

Microsoft Slams Google Over Threat To Shut Search Engine in Australia (ft.com) 44
Microsoft has moved to capitalise on Google's threat to shut its search engine in Australia, throwing its weight behind efforts to make Big Tech pay for news content and offering to transfer small businesses to its rival service Bing at no cost. From a report: The Seattle-based company on Wednesday slammed Google's threat to exit Australia [Editor's note: the link may be paywalled; alternative source] over the news media bargaining code and said it fully supported a draft law aimed at forcing technology groups to pay news providers for content. "One thing is clear: while other tech companies may sometimes threaten to leave Australia, Microsoft will never make such a threat," said Brad Smith, Microsoft's president, in a statement. "We are committed to supporting the country's national security and economic success."
Canberra's proposed news media bargaining code would introduce binding arbitration and non-discrimination clauses to protect publishers and force Google and Facebook to negotiate payments for carrying their content. Google has a 94.5 per cent market share in search in Australia, while Microsoft's Bing search engine holds 3.6 per cent, according to StatCounter, a web analytics company. Microsoft's decision to throw down the gauntlet will complicate Google's aggressive lobbying campaign against the draft legislation, which it has called "unworkable" and "unreasonable." Mel Silva, Google Australia's chief executive, said last month that if the code became law, Google would have "no real choice but to stop providing search in Australia."
Canberra's proposed news media bargaining code would introduce binding arbitration and non-discrimination clauses to protect publishers and force Google and Facebook to negotiate payments for carrying their content. Google has a 94.5 per cent market share in search in Australia, while Microsoft's Bing search engine holds 3.6 per cent, according to StatCounter, a web analytics company. Microsoft's decision to throw down the gauntlet will complicate Google's aggressive lobbying campaign against the draft legislation, which it has called "unworkable" and "unreasonable." Mel Silva, Google Australia's chief executive, said last month that if the code became law, Google would have "no real choice but to stop providing search in Australia."
Fine... (Score:5, Insightful)
This is how competition works - if Microsoft wants to replace Google in Australia, they can. We can then see if the laws are "unreasonable" and "unworkable". If so, then Microsoft will leave soon, too, and Australians can then just ask a passing 'roo for news and other search results. If not, maybe this is a reasonable and workable model to keep news organizations in business.
Re:Fine... (Score:4, Funny)
just ask a passing 'roo for news and other search results
Well at least you'd hear something positive for a change.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Perhaps. But do you think Microsoft is offering to pay news organizations to index and/or link to their content? Or does Bing just not include their content in its searches?
If they're essentially offering to pay for something in order to get a leg up on their competition, that might not be kosher - especially if Windows is still considered to have a monopoly on the desktop, and they're willing to operate Bing at a loss to hurt the competition.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3)
From the Google's FAQ:
"In this proposed law, “news” is defined vaguely and broadly—way beyond what most of us would consider “news”. There seems to be no clear or obvious distinction between news and non-news content, and the way that Google works, there is no algorithm that could navigate such a vague and broad definition."
Re: (Score:3)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: Fine... (Score:2)
So if it's about indexing news sites - don't index them and see the result.
Re: (Score:1)
It seems Microsoft hasn't lost its backstabbing tricks.
Virtue signaling, pathetic edition. (Score:3, Funny)
Aka Microsoft comemrcial/traimwreck edition. ;)
Re: (Score:1)
I'm still using products from China though, so I suppose I'm just as guilty. If the world seems ugly it's only because when you ge
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Such Rant! Much Spittle! Wow.
Re: (Score:3)
I think Microsoft are saying that they do *not* claim any moral high ground, but are willing to roll over at the smallest command given the opportunity.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not bullshit, it's marketing. No one gives a shit about pot vs kettle situation. This is an attempt to pretend to have the high ground.
Re: (Score:1)
To bad Google won't (Score:1)
Would Microsoft withdraw Windows? (Score:5, Interesting)
So many possible scenarios. A country forced to use Linux would be fun.
Re: (Score:1)
If you want to see the new 'Fox News' just tune into Sky News Australia. They are more pro-Trump than Fox and Newsmax combined. Strange considering how far Oz is from the so called 'land of the free'.
Re: (Score:2)
Geoblocking / Geododging (Score:1)
Just pay up, Microsoft (Score:2)
Then we'll see how you like it.
in other news, (Score:2)
... Microsoft bought a controlling interest in UPI, Reuters, FOX News, the NYT, the WAPO, CNN, TNN, the Guardian, Le Monde,....
Is that a threat? (Score:2)
If I was a small business owner and was told Microsoft would move me to Bing, I would threaten to sue for loss of business.
Don't forget ... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Let 'em leave (Score:5, Informative)
I predict that a lack of Google search within a week would drive those same news organizations into the ground. Few people fire up a news website and nobody in their right mind will pay for them. Information is no longer the exclusive commodity it once was and why would I bother with a local web site when I could reach out to any number of international sites with broader reach than the usual suspects in Australia.
This entire shitfest is due to Murdoch's news organizations and their control of the Liberal government. As usual, the Libs sell the Australian people down the river for their mates in business so they can be paid exorbitant 'consulting' fees once they retire from Parliament.
Google is guilty of a lot, but provision of search benefits both consumers and the news organizations it directs those consumers to. Those organizations would make more money if they weren't so fucking obnoxious, so they can cry me a fucking river. They're assholes and I can't wait for the lack of Google Search to teach them a lesson.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Few people fire up a news website
It was a couple of years ago now, but I used to manage an IT Dept and had to produce a Proxy report every month. The most common sites were consistently smh.com.au, news.com.au and realestate.com.au, along with standard Google, Facebook etc. So I think you're wrong.
As usual, the Libs sell the Australian people down the river for their mates in business so they can be paid exorbitant 'consulting' fees once they retire from Parliament.
Them guys over there, they're bad ones. And us here, we're the good ones, right?
Just curious, since you seem so emotionally attached to their subject, if you are Australian, why are you using the word asshole instead of arsehole? How very unAust
Good luck with... (Score:2)
...those archaic ten year old Bing search result.
Microsoft, you're my hero! (Score:2)
Secret Sauce (Score:2)
Google is a scam company. (Score:2)