Slashdot Log In
Google Code Search Reveals Dark Corners
Posted by
kdawson
on Tue Oct 10, 2006 11:01 PM
from the oopsie dept.
from the oopsie dept.
saccade.com writes, "The new Google Code Search isn't just for hackers sniffing for passwords. Jason Kottke and friends have discovered the new feature reveals all sorts of dark corners hidden in our code. And you thought nobody ever read your comments!" From the article: "Code search is a great resource for web developers and programmers, but like the making available of all previously unsearched bodies of information, it's given lots of flashlights to people interested in exploring dark corners."
Related Stories
[+]
Developers: Google Unveils Code Search 212 comments
derek_farn writes, "Google now has a page that supports source code searching. I hope they extend it to be more programming-language aware (e.g., search for identifiers and functions) like the specialist code search sites (Krugle, Koders, and Codease), who probably now have very worried investors. I don't see any option to search for Cobol. I guess there is not a lot of Cobol source available on the Internet, even although there is supposed to be more Cobol source in existence than any other language (perhaps that statement is not true in the noughties)." From the Cnet.com article: "Google engineers, many of whom participate in open-source projects, already use these code searching capabilities internally. Since it is a Google Labs project, the company is not yet seeking to monetize searches through ads."
[+]
IT: Hackers Find Use for Google Code Search 176 comments
An anonymous reader wrote in to say that "Google has inadvertently given online attackers a new tool. The company's new source-code search engine, unveiled Thursday as a tool to help simplify life for developers, can also be misused to search for software bugs, password information and even proprietary code that shouldn't have been posted to the Internet, security experts said Friday.
"
This discussion has been archived.
No new comments can be posted.
Google Code Search Reveals Dark Corners
|
Log In/Create an Account
| Top
| 297 comments
(Spill at 50!) | Index Only
| Search Discussion
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
(1)
|
2
(1)
|
2
google seems to inspire... (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.beuno.com.ar/)
Re:google seems to inspire... (Score:5, Funny)
Jeez, I must have swallowed a dictionary!
??? Profit! (Score:5, Funny)
2. Search Google Code [google.com]
3. ???
4. Profit!
Dark corners? (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://c0d3h4x0r.0catch.com/ | Last Journal: Friday February 03 2006, @06:21PM)
Re:Dark corners? (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://www.hificans.com/)
" but IE6's implementation fucks up the..."
"
Re:Dark corners? (Score:5, Interesting)
Just better not SCO know about this
Re:Dark corners? (Score:4, Funny)
(Last Journal: Wednesday August 14 2002, @12:33PM)
Dark corners? (Score:5, Insightful)
(http://127.0.0.1/)
They say sunshine is the best disinfectant. More eyeballs can fix problems as well as exploit them.
Ahhhh... (Score:3, Funny)
And the Ever Popular... (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.neolibrarium.com/ | Last Journal: Friday January 10 2003, @11:19AM)
--
Go Where Web Thinkers Gather [webcogito.com]
Re:And the Ever Popular... (Score:5, Funny)
I, for one, welcome our new xxxxxxxx overlords [google.com]
Re:And the Ever Popular... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:And the Ever Popular... (Score:5, Interesting)
(Last Journal: Wednesday March 09 2005, @03:04AM)
"guy who wrote this" [google.com] "in case some idiot" [google.com] "ugly hack" [google.com] "rewrite this later" [google.com] "hail mary" [google.com] "this shouldn't work" [google.com] "compiler happy" [google.com] "what the fuck" [google.com] "blows goats" [google.com]
And I really love this one: i=i++ [google.com]
Re:And the Ever Popular... (Score:4, Funny)
Old-school (Score:5, Interesting)
(http://127.0.0.1/)
Re:Your signature that very much is a signature (Score:4, Informative)
(http://www.geocities...atepower_gangsta.htm)
You incult clod, if the GP said it it was because the GGP's sig is a reference to a painting of an apple that says "Ceci n'est pas une pomme" ("This is not an apple") because it's not an apple but really a painting. The GP was pointing that the GGP's sig was actually a signature although it claimed not to be one, and thus that it didn't fit the spirit of the painting it was refering to, and that it would have been more like the spirit of it if instead of having it to be an actual sig, it was something he pasted at the end of every of his posts to make it look like a sig. It would look like a sig, but it wouldn't be one.
Bloody Microsoft (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.somuchpotential.net/ | Last Journal: Friday October 27 2006, @04:15AM)
Ahh frustrated programmers (Score:3, Interesting)
Fucks. (Score:5, Interesting)
This should never happen... (Score:5, Funny)
I like the memset search on that page too... scary. People need to run Lint or something. (Will Lint pick up that error?)
I had to do it... (Score:4, Funny)
For the record (Score:5, Funny)
(http://achurch.org/index-e.html)
I was not drunk when I wrote this [google.com]; that's just some immature coder making fun of me.
Granted, being drunk is about the only valid excuse I could make for only initializing half of a doubly-linked list node . . .
No fun! (Score:3, Interesting)
(http://www.flying-rhenquest.net/)
Instead potential employers (like me) can google your code and read those comments that you wrote in there. Don't worry though... I won't hold those against you.
Anyway, "unless you really know what you're doing" and "smoking cracK" are also fun searchesa over there...
Suicidal code... (Score:4, Funny)
Favorite (Score:5, Interesting)
I wonder.. (Score:5, Funny)
(http://www.jimtuck.net/ | Last Journal: Saturday June 25 2005, @03:08AM)
You are not expected... (Score:4, Interesting)
See here [bell-labs.com] for an explanation (from the horse's mouth, as it were...)
Let the holy wars begin: (Score:3, Informative)
(http://slashdot.org/~xnormal)
"perl sucks": Results 1 - 10 of about 32,900. (0.01 seconds)
It was hard to write... (Score:3, Funny)
(http://www.ivorysky.com/)
This could affect future job applicants (Score:3, Insightful)
(http://austin.rug.googlepages.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday November 02 2005, @05:03PM)
Re:And you thought nobody ever read your comments! (Score:3, Funny)
(http://www.subgenius.com/)