8Mbit Broadband to Become Available in the UK 518
UK Online is offering 8Mbit broadband service to the UK. The upstream is 400K, and there's a monthly download cap of 500GB, but at 40 pounds per month, plus 50 installation and a free wireless router in the package, that has to be among the best deals on offer from anyone.
Dear UK (Score:5, Funny)
40 pounds? Now that's a heavy modem.
Letter
Re:Dear UK (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Dear UK (Score:5, Interesting)
"and there's a monthly download cap of 500GB"
OK, bub, let's see you carry that much pr0n.
If a CD-R weighs 20 grams and holds 700MB, then a spindle of 50 CD-Rs (35 GB) weighs about a kilo, or 2.2 pounds. 14 spindles * 35 GB = 30 pounds.
So you're breaking even (pound for pound as you pound the pud) after about three weeks.
Conversion to Libraries of Congress full of dead-tree editions of Mayfair (it is the UK after all) is left as an exercise for the rest of you wankers. Er, for the student.
P0rn, NOT! (Score:3, Interesting)
For a rabid Linux hacker, it is easy to bust that CAP by downloading DISTROs after DISTROs not to mention package updates after updates.
Try Gentoo Distro [gentoo.org] for starter.
and here in Australia... (Score:2, Informative)
Re:and here in Australia... (Score:4, Informative)
http://bc.whirlpool.net.au/bc-isp.cfm?id=10&s=2
2048 / 384 kbps
400 MB $29.95
12 GB $49.95
Primus DSLAMs will also support ADSL2/2+ when the technology is approved for use in Australia.
Re:and here in Australia... (Score:4, Informative)
The reason prices are so high is above my head but I understand it has to do with the USA charging us for both incoming and outgoing traffic, whilst expecting our traffic to them to be free. Perhaps the FTA will help (not likely!). Someone please comment on this and provide some more info.
For foreign readers, telecommunications in Australia are monopolised by "Telstra", a formerly government owned body with a legal monopoly over the copper wiring throughout the country. Telstra, who see broadband (and hence, VoIP) as a threat to the vast revenue they obtain from local telephone calls, are deliberating holding back broadband within Australia, by preventing speeds over 1.5Mbit and by onselling DSL to third party providers at a port-only cost greater than Telstras retail plans. This of course makes it impossible for anyone to offer DSL at the same price as Telstra without making a loss. Great business model for Telstra, though.
Re:and here in Australia... (Score:2)
Re:and here in Australia... (Score:2)
Re:and here in Australia... (Score:2)
I live in Ireland and for EUR 47/month (about USD $60) I get
- 512/128 kbps
- 16GB cap (either up or down)
- dynamic IP, daily disconnect
Re:and here in Australia... (Score:2)
Re:and here in Australia... (Score:2)
Re:and here in Australia... (Score:3, Informative)
Where I live is right next to one of the major exchanges in Scotland and also covered by our cable company - but the maximum this company can offer me is 1Mbps, which is slower than I have just now.
That's still ~$10/mbps.. (Score:3, Interesting)
Plus.. I *rarely* max out my 1mbps line as it is.. who's going to have a good use for this.. (I don't use BitTorrent, mind.. the donkey does for me).
There is a catch! (Score:3, Funny)
a free wireless router
And how am I supposed to plug in the network cable? I knew there was a catch!
Sigh... (Score:2)
>$85 a month U.S. Jimminy
Re:Sigh... (Score:2, Informative)
Pre-referenced for your pleasure:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom [wikipedia.org]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States [wikipedia.org]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_korea [wikipedia.org]
The population density perspective (Score:2)
Re:Sigh... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Sigh... (Score:2)
Re:Sigh... (Score:3, Insightful)
What does this mean?
TWW
Huh? "Become available" (Score:2, Insightful)
http://www.easynet.net/broadband/broadband_cate
Re:Huh? "Become available" (Score:2, Interesting)
Not really a great deal... (Score:5, Informative)
I pay $105.95 a month for Speakeasy DSL. That is for a connection with 6000kbps down, and 768kbps down. That connection has no bandwidth limits. Not a bad deal, if I do say so myself, considering I can run any servers I want on the connection.
Now let's look at the offer that was described in this article. If we convert 40 UK pounds to US dollars, we see that this connection costs around $75 a month, depending on the exchange rate.
My connection through Speakeasy is roughly $25 a month more, has no bandwidth limits (and 500GB is very easy to reach on a fast connection) and a faster upload speed to boot. There is also no mention as to whether this connection allows servers or not. However, I am guessing it doesn't, considering that Speakeasy is an exception on this policy rather than the rule.
When you consider all of these factors, this "best deal around" doesn't really seem to be quite so great anymore.
Re:Not really a great deal... (Score:3, Interesting)
If you fully clog a T1 for a month, that is 461 GB, and I shouldn't need to tell you how much they cost.
Re:Not really a great deal... (Score:5, Interesting)
Erm. Unless it's a common practice to move to the USA to get cheaper internet, why would one from the UK even consider this factor?
Re:Not really a great deal... (Score:2)
Re:Not really a great deal... (Score:3, Informative)
In summary, I am now moving to America.
Re:Not really a great deal... (Score:3, Funny)
NOTE: It is ok if you do not speak Japaneese. That would be a problem only for people that require human contact - any geek does not.
Re:Not really a great deal... (Score:2)
And I paid that for a 1500 kbps down 384 kbps up cable modem with a 20 GB cap ($5 per GB over that). Now I work for an ISP, so I get my connection for free, or I'd be paying $90 per month for 1.2 Mbps by 320 kbps with no cap. Not all the US has fast options availab
Re:Not really a great deal... (Score:4, Informative)
theres the thing, £40 is CHEAP (ish!) here, just because it equates to a lot of dollars doesnt mean its expensive it just means that dollars are not worth very much.
Re:Not really a great deal... (Score:3, Interesting)
I live in one of "the worst serviced areas" in the Netherlands: my employer (a university) claims to have 96% national coverage for employee DSL, but not in my area. Most providers have near or total national coverage.
Still I could get for instance the following comparable offer with no cap: 8064/640, no cap, EURO 49,95 (Tiscali).
Minimum no cap: 256/256, no cap, EURO 15.00 (Speedlinq).
What I have is 3200/768, no cap, EURO 59,95 (but tax deductible), with a provi
Re:Not really a great deal... (Score:3, Insightful)
It'd be a fucking great deal here in Norway
Perhaps in the US it's only a good deal.
I'm sure in Japan, South Korea etc. it is a poor deal.
Somehow, I'm not about to move to either of those places for the Internet connection though. Would involve leaving my mom's basement and all, yes? Seriously though, most of us have a life where we are, and a vast improvement in internet connection where we are is "news for nerds"
Re:Not really a great deal... (Score:2)
Re:Not really a great deal... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Not really a great deal... (Score:4, Informative)
you guys are getting screwed... (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:you guys are getting screwed... (Score:2, Informative)
FYI I am in Australia
Re:you guys are getting screwed... (Score:2)
http://bc.whirlpool.net.au/bc-isp.cfm?id=10&s=2
2048 / 384 kbps
400 MB $29.95
12 GB $49.95
Primus DSLAMs will also support ADSL2/2+ when the technology is approved for use in Australia.
Re:you guys are getting screwed... (Score:5, Interesting)
Thats less than £10 per month and with no download cap! Come on UK... Getting beaten by the US is bad enough, but by France? That's terrible!
(BTW: I'm a Brit in France, so I have mixed feelings on this one!)
holy expensive! (Score:5, Informative)
There's no installation charge, and the cable modem is included.
I prefer to have more upstream.. and a little less downstream. That upstream is far more useful. So is the lack of limits.
Oh. By the way, this isn't make believe speed either. Videotron actually delivers. I get downloads at > 700kbytes/sec all the time.
Videotron isn't that great. (Score:3, Interesting)
- In my neighborhood, cable would get slow at Rush Hour. This was back then with a 4mbps connection
- They constantly change the deals. Sometimes, they make things better and sometimes really bad. For example, We (family) left because back then, the download limit per month was 6GB and for that speed, completely ridiculious. we payed $270 cause we downloaded around 20GB. Not
Is that really a news? (Score:5, Informative)
How much? Not more than USD 20 per month! The service was there for some years already. And there are now serval ISP providing the same service so the price is getting even lower~
Re:Is that really a news? (Score:3, Informative)
Or you want to check out some service pages?~
http://www.i-cable.com/ourservices/cablemodem/e-pl an_content.html [i-cable.com]
http://www.hgc.com.hk/eng/res_net_bb_hgcbb.html [hgc.com.hk]
[Sorry can't find English version for these]
http://www.vitaminbb.com/nwt/residential/chinese/d ocument_content.jsp?documentid=12 [vitaminbb.com]
http://www.hkbn.net/broadband/index.htm [hkbn.net]
Re:Is that really a news? (Score:5, Interesting)
We have only begun to tap the potential of the Internet. When the average connection can both download and serve hi-def video faster-than-real-time, we will really have arrived at the Internet of the future.
Re:Is that really a news? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Is that really a news? (Score:5, Informative)
Under one country two systems, we are really quite independent
good deal! (Score:2)
500GB = 4000Gbit (Round Numbers) (Score:5, Informative)
8Mbit = 8,000,000 bit
4,000,000,000,000/8,000,000 = 500,000
8Mbit/s gives you 500,000 seconds
There are 2,592,000 seconds in a month (30 days).
That means that if you let it download constantly at maximum speed, you only get to use it for a week.
Of course, if you can find 500GB to download (constantly), then you've probably already figured that out.
Ironically, here in the US, with cable, I routinely get 1.5Mb/s down, with no cap.
Verizon Metro DSL (Score:2)
Now, if they'd ever deploy fiber instead of just claiming it's deployed...
Why the upstream? (Score:3, Interesting)
What I think would make the most sense is giving people a few mbit upstream (closer to 2:1 or 3:1) and then limiting them to something reasonable, like 2gb/day (best done a floating 10gb/5 days or something). That way the upstream is there when needed, but doesn't let people run massive servers 24/7.
What makes you think that upstream costs more? (Score:3, Informative)
The 33:1 contention ratio (I never see contention ratio advertised by US ISPs, I note) means that for every 8mbps they're piping to the DSLAM, there are 33 people who could be trying
Ha ha (Score:2, Interesting)
I live in Sweden.
8MBit to the CO (Score:3, Insightful)
Is that ISP's network multihomed?
And even more importantly what is the latency to yahoo.com, Torontos 151 Front St, backbones in NYC, and the Silicon Valley Sprint networks? How much is the delay to alter.net routers?
In short, will you see 80ms or 30ms playing counterstrike on your average server in the US, Canada or Korea?
All this is assuming their internal switches are all non-blocking preferably gigabit switches with either gigabit or 10gigabit uplinks, not 10mbit ethernet hubs. Also assuming their modem and CO equipment are both nonblocking doing the pppoe and breaking up 1500-sized packets to fit because most people dont enter 1492 in their MTU settings.
If their networks are in such good shape, more uplinks will be appreciated more than higher speec downlinks, maybe 4mbit/1mbit or even 4mbit/4mbit SDSL, especially if they provide static non-pppoe IPs. These things simply allow other possibilities even for the consumer market which wants to share pictures, stream out videos to relatives, and run game servers.
With all ISPs inching up their technologies, upgrading their equipment in each iteration, it escapes me why dont they quite simply lay down fiber optic ethernet lines in the streets running at 100mbit both ways, and just be done with it. Their operating costs will absolutely plummett, and fiber optics do exceed the ADSL distance. What is cheaper, a new cisco or juniper DSLAM, with countless ADSL DMT/DOCSIS modems, or piles of made-in-taiwan switches and fiber cables??
Re:8MBit to the CO (Score:2)
In an entirely unrelated story... (Score:5, Funny)
Sorry, the French already won this one. 20MB/30Eur (Score:3, Informative)
20 Meg Down, 1 Meg up, 100+ channels TV,
Free fixed calls to all of France, Free
installation!
No cap (Score:3, Informative)
Expensive! (Score:5, Informative)
That is very expensive. In Japan, for example ADSL connection from Yahoo Japan costs you about 4000 yen per month (less than 40 US dollar) for 50 Mbps ADSL.
And also fibre optic connection has become very common and cheaper. For example Usen Networks (one of the provider in Japan) provides 100 Mbps fibre optic connection for only 2950 per month.
I use the fibre optic that comes with 5 static IPs. And it costs me about 5000 yen per month.
Download cap is totally never heard in here. As far as I know, all packages come with unlimited bandwidth.
Re:Expensive! (Score:2)
Silly IP question. (Score:2)
I wish I could just get *one* static IP at a decent cost... (well, free with my connectivity really)
Re:Silly IP question. (Score:3, Funny)
Well duh. Obviously 5.
Re:Expensive! (Score:4, Informative)
What's really worth mentioning is the Yahoo-BBphone. VoIP comes free with my internet access, and I can make phone calls to the U.S. for around 2.5 cents a minute, or free calls to other BBphone users.
Re:Expensive! (Score:4, Informative)
This offering is *not* expensive for this country (the UK)! Pretty much all suppliers offer capped access with limits in the region of 100-150GB/mth (ignoring the "exceptional" ISPs like BT who offer lower caps). Furthermore, this is going to be considered to be a very high speed connection in this country. Just to give you some perspective, I'm on a 1Mbit connection, which is more than most people in this country have.
If someone could come over here and offer high speed, reliable, uncapped broadband internet access to the home for a reasonable price, they would absolutely conquer the market.
I suspect that precisely the same would occur in Australia and New Zealand, where I understand the internet connectivity possibilities are even less impressive.
meanwhile, back in Sweden... (Score:2, Interesting)
Then there's several other companies offering DSL with various merits as well as prices.
Me, I'm happy with my fiber-LAN hookup. 10/10, no caps whatsoever, and five IP-adresses to use for whatever purpose I want. Price about US$40/month. If I want to I can get 100/100 for about US$80/month.
A
Deals (Score:2)
Keep in mind that the price is in pounds, however.
For example, up here Sympatico offers their "Ultra" service - 4Mbps download, 0.8Mbps upload - for CAD$60 = US$48 = 26 pounds. That's with no caps.
Their regular service, 3Mbps down, 0.8Mbps up, is CAD$45 = US$36 = 19 pounds. Again, no caps.
I'd be interested to hear what the prices are like in Korea, for example...
Can 400k up support 8M down? (Score:2)
From my reading on Broadband Reports, I thought that 128k up couldn't support 3M down, and Verizon offers 768k up with its 3M down package. Isn't 400k really cutting it to support 8M down?
Eh? (Score:2, Funny)
10MBit broadband (Score:2)
100Mbps in Japan for $52/month + VoIP (Score:3, Insightful)
expecting for broadband. Its fibre to the home.
(This was in Kyoto). VoD applications (movies, pay for shows, pr0n, its all possible).
In the good old US of A we can get 1.5 or 3mbps WooHoo!
Hedley
Hmmm? (Score:2)
Re:Hmmm? (Score:2)
which is a lot less than 500GB
Personally, I'm on the 2Mbit cable plan with the awesome-o FIVE gig cap
dependant on the size of the ISP's pipes too.. (Score:3, Interesting)
It might be that they only have a 1 gigabit pipe connecting them to the rest of the internet, which would ensure that the only time you'll reach 8 megabits, is when you are only transferring to other people on the same ISP.
Then the routing might be so bad that you have 600ms lag which will make it terrible for gamers.
Anyone actually on this ISP and checked the lag, and the average speed?
400 Kbps upload??? (Score:2)
In Canada (Score:5, Informative)
France has got UK Beat: 20Mbits/sec @ 30 Euros (Score:5, Interesting)
thanks for playing [adsl.free.fr]. You read it well: 20Mbits/sec DOWN and 1Mbit/sec UP. No cap. and that's for 30 Euros per month.
The service comes with free telephony [adsl.free.fr] to any french landline (calls to mobile phones cost something), and very cheap international rate, like 3 eurocents to europe.
Once you've got all that, you can pay an extra monthly fee to get hundreds of TV channels [adsl.free.fr]. With 20Mbits/sec ... that should do it.
All of this is given to you thru Free.fr triple-play box, the FreeBox. My Mom's been with them for a couple of years and has the original, more clunky incarnation of today's sleek freebox. Here's a picture of it [flickr.com].
Re:France has got UK Beat: 20Mbits/sec @ 30 Euros (Score:4, Informative)
Oh and they now give you 1GB hosting space with no ads, PHP, MySQL, and unlimited traffic (no pr0n allowed though obviously).
That shit rocks.
You can also get 2Mbps upstream but that requires disconnecting the baseband phone line (and you have to pay ~90 euro for it).
Re:France has got UK Beat: 20Mbits/sec @ 30 Euros (Score:4, Informative)
The state of India's Broadband (Score:2)
Much better than Australia (Score:2, Informative)
Contrast that with Canada: CD$50/month for 3Mbit, effectively unlimited (up to 8-10Mbit available).
Here's what I want (Score:2)
Is that so much to ask?
Duh, I have 25Mbps/2Mbps ADSL2+ in France (Score:2)
Talk about a breakthrough!
Re:Monthly Cap? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Monthly Cap? (Score:2)
Re:Monthly Cap? (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Monthly Cap? (Score:2, Informative)
500GB (Score:3, Insightful)
Unless you count those that run big servers, have massive storage space, or download tons of pr0n and archive it not many people will get near that anytime soon.
Re:500GB (Score:4, Interesting)
More and more I expect our HD's to become caches for content on the internet.
Imagine for a moment a filesystem driver that uses a local disk to cache files, expiring the old unused content and replacing it with a torrent file (or whatever the latest p2p is) that can be used to transparently download the file again the next time it is requested.
Re:Monthly Cap? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Monthly Cap? (Score:2)
I use Comcast, and can quite assure you that I've gone WELL over 2.5 gigs a day, between downloading several versions of Linux to try and running (perfectly legal stuff ;) ) over Bittorrent. I scoured their user agreements CAREFULLY for mention of a bandwidth cap and found no mention of such a thing. If they try to tag me with one, and it's still not in their subscriber agreement, they will be hit with a class-action false advertising suit.
In fact, while IANAL, it would seem to me that those saying "We of
Re:Monthly Cap? (Score:2)
And as I said, it's fine if someone wants to offer that, and it's fine if someone wants to pay for that. But the company should be up-front about it, not bury it in their fine print. If they claim they're still offering a product people want, well hell, they might be. But if they are, why bury the -real- terms in something the majority of customers don't read?
And yes, I know that people should read the fine print. That's why I do. But they know the majority of people don't, and stick land mines in there kn
Re:Monthly Cap? (Score:3, Insightful)
As I calculate it and concur with previous numbers, it takes about a week of SOLID streaming, at the full 8Mbps to hit the cap. Are you really going to pull that much data 24/7?
Your download speed might be able to hit 8Mbps, but is the server and interconnecting datapath going to send you the data that fast? My Comcast account (when I had one) was capped at 3Mbps (or 366Kbps if I figure it right, feel free to double check) but I almost never saw anything
Re:Best deal in UK or worldwide? (Score:3, Insightful)
I wonder if they'll offer a 2000/200 for £20 a month?
I expect this is why NTL are rumoured (well, I recall them sending a letter anyway) to be upping speeds from 300,750,1500 to 1000,2000,3000 in the near future, for the same price.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Dear UK.. (Score:2)
Some countries prefer a free and open market, however.
Re:Dear UK.. (Score:3, Insightful)
Actually, we could have had that kind of infrastructure in the UK too. Back in the 1980s BT wanted to replace the existing copper network with fibre across the board at its own expense. The catch was that it wanted the government remove the restrictions that were preventing it from becoming a content provider. Basically, their plan was to recoup the cos
Re:500 GB? (Score:2, Funny)
You mean self-pleasuring?
Re:just 400k? (Score:2)
That Ghandi was an economic genius. (Score:2)
Re:UC connection (Score:2)
But that sounds great
cool