Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?

Comment Re:DirectX for Macs? Replacing OpenGL? (Score 1) 94

Compared to DirectX, OpenGL is a terribad API to work with.

If you are using an engine such as Unreal or Unity with multiple back ends, then OpenGL becomes somewhat feasible. Otherwise developers are better off choosing DirectX and going Windows only, targeting 95% of the gaming PC market.

Comment You've got braces on your legs... (Score 1) 128

... so you're all set. Although, no braces on your arms, though, so you're going to have to rely on the old human strength to keep a grip on the device and, by extension, me. So do make sure to keep a grip on me.

Also a note: no braces on your spine, either, so don't land on that. Or your head, no braces there. That could--that could split like a melon from this height. [nervous laugh] So do definitely focus on landing with your legs.

Comment I use one of these (Score 2) 210

I keep hybrid tablet-laptop around as an art PC. It used to be an old Toshiba Satellite; now it's a Sony VAIO Duo 11. I run Slackware on it, like I do nearly all my machines. Slackware will run fine if the digitizer part is supported by the kernel (since new Wacom and N-Trig parts come out from time to time, sometimes kernel support may be missing or naff if the laptop is too new). Otherwise you will see reduced functionality, but that is true of any distro.

Using a stylus you can drive most aspects of a WM or DE. It gets tricky using your finger.

Comment It's open source. It's part of the ongoing convers (Score 1) 928

Systemd is open source software, which Lennart has made available more or less out of the goodness of his heart. You may hate it -- God knows I fucking hate it -- but the world really is a better place for it having been written. Why? Diversity. Systemd is yet another set of ideas in the ongoing discussion that is open source development. Software gets written, then it gets patched or replaced by someone who thinks they can make it better, and alternatives for every use case flourish. It's a conversation, a debate. So while there may be vehement disagreement with the ideas that systemd represents, we are all better off for at least having heard and considered those ideas.

Just don't make the entire user-space stack depend on systemd. Please.

Comment Re: Why do people still care about C++ for kernel (Score 0) 365

In the novel Jurassic Park, Dennis Nedry disabled the park's security by disguising a backdoor function call as an object constructor in what was pretty clearly a C++-like language, in an attempt to pull a fast one on anyone who might audit his code. (The novel had screenshots of his IDE and everything; wonderfully geeky.) That C++ enables this sort of behavior makes it complicated and risky to use in certain scenarios. I can imagine kerbnel developers blanching at its use, or keeping it to a restricted subset.

Every nonzero finite dimensional inner product space has an orthonormal basis. It makes sense, when you don't think about it.