Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Bill Gates to Step Down from Microsoft

Posted by Zonk on Thu Jun 15, 2006 04:00 PM
from the i'm-sure-you-have-more-to-say-than-i dept.
Geoffreyerffoeg writes "According to Microsoft PressPass, Bill Gates will be leaving his role at Microsoft in July 2008. He'll be staying with the company, but is also moving to a more fulltime position with the Gates Foundation. 'Microsoft Corp. today announced that effective July 2008 Bill Gates, chairman, will transition out of a day-to-day role in the company to spend more time on his global health and education work at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. The company announced a two-year transition process to ensure that there is a smooth and orderly transfer of Gates' daily responsibilities, and said that after July 2008 Gates would continue to serve as the company's chairman and an adviser on key development projects.' CTO Ray Ozzie will assume Gates' role of Chief Software Architect, and CTO Craig Mundie will also take on more leadership responsibility."
+ -
story

Related Stories

Offsite: CNN Coverage
Offsite: MSNBC Coverage
[+] Why Ballmer Should Leave Microsoft 341 comments
An anonymous reader writes "In the wake of the announcement of Bill Gates' departure from the top spot at Microsoft, CNN Money is carrying an article arguing that Steve Ballmer should step down as well." From the article: "Since Gates stepped down as CEO in 2000 in favor of Ballmer, the company has floundered technically and strategically. As the company's chairman, chief software architect and supposed visionary, Gates deserves blame for missing the wave of Web-based software that has propelled Google and Yahoo. But Ballmer has made gaffes of his own in his longtime role as head of the company's business side. They include an undistinguished push into business applications to compete with Oracle, financial maneuvers that have failed to stir the stock - which has slumped 16 percent so far this year - and continuing antitrust problems in the United States and Europe."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • Holy Sh*t (Score:5, Funny)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:01PM (#15543587)
    Time to sell off my M$ stock...
        • Re:Holy Sh*t (Score:5, Insightful)

          by ad0le (684017) on Thursday June 15 2006, @06:06PM (#15544815)

          This will be my final post with slashdot, i'll be moving to digg for my news after today.

          This guy wants to quit his day to day responsibilities to give away his money to the less fortunate and all you guys want to do is bash him. Hey, I like Linux, I own a Mac and have tons of Windows experience, but just because you don't like his business practices or his OS dosn't give you the right to belittle him. Will you manage to give away 80% of your fortune before you die? Didn't think so fucktard!

          Give the guy a break, he's one of the few modern day humanitarians!

          • Re:Holy Sh*t (Score:5, Insightful)

            by script_daddy (846338) on Thursday June 15 2006, @06:25PM (#15544947) Homepage

            You must be new here, etc. etc.

            Thing is, the Slashdot-crowd is becoming increasingly singleminded when it comes to issues such as Copyright Infringment, Micro$oft (never forget the dollar sign, or you'll never blend in!) and the Bush Administration. I blame the moderation system. Pimping Linux and Booing Bill, if done with some degree of artfulness, is a surefire way to get modded up. Why take the contrarian position if your point of view is going to be modded "Troll" or "Flamebait" in a matter of nanoseconds?

            For what it's worth, I agree with you. Microsoft's business practices can be questioned (though they're not much worse than other companies in similar situations), but the humanitarian efforts of Bill Gates should not be underestimated or scoffed at. Sure, he's still filthy rich despite how much he has given, but if he was as evil as many slashdotters would like to have it, why wouldn't he keep it all? Or spend the money to build an evil headquarter in an inactive volcano?

            • Re:Holy Sh*t (Score:5, Insightful)

              by CastrTroy (595695) on Thursday June 15 2006, @09:20PM (#15545884) Homepage
              What's funny is you just posted a comment about how messed up the moderation system is, and yet you get modded up to +5 for pointing out the flaws, and supporting Bill Gates. Guess it's not as messed up as you thought it was.
  • He's not leaving (Score:5, Informative)

    by Shippy (123643) * <shippy@NoSpam.nmt.edu> on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:02PM (#15543589)
    He's going to stay chairman. This is a transition of his Chief Software Architect role. From the first line in the article:
    Working full time at Microsoft through June 2008, Gates then will continue as chairman and advisor while increasing Foundation efforts; Ray Ozzie and Craig Mundie to assume expanded roles.
    • by mjmalone (677326) * on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:11PM (#15543713) Homepage
      Being the chairman of the board is very different from being an employee for a company. The chairman of the board is _not_ an employee, he is an owner and is supposed to represent the interests of the owners. Owners != Employees. Basically, sounds like Bill is stepping down from his day-to-day activities managing the organization. But he still has billions of dollars tied up in an ownership position -- it would be incredibly stupid of him not to protect that investment.
              • by Barlo_Mung_42 (411228) on Friday June 16 2006, @01:31AM (#15546845) Homepage

                He gave to charity long before the trial. Stock does have a real value. So giving away lots of stock = giving away lots of money.
                He's already given away over 60% of his net worth which is way more than any regular joe I know.
                His foundation is his AND his wifes. Yes she has a lot to do with it but where does the money come from. Hint...NOT FROM HER!
                Their foundation (I just learned this today form NPR) is funding 90% of the world effort to get rid of polio. That's one effort of many but if they succeed at just that one it will be huge.
                It matters not what you think of MS and how he got his money. He's doing a lot of good things with it. His wife doesn't get all the credit either. His father also had a lot to do with it growing up.
    • He's going to stay chairman.

      He's replacing Ballmer!?!? O.o
      • by Jugalator (259273) on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:20PM (#15543829) Journal
        What will we do when he dies? We will still make fun of him!

        Yeah, nothing like some black humor from geeks disconnected from reality!

        I picture some zealots crushing his tomb stone and leaving a note with the words
        "... and so, at last, Mammon fell, and this final puny sign of his evil rule was shattered!" -- From the Book of Mozilla, 8:12
        • Re:He's not leaving (Score:4, Interesting)

          by dar (15755) on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:28PM (#15543928) Homepage
          And on the pedestal these words appear:
          "My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings:
          Look upon my works, ye Mighty, and despair!"
          Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
          Of that colossal wreck, boundless and bare
          The lone and level sands stretch far away.

            Percy Bysshe Shelley
        • Re:He's not leaving (Score:4, Interesting)

          by kfg (145172) * on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:43PM (#15544074)
          I picture some zealots crushing his tomb stone. . .

          Anticipation of that is why he is going into the "philanthropy biz."

          It's SOP for those who know their tombstones deserve crushing. Some of them even go so far as to hide their tombs (See Alexander, Temujin, most of the Pharoahs, etc.).

          KFG
        • by mfg (16466) on Thursday June 15 2006, @05:19PM (#15544410)
          Bill Gates' tombstone will read

              This man has performed an illegal operation and has been shut down
  • by Average_Joe_Sixpack (534373) on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:02PM (#15543597)
    That borg icon finally got to him ... should be ashamed of yourselves!
  • by sakusha (441986) on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:02PM (#15543599)
    Same as the old Boss.
  • Thank you (Score:5, Funny)

    by murat (262137) on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:02PM (#15543604)
    Thank you Bill, for everything you've done for the industry and the world.
    • Thank you Bill, for everything you've done for the industry and the world.

      Signed, Steve Jobs

      -- PS: I'll fucking kill you.
    • Re:Thank you (Score:4, Insightful)

      by Geoffreyerffoeg (729040) on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:18PM (#15543803)
      I think he's serious. Gates did force a power-hungry company on us - but he forced a power-hungry company that made a profit from popularizing the personal computer. I doubt the PC would be quite as popular today as it is if it weren't for Gates.
      • by Surt (22457) on Thursday June 15 2006, @05:17PM (#15544385) Homepage Journal
        I can't see how someone familiar with the history of the computer industry could think that ... if anything I think the PC would be quite a bit more popular today had MS never existed.
      • Re:Thank you (Score:5, Insightful)

        by ClickOnThis (137803) on Thursday June 15 2006, @08:17PM (#15545623) Journal
        Gates did force a power-hungry company on us - but he forced a power-hungry company that made a profit from popularizing the personal computer. I doubt the PC would be quite as popular today as it is if it weren't for Gates.

        Frankly, I think the PC became popular in spite of Bill Gates, not because of him.

        We should really thank IBM, for creating a PC design that (unlike Apple's) could be "commoditized", and then Compaq, for creating the clone industry. That's what really led to the popularity of the PC, not the mediocre software that ran on it.
  • by dankelley (573611) on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:03PM (#15543624)
    Give the boy credit, for planning to devote his time to charity work.
  • by nstlgc (945418) on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:04PM (#15543626)
    I bet he just wants to make sure he makes it into heaven after all...
  • by Nesetril (969734) on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:04PM (#15543633)
    July 2008 - is that before or after Vista ships?
  • Resume (Score:5, Funny)

    by Thunderstruck (210399) on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:04PM (#15543634)
    What part(s) of my resume should I brush up when applying for the job of "master villian and arch-nemisis of WonderTorvalds?"

    On a more serious note, there are a lot of people with large emotional investments pent up in disliking Mr. Gates. The transition is going to be tough. It's almost like Inigo Montoya at the end of The Princess Bride. Maybe they should turn to piracy?
  • Oh, no! (Score:5, Funny)

    by Spaceman40 (565797) <[blinks] [at] [acm.org]> on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:05PM (#15543638) Homepage Journal
    Whatever will we do with the Borg-Gates icon?
  • who knew (Score:5, Funny)

    by User 956 (568564) on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:05PM (#15543643) Homepage
    "I believe with great wealth comes great responsibility"

    Who would have guessed that Bill Gates was also Spider-man?
  • by bitrate (460396) on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:07PM (#15543674)
    ....to create a new Microsoft icon for /. I felt a slight chill as I read the article, realizing that if Bill Gates is stepping down, he must be getting kinda older....which means I'm getting kinda older. It's been an interesting ride through the years with Microsoft. Thanks for everything, Bill, and best of luck with your philanthropy. My city in particular (Windsor, ON, Canada) has benefitted from the B&MG foundation with new computers in our library for public use.
  • Thanks Bill (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:13PM (#15543745)
    I would just like to say thanks to Bill for his continuing work with the Gates foundation. I don't see the other multibillionares (Google guys, Redhat guys, Ellison, Jobs, etc) stepping up to the plate and making any commitment EVEN CLOSE to the level he has. All I see those guys doing is buying fighter planes, boats, sports teams and big houses. Good luck Bill!
      • Re:Thanks Bill (Score:5, Informative)

        by WalterGR (106787) on Thursday June 15 2006, @05:46PM (#15544626) Homepage

        You should address your good wishes to Melinda. Gates did very little beneficial before he met her, and ever since they married, he's started spending more and more on philantropy. To me that's exactly the sign of a man under the soft but efficient control of his wife slowly turning him around to what she wants.

        "You may be interested to know that global warming, earthquakes, hurricanes, and other natural disasters are a direct effect of the shrinking numbers of Pirates since the 1800s. For your interest, I have included a graph of the approximate number of pirates versus the average global temperature over the last 200 years. As you can see, there is a statistically significant inverse relationship between pirates and global temperature." (Source [venganza.org])

        Correlation does not imply causation. Denigrating his generosity on account of when he was generous is just plain rude.

  • Doubtful (Score:4, Funny)

    by wardk (3037) on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:15PM (#15543768) Journal
    So how long can he stay out of the game? Not long I suspect.

    just wait until he notices his company following antitrust law, behaving ethically, paying to license code they use.

    he'll swoop right in and put a stop to that real fast
  • He's got a loooooong list to clear out before he can get positive on karma.
  • by timholman (71886) on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:20PM (#15543838)
    Bill Gates is doing the same thing that Carnegie, Rockefeller, Vanderbilt, Morgan, and the other 19th century robber barons did - he is transitioning from the persona of a despised, cut-throat, take-no-prisoners monopolist to that of a benign philanthropist, and spending the billions he acquired in order to ensure his legacy. And just like the robber barons the 1800s, I have no doubt that Gates will be viewed as a wonderful benefactor of humanity a hundred years from now. Only the historians will remember how many people and companies he mercilessly crushed to create his fortune.
    • by edbarbar (234498) on Thursday June 15 2006, @05:06PM (#15544305)

      So what? He's doing good, isn't he? Why do you care about the motives? Do you hate Bill Gates more than the good he is doing (this is not a rhetorical question)?

      Regarding what he did to other companies, he outcompeted them. I was at Novell and saw the errors at Novell cause it to fail, not helped at all by uSoft, so I have every reason to be bitter, but I'm not.

      Bill Gates (or rather uSoft) was caught violating the rules on a number of occasions, and they were punished, but it's not as if uSoft was an Enron or manipulated the US govt. as some large utilities and the ILECs do. I suspect breaking weak govt. rules is standard fare at the titan level too, and I don't think you can deprecate uSoft or Bill Gates for taking no prisoners. That's what business is all about: structured warfare, and the goal is to win. He won.

      By the way, I'm certainly no uSoft fan, and I have zero insight into what Bill Gates is as a person, but I can admire his achievements without being either incredibly jealous or bitter.
  • Ambition... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Rice-Pudding (167484) on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:20PM (#15543842)
    Gates is still ambitious.

    Bill Gates has achieved what most people only dream of in terms of their life's ambitions. What do most people want? Money? Sure, but that is not the end of everything. Most (normal) people actually want to make a contribution to society/the world; to leave a legacy, if you will. (Granted, Bill has already done that.)

    So when you have succeeded beyond your wildest ambitions, then what? Gates cannot actually spend his money on himself fast enough. There comes a point when you start to want to spend it on your legacy instead. Hence, the charity funding. But this is still ambition.

    (Of course, I wish more people would reach that stage.)
  • The End of an Era? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Banner (17158) on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:56PM (#15544214) Journal
    Like him or not, Bill Gates did a lot for personal computers, and honestly, those of us who use them and even the world. MicroSoft wrote a lot of good compilers and a lot of good programs, and while many may gripe, windows, windows98, windowsNT and windowsXP were pretty damn good products.

    Bill was rare in that he had vision and the ability to do technical things, and was a very driven person. He was the guy we all loved, then when he got rich he was the guy we all loved to 'hate'. But I remember what it was like before him, and he really did help change the world.

    At this point the only person left from the original shakers and movers is Steve Jobs. Steve isn't much of a technical person, but he has been a visionary in the past equal to Bill. I have to wonder how much longer till he bows out?

    And to be completely honest, it makes me wonder what the next bunch of 'snotty nosed kids' (as my compsci prof used to call Gates, Jobs, and Woz) will come up with. Every time an Era ends, a new one starts after all...
  • by I'm Don Giovanni (598558) on Thursday June 15 2006, @06:03PM (#15544788)
    Those of you calling Gates "evil", "villainous", etc, in order to belittle his philanthropic activities, consider this:
    The companies that Gates "crushed" were rich companies whose execs had become rich themselves.
    So Gates took from those rich fat cats (through unethical means, according to the Gates haters), and is now giving to the poor. That makes him a high-tech Robin Hood. And just like the government tried to bring down Robin Hood, they tried to bring down Gates. What say you to that? ;-)
  • by ZoneGray (168419) on Thursday June 15 2006, @06:44PM (#15545068) Homepage
    This is the beauty of capitalism. No matter how rich and powerful you are, you still get fired when you screw up.

    • Re:Uhhhh... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Jon Peterson (1443) <jon@@@snowdrift...org> on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:08PM (#15543682) Homepage
      Let's see:

      Gates - creates world's most successful company, becomes world's richest man, leaves day job to spend billions on charity.
      Us - Made lame borg jokes for 5 years, finally released a browser that's better than IE if you ignore all the unfixed copy/paste bugs. Convinced a few people that Unix sucked less than Windows.

      Dude, I think *he* won.
      • Re:Uhhhh... (Score:4, Interesting)

        by linvir (970218) * on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:19PM (#15543824)
        creates world's most successful company, becomes world's richest man, leaves day job to spend billions on charity

        You left out 'shapes computing the world over' (on the desktop).

        Gates kicks ass. He'd be the perfect role model if it weren't for some of his less savoury feats.

      • Re:Uhhhh... (Score:5, Insightful)

        by rmpotter (177221) on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:41PM (#15544059) Homepage
        Yes -- brilliant! You've captured the essences of the Slashdot v Microsoft "drama".

        And congratulations to Bill for having the sense to move on with his life. Microsoft may not be the most ethical of companies, but they are no Enron. Bill Gates is no Kenneth Lay. If you want some other perspective, compare Gates with Jobs [wired.com]. I don't know what Larry Ellison is doing these days, but in the past, his main "philanthropic" ambition was to donate to an anti-aging research foundation.
    • by LibertineR (591918) on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:16PM (#15543774)
      I give Gates credit for wanting to devote more time to his charitable activities.

      That said, I think it is time to sell off the rest of my shares, since the man who gave the world Lotus Notes is now the Chief Software Architect at Microsoft. Sorry Ray, you are a good guy, but I cant forgive you for Notes, my man.

    • by vertinox (846076) on Thursday June 15 2006, @04:42PM (#15544071)
      Gates DID make computers affordable.

      I wouldn't say that. He more or less make computers standard or in a sense... Got everything to run on the same operating system.

      If you want to talk about making computers affordable... Then you'll have to give the credit to the Intel, AMD, and Cyrix price wars of 1995-2000.

      (Although if you think about the saying "What intel giveth, microsoft taketh away." then maybe they caused a bit of motivation in that price and speed war)