Comment calling people gay (Score 4, Funny) 413
"who haven't talked to the opposite sex in five or six years.'"
Really? Is calling people it doesn't like gay really the governments new tactic?
"who haven't talked to the opposite sex in five or six years.'"
Really? Is calling people it doesn't like gay really the governments new tactic?
The Shark Tank has certainly done the opposite to that area of San Jose. Lower crime and increased property values. It's one of the reasons why Santa Clara wanted the stadium
It's not so much that they didn't see the potential; it's that they couldn't let go of their legacy business to pursue other avenues while that legacy was so much of their culture and revenue.
DEC saw Unix coming and responded with Ultrix; they saw internet search coming and responded with AltaVista etc etc. In every case DEC saw technology and change and made great products in response.
What they didn't do was really commit to those products.
For DEC it was all about VMS. Especially on VAX and later on Alpha. Other products could exist but the core of effort and marketing always had to go that directions.
It's a story that has played out over and over in tech at Wang, IBM, and even now is playing out at Microsoft.
At this point the only reason a prefer Google search is that I have Firefox configured to remove all advertising from Google. Until it's similarly easy to strip all advertising out of Bing it's just not worth looking at.
I think these stories of pirate parties, or communists, or greens, running and being elected to various governmental office are so titillating to Americans because we find it hard to imagine the vast tolerance of divergent opinions in non-american politics. In the USA we have two center right parties with almost no divergence over core political issues who fight to endlessly promote minor political issues or social wedge issues so as to disguise their complete lock on political power.
In the US you could no more elect a pirate, a communist, or an atheist, than you could elect bear. So in the end for us these stories are dancing bear type stories. No one asks if a dancing bear dances well. We aren't interested all that much in the policies or the questions themselves; we're just kind of amazed that you guys would conceive of electing someone whose opinion diverges so far from your rulers.
Microtransactions ARE how the web is funded currently. The majority of commercial web sites use advertising to monetize their content.. By placing ads on their pages they receive a minuscule sum of money for each unique user who views a page. The cost of the advertising is made up in the price of goods. ie just as in a classic microtransaction system the user puts money into an organization that pays small amounts to the owner of pages they visit.
Imagine if instead ISPs charged slightly more and paid a tiny amount say 1000th of a cent to the owner of websites you visit.
He keeps differentiating, flying off on a tangent.