Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Philip K. Dick Speaks (Sorta)

Posted by timothy on Mon Jul 14, 2003 10:20 PM
from the well-assembled dept.
futileboy writes "Erik Davis put together this posthumous interview of Philip K. Dick from some tapes he found (he explains how it came together in his introduction to the interview). It comes off pretty clean."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • by sulli (195030) * on Monday July 14 2003, @10:21PM (#6439705)
    (Last Journal: Monday October 22, @04:01PM)
    I just heard some sad news on talk radio - Sci Fi writer Philip K. Dick was found dead in his Berkeley home. There weren't any more details. I'm sure everyone in the Slashdot community will miss him - even if you didn't enjoy his work, there's no denying his contributions to popular culture. Truly an American icon.
  • Hmmm (Score:4, Funny)

    by gavinR (454878) on Monday July 14 2003, @10:22PM (#6439712)
    (http://sparkless.net/)
    Funny, because "pretty clean" isn't really something I'd ever describe PKD as having been.
    • What a wierd article. (Score:5, Insightful)

      by quinkin (601839) on Monday July 14 2003, @11:08PM (#6439897)
      What a wierd article.

      It kind of goes to prove that old adage (variously attributed to C.S Lewis or Aurthur C. Clarke) science fiction is the only genuine consciousness expanding drug. (Trust me, I have checked).

      Mind you, I think someone should have told P. K. Dick that before 1982.

      Favourite Quote: "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away."

      Q.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Hmmm by gavinR (Score:1) Tuesday July 15 2003, @02:09AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by Usagi_yo (648836) on Monday July 14 2003, @10:23PM (#6439716)
    Abrubtly cut short when he was asked about the marked improvement in his writing style and ability since his death.
  • Uhm. (Score:1)

    lousy psthumous interviews... Hasn't this guy been dead for a while? I don't know what sulli's talking about. Great writer, though.
  • Ghostscript Seance? (Score:5, Funny)

    by chris_sawtell (10326) * on Monday July 14 2003, @10:27PM (#6439742)
    Interesting application of Ghostscript [wisc.edu]
  • Insulting to PKD and his fans (Score:4, Insightful)

    by gad_zuki! (70830) * on Monday July 14 2003, @10:30PM (#6439755)
    (Last Journal: Saturday October 26 2002, @11:59PM)
    Oh wow, "Electronic Voice phenomenon?" Spare me. All this page needed was a midi playing "Age of Aquarius."

    PKD's writing are strongly rationalist with an intelligent approach to figuring out the strange phenomenon in his life. I think its insulting to turn him into a new age "John Edwards" bullshit spiritual medium commodity.

    > Subsequent research proved, however, that all of the quotations have already made an appearance somewhere in Dick's fiction, letters, or essays.

    No shit. Maybe because the "voice" he heard on the tape was nothing more than the subconscious projecting quotes hes read elsewhere onto nothing more than tape static and other ambigious sounds from the original recording.

    Maybe next week slashdot can expose how Ozzy put all those satanic messages into his albums.
  • Right.... (Score:4, Funny)

    by jeffkjo1 (663413) on Monday July 14 2003, @10:31PM (#6439757)
    (http://www.astroreverb.com/)
    Interviews with ghosts.... next thing you know, Slashdot will be reporting that some financially unsound software company will be suing... I dunno, IBM saying that they own Linux or something like that.
    • Re:Right.... (Score:5, Insightful)

      by PaulK (85154) on Monday July 14 2003, @10:39PM (#6439795)
      There are times, however, when we need to revisit the past, to get a better perception of the present.

      The man had an incredible insight into the social development of mankind as a whole.

      He was the fictional equivalent of Alvin Toffler, (i.e. Future Shock), and Desmond Morris, (i.e. The Naked Ape).

      It never fails to amaze me how often we lose sight of our collective image. It's things like this that make me slow down, and look around.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Right.... by hawkfish (Score:1) Tuesday July 15 2003, @04:24PM
  • ... we will have done so much speculating about how it will behave that the poor thing will probably just have a nervous breakdown and explode. Imagine being born and being presented with a huge book psychoanalysing your every emotion and impression in detail. The pressure to go crazy and enslave mankind would be enough to make you go crazy and enslave mankind.

    I am much more interested to hear what sci-fi authors have to say about near-future technologies (e.g. the stuff in this article about surveillance systems) than what they have to say about what things will be like when the earth is ruled by superintelligent robots.

    Girl: Remember when those cyborgs enslaved humanity?
    Fry: Uh... yeah, that rings a bell.
  • by krahd (106540) on Monday July 14 2003, @10:52PM (#6439846)
    (http://krahd.blogspot.com/ | Last Journal: Tuesday September 06 2005, @06:59AM)
    I do not understand, adding his own questions to pre-recorded phrases does not hold any sense, does it? He can twist it any way he wants... ("genuine dialogue"???!!? wtf?).

    What I liked about the article is the "The reality slips and cartoon metaphysics of The Matrix" phrase. A great synthesis of the trilogy (which, btw, i happen to like a lot).

    --krahd
  • Someone has to say it... (Score:5, Funny)

    by HiredMan (5546) on Monday July 14 2003, @10:54PM (#6439850)
    (Last Journal: Wednesday August 24 2005, @09:37PM)
    "psthumous"?

    What's that mean - he's whispering from beyond the grave?

    <Rimshot> Sorry.

    =TKK
  • Personally, I'm not offended by the obviously fictional framing device (lame though it may be), but it would only be fair to have references to all the interviews that these replies have been lifted from. After all, "fair use" implies that you're using the materially fairly. Not providing credit where credit is due isn't fair at all.

    Also, the comment about Dick's ideas infusing The Matrix is true as far as it goes, but misses one important point. Dick was an SF writer firmly grounded in the field, and would never have made as obvious and asinine mistake as violating the Second Law of Thermodynamics the way The Matrix's idiotic "humans as batteries" backstory does.

    Finally, the "spirit voices" tap shtick is especially lame considering the very sophisticated Gnostic sources and theories Dick turned to after his mystical "pink light" experience in 1974. Dick may have been wrong in the later mystical leanings that informed works like Valis, but he was never a believer in the type of fraudulent spiritual hucksterism that continues to rip off "new age" believers even today.

    Suggested reading: Philip K. Dick: The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep, Ubik, Time Out of Joint, and (after you've read the rest) Valis and In Pursuit of Valis: Selections from the Exegesis.
  • Really though, this is straight out off the super market tabloid rack.

    from the article:
    "I was experimenting with electronic voice phenomena. I was recording the analog noise between tracks on a scratchy old copy of Karl Muck conducting Parzifal with the Bayreuth Festival Chorus onto a cassette tape. Then I would cut, splice, and process the tape in various ways, and then listen to the results. On the third attempt I heard a voice that I recognized, from a tape once available through the Philip K. Dick Society, as belonging to the late science fiction writer. More incredible was my discovery that, by recording my own questions on the same cassette tape, I was able to initiate a genuine dialogue with this mysterious voice. Subsequent research proved, however, that all of the quotations have already made an appearance somewhere in Dick's fiction, letters, or essays. Nonetheless, the conversation seems worth presenting"

    Jumping crack-heads on pogo-sticks batman!
    What crack are the editors smoking and please pass it because my reality distortion field is waning and I need a hook up before the shakes set in.

    The page is only "text" from this supposed "interview" and none of the cut-spliced-processed audio is to be found.
    This is utter crap, if the audio was present it would at least have some artistic merit and therefore interest of value, but there is nothing but the rantings for those who wear shiny foil hats squarely screwed to their brows and interview excerpts readily available on Google!

    Mod me down for being a troll, but /. just sank to new lows. I mean c'mon couldn't roll out the Bill of Nine or an SCO rant so we had to troll the readers with "bat-boy" fodder?
  • by NotQuiteReal (608241) on Monday July 14 2003, @11:05PM (#6439886)
    (Last Journal: Saturday December 09 2006, @10:46PM)
    Ok. I did RTFA and this quote; "Subsequent research proved, however, that all of the quotations have already made an appearance somewhere in Dick's fiction, letters, or essays" allows that maybe the author is not a pompus ass. However, it looks like this guy is taking himself seriously, so GAH!

    It is not far enough out of context to be funny or slanderous, but not in context enough to be worth the paper is is written on... oh. Never mind.

    And why can't I mod down the whole artical, isn't this a heirachical database? :-)

  • Bizarre Cool Stuff (Score:5, Interesting)

    by fanatic (86657) on Monday July 14 2003, @11:18PM (#6439929)

    I still remember one of the first PKD things I read.

    Some guy meets a chick at a party who gives him some drugs. Then he watches the president on tv and sees a monster with writhing tentacles. But everything else looks normal.

    Comes to find out, the drug he was given was an anti-hallucinogen. Everyone who gets it sees some hideous thing when lookig at the President because there are already drugs in the water. But everyone sees a different hideous thing when on the anti-hallucinogen, but everyone sees the same thing on the hallucinogen....

    I'm pretty sure this is PKD. Something in my head says there's a slight chance it was Phillip Jose Farmer, but I don't think so.

  • by Jormundgard (260749) on Monday July 14 2003, @11:31PM (#6439985)
    Oh, he's become a victim of his own storylines. Lol.
  • PKD is amazing (Score:2)

    He is an amazing author. I've read around twelve of his books. I started with VALIS, and my most recent is The Galactic Pot Healer. I've actually d/led many of his novels off Kazaa, and am slowly replacing the PDF's with real books as I can afford it.

    If you like The Matrix, VALIS will throw you for a trip.
  • by banal avenger (585337) on Monday July 14 2003, @11:46PM (#6440050)
    Actual quote from linked article:
    I do seem attracted to trash, as if the clue lies there.

    Feh, most great minds are. His waning years sound rather like the trials of Kurt Vonnegut [washington.edu]. Disillusioned with the fact that his recent literature has not been well recieved, he blames it on the population rather than himself. It's a shame though: Kurt Vonnegut's earlier work was revolutionary, just like Philip K. Dick's writings.
  • Making a man speak after he's dead... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by blair1q (305137) on Monday July 14 2003, @11:58PM (#6440103)
    (Last Journal: Thursday October 17 2002, @10:28AM)
    Phil would have liked that plot.
  • would it have been so much to ask (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Triv (181010) * on Tuesday July 15 2003, @12:01AM (#6440126)
    (Last Journal: Wednesday May 05 2004, @01:25PM)

    ...to make a recording of the 'interview' available?

    I have a problem with literary journalism of this sort; we have absolutely no idea as to the context of the excerpted quotes. I could've dealt with this i he had actually created an audio interview; he did piece it together from recordings in the first place, after all. THAT would've been great (I love hearing authors talk). All this is is a transcription of an interview that never happened with no technical or historical reason for it to be interesting. I'll pass.

    Triv

  • Hmmmm... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by ziggy_zero (462010) on Tuesday July 15 2003, @12:15AM (#6440175)
    So the building blocks of the cosmos are not matter or energy, but information.

    The universe is information and we are stationary in it, not three-dimensional and not in space or time. We ourselves are information-rich; information enters us, is processed and is then projected outward once more, now in an altered form. Since the universe is actually composed of information, then it can be said that information will save us. This is the saving gnosis which the Gnostics sought.

    Did anyone read the recent Scientific American article about the holographic theory of the universe, whereby we're all not actually 3-dimensional, we're like information "painted" on another, 2-dimensional surface or somesuch....it also had something to do with the thermodynamics of black holes. I don't pretend to fully understand it, but it seems to be an actual tie-in the Dick's remark about us being made of information.

  • PKD Interesting as always, but... (Score:2, Insightful)

    by mykepredko (40154) on Tuesday July 15 2003, @12:21AM (#6440196)
    (http://www.myke.com/)
    As somebody who continually goes back and re-reads his various stories (I'm a big fan of "The Man in High Castle" and "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep") it was nice to see some quotes from PKD that I haven't seen before.

    I especially liked the ambulance analogy with respect to entropy. It could be an interesting debate trying to figure out if saving the man increased or decreased the order of the universe...

    But rather than having Davis' questions, I would have preferred to see a transcript of the comments without editing. I feel like many of the "questions" to be leading to an interesting/profound reply was undoubtedly not related to the question that was "asked" by Davis and I'm sure he ended up cutting something out that could have been much more interesting/profound.

    PKD's genius lay in his ability to look at questions which have no answers - but asking questions to pre-recorded PKD comments seems like a rigged game of cosmic "Jeopardy".

    myke
  • Burroughs Cut Up recordings (Score:2, Interesting)

    by jonnystiph (192687) on Tuesday July 15 2003, @03:12AM (#6440707)
    (http://www.yogurt66.org/)
    Did anyone else notice that his technique for the interview is based off, or strikingly similiar to that used my William Burroughs cut up [utexas.edu]
  • Amazing! (Score:4, Funny)

    by cascadingstylesheet (140919) on Tuesday July 15 2003, @07:51AM (#6441557)

    Subsequent research proved, however, that all of the quotations have already made an appearance somewhere in Dick's fiction, letters, or essays

    Wow! Then this must be for real! How could he possibly know things that have already made a public appearance?!?

    Does this guy have a 1-900 number? I must call him at $4.95/minute, so he can amaze me by telling me things that I already know!!!!!

  • by MORTAR_COMBAT! (589963) on Tuesday July 15 2003, @08:44AM (#6442006)
    Are you kidding? From the article: "Steven Spielberg turned Dick's tale "Minority Report" into his darkest flick yet."

    Uh... let's recap. In 1993 Spielberg [imdb.com] directed a film called Schindler's List [imdb.com]. A little darker than Minority Report [imdb.com]. I won't mention the content of "Schindler's List" for fear of invoking Godwin's Law [faqs.org], but suffice it to say that a movie featuring mounds of burning bodies and people shot for sport just might be a dark movie.
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by djembe2k (604598) on Tuesday July 15 2003, @10:51AM (#6443298)
    A few people here have been a little bit too harsh on Davis for what he's trying to do here. PKD's fiction has been more and more widely read in the last 10 years or so, but other non-fiction expressions of his ideas (his journals, his interviews) are still more difficult to find, and when you find them, they are often somewhat incoherent. Davis here is trying to take bits and pieces of that incoherence and turn it into a sort of summary of what PKD's own words said about what he was trying to say and do. It's a decent attempt to summarize a bunch of difficult-to-summarize writing and speaking.

    With that said, however, there's a little bit of an (unconscious?) agenda in this "interview" I think. He turns some of PKD's ideas about the world and religion and spirituality into ideas about technology, which really isn't fair or reasonable. Short example:

    So technology may actually be staging the emergence of a higher state of consciousness. Why is this happening now?

    Information has become alive, with a collective mind of its own independent of our brains.

    NO! This isn't PKD talking about technology emerging into consciousness, a la Terminator's SkyNet. For PKD, the prototype of living information was the Torah and the Dead Sea Scrolls, not some piece of technology. It's a very Hegelian view of consciousness and history here, that there's a sort of transcendent and fundamentally spiritual consciousness consisting only of ideas which forms the true substance of the Universe and the medium of history, but the information there isn't bit and bytes in computers; it's ancient Gnostic explanations of the spiritual relationship between God and man and the world.

    So that's my one gripe about the article. By trying to make PKD's usually incoherent ramblings coherent, he turned some really strange ideas about God and universe into easier-to-digest ideas about technological development. Aside from that, it was pretty clever.

  • wtf, unplussed? (Score:1)

    by blueskies (525815) on Wednesday July 16 2003, @12:01AM (#6450159)
    Heh heh. For someone reputed to be paranoid, you seem remarkably unplussed.
    Anyone know what unplussed means? Does that mean subtracted?
  • (sigh) - "speed ruined heart" - That's a myth.

    It was actually massive doses of thorazine, as opposed to just methamphetamines, which his publicist and friends claimed, because Dick was diagnosed as a schizophrenic many, many, years ago, complete with religious hallucinations and electro-convulsive therapy. It was easier to sell his books to a public that did not understand schizophrenia, but was familiar with drug-induced hallucinations.

    The writer missed a key movie:

    "Screamers" (1995), from the screenplay written by the Dan O'Bannon, based on the Philip K. Dick story "Second Variety". This movie envisions that robotic sentry devices would evolve into human look-alike androids, which are intelligent but deadly anti-personnel weapons, mimicking humans so well that they can fall in love.

    "Screamers" is a key predecessor to Jim Cameron's "Terminator" series and to Dan O'Bannon's own "Alien" series, where the weapon is a lifeform. "Second Variety" was anthologized by the "Spectrum IV" book.

    All of Dick's stories feature characters that represent the female duality of good and evil. Prissy/Rachel in "Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep"/"Bladerunner", Lori/Melina in "We Can Remember It For You Wholesale"/"Total Recall", and Jessica1/Jessica2 in "Second Variety"/"Screamers", Anne Lively/Evanna in "Minority Report", and the Chancellor/Maya Olham in "Imposter" (2002). It is reported that the female characters represent his obsession with his fraternal twin sister, Jane, who died shortly after child birth.

    All of the male protagonists are confused as to their own identity, as to whether or not each is a real human - or a synthetic memory implant, android, or clone. That confusion persists through every story.

    Add to this "Paycheck" (2003), starring Ben Affleck, which will be released later this year -- and Hollywood will have milked almost all of his written works, except for the novel "Valis", where Priscilla/Prissy reappears and Philip K. Dick is an active character, who has conversations with God. That might be tricky for Hollywood marketeers to sell to today's public.

    What's interesting is that a lot of Dick's plots were originally explored by A.E. Van Vogt. The difference is that the "identity confusion" theme really was informed from Dick's own personal experience.

    Hopefully, the residuals will go to support his former wives and his kids. It is well known that Dick would burn through his advances, and begin his next book in anticipation of the next advance check. In his lifetime, the publishers never sent him a residual check.

  • by Snoopy77 (229731) on Monday July 14 2003, @10:29PM (#6439749)
    (http://slashdot.org/)
    Mistage?
    [ Parent ]
  • by UserGoogol (623581) on Monday July 14 2003, @11:49PM (#6440059)
    Two words:

    "Grammer Syndrome."
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:Ask Slashdot... (Score:2)

    by grumpygrodyguy (603716) on Tuesday July 15 2003, @12:34AM (#6440224)
    How come everytime I go to use the fucking shower, our house guest is in there?

    Answer [theonion.com]
    [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • When I was young, I read SF anthologies constantly, and it is my opinion that they
    1. Have the best titles of any media, and
    2. Make the best movies
    [ Parent ]
  • by Gordonjcp (186804) on Tuesday July 15 2003, @03:46AM (#6440776)
    (http://slashdot.org/)
    I've seen it spelt "posthummus" - is that when you do something after eating Greek chickpea pate?
    [ Parent ]
  • Face it folks. This country hasn't had a decent president since FDR. He whipped things into shape and made sure that everyone was well off with the government programs he implemented. And when we went to war, it wasn't on some trumped up charges like Bush used to excuse his attack on Iraq. We had legitimate reasons to go to war during FDR's term.

    Clinton was a great president, but he was stupid with regard to being honest about what he did with Monica. He should have just admitted that he had a little piece on the side (nothing wrong with that). George Bush Sr. was a monster, but at least he wasn't a dictator. Did you notice how during the elder Bush's term, people could actually make fun of him and get away with it without fearing for your life or your job? Now with Baby Bush, you question him or make fun of him and you can lose your job or possibly your life. Reagan was just a fucking puppet. Poor thing had no idea what he was doing. Carter was another great president, but he had the problem of having the wrong kind of intelligence for the job. He probably would have made a better scientist of prof, than a president. Ford. Well... Ford. All I can say is Chevy Chase.

    Sadly the US government is becoming less and less relevant and the corporations gain more power over our lives every day. All that needs to happen now is for the repugs to get rid of taxes completely and the US government will die. It will probably be bought out by the corporations and then this country will be a real mess. Pay access for everything and never a chance to be debt free unless you live in the woods like Kozinski. To make matters worse, there probably won't be any woods to live in as the necons will want to pay everything in sight... so they can charge you to go there. Think about it people. How many more bills do you have now than your parents did? They are grooming us to become a "pay for play" nation in every regard. They started with simple things like car leases. Then they moved onto cell phones. Now it's hitting everything. Pay per play music videos on "The Box" and the over-the-air version of MTV2. Pay per play video game consoles like the Phantom. Pay per play movies and music coming soon to an ethernet jack near you. It's a fucking travesty! The capitalists are always on about how the communists were all about the elimination of the concept of personal property. I would say that this is also true of the neocons. When you buy that cell phone, do you REALLY own it? Can you use it without paying for it eventually? As you do when you actually buy and pay for something you really own? What about DRM controlled pay per play music? Do you really own it? Like the CDs you could buy a few years ago? Can you listen to the new DRM controlled music as many times as you want without having to pay every time or pay an exhorbitant fee to get that right? Wake the fuck up people!!!! THEY are grooming US. Not to be an equal part of the capitalist system, but to be slaves to it. Although you neocons always make the mistake of thinking that I'm a commie or a socialist, I will tell you that I am not. I am merely pointing out a flaw in capitalism that many people are either too scared or too oblivious to see: As long as humans are greedy, capitalism is no better than communism. As it develops further, you can see the grip it is getting on our personal lives. It's not yet too late. Think about this. Carefully.
    [ Parent ]
  • by 5ynPhL00d (689676) on Tuesday July 15 2003, @06:16PM (#6447922)
    Re:GNAA FIRST! (Score:0)
    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 15, @02:03AM
    (#6440292) Una comedia misógina de ciencia ficción:
    extraterrestres de una civilización de otra
    galaxia llegan a la Tierra y descubren que
    nuestro planeta está infestado de mujeres, por lo
    cuál proceden al exterminio de las mismas

    ESTA LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS!!! ESTADO UNIDOS!!! HABLE ESPANOL???? NOOOO!!!! NO! NO! NO! NO! NO! OJE!!! AQUI, HABLEMOS INGLES!!!! INGLES!!!! USTED PEDAZO DE MIERDA!!!!
    [ Parent ]
  • 42 replies beneath your current threshold.