Veeker Makes Video Instant Messaging a Reality 70
Stitch_Surfs writes to tell us that the new video instant messaging tool "Veeker" went live today. Able to be embedded in any website, Veeker allows you to share mobile video with your friends. From the article: "In a nutshell, Veeker is instant video messaging. The most basic use case is to shoot 60 seconds of video from your mobile phone and upload this video to Veeker in the form of an MMS. Within about 60 seconds your video is on the Veeker portal where, depending upon whether you sent it to one of three addresses is visible only by you (me@veeker.com) visible to you and your contacts (v@veeker.com) or made available for viewing by anyone who visits Veeker and is inclined to check you out (world@veeker.com)."
Moo (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Video voicemail (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Video voicemail (Score:4, Insightful)
Don't the cellphone companies already have convenient ways for people to send video voicemails to each other? Not that their systems would do everything this new company is doing, but it would be a good way to judge demand... which apparently isn't very high.
As near as I can tell, this offering does not replicate the functionality of the cell phone companies, but relies upon it. It looks like you use your service to send a short video to this company and they post it to a Website for you and let you manage who can access that site. Only people who make an account can view the videos, so it will never go anywhere.
Re: (Score:2)
Kind of, my cell phone company only allows me to send videos to other people on the same Wirless company easily (SprintPCS) but it could be due to my crappy phone being so old.
Re: (Score:1)
One Problem.... (Score:4, Insightful)
Interesting concept however.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Maybe they could convert the video to asciimation. [asciimation.co.nz]
I would feel a lot better about using their service then.
Re: (Score:1)
WiFi or Bluetooth could do it. (Score:2)
I assume that the next generation of WiFi-enabled phones will be able to upload photos and video that way, working basically like network cameras do now (they either upload files to an FTP server somewhere, or they present themselves as an FTP server so another process can d
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Have you looked at how little 3G cellphone network services are being used? I wouldn't be terribly surprised to learn that Veeker was financed by some of the cellphone service providers, in the hopes that they would come up with something that people would actually use with the MMS/3G services that are currently bleeding red ink.
Seriously. The GP said "rates are ridiculous" and that should be a clue. When you find a service the depends on you spending crazy amounts o
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Agreed. Seems more like video email to me. Video IM, IMHO, means something like iChat AV or AIM AV.
Re: (Score:2)
At least it sounds less complicated!
Re: (Score:2)
and? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Thus, they have almost certainly applied for a patent on the "technology".
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Has any one of the folks posting comments actually read the article, let alone bothered to sign up? Have any of you looked at the popularity of applications like Umundo or Abuzab that let users post images from their cell phones to their social network profiles in real time? It may not strike adults as all that appealing but the popularity across social networks is such that more images a day are displayed on MySpace via these tools than are uploaded to flickr.
The application does ride on MMS. That's b
How utterly pointless (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
instant? (Score:5, Funny)
For extremely large values of 'instant'.
And.... (Score:2)
And for unrealistically 'imaginary' values of 'real'.
Re: (Score:2)
And a very broad definition of "messaging." Sounds more like a mobile "YouTube" to me.
-matthew
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
New Products:
Microsoft Slow Videoer
Yahoo Slow Videoer
Video instant messaging? (Score:1)
Just imagine the harm that could be unleashed (Score:2)
Err, Latency? (Score:2)
Wow, a video IM scheme with 60 seconds of latency! Sign me up!
Re: (Score:2)
Conflict of interest (Score:2, Insightful)
Boo.
MMS (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Q: What's Next for Veeker? (Score:2)
--
From the referenced Mobile Crunch article...
"However when your executive team of four founders has generated a combined half a billion dollars in aggregate exit valuation in their prior gigs the bar gets raised considerably."
Past performance doesn't guarantee future performance. Who cares about how well the founders have done. How well are they doing? Specifically, how well are they doing with Veeker?
Ultimately, the success comes down to usability and cost. If t
Re: (Score:2)
Which bar would that be? The state bar?
Re: (Score:1)
YouTube (Score:2)
If they are going to rid their site of copyrighted material then their only option is to make it even easier to submit user created content. I'm sure cell phones are by far the main source of user generated videos in the world, so that seems like a sensible direction.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Also, just curious, but couldn't YouTube do this in, let's say, a few months?
Half a day would be more like it.
Sorta cool.... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
AAAAARGH! My eyes!
Re: (Score:2)
Great another way (Score:1)
Shouldn't it be (Score:1)
Hole in the system... (Score:2)
Must be nerve wracking being 1 SIM card update away from bankruptcy.
Re: (Score:1)
This is MMS, not video instant messaging (Score:2)
So let me get this straight... (Score:1, Interesting)
This service isn't all that practical.
Don't by stock (Score:2, Insightful)
Remember we have had the technology for video phones for years now. Where are they?
Except for phone sex. This would probably improve phone sex. . . Or maybe not . . . I have to think about that par
Or (Score:1)
They are desparate (Score:2)
- your service is like any other service, but attempts to differentiate by marketing same old same old, by giving it new names (not videos, but video instant messages..)
- your trademark needs (lame) "origin of" explanation, and tries to inject new words in your dictionary to induce word of mouth: "VEEKS are Video Peeks"... Veeks?! Zunes... YouTube that Meebo Orkuts, to hell and back.
- trying to be overly hip, energetic and youngster-ish (err...), by showing
Video IM? Video Pastebin more like... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah, its basically a YouTube ripoff with an MMS gateway tacked onto the front of it. Nothing Instant or Messaging about it.
email it for a nickel (Score:1)
only one thing to say here (Score:2)