Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Mac Thief Caught Thanks To Applescript & Timbuktu

Posted by CmdrTaco on Thu Jan 24, 2002 05:12 AM
from the funny-late-night-story dept.
el.cerrito.slasher sent in an amusing bit found on MacSlash. This story is a tale of a stolen iMac that just happened to be running Timbuktu (a remote control program like VNC I believe). Well the stolen box kept getting used, and the owner was able to track it down through a variety of amusing Timbuktu Fu. Funny story.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • applescript strikes back (Score:4, Interesting)

    by athagon (410963) on Thursday January 24 2002, @05:16AM (#2893448) Homepage
    What a brilliant idea. AppleScript - although simplistic and arcane - obviously has some uses. Forget getting the iTunes song or FTPing files, here comes the Timbuktu/AppleScript remote-disk-erase squad! ^_^
    • Re:applescript strikes back by Alan Partridge (Score:2) Thursday January 24 2002, @06:01AM
    • Re:applescript strikes back (Score:5, Funny)

      by gazbo (517111) on Thursday January 24 2002, @06:09AM (#2893567)
      set AppleScript's text item delimiters to {""}

      Yikes! That is some urglee code. I mean come on, since when has code used a possessive apostrophe? It's just......wrong.

      I'll grant it's wonderfully readable, but in people's experience, is it actually easy to write? I can imagine having difficulty remembering all of the exact 'easy-to-use' identifiers. Also, in some cases it seemed to match good grammar, whereas in other cases parts of verbs, plurals etc. were not used correctly. Is there a set of special cases you have to remember or what?
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:applescript strikes back (Score:5, Insightful)

        by Alan Partridge (516639) on Thursday January 24 2002, @06:24AM (#2893587) Journal
        AppleScript is UNBELEIVABLY easy to write. If you have any kind of logic in your soul and speak English, you can automate your plastic pal to death. We actually run our business on .as, it's just great to have a script that runs when you drop a video capure file on a folder, runs Cleaner to compress it, BBEdit to knock up some HTML, DeBabelizer to cobble together some GIF thumbnails, Fetch to upload it and IE to spring open to look at the site. All while preparing coffee or beating the crap out of some guards in Oni.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:applescript strikes back (Score:5, Informative)

          by smagoun (546733) on Thursday January 24 2002, @08:50AM (#2893890) Homepage
          Not only is Applescript unbelievably easy to write, it's easy to execute, too - drop an Applescript or three into the "Speakable Items" folder on the Mac, and your Applescripts are suddenly voice commands for your computer. This brings you a long way toward full voice command of your computer, depending on what you need.

          "Computer, update website" (computer executes the 'update website' applescript, which would probably be very similar to the parent post's Applescript"

          Since Applescript is easy, powerful, and voice-activated like this, you can do some amazing stuff on the mac with very little effort. It impresses the hell out of other people, too.

          (FWIW, the PC emulator VirtualPC is Applescriptable - you can have a LOT of fun with that: imagine the above Applescript, but add the part where the script fires up VirtualPC and loads your webpage in IE for Windows to make sure it looks good on that platform too. All this while you're playing Oni)

          [ Parent ]
        • Re:applescript strikes back by PaschalNee (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @11:14AM
      • Re:applescript strikes back (Score:5, Interesting)

        by Morth (322218) on Thursday January 24 2002, @06:25AM (#2893588)
        Yikes! That is some urglee code. I mean come on, since when has code used a possessive apostrophe?

        Since AppleScript was invented, obviously. (90-91?)
        IIRC, set text item delimiters of AppleScript to {":"} works just as well. It's the versatility and its way of knowing where to put parentheses that makes AppleScript easy.

        [ Parent ]
      • Re:applescript strikes back by nzhavok (Score:2) Thursday January 24 2002, @07:20AM
      • Re:applescript strikes back by @madeus (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @08:20AM
      • Re:applescript strikes back (Score:5, Insightful)

        by melatonin (443194) on Thursday January 24 2002, @10:43AM (#2894470)
        Yikes! That is some urglee code. I mean come on, since when has code used a possessive apostrophe? It's just......wrong.

        Uh, no, it just makes sense. Possessive apostrophes are awesome for programming languages.

        c++/java:
        foo->bar()

        AppleScript:
        foo's bar()
        bar() of foo

        It's a hell of a lot easier to type.

        PHP:
        $myArray[3]

        WebSiphon:
        myArray'3

        It's not wrong, it makes sense. Just try typing those lines of code there. I wish more programming languages used it.

        And ya, it's very easy to write. That is, once you understand that it is a programming language which has its own way of forming meaningful statements, so that something that makes sense in English doesn't necessarily mean it will make sense to AppleScript :)

        AS is best for making objects from different programs work together. It's a solution to the interoperability problem. Each program can describe itself with verbs and nouns, and AppleScript's syntax is very good at mashing those things from different programs together.

        It's not so great for coding intense algorithms, as it tends to be verbose.

        set foo to 5
        foo = 5

        When you do have to make programs talk to each other, AS makes wonderful glue. AS is intended to exploit logic in other code, so rather than running awk/sed to munge my text, or use the language's text manipulation expressions (as you would in Perl), I'll get BBEdit to open the text file, and use all it's insanely powerful multi-file regex features. Apps in OS X are supposed to support opening files and doing operations on them without presenting a user interface specifically for this purpose.

        No need for CORBA to solve those problems :P

        [ Parent ]
      • Re:applescript strikes back by phillymjs (Score:3) Thursday January 24 2002, @11:18AM
      • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:applescript strikes back by mother pussbucket (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @10:22PM
  • Can I do this with my laptop? (Score:5, Interesting)

    by bildstorm (129924) <peter...buchy@@@shh...fi> on Thursday January 24 2002, @05:33AM (#2893483) Homepage Journal

    Personally, I'm slightly security paranoid, but I don't believe that anyone who steals my machine is going to care what's on it, but more likely swap drives. Ok, that's what I'd do, at least.

    But, looking at this, I'd love to have something like this running. Are they any current security programs that do things like this? I would need it for Windows and Linux.

    Now if only I could have it run in the BIOS. Imagine if on the bios level, without a proper key or password or whatever, if the hard drive was removed and replaced, it would then call a panic number whenever connected. That'd be neat.

  • Reminds me of Cuckoo's Egg (Score:4, Informative)

    by Tony.Tang (164961) <slashdot&sleek,hn,org> on Thursday January 24 2002, @05:34AM (#2893486) Homepage Journal
    For those of you who got a real kick out of this thing, you may want to read Cuckoo's Egg [amazon.com]. Cuckoo's Egg is a little older (he talks about using the teletype), and follows a real life story of an admin who went and tracked a bad hacker (or thief? -- sorry it's been a while). It has the same sort of "you out-think me, i'll out-think you!" back and forth flavour to it. Give it a read, you won't be disappointed.
  • Good Idea (Score:1, Interesting)

    by TurboRoot (249163) on Thursday January 24 2002, @05:35AM (#2893487)
    Any professional would have wiped the hard drive. An easier solution would be along the lines of what they do with dogs. It would't be hard to make a tracker device/PCI graphics card that looked pretty mundane.
    • Re:Good Idea by Alan Partridge (Score:3) Thursday January 24 2002, @06:06AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Good Idea by rblancarte (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @07:16AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Good Idea by Lysander Luddite (Score:2) Thursday January 24 2002, @09:16AM
      • Re:Good Idea by MaxVlast (Score:2) Thursday January 24 2002, @10:48AM
      • Re:Good Idea by homer_ca (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @12:58PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Woof! by tomblackwell (Score:3) Thursday January 24 2002, @11:04AM
      • Re:Woof! by fishboy (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @01:19PM
        • Re:Woof! by The_dev0 (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @06:26PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Neat! But . . . (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Selanit (192811) on Thursday January 24 2002, @05:39AM (#2893497)
    All it would take to permanently disable this sort of thing would be to format the hard drive and reinstall the OS. And that would be very likely to happen on a Linux box. I mean seriously, how many thieves are going to be willing to sit and work at a Linux box till they come up with a valid Username/Password combo?

    With a Windows box, on the other hand, you could easily write a program to verify the computer's IP address at boot time, and if it doesn't match, send an email to you reporting the unusual IP address and any other useful info you can think of. At each boot thereafter (common with Windows, of course) it checks a particular file on a particular server for instructions on what else to do, such as activating auto-destruct. That way you never auto-destruct your own computer by accident, since it requires permission first.

    If you were particularly ambitious, you could have it activate a keystroke logger and email the recorded info to you each time it boots.
  • by nizo (81281) on Thursday January 24 2002, @05:39AM (#2893498) Homepage Journal
    Now if only there was a way to remotely electrocute the current machine's user when they touched the keyboard (this feature might be useful in a day to day network environment as well).
  • by wildcard023 (184139) on Thursday January 24 2002, @05:42AM (#2893507) Homepage
    I had flashbacks to reading "The Cuckoo's Egg" while reading this transcription. Does anyone else remember reading the commands listed in the book and quickly running over to a unix box to play?

    Honestly, I'm not -too- surprised that this happened. My machine runs:

    /bin/date | mail
    /sbin/ifconfig -a | mail

    (Running dyndns would be interesting also.)

    on bootup. I originally did this so that I could keep track of my box and identify when it went down and what the current IP was so I could ssh in and look around more comprehensively, although it has crossed my mind that if my machine were to get stolen it might report back to me where it was. I'd happy to see that it's worked out at least once for someone.

    Most ISPS keep logs of usernames and passwords on certain ips (especially if they're static/near static as in a cable modem or dsl connection). From there, it's fairly easy for the ISP for connect that back to a real name.

    I'd be very intrested to see if this is enough information to get a search warrent.
  • No, the thief wasn't caught. (Score:5, Informative)

    by rleyton (14248) on Thursday January 24 2002, @05:45AM (#2893510) Homepage
    The article doesn't say the thief was caught. To quote the guy himself: "So the conclusion to the story is: iMac and Lexmark printer recovered, one female pled out to possession of stolen property and got a year's probation.".

    Possession of stolen property is very different to theft. She claims to have bought the imac from "some guy". Ok, she might be complicit, but we won't ever know.
  • Some thoughts (Score:1)

    by Joe 'Nova' (98613) on Thursday January 24 2002, @05:47AM (#2893516) Homepage
    On erasing the drive:Wouldn't it have been better to give some cryptic error message that prompts you to call the "service" number for some agency? If you just wipe the drive, wouldn't anyone know the drive died? I did like the idea of phone home, then get caller id. Just don't use *(remove call id!;)
    Whoever the "fence" is(hot item buyer), they should know a few things.
    However, I've known a few machines that had a hard drive crash due to heads hitting the platters, maybe that would be a useful "feature";) to implement.
    I have another idea. ID the cpu somehow, so no matter if you pull the drive, unless you dissect the sucker, it will register itself, and the phone number connected, to a security co., then pay them a visit *weg*
  • by guttentag (313541) on Thursday January 24 2002, @05:48AM (#2893517) Journal
    From the "Have you ever flashy-thinged me? Kay? I ain't playin'. Have you ever flashy-thinged me?" department:

    <SARCASM>
    In related news, the FBI has announced that its stealthy "Magic Lantern" program is officially being launched under the name "fbiJack."

    "This guy got lucky, but how 'bout you, Slick?" taunted Special Agent Kay. "Wouldn't you feel better knowing that fbiJack is running on your machine? You can pick up an installer disk at any U.S. Post Office or download it from Microsoft.com."
    </SARCASM>

    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • right-fucking-on! (Score:1, Redundant)

    by spongman (182339) on Thursday January 24 2002, @05:48AM (#2893518)
    what a great story. the geek fights back - and gets a conviction out of it to boot.
  • Mac Thief (Score:3, Funny)

    by flumps (240328) <matt.corby@gCOLAmail.com minus caffeine> on Thursday January 24 2002, @05:54AM (#2893529) Homepage
    I thought that his name was Hamburgler, not Mac Thief...

    Oh THAT kind of Mac.

    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Very nice... (Score:2, Interesting)

    by Eythian (552130) <robin&kallisti,net,nz> on Thursday January 24 2002, @05:54AM (#2893531) Homepage
    This is quite a bit fancier than putting "logout" in someones .login when they leave their terminal unguarded.

    The problem with doing something like this under a system requiring user accounts is that once the person discovers that they can't just turn it on and get a point-and-drool interface, they'll erase it and start from scratch. Perhaps if you wanted something like this (and had a bit of technical skill) you could have it boot from a small partition (I mean, how many users know much about that?) that checks to see if what its booting into is what it should be (ie has windows been installed where linux should be), and if so alters something on that OS to make it phone home (obviously, something different for every OS that may be installed would have to be done, but this is hypothetical), and then proceeds to boot the new OS normally.

    In the case of many Linux machines on dialups with a dedicated phone line, they are told to dialup on boot anyway, so that would give you some oppertunity to trace it, by checking the number that it is calling from. However, that is assuming that someone sets everything up, including the modem cable, before turning it on the first time.

    On another note, how come erasing everything didn't remove Timbuktu? Does it live in the System Folder only?
  • Now I understand... (Score:2, Funny)

    by Advocadus Diaboli (323784) on Thursday January 24 2002, @05:55AM (#2893532)
    ...why Windows XP is frequently calling "home" :-)
  • praise osx (Score:4, Interesting)

    by banky (9941) <gregg@neuroba[ ]ng.com ['shi' in gap]> on Thursday January 24 2002, @05:55AM (#2893533) Homepage Journal
    Now instead of all that freaky AppleScript, the payload of the script is a simple
    sudo rm -rf /

    Applescript is my least favorite part of Macs. (shudder). it's nice to be able to integrate shell scripts as AppleScript now; just wrap the entire shell script in a single line of Applescript.
    • Re:praise osx by Smoking (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @09:37AM
      • Re:praise osx by banky (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @09:40AM
        • Re:praise osx by Smoking (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @09:57AM
          • Re:praise osx by Lazaru5 (Score:2) Thursday January 24 2002, @11:05AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:praise osx by MoneyT (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @11:06AM
    • Re:praise osx by archen (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @11:46AM
      • Re:praise osx by linzeal (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @01:37PM
  • lamers (Score:5, Funny)

    by Rinikusu (28164) on Thursday January 24 2002, @06:20AM (#2893578)
    Seriously.

    If you were really serious about inflicting pain, how about:

    setting up one of those $125 per call phone lines in the bahamas and then having the imac call it every 2 minutes...

    repeatedly call 911 and play recorded message: "help! I've fallen and I can't get up!" over and over again

    install a keylogger so you can post their most intimate conversations on your website.

    those are just a few ideas that have popped in my head.. Hell, you could do that with VB email virii and make a mint with the first one...
    • Re:lamers (Score:5, Funny)

      by buckrogers (136562) on Thursday January 24 2002, @06:44AM (#2893610) Homepage
      I like your idea of having the iMac call the 900 number for cash. If it called enough times you could buy a brand new computer.

      I'm thinking that you need to turn off the speakers, turn off the modem sound and if there has been no activity for a few hours, at 4am have the system call that $125 number about 20 times in just a few hours.

      With this scheme you could sell reconditioned iMacs setup with this software out of the back of a van for about $100 apeice and just sit back and rake in the cash. The people who bought what they thought was stollen property will never say a word as long as you only ripped them off for a couple of thousand dollars.

      So, people, if you buy computers from the back of a van, don't complain when you get ripped off. :) You were warned!
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:lamers (Score:5, Funny)

      by petej (36394) on Thursday January 24 2002, @09:11AM (#2893949)
      "Hello, Miss Cleo? My name is Eliza."
      [ Parent ]
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:lamers by MoneyT (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @11:10AM
    • Re:lamers by shotfeel (Score:3) Thursday January 24 2002, @01:17PM
    • Re:lamers by Restil (Score:2) Thursday January 24 2002, @04:39PM
    • Re:lamers by iphayd (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @04:48PM
  • Record 'em! (Score:5, Interesting)

    by PhotoGuy (189467) on Thursday January 24 2002, @06:31AM (#2893596) Homepage
    Recovering the iMac at all is very cool. Every PC and Mac should have some "phone home" program installed; I bet most stolen computers aren't wiped. Anyone buying a Mac/PC on the super-cheap, is unlikely to buy or dig up a copy of the OS to start fresh.

    The lack of a prosecution for the theft is disappointing. (As someone who has had their place robbed twice in the past two years, I find the low capture/prosecution rates depressing; it just doesn't seem to be a priority with law enforcement. Sigh. Oh well, if anyone tries to hit me again, they'll be on candid camera :-)

    What might also have been cool, would be to use AppleScript to flip on the microphone, record the sound in the room, and send the recordings now and then, when connected. (Or use AppleScript to download a program that does the same; I don't know AppleScript.) That would potentially allow more "evidence" to be collected. If the lady didn't steal it, there's a chance you'd record something that would be useful. (Her thanking her brother-in-law for the Mac, or the like.) Having the Mac copy you on all incoming and outgoing mail may also be useful. (Not sure if the Mac could do it; Outlook almost does this by itself, with all the viruses it accepts :-)

    Probably not admissible in court, I guess. Although using a stolen device for surveillance really *should* be a legal means of admissible evidence, in a perfect world :-)

    -me
    • Re:Record 'em! by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @09:33AM
    • Re:Record 'em! (Score:4, Informative)

      by gordguide (307383) on Thursday January 24 2002, @12:14PM (#2895168)
      " ... Probably not admissible in court, I guess. Although using a stolen device for surveillance really *should* be a legal means of admissible evidence, in a perfect world :-) ..."

      I'm not so sure it wouldn't be admissable in court. Unauthorized taps are illegal in some, but not all jurisdictions. Also, illegaly obtained evidence is admissible under some conditions; in particular when the illegal evidence is obtained by someone who is NOT a police officer, etc.

      Finally, consider this: if you use the phone or use the bathroom, this is an illegal tap. Phones are not recorders and bathrooms are not cameras, there is an expectation of privacy. But a computer can be and is an audio and video recording device, as well as a network data collector. Many computers have built-in microphones and network devices; no reasonable person should assume they don't work. In other words, there is no expectation of privacy; especially if the lawful owner has configured it to act as a remote device.

      I'm sure the laywers will eventually hash this out, but I can assure you the evidence would be admissible in my jursdiction; legal or not, because I am not a cop.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Record 'em! by DavidTC (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @03:12PM
    • Re:Record 'em! by bughunter (Score:2) Thursday January 24 2002, @04:01PM
    • Re:Record 'em! by Restil (Score:2) Thursday January 24 2002, @04:29PM
    • Re:Record 'em! by Scooby Snacks (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @10:31PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • This reminds me.... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by sawilson (317999) on Thursday January 24 2002, @07:48AM (#2893694) Homepage
    Of an admin legend I heard once about an overzealous equipment cage guy that spent years doing tcpdumps scanning for the mac addresses that belonged to a shipment of missing ethernet cards, and eventually caught the guy that did it. Anybody ever heard that one?
  • See this?? (Score:1, Troll)

    by qurob (543434) on Thursday January 24 2002, @08:17AM (#2893773) Homepage

    Reader: I have got a much better idea!

    Write a script that pops up a window saying "You have won a special 500.00 prize. Your machine has run for 3000 hours without a major problem!"

    Create fields for them to enter name, address and phne numbers to receive the prize.

    Make the script write that data to disk and you can pull it with timbuktu

    Then call the police.

    Crooks often fall for the stupidest tricks, especially if you appeal to GREED!!!



    I know THIS would work. I steal computers all the time, and I ALWAYS click on every pop up and fill out ALL the forms. As everyone knows, they are all 100% real!

  • The scary thing is, it works.... (Score:1, Redundant)

    by mblase (200735) on Thursday January 24 2002, @08:18AM (#2893774)
    Wouldn't it be great if every Mac/WinTel computer came with a stripped-down, Timbuktu-like program as part of the operating system? That way, owners and police could locate and retrieve it any time it was stolen anywhere in the world...

    Kidding, of course. But you know that Microsoft is working on something like this already, if they haven't finished it by now. On the other hand, it *would* be nice to have a THIRD-PARTY tool that I could purchase separately (for less than Timbuktu) that would let me do things like this, locate it online anywhere should it be stolen simply by using a login/password combination I secretly set myself. It wouldn't do any system-takeover kind of stuff, just tell me what phone number or static IP it's being used at. Yes, a hard-drive format would solve the thieves' problem for me, but as this story indicates, not everyone is that careful when dealing with stolen property.

    I just don't want Microsoft to install it for me by default. But that's a given.
  • by b1t r0t (216468) on Thursday January 24 2002, @08:36AM (#2893837)
    Back in the late '80s, a friend of mine had one of the first Apple HD-20 hard drives. At a user group meeting someone stole the computer and hard drive. But not the boot disk. See, this wierd hard drive hooked up to the floppy port, and until the 512e/Mac Plus ROM, you had to have a special boot disk which contained a replacement floppy driver to use it.

    So he called up all the places in town that sold Macs (all two or three of them) and waited. Sure enough the idiot kid shows up at a store asking about an HD-20 boot disk. Snagged!

    The difference now is that the internet is everywhere, and it's now possible to have the computer "phone home".

    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • by Obelisk_ym (551976) on Thursday January 24 2002, @09:46AM (#2894145)
    If this were my machine, I would definitely not want the script to be visible in any way to the user. Especially I would not want it to be shut down. I would want the user to be online as much as possible in order to keep tabs on it. Of course I would never own an iMac either. I know there's some work being done on linux BIOS programming, maybe we will see some great abilities of a computer BIOS in the future. How cool would that be?
  • Well now... (Score:1)

    by Drakin (415182) on Thursday January 24 2002, @10:01AM (#2894205)
    Isn't it time to build a good web cam into the monitor?

    Think of the fun you could have with that...
  • Powerbook... Phone home! (Score:2, Interesting)

    by ion_ash (14931) <ion_ash@[ ]isash.com ['chr' in gap]> on Thursday January 24 2002, @10:14AM (#2894292) Homepage
    I once had an older Mac Powerbook (520c) that I kinda left, uncased, on the top of my car and drove around for hours before I figured out what happened. Naturally I expected it to be, if found, completely trashed from falling off my car but searching for it returned no results.

    So I placed a Lost and Found ad with a Reward, and sure enough a couple days later this kind person calls me to say they found the laptop.

    The people who found it said they watched it fall off my car on the highway and stopped to pick it up. The amazing thing was that the only damage to the Powerbook was the floppy drive and a scuffed case (battle scars.)

    Unfortunately, the people who rescued my mac weren't mac users. Actually I don't think they were computer users at all as it seemed the only thing they were capable of was changing the names of all the files on the desktop to variations of :aaasjkdfl;jjj, including the hard disk:fhhdks;jasdfjjh. And that's what really would've been nice, a form of nag-ware that ran when powered up saying: to whom it belonged, and how a reward for return would be paid, etc. And maybe an applescript to auto-dial the modem to my home phone. Then at least I'd have a chance of caller-id picking up!

    -

  • Windows-based mailer (Score:4, Informative)

    by pilsen (551725) on Thursday January 24 2002, @10:27AM (#2894361)
    What I did on my Windows machine to record the IP address was use a *very* simple set of tools.
    1. I wrote a one-line .bat file, which runs and ends very quickly at startup:
    ipconfig > c:\windows\system32\ip_ADDR_resolv.sys
    to make it look like a system file. All it is really is an output of my local IP address.
    2. I used the free StealthMailer program at: http://www.amecisco.com/stealthmail.htm to mail my .sys file to my hotmail account. And it does so periodically.
    3. For added cool, you can use low-level key-logging software [amecisco.com] and mail out everything that use types and mail it to yourself. Cost is about $79/license.
    You can't beat that for peace of mind.
    .p.
  • Very Sad (Score:4, Interesting)

    by smack_attack (171144) on Thursday January 24 2002, @11:12AM (#2894669) Homepage
    This just exacerbates the problems with the current police system. Cops would much rather sit by the side of the freeway eating a donut, drinking some coffee and pointing a fucking radar gun at your car. God forbid they actually help people out in recovering stolen property, that has to be done by the individual these days.

    Why is that? Is it because traffic citations are easy and gain them money? Is it because they can bust someone for possession of a "controlled" substance and also get forfeiture of property? Is it because law enforcement is just lazy when it comes to going after real criminals who leave behind real victims because it's not economically viable?

    I'll let you decide.
    • Re:Very Sad by SpacePunk (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @11:15AM
    • Right (not) by mikey504 (Score:3) Thursday January 24 2002, @12:21PM
      • Re:Right (not) by smack_attack (Score:2) Thursday January 24 2002, @02:24PM
      • Re:Right (not) by Chemical (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @02:52PM
      • I see. by roystgnr (Score:1) Thursday January 24 2002, @07:44PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Very Sad by geekoid (Score:2) Thursday January 24 2002, @07:56PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • by MsGeek (162936) on Thursday January 24 2002, @11:30AM (#2894809) Homepage Journal
    ...the security implications of this "suicide script". I can easily see someone taking this applescript and tweaking it to create a really nasty trojan. Hope all you Mac users are either running a current version of an anti-virus proggie or have applescript disabled...
  • here's how da penguin does it (Score:3, Informative)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday January 24 2002, @12:03PM (#2895090)
    First you set the bios password. I know it can be removed, but thieves are idiots afterall and this might take them a good deal of time.

    If they get past that, and boot, they'll be confronted with a password prompt to mount your /home filesystem through the crypto loop back (you *do* mount your /home dir through the crypto loop device in Linux, right???). Obviously, they won't be able to guess this password (hell, my password to do this consists soley of 9 digits).

    So they will have to remove somehow repartition the drive and install another operating system. Can a thief do that too? This causes the thief precious time and effort... more and more the machine becomes a less interesting proposition.

    Between boot and trying to mount your sensitive crap in /home, a sweet little /etc/init.d/ script you made sends your IP address via email to you. Then you can SSH on in do whatever you like.

    BTW, I can't spel.
  • Privacy? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by allenw (33234) on Thursday January 24 2002, @12:03PM (#2895098) Journal
    Interesting story. But there is one part that has me a bit concerned:

    The Timbuktu extension that's installed on it posts a unique identifier to Netopia's IP Locator server (findme.netopia.com) whenever it connects to the internet.

    What about the privacy aspects of this? S