Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment: Re: Wow, no (Score 1) 174

by Havokmon (#48717435) Attached to: Hunting For a Tech Job In 2015

That's nothing. I won't get out of bed for less than $250K. Just not worth it.

Yeah. That's the right attitude. Let the recruiters know what we are worth.

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic, but I do the same thing, ESPECIALLY for recruiters - they do NOT have your best interests in mind. IMHO, when I talk to a recruiter, it's only because it's a position of interest. It seems to me recruiters tend to treat the prospect like they're applying to anything that passes in front of them.

Of course, you have to be PC about it: "I just want you to know, I'd prefer not to waste anyone's time - and while this job sounds like something that's right up my alley, if the job doesn't pay 'x', I'm just not interested."

Even if it doesn't get back to the employer, the recruiter is aware.

Comment: Stupidest complaint ever (Score 1) 141

by Havokmon (#48690149) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Dealing With Companies With Poor SSL Practices?
So you created an account, were emailed the password, and that's it? THAT"S the problem? You never saved your payment information - which if you use Visa/MC you're 100% protected from fraudulent transactions. And an attacker would gain what? Knowledge of the sex toys you like?

Not even sure why I'm wasting time posting this.

Next time before you post stupidity, actually do a risk assessment. Too much 'security research' is concentrated on a single action, and people are having a REALLY hard time seeing the big picture (or the 'forest through the trees').

The reason they're not responding to you is because you're not worth their time. They have products to ship, and actual customer service to provide. They will have zero problem dropping a pain in the ass customer with minor complaints that they want to publicize for their own personal gain.

Comment: Re:Nothing made after 2000 (Score 1) 195

by Havokmon (#48435621) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: What's the Most Hackable Car?

Modern cars use proprietary designs and even smallest modification would require you to re-flash software. While it is possible, and there are 'dealer' keys out there, modern cars are overly complex. Your best bet is to get something classic and not too rare.

I agree. Get a Honda from the 90s. OBD2 will give you good insight into the ECU, plus there won't be engine components crammed into every nook and cranny of the engine bay. And the Keys - my god the keys. If you don't want to pay $100 just to copy your key, avoid that proprietary garbage.

I've got a '93 Del Sol. Only OBD1, but fun to drive, parts are easily found and there's a ton of info available about Civics. My 2005 Pathfinder needs a new key, and I can't bring myself to spend that kind of money for what's worth $1 to me.

Comment: Re:yea no - happened in Middle School (Score 4, Interesting) 320

by Havokmon (#48368167) Attached to: Duke: No Mercy For CS 201 Cheaters Who Don't Turn Selves In By Wednesday
Same thing happened in my Middle School science class. One kid got a hold of the teachers copy of the final, and a bunch of kids cheated - including twin friends of mine. The administration did the same thing - "Tell us if you cheated, and it'll be ok".

The brother admitted to it, and was held back. The sister stayed quiet and moved on to high school.

Comment: Re:HA! (Score 4, Insightful) 102

by Havokmon (#48319565) Attached to: Using Naval Logbooks To Reconstruct Past Weather and Predict Future Climate

"Anything you read in a logbook, you can be sure that it is a true and faithful account."

Says someone who never stood watch in the Navy.

Especially back before satellites and realtime communications Wanna pick up some 'native' chicks?

Oh we're a week late because it was REALLY STORMY at sea. See? It says so in the log book.

Comment: I've done this. (Score 3, Informative) 168

by Havokmon (#48312115) Attached to: Ask Slashdot: Single Sign-On To Link Google Apps and Active Directory?
I was InfoSec at a Fortune 500 company that moved to Google Apps and the Security rep for the email migration. SSO and account verification was to accomplished via SAML - so we could restrict non-exempt employees and consultants, etc. Not having worked with it before, I setup SimpleSAMLphp on my Windows laptop using my personal domain on Google. It took me about 40 minutes to get my local AD credentials to auth to my domain on Google.

They paid $1mil for 4 servers to do the same thing.

Comment: Re:no dimocrats (Score 1) 551

by Havokmon (#48301077) Attached to: In this year's US mid-term elections ...

If you're going to put words in your opponent's mouth, make sure they are coherent. I don't believe suffering is limited by economic class. If you are going to claim liberals are elitist (nice parroting of a GOP talking point), say *why* you believe that. Seriously learn to read. I didn't say it's wrong to call someone black, or jewish, or anything at all as a description. Just that some people like to *complain* (how did you miss that word?) about others, and hide behind "you guys are too PC" as a cover. Though more likely they just use PC as either a dog whistle, or as an alarm to raise a panic about liberals.

" For example how wealthy Republicans con poor Republicans into voting away their power" Does that help with why I believe you're elitist? Seriously, learn to read. (Does that help too?).

Comment: Re:no dimocrats (Score 0) 551

by Havokmon (#48300835) Attached to: In this year's US mid-term elections ...

I don't believe in hateful divisions along lines of gender, race, heritage, education level, ... {insert wedge issue}, ... and I don't believe in a "class" system.

Are you saying you don't believe those divisions exist? That's denying the painful reality. Or are you saying that Democrats somehow divide people by acknowledging how some groups of people take advantage of others? For example how wealthy Republicans con poor Republicans into voting away their power by using wedge issues like gun control, abortion, and gay rights.

ahh another "You must be a 1%er if you haven't suffered, and if not then you're obviously a sucker". Yes, both parties are at fault, but damn, liberals are some snobby elitist bastards. I'm athiest nonPCer. Yeah, if the guy is black - it's a description, not a judgement. Get over yourself already, it's almost 2015.

Comment: Re:Open Source? (Score 2) 71

by Havokmon (#46219699) Attached to: How Online Clues Located North Korea's Missile-Launcher Factories

Ah, come on. Open source intelligence? What's unusual about this?

I remember from Tom Clancy's "Clear and Present Danger" where the CIA was watching Cable News, getting lots of information from what was freely available from the likes of CNN and Fox. I also remember watching CNN reporting from Down Town Baghdad while the US was dropping bombs at the start of desert storm. Can you say instant BDA on the raid? "Yes, our power just went out! Good thing we have battery powered equipment so we can show you what's happening next to ground zero. Oh wow, Baghdad TV just went off the air too!" You know that this often happens in real life.

What's important about this story is that the North Koreans messed up, assuming they intended to keep this development a secret. Somehow, I doubt they made a mistake, but this release was calculated, knowing that the west would figure out what's going on. They are simply too controlling.

The assumption is that the west didn't know anything about it. I bet the CIA has rooms full of people going over satellite images of North Korea that would make Google Maps look like something Magellan used.

I would be surprised if the west didn't know about it.

Now, that's totally different from discovering the Icelandic military (is there one?) has ICBMs. I would assume that's not a place we're actively looking to protect ourselves from.

Comment: Re:Serious sample bias (Score 1) 390

by Havokmon (#46113403) Attached to: IE Drops To Single-Digit Market Share

The statistics are "collected from W3Schools' log-files..." So an English-language site for people interested in standards compliant web development is now considered an accurate proxy for browser usage? I think not. Predictably, the results are way out of line with, well, pretty much everyone:

FTFY- We all know anyone who does dev in IE isn't concerned with standards compliance.

Human beings were created by water to transport it uphill.

Working...