and Drop file uploads for AJAX applications.
Sure, there is a FF Extension to solve this, but requires the user to install for such a behavior to work.
This should be a native solution. Can Firefox please reconsider their stance on this issue?
For years, drag and dropping of files into application windows has been EXPECTED behavior.
Firefox should allow AJAX applications the same sort of functionality.
As it stands, Firefox is the only browser I can not create a strictly script based solution for.
Below is an example. As we can see, the dragdrop event is useless except for preventing the dragdrop event from continuing propagation after we capture it.Also, firefox (on Mac at least) does not properly recognize an onBlur when I click on a non-firefox application window.
onBlur only happens when we click on a 2nd Firefox browser window - bad bad bad.
This and the above dragdrop issue means that Firefox is not properly supporting OS integration.
Addressing these issues would be huge in more robust user experience and application capabilities for AJAX developers.
TIA for your consideration of these points.
V
make the search box easier to extend (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://robotmonkeys.net/ | Last Journal: Tuesday October 26 2004, @03:23AM)
Completely unacceptable, and worst of all, I don't even understand how they even thought that their approach was even remotely necessary.
Better Tab Docking (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://www.glpwd.com/)
-----
|1| |
|-|2|
|3| |
-----
is a perfectly valid tab configuration. Here, 1 & 3 take up the upper-left quarter and the lower-left quarter of the window respectively. 2 takes the entire right half. With larger monitors becomming the norm, this would be a great enhancement for those who would like to make better use of their horizontal space.
How to turn PDFs into pop-ups (Score:5, Informative)
(http://myatomic.com/ | Last Journal: Sunday November 19 2006, @12:31AM)
To solve this issue, remove the Adobe Reader plug-in from your Firefox plug-ins folder. This will cause Adobe Reader to launch in a separate process with its own window. Or just ditch Adobe Reader and install Foxit Reader, the PDF viewer with less bloat.