Video Games and the Hi-Def Format Wars 260
Pika the Mad writes "Reuters has a concise but interesting article up about how video games will help decide the format war between Blu-ray and HD DVD. According to industry analysts "What Sony and Microsoft decide to announce publicly or to dealers at E3 next week will be key." So this year's E3 could very well be a deciding factor in how you view your movie library for years to come."
I still watch Beta (Score:3, Funny)
Though i might upgrade to one of them fancy color tvs i keep hearing about sometime this summer.
Re:I still watch Beta (Score:3, Informative)
Real determiners of HD format wars (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Real determiners of HD format wars (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Real determiners of HD format wars (Score:2)
Re:Real determiners of HD format wars (Score:3, Insightful)
And what they do sell as elite porn... Well what can you expect from the pr0n industry after all?
Re:Real determiners of HD format wars (Score:3, Insightful)
(Incidentally, I also think that this is the direction that movie distribution will take.)
Re:Real determiners of HD format wars (Score:3, Insightful)
You want to pick the winner? Look at the market for family entertainment.
How much do you think the Harry Potter franchise is worth to Time-Warner? To Walmart? It has made J.K. Rowling richer than the Queen.
Is there a market for HD porn? (Score:5, Interesting)
The real determiners of the HD format wars will be the adult DVD producers.
Conventional wisdom is that adult DVD doesn't want high definition, as the 480-line output of standard definition production hides the imperfections in erotic actors' skin.
Re:Is there a market for HD porn? (Score:2)
That sort of thing is a lot of why it's so much more expensive to make an HD program over an SD one. Every imperfection shows up where previously, it would be hidden by the low resolution of the camera.
"Star Trek" took advantage of this in its Next Generation series -- the red labels on all sorts of access panels have a visible number on them that you would think is for inventory control or for referring to
Re:Is there a market for HD porn? (Score:2)
Many older series are being shown in HD (Knight Rider, older Law & Order, etc) because they used film rather than video.
The problems come in on things like aspect ratio (depending on the film process, there may be enough frame for 16:9 aspect ratio... but things like microphone booms, the sides of sets, etc, may be in it). So a fair amount of re-editing is required.
Interesting, but untrue (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Interesting, but untrue (Score:3, Insightful)
Industry analysts are
Re:Interesting, but untrue (Score:2)
I agree that console games likely will not have much impact. Anyone with a HDTV is not likely to be satisfied with the 'HD' quality that would be produced by a console DVD player anyway.
The winner will of course be the format with the best price/performance and availability.
Re:Interesting, but untrue (Score:2)
Which, right now anyways, is HD-DVD. I've hardly heard about people flocking out en masse to pick up the four movies that are out. I think price over anything else will become the determining factor, as cheaper products tend to win out in capitalist societies. I'll wait a few months for both formats to be decently available to wait about this, but seeing that the HD-DVD players cost half of that of a Blu-Ray, and ar
Re:Interesting, but untrue (Score:5, Insightful)
I doubt it.
If the novie plays that will be the end of it for just about everyone.
If one click in Vista or OSX saves HD to your hard drive or low-res to a portable player, so much the better.
But only a Geek to give a damn about codecs, cables and connectors, or the fine points of managed copy. Everyone else will just buy the standard color-coded MCE bundles from Dell or HP and be up and running in under an hour.
Non-Adopters (Score:2)
No, my VHS and DVD players should work pretty much the same way they do now, for the foreseeable future. Considering the installed based of non-HD TVs and DVD players hooked up to them, I don't see Plain Old DVD disappearing from the shelves any time soon. (Just look how long ye olde VHS held on.) So I'll just continue watching my library of VHS tapes and buying/renting PODVDs until these mutuall
To be completely honest (Score:5, Insightful)
I mean I'd like Hi-def, but the amount it's going to cost me to upgrade and all the hassles with the competing standards, the retarded prices they'll be charging, the 'oh this can't play on your PC as we don't like the connector you're using' blah blah
I just can't be bothered. DVD'll do me fine for a few more years - and after that I'll be sticking to media-less content.
Re:To be completely honest (Score:5, Insightful)
My thoughts exactly. Why buy either when both will be replaced by direct download? Until then, the DVD is good enough. In fact, DVD will probably be around much longer than that, just as the floppy is still around today.
People keep comparing the BluRay vs HD-DVD war to the VHS vs Betamax war, but I think the comparison is flawed. This is more like the Zip-disk vs LS120 "war." Remember that? People wanted to know which format would replace the floppy disk, but both are now irrelevant. The difference is simple - VHS and Betamax both competed in a market where there was no existing alternative, while the Zip-disk and LS120 competed in a market with a well-entrenched but less-capable alternative. In the end, better technologies like flash drives, email, and networks destroyed the market for the high-capacity floppy replacements. Meanwhile, the floppy itself still lives on for the few things it can still do well, like system recovery. For the same reason, the DVD wil still be with us years after the HD-DVD and BluRay are forgotten. How else will we watch our massive collections of "old DVDs?"
Re:To be completely honest (Score:2)
Unfortunately, the floppy is disappearing. I miss it- my recent computer I bought doesn't have a floppy drive. While I haven't run into any problems because of it, it makes me kind of uneasy.
Of course, if one of the optical drives fails, I still have another one already in the machine, and then the four or so in other computers at home... and now that I think about it, floppies were ridiculously unreliable
why buy? (Score:2)
I'm also excited for subscription audio services.
Re:To be completely honest (Score:2)
And the pricetag doesn't bother me one bit.
Re:To be completely honest (Score:5, Interesting)
Frankly, HD-DVD and BluRay displays at such a high resolution, I can't imagine that half the people that buy HDTV sets can even see any actual quality difference between an HDTV version of a movie and a standard DVD version without buy a television so large that few if any can afford it. My eyes aren't that good. Hell, my TV isn't that good, and I don't want to and am not going to buy one until this one gets broken beyond repair (and there's a very good TV repair place near here, so that's not very likely).
Also, there's little actual advantage that I can see in the HD-DVD/BluRay over the DVD format, aside from a reduction in the number of discs needed for big movie sets (like the LotR special editions, TV series, etc) but that kind of economy isn't going to last very long. The content size will expand to fit the media. Video games used to be dwarfed by the capacity of CDs, now they're pushing the limits of multiple DVDs, multiple HD-DVD/BluRay will soon follow so that doesn't really solve the multiple disc problem permanently. DVD had very clear advantages over VHS. HD-DVD's advantages are not so clear.
Re:To be completely honest (Score:3, Informative)
RCA 52" Widescreen Projection HDTV, HD52W59 [walmart.com] $ 894 USD
Re:To be completely honest (Score:2)
Irrelevant for the purposes of a discussion about HD-DVD and Blu-ray, as the TV you link to does not include the required HDCP connection. Care to try again?
Re:To be completely honest (Score:4, Informative)
For those who don't know the nomenclature, DVI-HDTV is the proper name for a DVI input with HDCP support included. It is fully compatible with HDMI via use of a simple adapter cable from HDMI sources, or can accept direct DVI sources, both with HDCP 'protection'.
Re:To be completely honest (Score:5, Insightful)
Folks, anyone else out there realize that $900 is extremely expensive for the average joe to spend on a TV? Let's see, the majority of TVs are bought by late teens and 20-somethings, heading out into the world, or college bound to fit in their tiny apartments or basement flats. As they have famillies, SOME will become wealthy enough to spend $500 on a 30" TV, most will be happy with a 20" (as my familly has been for years), an elite few will be purchasing $800 widescreen, rear projection systems with surround sound equipment. The /. community is a VERY BAD sample of mainstream society. Most (not all) /.ers are middle class to to upper class citizens, as they had the fortune of being able to be introduced to high techology at an early age (I know there's a few of you here and there that are exceptions, but you are a minority). Also, we LOVE gadgets and technology, and various forms of entertainment. And still, from what I'm seeing, the majority of people even HERE wouldn't even benefit from HD.
Take off your rosie colored glasses and realize:I haven't done a direct comparison, but going to take a guess that HD will only be of real significantly noticable difference on 40"+ TVs. That's an extremely tiny part of the market. Most everyone else is fat and happy, and would rather spend their time trying to figure out a way of paying less at the pump.
Funny, I consider myself a film buff, I even work as a video editor and producer at a TV station, my life litterally revolves around the tube, yet I have zero interest in any of this HD stuff. When I see a movie, I don't care if it has the nth degree of resolution. My favorite movie of the year was "Good Night & Good Luck", how is HD going to help that? Even if "King Kong" was the hit movie of the year, I really don't see how HD is going to "increase my viewing pleasure", the graphics were neat enough as it was. This is 100% hype driven by video equipment manufacturers. Hollywood doesn't care (in fact, they'll be the big losers of this, because it might make more people stay home then go to the theatre), the mainstream public doesn't care, NOONE CARES! When The NES begot the SNES, the entire gaming community was ready for a change in quality, when VHS begot DVD, most people were ready for a media distrobution change to match their music media (notice I didn't say "quality", DVD adoption wasn't about quality, it was about convenience). People would still be using VHS if it weren't for the added convenience of DVDs, HD doesn't add any convenience. I seriously think that the HD revolution is going to die even before it gets off the ground. When 95% of the population goes to the store, see sa DVD version of a movie and an HD version of the same movie for twice the price, and buys the DVD version, suddenly the HD manufacturers are going to look a bit green around the gills.
The immediate future of movie distorbution is in cheap, simple, low-bandwidth internet distrobution. The population won't care if quality takes a hit, just as audio quality took a hit with the iPod. The TV manufacturers know this, so they're desperate to get a new media off the ground before traditional media distrobution becomes a thing of the past. Even if HD gets off the ground, they're only buying a little time, maybe a year or two. I bet you anything that even if everyone switches over to HD, the average citizen will be willing to fall back to non-HD if renting a movie becomes as simple as iTMS.
Re:To be completely honest (Score:2)
The New York Tines has HDTV in 19% of american households. The Geek is the last to know.
The RCA model is a bog standard entrant from Walmart.com, marketed for sale to middle class families, the core market for projection TV. It isn't by chance that Harry Potter is on the fast track for HD release.
Re:To be completely honest (Score:3, Interesting)
well, movie theaters costs $20-45 per person. Large screen TV's were not a replacement for the Movie theater in quality. $900 HDTV seams like it would be.
so that TV costs equivalent 20 persons visits to the theater, or 10 date visits, or 5 family visits.
my 42" TV, and Netflix subscription has so far (1 year) eliminated the thought of a Movie theater from my house. But the regular DVD wouldn't el
Re:To be completely honest (Score:3, Informative)
Re:To be completely honest (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:To be completely honest (Score:2)
Re:To be completely honest (Score:2)
What the media is sold on I dont give a crap about except insofar as the format has to allow easy transfer to the mediaserver. And it appears neither of these obsolete-before-they-hit-the-shelves formats are going to deliver.
HD-DVD managed copy (Score:5, Informative)
What the media is sold on I dont give a crap about except insofar as the format has to allow easy transfer to the mediaserver. And it appears neither of these obsolete-before-they-hit-the-shelves formats are going to deliver.
HD-DVD allows the owner of an authentic disc to make a so-called "managed copy" on a conforming (proprietary) media server.
Re:HD-DVD managed copy (Score:2)
Re:To be completely honest (Score:3, Insightful)
Exactly. Why bother? It's so much less expensive to use standard DVD, I already have the equipment, there are lots of movies available, my TV upsamples to get close to HD resolution (it can't resolve small stuff that was never resolvable in the first place -- not like those magical photoshop plugins CSI has --, but it makes the picture look much better).
And then look at the prices. $300 and u
Sony's strange plans, two-many-formats wars (Score:4, Interesting)
I just don't get Sony's plans...
DVD-video was a success because it is the only digital format and all studios support it. From now on, it's a three-head race with Blu-Ray, HD-DVD and the good-enough-for-most-of-consumers ol' DVD.
I'm happy with what I can rip and view as I like ^_^
Re:Sony's strange plans, two-many-formats wars (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Sony's strange plans, two-many-formats wars (Score:2, Informative)
How did the industry react when the PS2 was released? they were still selling $500 DVD players that did just about the same amount (just they could play VCD's) as the PS2, the only problem I ever had with the PS2 DVD Player (which was my first) was the audio on the launch models were extremely low, I remember
Formats are Irrelevant (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Formats are Irrelevant (Score:3, Insightful)
25-100 gig BR discs showing content in hd will appeal to home theater afficiondo's first and as prices go down it will whittle down to the general masses.
Have you seen the difference? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Have you seen the difference? (Score:2)
Re:Have you seen the difference? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Have you seen the difference? (Score:2)
People with low end stuff like that walmart "HD" TV will not.
There is a difference sitting at the back of an IMAX movie theater vs your local movie outfit.
LCoS TVs are absolutely beautiful. DVD resolution on one at 80-100" simply does not cut it, and that is with a $2,000 upscaler.
I know that many here are happy with the free low quality downloads of video and audio on the net, but rational or not, there
Re:Have you seen the difference? (Score:2)
Disagree - I haven't yet seen a computer based video player that does as good a job as my stand-alone upscaling DVD player, and most are considerably worse. MPlayer is fairly close, but forget about anything else...
Re:Have you seen the difference? (Score:2)
I find DVDs don't look anywhere near as nice since I upgraded my home theatre system [mikebabcock.ca] to include an HDTV. I now watch HD shows like CSI which look absolutely astoundingly beautiful then I put in a DVD and find its grainy. Upconverted or not, there's a huge resolution difference between the two.
I'd posit that most people who can't see the difference either don't have true HD HDTV sets or need glasses (really). If you find road signs fuzzy on the side of the road, you shouldn't bother with HD.
Re:Have you seen the difference? (Score:2)
Being a science geek I watch CSI, too. But I have to laugh at the irony here: watching in HD a show which frequently does BS crap like get a 1024x768 perfectly-sharp image from a crappy VGA-resolution or worse security camera. I'd like to know how they're doing that, because as far as I know it's impossible to insert back data never recorded by the camera in the first place.
I guess they're using computers with flux-capacitor PCI cards
Re:Have you seen the difference? (Score:2)
1920x1200 may be available with a (expensive) computer display, but not in a TV.
I don't think I've used 800x600 in many years.
Re:Have you seen the difference? (Score:2)
I can tell the difference. If, y'know, I look hard at a TV almost twice the size of my own. Now ask me if I care enough to replace my DVD collection
Re:Have you seen the difference? (Score:2)
I will vote "no comment"... (Score:4, Interesting)
I don't care about SACD or DVD-A, and don't care about the two HD movie formats either. I just want a bigger write-once media format to store my own stuff.
Re:I will vote "no comment"... (Score:5, Funny)
Be vewy, vewy qwiet, we'ah hunting video fawmats. Heh, heh, heh, heh, heh!
KFG
HD-DVD vs Blu-Ray - does either offer more? (Score:2, Interesting)
Meanwhile, it certainly looks like Sony are going to be able to use the PS3 to drive through a huge installed base of Blu-Ray machines.
From an experience point of view, why should we care? Well, I was at a conference in London where the dreaded Bill Gates spoke, but he did say something I found interesting: he said that "soon, the
Re:HD-DVD vs Blu-Ray - does either offer more? (Score:2)
I don't care about high def in games (Score:2, Funny)
Making the pixels sharper with hq4x (Score:2)
Try running your Spectrum emulator in Scale4x [sourceforge.net] or hq4x [hiend3d.com] mode and seeing if it makes the pixels sharper.
The 360 is Not a Factor Here (Score:2, Interesting)
What is the trend according to the past ? (Score:2, Insightful)
Music industry promoted the classic black disc
Music industry promoted the tape
Music industry promoted the CD
Video/Movie industry promoted VHS/Beta
Video/Movie industry promoted DVD
Console games initially used cartridges then moved to CD then to DVD. They always had to adapt to the market directed by the music and the video industry. Actually the music industry is pretty much overwhelmed by the MP3/Internet "media". So I really think the video industry (and of course the consumers of that industry) will
Re:What is the trend according to the past ? (Score:2)
Re:What is the trend according to the past ? (Score:2)
The major standards for videogames over the past few years have been
A: cartridges, a unique videogame phenomenon
B: CD's, which didn't catch on in gaming until long after the basic audio CD was standard (though drove PC CD sales).
C: DVD's, which consoles had a hand in popularizing.
The company I wo
"NEITHER" (Score:3, Insightful)
Perhaps if digital television had taken off a few years earlier, pushing higher-def TVs and better home theater sound into a majority of households, this might be a winning proposition... but for now, most people are quite happy with the DVD experience.
Unlike the transition between video tape and DVD, the improvements moving to HD are far more elusive, and when finally observable, are not really all that great over the "old" DVD format. Early reviews state that a clear difference is only discernable at very high screen sizes; and at the prices those extra-large format, hi-def TVs run, only the most affluent will be able to afford to see what the hype is all about.
In the end, there's no point declaring anybody a winner in "next gen" DVD until the Walmart crowd gets behind it, and "old" DVDs fade into oblivion.
Games deciding DVD Format? (Score:4, Funny)
This was the first month I bought a game on DVD format instead of the 6 CD package. For the past year they've been charging a *premium* for the DVD packaging.
Who REALLY CARES what format the consoles select? It's a closed system most certainly DRM'd to the nuts. It'll be at least five years (after they make up their minds) before I see any games in a hi-def DVD packaging.
Uhh.. (Score:2)
Every game that has exceeded the capcity of one CD was put on DVD. Sometimes publishers still opt for a two-disc packaging rather than a daul layer DVD packaging (Xenosaga was dual layr DVD, the sequal packaged as two single layer DVD).
The point is, printing one DVD is cheaper than printing a set of CD
Re:Uhh.. (Score:2)
I think he's refering to PC games. For some reason, it seems that game makers prefer to send games as a stack of CDs rather than a DVD, despite the fact that a DVD drive has been pretty much standard equipment on any computer that someone would buy to play games on for atleast a couple of years. I'm not sure why they do this, but due to the harddrive in the PC you usually don't have to swap disks that much.
Re:Uhh.. (Score:2)
For some reason there are a vocal base of PC gamers who are happy to shell out $300 for a 7900GT but not $30 for a DVD-ROM drive. They whine and throw a hissy fit when a game isn't available on CD.
Re:Games deciding DVD Format? (Score:2)
You need to not think of this issue as a geek. Instead, look at it from the point of view of the mass of early adopters - Namely, 18-30YO males, usually slightly more tech-saavy than average but not actually geeks. They can set their DVD player's clock, they can manage most AV equipment cabling, they can probably correctly assemble an out-of-the-box computer (though not safely do anything inside the case).
These folks will buy (at least) one of the next
And the Winner Is... (Score:5, Insightful)
But the article totally misses the dark horse candidate which I, with my great knowledge and keen insight of the market, predict will be the real winner.
The losers will be both BLU-RAY and HD-DVD. The winner will be downloaded content.
All of the game systems are network centric. In order to get much benefit out of any of the systems you practically have no choice but to connect them to the internet and that is typically going to be a broad-band connection too.
Combine that ubiquitous high-speed internet connectivity with the high-powered processing built into these systems and you have the ideal platform for media distribution using new highly efficient codecs like h.264.
An hour of 720p encoded with h.264 to just 1GB looks pretty good. In most cases it looks a lot better than a DVD. A low-end 1.5Mbps (DSL) connection can transfer that 1GB in under 2 hours. A mid-range 8mbps (comcast cable) connection can transfer it in less than 20 minutes, and high-end 20mbps (Verizon FIOS fibre) will do it in under 10 minutes with plenty of bandwidth to spare.
This combination of processing and network throughput will make it feasible to sell direct downloaded hi-def video to anyone with one of these game consoles.
I believe that just as MP3's portability convenience trounced the non-portable high-def audio products like SACD and DVD-Audio, so too will downloaded (possibly, but not necessarily) pay-per-view hi-def tv and movies.
Of course the quality of 1080p at 8G/hr with h.264 will be significantly better than just 720p at 1G/hr - but for many people the lower quality will be still be more than good enough, and for the videophile, waiting a little bit longer for the download of a top-notch 1080p encoding won't be a terrible inconvenience.
Re:And the Winner Is... (Score:2)
On hi-speed fibre, you won't have to wait even for an 8GB encode. The hour it takes to send is still faster than the movie itself, so your provider will stream it to your set-top box, and you'll just watch it as it arrives.
Re: (Score:2)
actually.., those are H.264 (Score:2)
I would think you could do okay at 1G/hour in H.264. I would think 2G/hour in H.264 would look nearly identical to the MPEG-2 8G/hour source materials.
That having been said, the poster sets the bar absurdly low. "Better than DVD"? DVD looks like poop. I'm not going to buy a movie in a format that looks only as good as DVD.
In the end, I can play a DVD as long as I want and take it to other places. These downloads will be DRMed to high heaven, locked to a given
Re: (Score:2)
what about the porn industry (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:what about the porn industry (Score:2)
Re:what about the porn industry (Score:2)
There really must be something wrong with the RIAA's theory about piracy then, and the /. people must be right - video sales have slumped because the content is worthless!
Which suggests that neither format will go anywhere until content improves.
IMHO, MP3 has taught the consumer that content and media are separable, and the public will either buy what ever is cheapest, or hold out for dual format drives.
Why Bother? (Score:2)
If people really cared about getting the ultimate quality in their viewing, DivX and Xvid would not be so popular as they further degrade the image quality.
The only benefit I can see in Bluray is as a storage medium. I have lots of st
Stuck (Score:2)
But now I find myself in the market for a new laptop, and whaddaya know, there are mode
Well (Score:2)
Why? (Score:2)
But seriously, how many people really want a higher def DVD player? How many people are going to really care about the difference?
The new "format" that is going to beat both Blu-Ray and HD-DVD will be the net. How many people are buying high-end CD walkmans? Do they even make high end CD walkmans any more? Everyone wants an I-Pod or some sort of MP3 player! And how many
Re:Why? (Score:2)
Re:Why? (Score:2)
But the average person would rather listen to a song, encoded in 128kb on their ipod, than to hear it in much higher quality on a high end CD walkman... even though the CD walkman will produce a lot better sound.
We are at the point where the video and audio technology are so good, that people now want other feature
Solution to the format wars (Score:2)
Michael Pachter (Score:3, Interesting)
Will there even be time for a format war? (Score:3, Funny)
The only technical difficulty will be how they'll fit all the logos on the tray door
Up to WHO? (Score:3, Insightful)
Who says I have to buy into whatever HD format they choose? Last time I checked it was still the consumer who's in charge. If nobody buys the format, it will just turn into the next LaserDisc-drops-while-VHS-puffs-on story. If I don't have an HD TV (which I don't) is there any reason for me to upgrade to a differnet format, other than lots more DRM headache?
I don't see why... (Score:2, Interesting)
But, I could be wrong.
Why? (Score:2, Interesting)
Games nowadays barely fill up a single DVD (and a large percentage still comes on 1-2 CDs), what are we talking about here?
DVDs suck (Score:4, Interesting)
The DVD experience is just so bad, and its guaranteed to only get worse with HD formats since all the stupid, cheesy ideas the studios have to 'add value' by ramming advertising, previews and propaganda down your throat as well as 'rich media' navigation screens will simply mean it takes even longer to just watch the f**king movie you wanted to.
Since I have experienced the simplicity and ease of just choosing video files to play off a Freevo menu, I dont think i'll ever buy any kind of video disc player again, unless it comes bundled with a computer which I can use to extract the content that I actually find relevant or desirable, and archive for convenient viewing.
If the MPAA/RIAA dont like the idea that I will choose to spend my time watching only content I find relevant or desirable (for which I am happy to pay for), they can go f**k themselves.
Re:Blu-Ray will win (Score:2)
Re:Blu-Ray will win (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm sorry, but I don't agree. PSP had its own proprietary movie format, and there are probably 1 million PSP sales to date (actually, according to Wikipedia, 10 million units as of oct 2005), yet UMD is struggling/floundering/dying. People do not yet buy video game consoles and let that drive their movie purchases. You're right, no one will buy a $300 add-on. People will just buy a $300 HD-DVD sta
Re:Blu-Ray will win (Score:2)
I'd have bought more UMD movies if I could've plugged them into a box at home so I can watch some of them on something other than my psp. However, if my ps3 is capable of playing bluray movies that a blu ray player is also capable of playing, I will buy those. Assuming that the content restrictions aren't going to grab me by the balls.
Re:Blu-Ray will win (Score:2)
UMDs can ONLY be played on the tiny PSP screen.
Blu-Ray discs on the PS3 can be played on ANY TV. (Low-res on non-HDCP models... just like with a standalone Blu-Ray or HD-DVD player.)
Re:Blu-Ray will win (Score:2)
I don't believe this is a truism anymore. The people I know that purchased a PS2 or an Xbox did not know at first that they were also capable of DVD playback; but they all learned it after the fact (and when necessary bought the required add-ons, in the case of the Xbox).
But on the other hand (arguing against myself, I suppose) we bought two PS2s over th
Re:Blu-Ray will win (Score:2, Informative)
I know that it is certainly not top of the line, but I've never had any issues with it myself and it has been my only DVD player for nearly 2 years.
If it plays it, it works. Real people don't care about 1080p and other "jibberish" to them, they just want to play their movies. I might know what the technical details mean, but I don't care, I just want to sit down on the couch
Re:Blu-Ray will win (Score:2)
"TV system doesn't match" on the Piss 2 (Score:2)
I can't think of one single person, aside from reading on the internet, who has said the PS2's DVD player sucks.
I apologize for only being able to say this through the Internet, but I can give you a more concrete reason why the PS2's DVD player sucks: it can't play all-region DVDs that don't match your TV system. I bought a copy of Wobbl and Bob Volume 1 (all-region PAL), which my Windows PC with DVD-ROM (region 1) and my $60 Apex AD-1200 DVD player (region 1) play fine. My $150 slim PS2 (region 1, NTSC
Re:M$ and Sony are hardly the decision makers. (Score:2)
Frisbees? I them in the mail... (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Bill's uninformed choice (Score:2)