Forgot your password?

typodupeerror

+ - AT&T Quietly Adds Charges to All Contract Cell Plans->

Submitted by guttentag
guttentag writes "The Wall Street Journal is reporting that AT&T Mobility, the second-largest wireless carrier in the U.S., has added a new monthly administrative fee of 61 cents to the bills of all of its contract wireless lines as of May 1, a move that could bring in more than a half-billion dollars in annual revenue to the telecom giant.

An AT&T spokeswoman said the fee covers "certain expenses, such as interconnection and cell-site rents and maintenance." The increased cost to consumers comes even though AT&T's growth in wireless revenue last year outpaced the costs to operate and support its wireless business. The company has talked of continuing to improve wireless profitability. Citigroup analyst Michael Rollins noted that the new administrative fee is a key component for accelerating revenue growth for the rest of the year. He said the fee should add 0.30 of a percentage point to AT&T's 2013 revenue growth; he predicts total top-line growth of about 1.5%.

Normally, consumers could vote with their wallets by taking their business elsewhere. AT&T would be required to let customers out of their contracts without an early termination fee if it raised prices, but it is avoiding this by simply calling the increase a "surcharge," effectively forcing millions of people to either pay more money per month or pay the ETF."

Link to Original Source

Comment: Visually Efficient? (Score 3, Insightful) 23

by guttentag (#43808389) Attached to: Scientists Growing New Crystals To Make LED Lights Better

When to comes to offering warm yet visually efficient lighting, LEDs have a long way to go.

What would visually-efficient lighting look like? Would it not be so time consuming to watch?

As far as warmth goes, there are plenty of options for warm LED light bulbs right now:

  • Warm = 2700K
  • Bright White = 3000K
  • Daylight = 5000K

I have two of these 2700K bulbs installed in the ceiling fan here in my living room. I have no complaints about the light they provide, and the cost savings are significant. A warm bulb is not what you want in every situation... warm is good in a relaxing environment like the living room or bedroom, but in the kitchen and bathroom I have 5000K (Daylight) LED bulbs.

As far as them having "a long way to go," that sounds like what someone would say if they were trying to sell us some "new" unspecified kind of LED that they are only able to claim is better because not enough people have LED bulbs now to know they don't suck. Perfectly happy with mine. The only thing the manufacturers need to do now is bring the price down to drive wider adoption. Tell me this "new LED technology" will do that and you have my attention.

Comment: Not Just Paying For the Cores (Score 1) 138

by guttentag (#43805887) Attached to: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Offers 2,304 Cores For $650
You're paying for the luxury of what appears to be the world's first high-end video card with a built-in speaker. Nvidia finally reached the point where the polygons their products could produce exceeded the nominal human capacity to perceive them, so now they've added the ability to hear the extra polygons you can't see, as ultra-soothing HD Brown noise! The only side effect is that it reduces your available gaming time by increasing the number of bathroom breaks you need to take.

Comment: Re:LANPARTY! (Score 1) 130

by guttentag (#43805765) Attached to: Ethernet Turns 40
LAN parties never made much sense to me.

Were you that overly-excited guy going from door to door in the dorms, announcing, "We're having a LAN party! Unplug your computer and bring it down to the 4th floor lounge!" To which I replied, "why don't I just stay here... I'm already connected."

I always felt like the point of having a LAN was so you could be far enough away that I couldn't hear you shrilly giggling about the ginormous zerg rush you were preparing to unleash upon me.

Comment: Re:Paid Reviewer Alert (Score 1) 43

by guttentag (#43776569) Attached to: Book Review: Locked Down: Information Security For Lawyers
And if you look at benrothke's page on slashdot, you'll notice that he only has one comment and many submitted book reviews. His one comment:

Thank you for the comments. In my haste to get this review out, I was not as diligent in proofreading as I should have. With that, you are correct that information is their enemy. I hope my grammatical errors in the review don’t get in the way of Mr. Wrights important message. Thanks again.

That sounds like an apology to the author for making mistakes in the review, and he bends over backwards to call the author Mr. Wright and his book an "important message." Why was he in such a hurry to get the review out? Did the publisher give him a deadline?

He's definitely copying and pasting reviews written elsewhere. Check this submission out from January 27th:

"Untitled documentol{margin:0;padding:0}.c5{max-width:468pt;background-color:#ffffff;padding:72pt 72pt 72pt 72pt}.c0{color:#1155cc;font-size:12pt;text-decoration:underline}.c3{color:inherit;text-decoration:inherit}.c2{text-align:justify;direction:ltr}.c4{height:11pt;direction:ltr}.c1{font-size:12pt}.c7{font-style:italic}.c8{height:11pt}.c6{direction:ltr}.title{padding-top:24pt;line-height:1.15;text-align:left;color:#000000;font-size:36pt;font-family:"Arial";font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:6pt}.subtitle{padding-top:18pt;line-height:1.15;text-align:left;color:#666666;font-style:italic;font-size:24pt;font-family:"Georgia";padding-bottom:4pt}li{color:#000000;font-size:11pt;font-family:"Arial"}p{color:#000000;font-size:11pt;margin:0;font-family:"Arial"}h1{padding-top:24pt;line-height:1.15;text-align:left;color:#000000;font-size:18pt;font-family:"Arial";font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:6pt}h2{padding-top:18pt;line-height:1.15;text-align:left;color:#000000;font-size:14pt;font-family:"Arial";font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:4pt}h3{padding-top:14pt;line-height:1.15;text-align:left;color:#666666;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Arial";font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:4pt}h4{padding-top:12pt;line-height:1.15;text-align:left;color:#666666;font-style:italic;font-size:11pt;font-family:"Arial";padding-bottom:2pt}h5{padding-top:11pt;line-height:1.15;text-align:left;color:#666666;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Arial";font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:2pt}h6{padding-top:10pt;line-height:1.15;text-align:left;color:#666666;font-style:italic;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Arial";padding-bottom:2pt}

In its first week, Going Clear: Scientology, Hollywood, and the Prison of Beliefwas #3 on the New York Times Best Sellers list and will likely be #1 soon. The fact that the book is in print is somewhat miraculous given the voracious appetite Scientology has for litigation.

And this from January 21:

"Untitled documentol{margin:0;padding:0}.c6{max-width:468pt;background-color:#ffffff;padding:72pt 72pt 72pt 72pt}.c0{text-align:justify;direction:ltr}.c4{color:#1155cc;text-decoration:underline}.c3{color:inherit;text-decoration:inherit}.c1{font-size:12pt}.c7{font-style:italic}.c5{height:11pt}.c2{direction:ltr}.title{padding-top:24pt;line-height:1.15;text-align:left;color:#000000;font-size:36pt;font-family:"Arial";font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:6pt}.subtitle{padding-top:18pt;line-height:1.15;text-align:left;color:#666666;font-style:italic;font-size:24pt;font-family:"Georgia";padding-bottom:4pt}li{color:#000000;font-size:11pt;font-family:"Arial"}p{color:#000000;font-size:11pt;margin:0;font-family:"Arial"}h1{padding-top:24pt;line-height:1.15;text-align:left;color:#000000;font-size:18pt;font-family:"Arial";font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:6pt}h2{padding-top:18pt;line-height:1.15;text-align:left;color:#000000;font-size:14pt;font-family:"Arial";font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:4pt}h3{padding-top:14pt;line-height:1.15;text-align:left;color:#666666;font-size:12pt;font-family:"Arial";font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:4pt}h4{padding-top:12pt;line-height:1.15;text-align:left;color:#666666;font-style:italic;font-size:11pt;font-family:"Arial";padding-bottom:2pt}h5{padding-top:11pt;line-height:1.15;text-align:left;color:#666666;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Arial";font-weight:bold;padding-bottom:2pt}h6{padding-top:10pt;line-height:1.15;text-align:left;color:#666666;font-style:italic;font-size:10pt;font-family:"Arial";padding-bottom:2pt}

In the 4th edition of A Gift of Fire: Social, Legal, and Ethical Issues for Computing Technology, author Sara Baase takes a broad look at the social, legal and ethical issues around technology and their implications. Baase notes that her primary goal in writing the book is for computer professionals to understand the implications of what they create and how it fits into society. The book is an interesting analysis of a broad set of topics. Combined with Baase's superb writing skills, the book is both an excellent reference and a fascinating read.

Same CSS junk at the beginning of several reviews before that. This guy needs to be blacklisted.

Comment: Paid Reviewer Alert (Score 4, Insightful) 43

by guttentag (#43776437) Attached to: Book Review: Locked Down: Information Security For Lawyers
The reviewer's Web site and LinkedIn profile both state "I review and recommend books on digital security, privacy and other relevant issues and write a monthly book review on topics of information security and privacy for Security Management magazine and Slashdot."

The reviewer reviews IT books on Amazon like clockwork, almost always 7 or 8 days between reviews, which are always positive, written like marketing material and always give 4 or 5 stars:
May 20, 2013 Locked Down: Information Security for Lawyers 5 Stars
May 13, 2013 The Plateau Effect: Getting from Stuck to Success 4 Stars
May 7, 2013 Secure Coding in C and C++ (2nd Edition) (SEI Series in Software Engineering) 5 Stars
May 1, 2013 Cybersecurity: Public Sector Threats and Responses (Public Administration and Public Policy) 4 Stars
April 22, 2013 Applied Information Security: A Hands-on Approach 4 Stars
April 15, 2013 The Death of the Internet 5 Stars
April 8, 2013 Applied Cyber Security and the Smart Grid: Implementing Security Controls into the Modern Power Infrastructure 4 Stars
March 28, 2013 Introduction to Computer Networks and Cybersecurity 4 Stars
March 20, 2013 Managing Risk and Information Security: Protect to Enable 4 Stars
(362 Reviews total)

There's a theme in his reviews of either saying that the book is a must-read for _____, or suggesting that the only people who won't get a lot out of the book are people who don't understand how much they need it: "For the reader who may be indifferent to their need for change, the book may not be of full value to then." And "The only negative thing about the book is the over the top title, which I think detracts from the important message that is pervasive in it."

Comment: Re:Toothpaste (Score 4, Funny) 221

Personally, I find the thought that we put that stuff in our mouths every day much more worrying than the use in soaps.

Perhaps you just need a brand in a shinier box? I suggest you try the new Crest 4D White toothpaste. It has every bit as much fluoride as 3D White, but comes in a new extra-shiny with sparklies box. Those matte boxes will make your teeth rot.

Comment: Re:Oh dear (Score 2) 84

by guttentag (#43774901) Attached to: Interviews: McAfee Says House Fire Was No Accident

The day that Slashdot finally became a gossip mag has arrived.

I'd say it's becoming more like the techie version of the Howard Stern Show. McAfee is just one of the premier members of The Wack Pack, like High Pitch Erik. People are fascinated by train wrecks:

  • CrackAfee (John McAfee)
  • Crazy Lauren Guy (Lauren Weinstein)
    The name informs people up front to take Lauren's submissions with a grain of salt, and heads off all the uninformed incorrect gender-specific pronouns that inevitably get applied to him
  • Nick the Troll Prostitute (Nerval's Lobster)
    The name informs people up front that Nerval's Lobster is actually Nick Kolakowski, slashdot "editor" and self-described "literary gun for hire" who writes brief provocative opinion pieces (often about stories we've already discussed) and sells them to generate page views by pushing slashdotters' buttons (he's a paid troll)

I'm just surprised they didn't go with "McAfee's Home Set A Belize" for the headline.

Comment: Re:Here on Slashdot (Score 5, Informative) 160

by guttentag (#43774007) Attached to: Yahoo Pinkie-Swears It Won't Ruin Tumblr
The AC is right about the Orwellian two minutes hate. As soon as I read the headline I knew it would have been submitted by Nerval's Lobster and link to a slashdot/topic/cloud or slashdot/topic/bi opinion piece by Nick Kolakowski.
  • The headline evokes childish playground antics
  • The headline is about a news story we already covered yesterday
  • The headline takes the position that big company buying little company will ruin it, but provocatively flips it around to get a rise out of Slashdotters who will inevitably argue against it

As previously noted, "Slashdot Editor" Nick Kolakowski is once again promoting his own "Business Intelligence/Cloud" opinion pieces under the guise of the fake user Nerval's Lobster. He's simply trolling for pageviews, as he does just about every weekday... but this one is particularly shameless, as he's writing something almost no one will believe about a story we discussed yesterday. It's almost like his day consists of reading the comments of slashdot stories to see what deeply-seated opinions he can play off the next day to justify his job.

Don't feed the troll. Don't comment on stories "submitted" by Nerval's Lobster.

Comment: Editors: Check Your Sources (Score 4, Informative) 361

Disclaimer: I am a former Washington Post journalist

First of all, TFA is at The Washington Times. That alone makes its credibility dubious. The Washington Times was founded by Sun Myung Moon (crazy "Unification Church" cult leader) who stated that the purpose of the "newspaper" was to be "the instrument in spreading the truth about God to the world." Moon was convicted that same year of filing false federal income tax returns and conspiracy and served 13 months in prison. The Times has long been known as a conservative shill (although it has a decent sports section) that had to be financially supported by Moon's "church" to survive. Moon spent nearly $2 billion of his followers' money over 20 years to keep the paper afloat.

Second, The Washington Times article doesn't even claim to have done any reporting on its own... it cites some article from UPI that isn't readily available on UPI's home page or even by searching UPI for "IRS." Ultimately found the "article" here. It's a 9-paragraph blog posting. UPI was once a respectable news agency like AP or Reuters, but its relevance diminished to the point where it was bought out in 2000 by... you guessed it: Sun Myung Moon. UPI's White House correspondent retired the next day after 57 years with the organization. These days UPI doesn't even have a White House correspondent, and its finances have gotten so bad that it relies on free articles contributed by college students.

The UPI blog posting cites a Courthouse News Service article: John Doe Company sued 15 John Doe IRS agents in Superior Court. The plaintiff's attorney alleges that the records affected may include those of "politically controversial members of the Screen Actors Guild and the Directors Guild, and prominent citizens in the world of entertainment, business and government, from all walks of life." He goes on to complain that the unnamed IRS agents "decided to use John Doe Company's media system to watch basketball, ordering pizza and Coca-Cola, to take in part of the NCAA tournament," but "Plaintiff's attorney Robert E. Barnes declined to elaborate on the complaint's allegations, saying he will have more information 'in a few months.'"

Why publish a story no one can verify, since all you can say for now is that that unnamed people at the IRS are illegally snooping on unnamed politically controversial people through an unnamed medical firm? Because it helps fuel the fire driving the current Republican party line of "the IRS is evil and Obama is responsible." Because some ignorant blogger might pick it up and run with it, thinking that The Washington Times and UPI are real news organizations, and not even bother to look for the source of this story. Great job Timothy.

Comment: Re:Narrated by Peter Griffin? (Score 1) 193

by guttentag (#43719415) Attached to: <em>Cosmos</em> Remake Coming To Fox In 2014
It's the next episode in MacFarlane's Star Wars remake series. Remember, at the beginning of Blue Harvest Peter said "let's start with part four." He then went on to do parts five and six, so now he's going back to do part one to explain how it all began, only on a grander scale, possibly with Tom Hanks voicing a long-eared character with a pull string who is like the Forrest Gump of the universe. It will require RealPlayer 7 to watch.

Comment: Re:I hope (Score 2) 353

by guttentag (#43704831) Attached to: Engineering the $325,000 Burger

But then, it's not made out of animals. So it's clearly vegetarian food.

No, it is made out of animals. From TFA:

But the meat is produced with materials — including fetal calf serum, used as a medium in which to grow the cells — that eventually would have to be replaced by similar materials of non-animal origin.

Vegetarians love fetal calf serum. It just sounds so tasty, natural and cruelty-free!

Comment: Obligatory (Score 4, Informative) 353

by guttentag (#43704703) Attached to: Engineering the $325,000 Burger
Ted: "We're talking about growing meat in a lab without cows."
Linda: "Ugh! That's creepy!... Right?... Oh, I see, we're doing that."

Artificial Beef Taste Tester: "It tastes... familiar..."
Ted: "Beef?"
Taste Tester: "No..."
Linda: "Chicken? We'll take chicken."
Taste Tester: Shakes his head
Ted: "What does it taste like?"
Taste Tester: "Despair?"
Ted: "Is it possible it just needs salt?"
Taste Tester: Shakes his head very slowly

Better Off Ted, Season 1 Episode 2

"Oh my! An `inflammatory attitude' in alt.flame? Never heard of such a thing..." -- Allen Gwinn, allen@sulaco.Sigma.COM

Working...