You want to show an image or video that someone else owns? You link to the page that they have made that embeds that image/video.
What's so bad about that?
From the ruling, "On 27 October 2011, an article relating to those photos of Ms Dekker, entitled ‘! Nude photos of [Ms] Dekker’, was published on the GeenStijl website, which included part of one of the photos at issue, and which ended with the following words: ‘And now the link with the pics you’ve been waiting for.’ By clicking on a hyperlink accompanying that text, users were directed to the Filefactory website, on which another hyperlink allowed them to download 11 electronic files each containing one of those photos."
Your suggestion is what was deemed a violating action.