The Neediest Dolls In The World 149
captinsano writes "Forbes.com is taking a look at, 'The Needies,' the newest interactive stuffed toys, each one of which is fitted with an internal microprocessor and wireless antenna. They beg for attention (with varying levels of perversity) and when you finally pick one up the others complain loudly ("Throw him! Throw him!"). They're a cool example of the coming wave of wireless toys --and interestingly enough they are being designed for adults, not just children. There's a funny video showing the dolls in action, as well." These toys were originally designed after their NYU student creators and modeled after the horrible behavior they saw themselves exhibiting while trying to come up with a school project.
Risky idea (Score:3, Insightful)
Lawsuit city. Imagine when a toddler does the same thing to a *real* baby.
Re:Risky idea (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Risky idea (Score:2)
--- SER
Re:Risky idea (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Risky idea (Score:2)
That said, anyone who buys this crap deserves what they get. Needy dolls from Codependent inc.? Don't we have enough of that shit in our real lives to seek it out in cuddly toys? On top of that the toys don't look all that pleasant at all; they are ugly and dopey looking, hardly the kind of thing I would want to hug, especially if it was fucking whining "touch me
Re:Risky idea (Score:2)
Re:Risky idea (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Risky idea (Score:2)
Well, when he picks up the real baby, all the toys wont shout "throw him! throw him!" since the real baby wont have the microprocessor and wireless connection to the the toys.
But if this is a Borg family...
Re:Risky idea (Score:2, Interesting)
But just look at video games. No one cares that it's the parent's responsibility to teach children not to mimic the video games. It will be the doll's fault for "instilling bad values into our nation's children".
Re:Risky idea (Score:5, Funny)
> commonsense behaviour into their children then they shouldn't be parents imho.
bwahahaha. Spoken by the usual moron who has never had kids.
Instilled good values and commonsense behaviour into a TODDLER?!
May as well teach your dog particle physics.
Re:Risky idea (Score:2, Insightful)
I agree, teaching a toddler right and wrong, common sence, and good values is difficult. But 90% of the adults out there now don't have any one of these qualities. How do you expect a child to learn one thing if so many people around him are doing another?
I have seen very smart and respectful toddlers, and terrible terrible, parent kicking ones
Re:Risky idea (Score:2)
As the 4th of 9 children, with several nephews and nieces before I got married, and with very good examples of how to take care of children, I would say:
Most people who have never had children of their own, but think that they know how to deal with them, are mistaken (though not necessarily morons).
One of the common mistakes that childless people make is that babysitting for 2 hours, 3 days, or 2 months, is not the
Re:Risky idea (Score:2)
Ads. (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Ads. (Score:2)
I wouldn't know... "Helix cannot play this format."
Ho hum.
Re:Ads. (Score:3, Informative)
Consider yourself lucky ... I had to stop half-way through (Suse Openlinux/Firefox).
By the way - this toy is NOT original or new. About a decade ago, one of my nieces had a stuffed toy that, if you didn't pick it up every few minutes, would start complaining.
If they try to sell these as "original", they may end up having to change their name from "Co-dependant Designs" to "Co-defendant Designs".
Re:Ads. (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Ads. (Score:1)
Re:Ads. (Score:2, Interesting)
Did it interact with other stuffed toys nearby? I highly doubt it, and that seems to be the main thrust of the concept. There's a huge difference between a toy with a simple timer in it, and a toy that wirelessly interacts with other wireless toys.
That said, these look like horrible toys, and it might just be me, but I couldn't shake
Re:Ads. (Score:1, Interesting)
The video was a fake. The toy addressed its creator by name. It was obvious at that point it was nothing more than somebody using a "Mr. Microphone."
Re:Ads. (Score:2)
Re:Ads. (Score:2)
This one had the same voice for the whole phrase, not just the name.
It was painful to watch, as everyone else here can attest to.
If you go to the website, you'll see that they're just trying to raise $$$. I put George Bush on their "subscribe to email" list. He's pretty needy.
Worst video ever (Score:1)
Re:Worst video ever (Score:3, Interesting)
Yo forgot "most blatant attempt to get some dumb-ass VC to throw money their way", and "Oops - forgot to update the web site" awards.
From their web site:
Worst reporter ever (Score:2, Interesting)
I have seen/heard better video presence on The Naked News. Even if you turn off the monitor and merely listen to The Naked News you'll get higher quality news, better dialog, more informative reporting, and in general more professional reporting than this crappy Forbes video.
This comes witht he disclaimer that the last time I watched The Naked News was back in 2000 when they still gave out free daily shows.
Re:Worst reporter ever (Score:2)
-Eric
Re:Ads. (Score:1)
Re:Ads. (Score:3, Interesting)
I would not have minded one advertisement. Or, even a couple of very short ones at the beginning. After all, *someone* has to pay for bandwidth. I'll "pay" the price of losing 30-60 seconds of my time if the content is hard to find anywhere else and it's an interesting subject to me. Heck, if it's a quality 1 hour video I'll put up with several minutes (ala PBS) at the beginning but the content had bet
Real Ads (Score:2, Insightful)
this makes it an advertisment playing an advertisment.
Re:Ads. (Score:2)
Re:Ads. (Score:2)
Nerdiest? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Nerdiest? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Nerdiest? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Nerdiest? (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Nerdiest? (Score:2)
Re:Nerdiest? (Score:2)
Alright! (Score:3, Funny)
I once knew a needy doll (Score:5, Funny)
investors (Score:5, Funny)
Rumor has it that Steve Ballmer has invested in this technology and plans to implement it in a new line of chairs.
ID (Score:3, Funny)
Damnit, when will these Intelligent Design freaks stop their propaganda campaign?!
How long until... (Score:5, Funny)
Finally, you can have a more realistic three-way without faking two falsetto voices.
Re:How long until... (Score:5, Funny)
Presenter... (Score:1)
Plus of course, 800 commercials. Whee. Useless waste of bandwidth!
Sadistic? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Sadistic? (Score:3, Interesting)
You mean like this: http://www.happytreefriends.com/ [happytreefriends.com]
Re:Sadistic? (Score:2)
wow..
Re:Sadistic? (Score:2)
Don't you mean Pokemon?
Re:Sadistic? (Score:2)
Re:Sadistic? (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Sadistic? (Score:2)
I haven't seen those movies in years but man they made me laugh when I was a kid. Better check on Netflicks!
Downloadable content (Score:1)
Hmm, if the content was by RSS feed, just include the articles, maybe some of the content. "What's that monkey doll in the corner with duct-tape over the mouth?" "That's Trip-Master..."
I smell a prank. (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:I smell a prank. (Score:2)
Re:I smell a prank. (Score:2)
for anyone too lazy to google (Score:2)
Geddy Lee's career is over? (Score:2)
From progressive rock god, to toy salesman. How sad.
oodles of fun (Score:5, Funny)
Re:oodles of fun (Score:3, Funny)
Re:oodles of fun (Score:1)
There's a funny video showing the dolls in action. (Score:4, Informative)
That video wasn't really that funny. I mean, the guy was laughing half the time at his own jokes and the lady... Well, the lady seemed bored of him and a little annoyed at the dolls. I would be annoyed at those dolls. I can't see how they would ever perform well, selling-wise. I wouldn't simply turn it off and throw it away. It incites rage-like, pyro-like tendencies in me... Grrr... I could already sense my temper flaming up just from watching the video...
The Slashdot Effect (Score:1, Insightful)
Re:The Slashdot Effect (Score:1)
I wonder what they say when... (Score:1)
Toss my Toys! (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Toss my Toys! (Score:1)
That has got to be... (Score:2)
And what's worse? They played that stupid car commercial twice and you can't fast forward in the window. Stupid commercial, stupid car, stupid people!
I'm going to grab a needie and beat you all with it! GRRRRRRR!
Needy? (Score:2)
Wooden horse included for free?
My name is Talking Tina and you'd better pay your license fee...
Blond doll (Score:2)
Re:Blond doll (Score:2)
Re:Blond doll (Score:2)
I Don't Need This... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:I Don't Need This... (Score:1)
Where they will go on to the lucrative career of creating doll replicas of themselves...
we need an open source doll (Score:2)
HEY!! (Score:1)
Re:HEY!! (Score:1)
It's the '73 Mini Cooper isn't it? Bastard.
Laurel and Hardy (Score:2)
what about the "toys" effect on their owners? (Score:3, Funny)
Not new (Score:2)
It's a shame they are _still_ searching for someone to mass-market them. Even worse that you _still_ can't buy them. I think they have a really, really neat idea there.
Re:Not new (Score:2)
There may be hope for the psychotically demanding toys yet. I'm just wondering how long it will take the guys from the RoboCup lab at my alma mater to get their grubby little fingers on a few of them and hack the things to be *really* entertaining.
Re:Not new (Score:2)
And I hope they are hackable to some degree, I mean, soft toys that can speak and communicate amongst themselves... some possibilities there...
Re:Not new (Score:2)
"It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again"
"My name is Talking Tina, and I'm going to kill you"
or "I'll be your friend till the end! Hidey-ho!"
what's with the schmoo? (Score:2)
Neediest interviewer lady (Score:1)
Union! Strike! (Score:1)
Watch this space
TV-controlled dolls are already here (Score:1)
The TV transmissions of certain games sent out signals the dolls responded to, saying various more-or-less appropriate comments.
http://www.smh.com.au/news/sport/boonanza-for-thes e-fans-but-sport-too-fleeting-for-former-pm/2005/1 2/09/1134086812393.html [smh.com.au]
Re:TV-controlled dolls are already here (Score:2)
Bah, Mad TV had these years ago... (Score:2)
Needy Evie: I need someone who will love me and never leave me, is that you? Is it?
ANSWER ME! STOP IGNORING ME! I'M TALKING TO YOU!
I'm a little doll and I deserve to be loved! WHY CAN'T YOU SEE THAT!?
Annoying dolls (Score:1)
I see a good use for this toy... (Score:1)
Did you watch the video? (Score:2)
He keeps the thing in his lap for the whole interview and talks over it. You can't actually hear him talking in response to her in depth questions cause every time she finishes talking, he shifts a little and the damn thing goes off again...
If they want to sell these things they need to learn a few interview skills... like taking cues from your interviewer...
Between the wife and the cat... (Score:2)
Re:I, for one..... (Score:5, Funny)
They are called "Toddlers", sometimes also known as "Storm-Troopers in the Army of Chaos".
Re:I, for one..... (Score:1)
Chucky (Score:2, Funny)
Re:I love Slashdot (Score:1)
Re:I love Slashdot (Score:2)
This is all advertising. It's not like the content of the video was informative or useful. They are supposed to be trying to entice you to buy a product. It should cost them money. I have to pay for the bandwidth to receive the advertisement. Why should the advertisement have another advertisement embedded in it to pay for the main advertisement?
Of cour
Re:I love Slashdot (Score:2)
Sorry, my friend. To understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
Re:Lamest Slashdot article ever. (Score:2)
Are you kidding? It's genius! The entire history of dolls has been monopolized by kitschy-cooing sweet girly things, and the only place you could find any kind of doll-based evil Machiavellian backstabbing at all was in the "Chucky" movies. But now this technology has finally made evil dolls available to the common man! And this is only the first generation... as technology progresses would should see the state of the art grow to include everything from the t
Re:Ads (Score:2, Informative)
I just downloaded it and I'm really pleased =]