Slashdot Log In
Google Suggest
Posted by
michael
on Fri Dec 10, 2004 12:21 PM
from the freedom-to-innovate dept.
from the freedom-to-innovate dept.
Cristiano writes "As you type into the search box, Google Suggest guesses what you're typing and offers suggestions in real time. This is similar to Google's 'Did you mean?' feature that offers alternative spellings for your query after you search, except that it works in real time." It crashes Konqueror, but works nicely on Mozilla. Update: 12/11 by J : The engineer who thought of it, then built it in his "20% time," blogs about the process.
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Google Suggest
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 655 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
|
2
(1)
|
2
/. Spelling (Score:3, Funny)
Google
------
Did you mean: lose?
Yeah, Slashdot needs this badly.
Re:/. Spelling (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Wednesday January 31 2007, @02:25AM)
It does suggest "loose women".
Re:/. Spelling (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.dixie-chicks.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday July 24, @05:17PM)
It does suggest "loose women".
It also suggests "loose weight". I can't believe how many web sites there are devoted to loosing weight. I guess that's the origin of the term, "to throw your weight around" -- so many people loosing it, and throwing weight will certainly loose it. What a bunch of loosers.
(and looking at that paragraph long enough makes me wonder if I've loosed it, myself)
Cool! Just like form AutoComplete (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://slashdot.org/~GillBates0 | Last Journal: Tuesday July 10, @04:36PM)
Wonder how it'll hold up when it gets out Beta though...it's bound to be pretty computationally intensive.
Re:Cool! Just like form AutoComplete (Score:5, Funny)
(http://mdf356.livejournal.com/)
Cheers,
Matt
Re:Cool! Just like form AutoComplete (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.dustinbarbour.com/)
Re:Cool! Just like form AutoComplete (Score:4, Informative)
(definition)
Definition: A theoretical measure of the execution of an algorithm, usually the time or memory needed, given the problem size n, which is usually the number of items. Informally, saying some equation f(n) = O(g(n)) means it is less than some constant multiple of g(n). The notation is read, "f of n is big oh of g of n".
Strangely enough, I got this definition from a Google search.
Re:Cool! Just like form AutoComplete (Score:4, Interesting)
Chris Mattern
Re:Cool! Just like form AutoComplete (Score:4, Interesting)
Instant access to any piece of human knowledge, and it now can guess what you are looking for right as you can type. The only next improvement I can think of is if it did related searches to the term you searched for, but I'm not sure how you would represent all of that data at once. Leave it to the Google geniuses
Re:URL is same, with ?complete=1? (Score:4, Informative)
(http://www.crashproofsolutions.com/)
function jb(){var A=null;
try{A=new ActiveXObject("Msxml2.XMLHTTP")}catch(e){try{A=ne
This function is obviously copyright google, inc., but being presented here for educational purposes only.
Re:URL is same, with ?complete=1? (Score:4, Informative)
Advertising potential? (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.gavint.co.uk/)
Looks nice, but what happens when you type "the"?
"the incredibles"
Is anyone else seeing the advertising possibilities?
Re:I call foul: CENSORSHIP (Score:4, Funny)
(http://www.tomtheisen.com/ | Last Journal: Thursday June 20 2002, @12:33PM)
Careful though, some pervs our there might think you were talking about wanking, jagging, or otherwise masturbating. (Horrors!) They might not get your true message about amputees.
I keed, I keed. I was just very amused with puritanical way you approached the subject, and that you went the extra step not to condone it.
Try this: (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Try this: (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://jimthompson.org/ | Last Journal: Monday August 20 2001, @09:22AM)
gooooooooooooooogle 618
goooooooooooooooogle 23,300
gooooooooooooooooogle 198
I thought maybe it was a power-of-two thing, but other such disparities happen at non 2^n transitions. Interesting.
Try this: (Score:4, Funny)
Crashes Konqeuror? (Score:5, Informative)
(http://www.rumour.com/)
Is it any coincidence (Score:5, Funny)
(Last Journal: Saturday January 10 2004, @08:01AM)
Re:Is it any coincidence (Score:4, Funny)
Their suggestions is ofcourse based on earlier interests shown from your ip. So when you type capital P, google knows that you are not intereste in Paris, France but Paris Hilton and no, it's not a hotel!
Suggest failed (Score:3, Funny)
(http://www.cyberista.com/)
Advertising potential (Score:3, Insightful)
How is it so FAST!? (Score:4, Interesting)
(http://slashdot.org/)
It is blazingly fast. I expected it to be slowwwww.
Can somebody outline how it works?
Re:How is it so FAST!? (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.loconet.ca/)
check itout [google.com]
Impressive
Re:How is it so FAST!? (Score:4, Informative)
(Last Journal: Thursday May 24 2007, @01:08AM)
Implementation details (Score:5, Informative)
(http://jtheory.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday March 28 2006, @10:45AM)
It disables your browser's autocomplete on that textfield (for obvious reasons). Then it basically just defines a hidden div for that auto-complete dropdown (variations on this depending on browser... frickin' incompatibilities).
Each time you type a character, it populates that div body with the results of a quick, tiny query back to Google. It's NOT running the search for you; it's hitting (I assume) a simple, probably totally in-memory list of the most popular searches and number of results. That's how it can be so quick a response -- the lookup on their end is super-minimal, and the data to be transferred is probably less than 1k each time.
Cool. Nice concept, nice execution. And one of those nice "only obvious in hindsight" additions.
Even cooler -- it looks like (from the js file) they are supporting multiple languages here, not just English. Anyone using want to test this out for me? I think even Chinese is supported (or maybe that's the one that isn't.. I don't want to take the time to parse this properly).
google whacks (Score:3, Interesting)
Privacy? (Score:3, Insightful)
(Last Journal: Thursday May 10 2007, @01:10PM)
I don't mind Google knowing what I ask, but I'm not sure I want the world to see them.
I can see it now (Score:5, Funny)
"It looks like you are searching for lesbian porn again, do you remember what I showed you last time?"
"I know, I know, Lesbian porn,and can you rate these pages so I can update my page index?"
"Hello freak, try these"
The ABCs of Google Complete (Score:5, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Monday November 28 2005, @12:21PM)
B is for Best Buy
C is for CNN
D is for Dictionary
E is for Ebay
F is for Firefox (yay!)
G is for Games
H is for Hotmail
I is for Ikea
J is for Jokes
K is for Kazaa
L is for Lyrics
M is for Mapquest
N is for News
O is for Online dictionary
P is for Paris Hilton (wtf?!)
Q is for Quotes
R is for Recipes
S is for Spybot
T is for Tara Reid
U is for Ups
V is for Verizon
W is for Weather
X is for Xbox
Y is for Yahoo
Z is for Zip Codes
Re:The ABCs of Google Complete (Score:5, Interesting)
1 is for 1
2 is for 2004 election
3 is for 3m
4 is for 411
5 is for 50 cent
6 is for 60 minutes
7 is for 7th heaven
8 is for 89.com (as bad as Paris Hilton!!)
9 is for 911
Re:The ABCs of Google Complete (Score:5, Interesting)
x : xbox
xx: xxl
xxx:
p: paris hilton
po: poems
por: porsche
porn:
s: spybot
se: sears
sex:
Somehow, I don't think these are based purely on search requests
Re:The ABCs of Google Complete (Score:4, Insightful)
(http://jimthompson.org/ | Last Journal: Monday August 20 2001, @09:22AM)
Google is ranking these suggestions so that the ones you're most likely to search for are higher. So even though 's' has more hits than 'spybot', Google thinks you're more likely to search for 'spybot'. That makes sense - the terms people search for most often are not necessarily the pages with the most search results (or the highest Pagerank).
I wonder... (Score:3, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Thursday January 10 2002, @10:55AM)
Re:Google starts to suck (Score:4, Interesting)
What Google needs is Lexis-Nexis and Journal tabs (Score:4, Insightful)
Interesting Political Uses (Score:3, Funny)
If you go to the page [google.com] and type "George Bush is a" you get some interesting suggestions.
Obfuscated Javascript (Score:4, Interesting)
http://www.google.com/ac.js [google.com]
The Javascript is ripped to shreds as far as readability goes, but buried in there somewhere is the key to making your own app based on this. If you were so inclined to piggy-back on top of this technology. Not that I'd advocate such things.
Yippee! A new source of amusement! (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.danm.net/)
my cat:
my girlfried:
(No suggestions, obviously Google is run by a pack of lonely nerds).
my boyfriend:
(Okay, make that an apparently gay pack of lonely nerds).
darth vader is:
(A delusional pack of gay nerds?)
Oh, the fun I'll have with this new toy when I'm bored at work.
In a later report..... (Score:3, Funny)