Options for 'Fixing' A Pirated Copy of Windows 601
PunkOfLinux writes "My parents are running a pirated copy of windows that my mom received from a teacher at school. My parents want to go legit, and buy a copy of Windows, but they are afraid of deleting everything and having to reinstall all their programs. Seeing as I know you guys will have an answer, I'm going to ask you: What would you do in this situation?"
First of all... (Score:4, Funny)
Call microsoft (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Call microsoft (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Call microsoft (Score:5, Informative)
If you try any of the registry tricks to 'update' your product key, Windows XP Professional Corporate's Activation Wizard will not accept a non-corporate key. The non-Microsoft key changers I ever saw couldn't get around this because there are very specific differences (file based) between corporate and non-corporate versions of Windows.
In any case, my recommendation to poster is to do what I did: Run the WGA tool, click the link to buy a license online, buy the license, and use the MS keychanger. Takes about 5-10 minutes overall, and you get the creamy goodness of running your very own legit copy of Windows XP.
Do Complete Backups *First* (Score:4, Insightful)
*Then* they can think about doing a Windows key update or if necessary reinstalling.
Re:Call microsoft (Score:4, Informative)
Change your product key (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Change your product key (Score:5, Informative)
"Warning The steps in the article are effective only on Volume License media. If you try these steps on OEM media or on retail media, you will not change the product key."
AFAIK, this will only work with another volume licensed key. I occasionally have to install windows to test something for one of my moonlighting clients, and no, I don't buy a discrete license for a machine that's only going to have my copy of XP on it for two hours; I've been around the particular treadmill described here. (I own a "legit" XP license for my virtual PC instance; and I rarely start it up, so usually I'm not in violation anyway - one license, one running instance. *shrug*).
But if the author of the parent post buys his parents a licensed copy of XP from a vendor, it won't be volume licensed, and this trick may not work.
Microsoft does not know the alphabet. (Score:3, Funny)
Buy a copy of windows (Score:5, Informative)
http://download.microsoft.com/download/e/9/c/e9c7
enter in your new key, reboot and you are legit
Re:Buy a copy of windows (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Buy a copy of windows (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Buy a copy of windows (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Buy a copy of windows (Score:3, Informative)
Re:So tell me... (Score:3, Funny)
My sanity.
Re:Buy a copy of windows (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Buy a copy of windows (Score:3, Informative)
Anyway, MODs [wikipedia.org] came out in 1987, which is the same decade as 1982 -- the year the C64 was released.
Re:Buy a copy of windows (Score:2, Informative)
CD key generators by several popular groups tend to have midi files that repeat over and over again. Some are supprisingly nice.
This is Microsoft, just call us (Score:2)
Seriously, though, I would think one big problem is that to to get legal you're Windows install is going to have to send a new registration message off to Microsoft. Not sure how you do that without a reinstall.
Maybe if they're on XP Home, buy them an OEM version of XP Pro?
TweakXP (Score:5, Informative)
http://www.tweakxp.com/tweakutility/ [tweakxp.com]
Why bother? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Why bother? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Why bother? (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Why bother? (Score:3, Insightful)
These people are obviously happy with their OS, as they want to stick with it, I dont understand why you think they shouldnt pay for a product they clearly use probably every day, or is this just normal slashdot microsoft bashing?
What is it about products that can be encoded digitally that some people think that their creators dont
Re:Why bother? (Score:3, Interesting)
What is it about products that can be encoded digitally that some people think that their creators dont need to eat?
Grow up, child.
---
It's wrong that an intellectual property creator should not be rewarded for their work.
It's equally wrong that an IP creator should be rewarded too many times for the one piece of work, for exactly the same reasons.
Reform IP law and stop the M$/RIAA abuse.
Re:Why bother? (Score:4, Informative)
You seem to be arguing in favour of a change in copyright terms, or higher corporate taxes. But rather than lobby for change, you've decided just to take stuff without paying.
Interesting.
Re:Why bother? (Score:4, Interesting)
I'm in favor of changes to intellectual property law. You talk as if the law is holy or something. But we all know very well there are many bad laws on the books thanks to selfish interests who got rich off the masses and then used that wealth to buy laws. They're the ones laughing at the poor schmucks who waste time lobbying. Can't lobby effectively without a lot of money. The ultimate message that the whole idea of "intellectual property" is seriously broken has yet to sink in. How to get that message across? Don't buy or license their "property" and make sure they understand why! Whether that means pirating, boycotting, or finding alternatives is up to the individuals.
It'd be a poor world where everything, tangible or not, has to be owned, where it's considered treason against Capitalism to not play the game and haggle, scratch and claw, and account for every penny. I know what such a world is like because I was in one in miniature. I was once in a private school attractive to wealthy and powerful people. I wonder if you know how those people think? Think of the movies Titanic and Dead Poets' Society. Everything has a price. Save a lady from drowning herself? Worth at least a $20 and a dinner invitation, thank you and go away when dinner is over, you've been paid. No, that was not typical Hollywood bashing of the rich, that's really how those people are. One of the crazier things at the school was the system the students had going for software piracy. You had to have a stake. At that school, these children of the wealthy were not going to give away a copy of some computer game, it had to be "paid" for with a copy of something the "owner" didn't have. A copy for a copy. Strange how fussy those students were about "something for something" all while blissfully ignoring the copyrights of the game makers. But they were always two-faced like that. They were as much and probably more into piracy as everyone else. Intellectual property rights are for little people to obey?
So tell us, where's your righteous outrage on behalf of those people who got screwed into paying for Windows twice, thanks to WGA? To compensate, maybe it's okay for them to pirate Vista when it comes out? Yes, yes, it'd be a lot of fun to drag MS into court and win a lawsuit over this, but it's a lot quicker to just pirate, or pay for Windows again. Saves time, and time is money. Saves on court costs too. 2 wrongs don't make a right, but often a wrong for a wrong is a lot more efficient and cost effective. Admit it, lobbying isn't in the same league as piracy for time, effort, and effectiveness.
Re:Why bother? (Score:3, Insightful)
The guy was an idiot and your were congratulating him on it.
He did the equivalent of saying that only druggies complain about drug laws, or only speeders think speed enforcement laws are often abusive, or only gun-nuts dislike gun-restriction laws, etc, etc.
In his self-righteousness, he couldn't even conceive of the possibility that one might make a rational argument criticisizing the state of copyright law without himself being a copyright violator. That's worse than attacking the messenger and ignor
Re:Why bother? (Score:5, Informative)
Oh is it? Show me a passage in any lawbook that equates copyright infringement with theft.
Also, in many jurisdictions copyright infringement is a tort [wikipedia.org], not a crime.
Re:Why bother? (Score:3, Informative)
17 U.S.C.A. 506(a) - Criminal infringement of copyright - Any person who willfully infringes a copyright shall be punished as provided under section 2319 of title 18, if the infringement was committed for commercial gain, of copyrighted works up to $1000, OR making available a work in production (including movies, music and software) on a computer network against the copyright holder's wishes. There are a total of f
Re:Why bother? (Score:3, Informative)
nowhere.
because it isn't.
gg.
Re:Why bother? (Score:4, Insightful)
Re:Why bother? (Score:3, Interesting)
No economic va
Re:Why bother? (Score:3, Insightful)
That's a bit like saying that home invasion isn't assault, and then demanding to see a law book that equates home invasion with assault, with one exception: using unlicensed software isn't copyright infringement. Just because there's a more specific version that uses a name involving different words doesn't mean that it's anything different.
Now, as to why using unlicensed software isn't copyright infringement, let's review, s
Re: Why bother? (Score:3, Informative)
Go find one of those stories about a big warezer bust. Follow it through to the indictment; they're all freely available online in the US since 1998..2001, depending on what state you're in. Then, look at what crime the warezers are being convicted of.
I Googled "warez indictment" and found a number of press releases from the federal government. This one, about the RISCISO bust, is typical:
Re:Why bother? (Score:3, Interesting)
He said artificial scarcity. Not "protected artificially."
The difference is that real property is naturally scarce, or more technically it is rivalrous, and thus inherently "protectable" since there is only one instance to keep track of, either you have it or you don't.
that recognition works just fine as long as everyone plays by the same rules.
However, it is both many orders of magnitude more difficult to enforce the rules for information than it is for real propert
Re:Copyright is a useful compromise (Score:3, Interesting)
Sorry, typo: that should obviously have read "such a system could never work without Big Brother-scale surveillance of any use of copyright materials".
Buy an OEM copy (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Buy an OEM copy (Score:2)
That's a great idea, except for one thing. It's not any more legal than running the pirate version.
OEM copies may only be sold with a new PC. If they're not buying a new PC, installing an OEM copy is against the license agreement. Of course, most folks don't pay attention to that, but poster did say they were trying to be legal, not aiming for "almost, but not quite" legal.
You can't even transfer your OEM license [microsoft.com] from one machine to another. Again, nobody pays attention to that, but that doesn't cha
Re:Buy an OEM copy (Score:2)
Re:Buy an OEM copy (Score:5, Interesting)
Judging from Microsoft's 'System Builder' documentation, I don't think you even need to bother doing that. Buying and installing an OEM version of Windows onto your PC is perfectly fine and legal. But by doing so, you've now created a 'new PC' in Microsoft's eyes and so you no longer have access to any support from them, as support for OEM software is to be obtained from your system builder (namely, you, in this case). So you're legal but completely on your own. At least this is the way I read it.
Re:Buy an OEM copy (Score:3, Interesting)
I do think one should buy the software one uses (I know I do), but I don't expect
any personal support from Microsoft; I'm already glad if they fix known (security)
bugs in a decent time frame.
Re:Buy an OEM copy (Score:2)
But first, why not try a livecd of ubuntu or suse. If it does what they need, save the money, and spend some of it on hardware upgrades.
Re:Buy an OEM copy (Score:4, Insightful)
Over-under (Score:5, Funny)
Do NOT fear the Windows Reinstall. (Score:5, Insightful)
Much less full reload to clear an infection.
Re:Do NOT fear the Windows Reinstall. (Score:2)
Looks like somebody accidentally installed the WGA update.
Re:Do NOT fear the Windows Reinstall. (Score:2)
I fear the re-install (Score:5, Insightful)
I'm a consultant who helps small business and home users. I can't tell you how many times I have talked to customers who (in the past) have had another tech come along and do a re-install without understanding all of the implications.
There is value in a machine's configuration! The customizations, tweaks, and even icon arrangements people create to make their systems work and lives easier are time-consuming to recreate, and there can be a major loss of productivity if they have to re-do it all from scratch. I'm a professional, and it's not uncommon for it to take me 3-5 hours to do a good job of getting all of the software, utilities, and configuration changes done for a typical business machine. Just because you can rebuild your own gaming rig from scratch in two hours (because you do it once a month) doesn't meant that this is a course of action that makes sense for everyone.
This is why I always recommend *full* backups of the entire system... not just "important" documents. And it's why I do a full re-install as an absolute last resort. I can count the number of re-installs I've been forced into in the last *year* on one hand.
The good news is that if you know what you're doing (unfortunately many techs don't) VERY few problems require a rebuild. It's very possible to clean off even the "worst" infections fairly quickly, with high confidence that everything is gone. I charge a two-hour flat rate for *any* infection cleanup (including kernel rootkits), and that usually works out to my advantage. Hard drives often have only failed in a few sectors... I commonly am able to image the failed drive to a new one, and repair the windows install using a combination of sfc, system restore, misc subsystem fixes, and (in the worst cases) a repair re-install.
The benefit to the user is that they get their machine back *exactly the way it was*, the same day, without a large repair bill. The benefit to me is that the customer is happy and calls me back the next time they have a problem... instead of cursing me the whole time they are trying to rebuild their system the way they had it.
If you are a tech and haven't learned this stuff, you are doing your customers and yourself a disservice.
-R
Re:I fear the re-install (Score:3, Insightful)
But a typical business machine is precisely the kind of machine that you should be able to re-image. The advantages of roaming profiles are enormous, and machines should be set up to use them. If they are, then repairing a virus or spyware infection would be a simple matter of rebooting with the image CD in the drive.
You should look before you leap... (Score:3, Interesting)
Kernel rootkits made this a bit more challenging, since you can't trust what Windows is telling you about what you see through these tools. The
Careful before you buy (Score:5, Informative)
Your parents probably installed a Corporate copy of XP. This doesn't take the same keys as Home so they can't just walk down to Best Buy and get a key that is going to work.
In fact, there are a number of different key types including:
* XP Home
* XP Home OEM
* XP Pro
* XP Pro OEM
* XP Corporate
(and more)
Assuming your parents installed Corporate, they still need to buy a legal copy of Windows, yes, but they won't be able to pop the key in and go on their merry way. They will need to do what is knows an a "In place install". This isn't the cleanest way to do things but will make sure all their files are left intact (all settings including the entire registry are lost). Boot off the new disk:
The first menu is going to ask you to install, go to the recovery console, or quit. Choose install by hitting enter.
The second menu is a license agreement, hit F8.
The third menu is going to show the existing Windows installation, choose to install on top of it. You will be warned about an existing Windows install there and be given the option of deleting the existing %systemroot% folder and continuing.
Choosing this option will not delete anything on the drive other that what is in the windows folder. All of their files will still be available by navigating to the "Documents and Settings" folder.
I know it is a dirty mess but it is the only way to go from one version of Windows to another while still retaining the contents of the hard drive.
Re:Careful before you buy (Score:2)
The easy way around most of this is to get the OEM version for the windows you have installed, do a software repair (boot from cd, enter at first screen, f8 then "R" to repair) and then it will take the OEM CD key as normal
Re:Careful before you buy (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Careful before you buy (Score:3, Informative)
CAVEAT: Make *sure* you copy all data out of user directories before doing this. You will *not* be able to access them sometimes.
--Michael
If it's a pirated version of XP (Score:3, Funny)
Vista (Score:3, Funny)
See you in a few years.
Re:Vista (Score:2)
I don't think technically-savvy XP users have delusions of OS superiority. The reason they still use Windows is compatibility phobia/lock-in. Why invest in a system that's in the process of being superseded? Microsoft support will continue for a long time, but n
Windows Genuine Advantage Talkback (Score:5, Informative)
Now that Windows Update and certain Windows downloads require you to validate your copy of Windows before accessing the services (the Windows Genuine [microsoft.com] program), people have of course started having troubles with invalid product keys, etc.
To help people sort out their Windows license problems, Microsoft have put online the Windows Genuine Advantage Talkback [microsoft.com] bulletin board, where Microsoft offers advice for people with license troubles.
An interesting utility that I found mentioned there on the bulletin board is Microsoft Genuine Advantage Diagnostic Tool [microsoft.com], that shows lots of information about the license / product key of the current Windows installation.
Try windows update, they sell keys there (Score:2)
I tried to update one of my friends' laptop, but it failed the activation check. Apparantly he did not install from the original cd that came with his computer (there is a genuine sticker below the laptop so it does have a legal license), but instead used a "corporate version" he got from another friend.
Windows update offered selling a legimate key for retail price. I guess they do this for non-volume versions too.
So all you have to do is engage windows update, get the check failed and follow the correspond
Clean reinstall without loss of data (Score:3, Informative)
Move to Thailand (Score:2)
It's simple... (Score:5, Funny)
Secret Code Here (Score:2)
Done!
XP's No-Reformat, Nondestructive Total-Rebuild... (Score:4, Informative)
http://www.informationweek.com/showArticle.jhtml;
Obvious: Sysprep (Score:2, Informative)
extract sysprep.exe and run sysprep.exe -reseal.
when the machine reboots you can enter the COA from your legit copy of XP. no fuss, no muss. and your installed apps will still be there.
For the love of god....it's TOO EASY (Score:5, Informative)
If you need/want to do a full reinstall (Score:4, Informative)
call microsoft (Score:3, Insightful)
Mod parent up. (Score:3, Informative)
Also, if you need to go through re-activation, and it doesn't like your key, it will offer to sell you one.
And, if they bought the computer from a store and the store sold them a pi
do the dirty work... (Score:3, Insightful)
Whenever I have to reinstall windows (or more often, linux since my main computer runs a different distro about every week), I do an audit of all my data.
First, write down what you need to keep: emails? accounting data from Quicken? config info from other applications? bookmarks? Get it all down and back up everything to an external drive or a CDR.
Second, reinstall the OS and all applications. If you went through the whole harddrive, directory by directory, you should have saved all the config files and data files that you needed. If you didn't, then you should have gone more slowly and carefully.
It is best to do a reinstall anyway, because if they've been running Windows for a long time, they probably have a lot of cruft... left-over services and other junk from programs they don't run anymore that are slowing down their machine... and there's always the possibility of malware lurking in the shadows.
A reinstall takes care of all those things. Tell them not to be afraid, just patient and careful.
Product Key Update Tool (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Let's get the answer out of the way (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Let's get the answer out of the way (Score:3, Informative)
Dipshit.
Re:Let's get the answer out of the way (Score:5, Informative)
I guess that "+5 informative" needs some "-1 overrated" side-salad, huh?
I'm pretty sure the reason it doesn't work is that the version of Windows supplied under the genuine advantage program is different from the version that my customer's nephew installed. I believe it was Windows XP Professional Corporate Edition that was installed, and I'd guess that the CD supplied by Microsoft when she clicked on the "Get Genuine" link was either OEM or retail (it was certainly Windows XP Professional, and was a hologrammed CD).
The way I fixed this was to do a "repair install" of Windows XP. [michaelstevenstech.com] This worked perfectly & retained all the user's settings and documents, although I was pretty nervous about doing it and a number of drivers did require reinstall. Honestly, if you're undertaking this, be prepared to back everything up with a Knoppix CD & a portable hard-drive and to do a format-reinstall if necessary.
Ned.
Re:Let's get the answer out of the way (Score:2)
http://msdn.microsoft.com/windowsvista/downloads/
Re:Let's get the answer out of the way (Score:2)
XP Pro Corp to Home = No Repair (Score:5, Informative)
Anyone know of a possible way to get around this, other than having to reinstall Windows XP Home from scratch?
Re:XP Pro Corp to Home = No Repair (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Let's get the answer out of the way (Score:4, Insightful)
It's actually alluded to on the page that you linked to, but it bears spelling out explicitly:
The repair install option returns Windows to the state it is in when freshly installed from the CD used
In other words, while you keep all your settings, files, etc, it wipes out any drivers, service packs or other updates that you have installed since installing from the CD. An XP SP1 install CD used to repair an up-to-date XP install is going to wipe out SP2, and a whole host of other updates.
That's why you had to reinstall the drivers - they weren't on the CD so they were nuked.
Re:Let's get the answer out of the way (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Let's get the answer out of the way (Score:3, Informative)
Seriously, it's pretty easy for them to change the product key / product ID of an installation, and you won't have to reinstall anything. Plus, I doubt they'll care that much that you pirated in the first place if you say you want to purchase a legal version now.
It probably doesn't apply to you, but if your mom didn't know she received an illegal copy, she could actually get a complimentary Windows license. However, she'd have to rat out said teacher, would have to have bought the counte
Re:Let's get the answer out of the way (Score:3, Informative)
They actually make a little tool for updating your product key, so you can avoid googling for key changers (which may lead you to potentially dodgy websites).
If you go and buy a boxed/retail copy of the Windows version you are currently running (eg, Home or Pro), you can update the product key by following these instructions [microsoft.com]. Or, instead of buying a retail version, you can buy the WGA kit
Re:Let's get the answer out of the way (Score:3, Interesting)
The directory containing that file also has an Office 2003 key :-)
Re:Reinstall (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Reinstall (Score:5, Informative)
However the 290euros is also a bit high. You should be able to buy a 'upgrade' version instead of a 'full' version. They are the same, but one requires the machine to have had a version of Windows installed on it before or the CD to prove you own it. (There are two types of 'retail' versions in other words, and most people only need the upgrade version which is about the same price as the OEM version give or take 10-15 Euro.)
Stay way from people selling OEM copies of any company's software unless they are also keeping to the licensing rules and selling it with a new computer or qualifying hardware. The Windows OEM license used to allow it to be purchased if the end user was buying a new hard drive etc.
If they are just selling the OEM software, with most companies this is illegal and would not help in getting your copy to be legitimate. This is also why OEM software often requires a clean install and will not 'upgrade' as it is not ever to be sold in a circumstance to upgrade anything.
Re:Reinstall (Score:2, Insightful)
Depends on legislation, Germany at least differs (Score:3, Informative)
The court found that the EULA was not binding, and Microsoft did not have a separate contract with that dealer that explicitly barred him from selling the OEM versions without hardware (that way, they could have made their OEM rules bindin
Re:Reinstall (Score:2)
Re:Reinstall (Score:2)
The thing is, if you really want to be legit, you have to buy retail.
That's what proprietary software is: you don't buy software you buy rights to do certain, carefully spelled out things with the software, which remains the vendor's property.
So, you may think that charging more for a retail license is unfair because the software inquestion is just the same as the OEM liceense, but technicall
Re:Reinstall (Score:2, Insightful)
Using a program called nlite to redo your disc still solve many problems
Re:Reinstall (Score:3, Informative)
If you've got the OEM from Microsoft version, which is what any Mom & Pop store gets, and is also included with Acer, some Dells, and I'm sure a couple of others, then you can do a repair install, upgrade install, or just re
Re:Reinstall (Score:3, Funny)
Re:WGA (Score:2)
Re:Simple... (Score:3, Informative)
You are dead [microsoft.com] wrong [microsoft.com]. Stop spreading the FUD. What I think you meant to say is that you won't be able to buy a copy a year after the release date of Vista. According to Microsoft, mainstream support for Windows XP will end two years after Vista has been generally available. So, we're looking at the end of 2008 or beginning of 2009 at the very least (depending on how bad Vista slips),
Re:Simple... (Score:3, Insightful)
The same policy will be applied, much more aggresively, with Vista, because of economics.
Re:Simple... (Score:3, Interesting)
Not certain, and definitely not equating to profits, which are down.
Wii is the one to watch.
Total bullshit. What's happened was predicted a decade ago. Microsoft has already picked all the "low-hanging fruit", and now needs more bodies to squeeze more revenue out of marginal products.
The current prediction is a flat stock value, beca
Re:Options... (Score:2)
Why the fuck would you take care to point out acronyms and provide correct capitalization for most products - yet spell "Windows" "'winders"?
Also, what are the "intranetz".
I hate you.
Re:"What would you do in this situation?" (Score:3, Insightful)
Linux? Once again, they loose most, if not all their software, and probably the same with the data.
Sorry when a person asks fo
Re:Obligatory Linux Plug (Score:3, Insightful)
http://easyubuntu.freecontrib.org./ [easyubuntu...ontrib.org] Takes a couple minutes to run, installs pretty much every codec out there