Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

U.S. Penalizes Ukraine for Abetting 'Piracy'

Posted by michael on Thu Jan 03, 2002 03:24 PM
from the communists-a-little-too-free-for-us dept.
The Politech mailing list has a note and follow-up on new trade restrictions levied against Ukraine, since they haven't complied with the U.S.'s demand for 'an optical media licensing regime.' John Gilmore's response puts the issue in perspective. Update: 01/03 23:08 GMT by M : The RIAA has a press release about the trade penalties and response to Gilmore.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Looks like the US... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by UberOogie (464002) on Thursday January 03 2002, @03:30PM (#2780829)
    ... is going after targets it can afford to bully. I'd like to see them try that with China, or India.

  • Double Standard (Score:3, Insightful)

    by zmokhtar (539671) on Thursday January 03 2002, @03:30PM (#2780830) Homepage
    I'd like to see the U.S. implement something like this before they go shoving it down other people's throats.

    If don't want something here in America, why should we want it for countries abroad?
  • Umm... by gooberguy (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:30PM
    • More bad logic by gfxguy (Score:2) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:35PM
    • Re:Umm... by torqer (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:37PM
      • Re:Umm... by Computer! (Score:2) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:57PM
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • does this work? by Syre (Score:2) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:30PM
  • english translation: by jeffy124 (Score:2) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:31PM
  • I'm not sure I see the issue.. by dagoalieman (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:32PM
    • Re:I'm not sure I see the issue.. by jmccay (Score:2) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:39PM
    • Re:I'm not sure I see the issue.. (Score:4, Insightful)

      by KjetilK (186133) <kjetilk@BLUEopera.com minus berry> on Thursday January 03 2002, @04:06PM (#2781080) Homepage Journal
      Well, imagine being a journalist working in an oppressing regime. Then, you get some information that may open the eyes of the outside world. Arguably, the murder of Stephen Biko and the subsequent release of the details had such an effect.

      Obviously, you have to release the information anonymously, othervice they would kill you.

      Unfortunately, all the paper in the world is marked. The manufacturer has inserted a unique watermark, and they have extensive records of who buys each sheet of paper. If the secret police get their hands on any of the documents you distribute, it will point right back at you. You'll be dead.

      To figure out who the "pirates" are, this is what RIAA et al. wants, even if they don't dare state it up front. They want extensive records of all the CDs, so that when a "pirated" CD is found, it points right back at everyone involved, and they can be nailed for it.

      I think this small label is not going to do much to achieve that goal, but it is really beside the point.

      And so what? Paper is one thing, CDs is an entirely different matter?

      OK, so you get a piece of footage. Compressed down to 650 MB (by Ogg Tarkin... :-) ), you can burn it on CDs and distribute it to have it aired worldwide.

      Unfortunately, because RIAA needs protection from "pirates" you can't do that. You can't do that to free your country from oppression.

      OK, this is a bit far-fetched perhaps, but you never know if this could happen.

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:I'm not sure I see the issue.. by goopie (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @06:03PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Uhhh... wait a second... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Bonker (243350) on Thursday January 03 2002, @03:32PM (#2780852)
    Sayeth Gilmore...

    Next thing we'll have telephone answering machines recording what phone numbers people are calling from....video libraries recording who
    borrowed each book and when.....Internet ads that track and record who saw them...hotel room doors that record every time each person goes in or out...cellphones that report every move we make to the authorities...tollbooths that record every car that goes through them... guards in every airport demanding to see 'our papers' before we are permitted to travel in our own country...


    Hmmm... Caller ID machines, Doubleclick.net, and Electronic, DB controlled locks at hotels and Post 9-11 'random checks' at airports.

    Gilmore's being sarcastic, isn't he?

    Remember that the U.S. stoped being 'Of the people, for the people a long time ago'. It's been 'Of the corporate interest for the corporate intrest for quite a while... at least since the Vietnam War, (The Johnsons had a significant stake in Bell Helicopter, which profited outrageously from the war) and probably before, but I'm not a good enough history student to tell you how far back.

    I know a 'Sherman Act' would sure as hell never make it out of committee in today's congress.

    Well, when it gets too repressive, now I know where I can go. They speak Russian in the Ukraine, right?
  • United States Iron Fist? (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Wire Tap (61370) <.frisina. .at. .atlanticbb.net.> on Thursday January 03 2002, @03:33PM (#2780863)
    Is this just another example of the All Powerful United States flexing its mighty iron fist around smaller countries that have almost no means by which to fight back?

    Or, is this a legitimate action? Why not protect people who work hard to make their intellectual products? Does information really want to be free, and, if it does, should it be? Who is to decide?

    I often find myself torn between these two schools of thought, as I believe that the IP could be integral to the lives of those who do not have the resources to pay for it, but, then again, does that justify the essential theft of such IP? Chairity theft, perhaps?

    It's all very complex. Any opinions? I'd hate it if the US hurt more innocent people, only because of something as seemingly insignificant as IP law.
  • Oh, great! by Vegeta99 (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:33PM
  • by Deagol (323173) on Thursday January 03 2002, @03:35PM (#2780877) Homepage
    From the article:

    "Reader, in case you didn't know, every color Xerox machine and color laser printer prints the serial number of the machine on every page they produce, covertly hidden in the output, under a long-standing private "arrangement" with the US Treasury Department. I have been unable to confirm whether this is also true of black-and-white xerox machines."

    I'm as paranoid as the next PGP-using, hard-drive encrypting, tin-foil-hat-wearing guy. BUT... I have a really hard time buying this, and I cold not locate any creditble documentation on Google.

    Anyone have any good links?

  • Uh, the Ukraine? by joebp (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:36PM
  • Hmmm... by Reality Master 101 (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:36PM
  • Right back into the swing of things (Score:5, Insightful)

    by nochops (522181) on Thursday January 03 2002, @03:36PM (#2780888)
    And here we (USA) go, getting right back into the swing of things, just like pre 9/11/01.

    I find it fascinating that people like the Bush family can't figure out why America is globally hated.

    "Sorry, you are not allowed to have strong encryption, supercomputers, nuclear weapons, shoes, food, oil, etc. Why? Because we are the USA, and we said so........"

    (...a few years later...)

    "Boo-hoo....I don't understand why these people are so mad at us...I don't understand why they would blow up our landmarks..."
  • History repeats itself (Score:5, Insightful)

    by sabinm (447146) on Thursday January 03 2002, @03:36PM (#2780889) Homepage Journal
    Isn't is ironic that the one tactic that drew the American colonies to revolt against England, America reuses again and again to gain leverage over countries dependent on American trade?

    The only thing that this will cause is Ukraine products being shipped somewhere else. This doesn't sound too good, since the former Soviet Union prevented OPEC from cutting production on oil, thereby giving us low gas prices ($.99 where i live)just one month ago!

    Hope this doesn't mean that my gas prices will go up to subsidise software companies' "right to innovate"
  • The RIAA says... (Score:4, Funny)

    by EllisDees (268037) on Thursday January 03 2002, @03:36PM (#2780891)
    We Love [riaa.com] it!
  • Human Rights vs. IP (Score:5, Insightful)

    by drenehtsral (29789) on Thursday January 03 2002, @03:37PM (#2780894) Homepage
    Funny that we'll impose terriffs against the Ukraine at the whim of the RIAA to protect the profits of Time Warner, but we won't lift a finger against China in the trade department even when they go around torturing and shooting political dissidents.

    I guess it shows what the U.S. is about, eh?
  • Effects of such actions.... by sonicsft (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:37PM
  • Ukraina has it's problems too by KjetilK (Score:2) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:39PM
  • IFPI - a new acronym to hate by b0r0din (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:39PM
  • Frightening (Score:5, Insightful)

    by DarkZero (516460) on Thursday January 03 2002, @03:41PM (#2780917)

    I know some people might say I'm overreacting, but this honestly scares me. Over the course of this week, we've given full trade access to China, despite the fact that it is a communist nation of the worst kind that openly hunts, tortures, and kills people for belonging to a religion that isn't sanctioned by the government or coming anywhere near defying the government's will, and we've punished Ukraine for abetting piracy.

    For Americans, we are now living under a government that cares far more about the profits of groups like the RIAA and MPAA than it does about human lives and our country's base freedoms. This week, it has rewarded one country for cruelty, torture, murder, and oppression, while punishing another for having a potential small effect on industry groups that make large contributions to political campaigns. The DMCA is a stupid and dangerous peace of legislation, and the SSSCA might fully qualify as evil... but these trade decisions belong to a whole new level of sick that nothing else on Slashdot has ever brought up.

    The most powerful government in the world openly caring more about profits than about human lives... welcome to the world of several of the dystopian future sci-fi novels you've read.

    • Re:Frightening by embee232323 (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:48PM
      • Re:Frightening by clone304 (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @08:25PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Frightening by okigan (Score:2) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:53PM
      • Re:Frightening (Score:5, Insightful)

        by dillon_rinker (17944) on Thursday January 03 2002, @04:00PM (#2781044) Homepage
        I really do not think things are like that.
        Really? Which part?
        - Totalitarian government in China
        - Human rights abuses in China
        - China recently given MFN trading status
        - Ukraine recently penalized for copying content

        I don't really care how or why any entity behaves the way they do. All that matters are actions. You believe that it is not the intent of any in the US govt to be evil. I believe that too. IT IS IRRELEVANT. Look only at the actions...from actions you can discern true intent rather than marketing messages. The intent of the US govt is exactly as the previous poster stated.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Frightening by Steve B (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @05:57PM
          • Re:Frightening by gotan (Score:2) Thursday January 03 2002, @11:31PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Frightening by pyramid termite (Score:2) Thursday January 03 2002, @07:59PM
    • Re:Frightening by tewwetruggur (Score:2) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:55PM
    • Re:Frightening by bensej (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:58PM
      • Re:Frightening by Rand Race (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @04:53PM
        • Re:Frightening by Prior Restraint (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @05:30PM
          • Re:Frightening by linzeal (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @06:14PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Frightening by karb (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @04:07PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Frightening by indiigo (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @04:55PM
      • Re:Frightening by clone304 (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @08:31PM
    • Re:Frightening by sheldon (Score:2) Thursday January 03 2002, @04:58PM
    • Frigthen this! by Qbertino (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @05:21PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • *pff*, Ukraine? by The Great Wakka (Score:2) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:41PM
  • Can you spell "illiteracy"? (OT) by mi (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:41PM
  • The core issue (Score:4, Interesting)

    by syrupMatt (248267) on Thursday January 03 2002, @03:45PM (#2780943) Homepage Journal
    Do companies operating under one countries legal structure gain the same amount of protection when operating (or having their goods sold) in another country?

    I find an interesting correlation here between "lassaie faire" business practices and the anti-corporation/IP movement. The movement wants corporations to recieve no help from the government for their business practices (IP, relief from economic hardship, etc), which are essentially leftist ideals. However, the fairly right ideal of lassaise faire essentially espouses the same thing, no? By all means correct me if I'm off base here.

    (btw: sorry for the poli-labeling, but it helps to illustrate the constrasts in my point.)
  • by RobertAG (176761) on Thursday January 03 2002, @03:50PM (#2780970)
    "[Summary: In response to the Ukraine government's "failure to enact an
    optical media licensing regime that would preclude the piracy of such
    products," the U.S. government has levied 100 percent tariffs on
    Ukraine exports such as fuel oil, sneakers, paper, and diamonds. --Declan]"

    Do we actually BUY that much stuff from them? It seems most of these exports can find ready markets elsewhere. It seems the loss in trade is greater than any piracy could be. Any comments?
  • International RIAA by Renraku (Score:1) Thursday January 03 2002, @03:51PM
  • Both Ways (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Alien54 (180860) on Thursday January 03 2002, @03:55PM (#2781007) Journal
    This is sort of like wanting everyone to obey USian laws without the US obeying theirs.

    It becomes a matter of disrespect for national self rule. Also it is a matter of foreign policy being dictated by greed of business interests, morte than anything else.

    I somehow like the old system where there always was a place on the planet that was outside the reach of the grasping hand of your local government. This is starting to go away now. Not yet, but soon.

    • Re:Both Ways by Alsee (Score:2) Friday January 04 2002, @12:34AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • From John Gilmore's Response (Score:5, Insightful)

    by AgTiger (458268) on Thursday January 03 2002, @04:00PM (#2781045) Homepage
    > There is a similar tracking requirement imposed on CD recorders (by
    > the patent licenses issued by Philips). It requires that each CD
    > burner record on the CD the serial number of the recorder, so that
    > every burned CD-R can be traced back to which individual CD-burner
    > recorded it.

    Now _this_ was news to me. I'd like to see this proven or debunked. Is this software driven, or done by drives' firmware when a burn is started? Is there any way to disable this?

    I don't mind my drive containing an electronic copy of its serial number for the purposes of identifying an individual unit with the manufacturer if I happen to need service.

    I sure as hell mind if my drive is disclosing that information without my knowledge or consent!

    As an example: John Doe works in a government agency, and notices some truly heinous and illegal activities going on with regards of that agency towards citizens of that government. John wants to blow the whistle, but he isn't stupid either. He anonymizes the information as best he can, cites several sources within the agency for the information in question, and writes it to a series of 5 CD-R's that he then sends to major newspaper editors in the hopes that they'll print it. CD-R's are the write-once/read-many diskette of the day, after all, and you don't have to worry about accidental magnetic erasure, so John thought he was being smart.

    The story gets printed, there's a huge public outcry, the agency gets investigated, and this goes all the way to charges being laid and a lot of very powerful people being made _very_ uncomfortable, and quietly swearing to find the mole and give unto him a share of the misery that they are going through.

    Fine, it's fictional, it probably has holes in it, and I've probably not drafted the perfect hypothetical scenario, but the basic gist of it is there.

    There's a lot of cases where accidental disclosure of any information that would allow the source to be accurately identified is a _bad_ thing. Admittedly in some cases it can be a good thing, but I'm leery of making it _too_ easy.

    Is there any way to prevent this little function from working correctly?

    1. Change the electronic serial number of the drive?
    2. Disable the routine that spits out a serial number?
    3. Disable the routine that writes the serial number to the drive?

    Rom microcode disassembly anyone? :-)