Exactly. Even if someone dies it doesn't matter as long as it doesn't hurt the bottom line.
One of the SAN vendors we met with a while back was arranging their drives within each drawer in such a way that it supposedly minimized/neutralized the RV effect.
Outsourcing to the lowest bidder and then not adequately sampling items to verify they were made to spec.
The library doesn't have unlimited porn, social media, music, etc etc but that is what the majority of the students are using the network for at the school. There isn't nearly as much "personal research" going on in a library as there is on the Internet.
I'm not saying network access should be restricted. I'm just saying let's be honest about how it is being used.
FCC should pull the rule to let supply and demand work it out.
I like your style but I think we might have better luck starting small at first.
My experience is different. My parents smoked 30+ years and they didn't die immediately from massive heart attacks as YOU would think. They developed quite a few health problems later in life which required many many meds and doctor visits over their last 10-15 years. Sure, insurance covered much of it but I gotta think the medical industry definitely makes out better if most of their patients are like my parents were.
Do any of those have effect nearby non-users like smoking and "second hand" smokers?
If only the journals could run some kind of check to determine if "peers" are who they claim to be.... and only them.
Good for them for not giving up. Now they don't really have to stick with just local channels either. It will be interesting to see what the cable companies do to compete if Aereo starts doing well.
It makes sense if the email hasn't been retrieved yet. GS wants SMTP to have a Recall Unread Message feature which it doesn't. So in the meantime, they expect Google (or the postman) to do the retrieval for them. Should this be possible? Sure, for a fee until SMTP (or another protocol) will let users recall their own messages.
FWIW - You can recall internal messages with Outlook/Exchange. I'm sure others do it too.
What happens if somebody decides to fill it with water?
No more drought. Duh.
Exactly because his property gets better reception.
How is a PUBLIC list of PUBLICLY TRIED AND CONVICTED sexual offenders the same as a SECRET list of people who MAY OR MAY not have done anything wrong the same? Isn't one is a list of public facts while the other is a secret list of accusations.