


Phrack E-zine Comes To An End 268
Flammable writes "Since 1985 Phrack has been releasing ezines to public about Hacking, Cracking, Radio, Social Engineering, etc. All things come to an end, and Phrack is no different: the last issue, #63, is accepting articles from the community now."
A useful resource (Score:3, Insightful)
Budweiser hackin (Score:2)
But I thought that was one of the best...Thanksgiving dinners that I've had in a long time.
And Phrack was one heck of one hell of a magazine. That was one byooful magazine thar, bud.
W4NUA standin bye and monitrin
Re:A useful resource (Score:5, Funny)
Hackers should know better... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Hackers should know better... (Score:1)
Re:Hackers should know better... (Score:2)
000001 is the first issue
111111 is the last (issue 63)
2600 is still around (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:2600 is still around (Score:1, Informative)
and quite honestly, i've always been quite partial to 2600 also.
just something to the whole team, they make you feel,
like family kinda.. and the radio shows own.
Re:2600 is still around (Score:3, Insightful)
Phrack always had something sophisticated, unusual, or actually creative. The true hacker spirit, that didn't care that mass media confused 'hacker' with 'cracker', and that didn't wear the term 'hacker' like a merit badge or fashion statement, was very evident in their issues. They published
Re:2600 is still around (Score:3, Interesting)
The articles in Phrack are a step above the few technical articles in 2600 these days.
Re:2600 is still around (Score:3, Interesting)
Mod Parent Up (Score:2)
The reason why Emmanuel and others (including Micheal who gave a talk at the last HOPE[Hackers On Planet Earth] conference.[MP3 here http://www.the-fifth-hope.org/mp3/drm.mp3 ] ) have started paying attention to politics and particpating in them is because they started affecting w
Re:2600 is still around (Score:2)
Or listen to Off the wall or whatever the radio show is called. Seems they devote half the show now to planning a protest over something or bemoan the horrible practices of the giant corporations.
Re:2600 is still around (Score:2)
I have no particular reason to like lefties. I know next to nothing about most of the issues they raise about big bad corporations. But, I happen to know a little about PCs, and I have experienced on my skin the impact of corporations' common practices on the development of IT, and politicians' ineptitude or servitude towards their interests. You have probably experienced it yourself.
So i reasonably concluded long ago that what happens in the IT
Re:2600 is still around (Score:2)
If you ever walk by a theater and a documentary movie called "The Corporation" is showing, go see it. (Would have to be an off-main-street movie house though.) Or find the movie on P2P, or wait for the DVD. Or try the book [amazon.com] by the same guy (Joel Bakan) and the same title.
Bakan presents a very sober analysis, but the gist is: imagine a human being who (a) is motivated solely by pursuit of profit, (b) violates the rules
Re:2600 is still around (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:2600 is still around (Score:2)
What often happens is hat CEOs are prevented from maing ethically sound decisions by corporate laws. The CEO cannot take actions that would hit the shareholders' bottom line. Hence, all decisions made must be motivated by profit - even if the CEO doesn't like that.
In 1916 Henry Ford wanted to lower the price of the cars. Quote from Ford: "I do not believe that we should make such awful profits on our cars. A reasonable profit is rig
Re:2600 is still around (Score:2)
congratulations, you've just descibed every businessman in Russia.
Re:2600 is still around (Score:2)
This never ceases to amaze me. US politics is so far right that the right fringes of it are starting to firmly push into the grounds once reserved for the likes of Hitler. And the American public is so brainwashed and numbed down that a center-right rag (more right then center as the run up to Iraq clearly demnostrated) is claimed to be "left wing"... ah how would Dr. Goebbels be proud, such a trumph of propaganda!
Dude, I have shocking news for
Re:2600 is still around (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:2600 is still around (Score:3, Interesting)
Right you are. I'm a life time subscriber, but with some of the content anymore - especially the letters - just pains me to read it. Once in a while there will be a good 'hacker'-worthy article. But most of the time it's "how do I get around right-click suppression using Internet Explorer?" Please.
Fyodor introduced nmap on Phrack. Aleph 0ne taught us about buffer overflows through Phrack. And route was the funniest damn editor ever. My only complaints about
Re:2600 is still around (Score:4, Interesting)
As someone who's read 2600 on and off for going on 15 years, I like that they haven't felt the need so much to prove their l33t-ness by insulting newbies and making the material out of the reach of intermediate and even beginning hackers. What and when were 2600's "roots" to you? I don't recall a time when it was overly "stuffy," and it's always kept truer to the so-called "underground" - which if you don't recall was significantly populated by what we'd call "script kiddies" today.
Put another way, if everyone has that attitude, then there are no new hackers. Some proportion of script kiddies actually grow up to be good hackers. Now that doesn't mean that the material has to be of the "where can I find a perl script to do X" nature, but making concepts understandable isn't a bad thing.
Of course, 2600's increasingly political bent technologically irrelevant matters is another issue...
Re:2600 is still around (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:2600 is still around (Score:2)
So teaching kids how to spoof IP addresses is doing something "useful" whereas activism is not?
Re:2600 is still around... I disagree. (Score:2)
For example, volume 21, number 2 had a great article on magstrips. The article its self really went into a lot of details relating to how the hardware works, with some really great diagrams relating to serial, and a great bit of code relating to how to read the data passed from the reader through serial.
I guess it depends on what you expect from the zine, but I think for their customer base (younger kids interested in computers) this is a great p
Re:2600 is still around (Score:2)
assuming that 2600 has dumbed down over the years for a moment...
there's good reason that Emmanuel has been concerned with activism more now than before.
Well to start, let's take his radio show 'off the hook'. A show on high technology and the telephone network right? Well if you mess with t
Re:2600 is still around (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:2600 is still around (Score:2)
| and "you don't seem to know much about" smack of intelluctual elitism.
| I feel sorry for you, little man. Not everything has to be a battle.
Pot... kettle... nigritude.
Re:2600 is still around (Score:2, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re:2600 is still around (Score:2)
Memories, indeed. This [phrack.org] almost made me weep for my younger days:
300 baud! Where's my VIC-20 when I need it...?
Re:2600 is still around (Score:2)
Before, he wrote nearly all the stories. After that, it was all, "We here at 2600...". Yeah right. Maybe it's more professional, but to me, it took away all the personality and passion from the writing.
Re:2600 is still around (Score:2)
Maybe my memory isn't as good as I thought.
hmm we're too late. (Score:2)
I found issue #64 (Score:2, Funny)
Frankly I think it's lame.
Re:I found issue #64 (Score:2)
What's with the cover? (Score:1)
Re:What's with the cover? (Score:3, Funny)
I don't understand the question.
Re:What's with the cover? (Score:2)
If it wasn't dead already... (Score:4, Funny)
Use web.archive, Luke (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Use web.archive, Luke (Score:2)
Re:Use web.archive, Luke (Score:2)
MirrorDot Works!!! (Score:2)
Yes and... (Score:3, Funny)
Warning: mysql_connect(): Can't connect to local MySQL server through socket '/var/run/mysqld/mysqld.sock' (11) in
error: mysql_connect() failed
Re:Yes and... (Score:1)
I wrote (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:I wrote (Score:3, Insightful)
I had the pleasure of meeting or knowing several of the editors and the wear and tear on their enthusiam was evident as the torch was passed. Today it seems hard to find like-minded individuals willing to take up the cause in the ether-sea of a me-too generation.
Re:I wrote (Score:2)
Re:I wrote (Score:2)
Coral Cache (Score:2)
Phrack.org [nyud.net]
Re:Coral Cache (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Coral Cache (Score:2)
Re:Coral Cache (Score:2)
Re:Coral Cache (Score:2)
I'll be sorry to see it go (Score:1)
Great stuff for a long time (Score:5, Insightful)
However, anyone who has followed Phrack will admit that it peaked long ago, and has slowly been going away. Phrack closing shouldn't be a shock to anyone. I'm glad someone finally decided to say 'it's over' rather than having one issue a year.
Powers of good and evil (Score:2, Interesting)
I completely understand the thrill that comes with probing a system for vulnerabilities. Hacking is a drug... it's a power trip to take control of another host. But that power comes with karma of the worst kind. Whether a hacker hurts an individual, a company, or corporation... their deeds are not any more acceptable. Even if they're smart enough to cov
Re:Powers of good and evil (Score:2, Insightful)
Hacking, by definition, is attempting to figure out how
RE: using powers for "good" vs. "evil" (Score:4, Interesting)
Like almost everything in life, there are complex shades of grey. It's fine to lecture people on how much better it would be for everyone involved if they broke security protocols on their own time and hardware, and then published "white papers" on what they found. But when you're a 15 year old kid, you probably wouldn't find any of that "interesting" at all. You aren't tinkering around with hacking/cracking because you wanted another "homework assignment" to take on. It's purely for the thrill and bragging rights to your like-minded buddies.
I'm not saying this gives them "carte blanche" to go out and destroy other people's systems... But I guess what I *am* saying is, magazines like Phrack and 2600 started out (and thrived because of) the rebellious spirit of bored teens. Sometimes, the only way you'll really get people to find flaws in a product's security is by putting it in place and seeing who ends up breaking it in order to do something you see as "evil".
Take those dial-type Master locks for example. Before kids were messing around with them, trying to figure out how they could "feel" the tumblers inside them click to find the combinations on them, most people assumed they were pretty secure locks. (Short of a bolt-cutters, you weren't likely to get by them.) After kids (obviously motivated by the "evil" desire to break into other kids' lockers in schools) leaked out the secrets to picking these things, and it got passed around the Internet, Master Lock, Inc. made improvements to the lock and started selling revised versions.
I think we'd *still* be using an older revision Master lock today if we waited around for someone to put on a "white hat" and hack their own Master lock purely to "do good" by writing up a white paper on it when they finished.
Re:Powers of good and evil (Score:2)
You lost? Game over man, rm -rf
Re:Powers of good and evil (Score:2)
I enjoy playing the piano. Some pianists break laws. Therefore, fuck pianists?
See the problem?
Re:Powers of good and evil (Score:2)
Re:Powers of good and evil (Score:2)
Re:[Pedanticism Alert] (Score:2)
Absolutely right. I'm glad someone put it so well.
I get so irritated every time I hear this conversation. There's no chance of convincing John Q. Public that a hacker is a guy who takes things apart to find out how they work.
All they know is viruses, spyware, drone computers, losing their CC#'s while trying to buy pillowcases online, and all the various other stuff that DOES make news.
Just let the argument die, we lost a LONG time ago!
Re:[Pedanticism Alert] (Score:2)
"I get so irritated every time I hear this conversation. There's no chance of convincing John Q. Public that a hacker is a guy who takes things apart to find out how they work. [...] Just let the argument die, we lost a LONG time ago!"
The reduction of the word to have only a negative connotation casts a pall over all unorthodox computer activity. I believe that letting that attitude prevail will ultimately cause more trouble than it already has.
I don't know about you, but I quite like the effect I have
Re:Powers of good and evil (Score:2)
This statement is so ass backwards I don't know if it's coming or going. I've got an id
Re:Powers of good and evil (Score:2)
Re:Powers of good and evil (Score:2)
It wasn't all that offtopic, and it's a very understandible opinion. As you can tell by now though, you've accidentally pushed some buttons. Here in a techie arena, there is a techie terminology more detailed than in the general public, and you've paid a little karma to learn (maybe not agree with) that. others that have no patience to hear the explanation over and over flame back.
Even aside from the petty symantics though, I think you're a little short-sighted.. I'm sorry for the wrongs you've suffered, b
All-time Top 10 Articles (Score:5, Interesting)
As someone who has not only read but also studied every single issue of Phrack I propose that in the very last issue they also publish the All-time Top 10 Articles List as voted by readers and I hereby nominate Aleph One's legendary article Smashing The Stack For Fun And Profit [phrack.org] (Volume 7, Issue 49, November 08, 1996).
So let's hear your nominations... Yes, I know phrack.org has been slashdotted (commiserations to John Kozubik of Johncompanies in San Diego), but that's the point - if you are a true diehard fan of Phrack you already have all the issues mirrored locally because you've studied them thoroughly.
Re:All-time Top 10 Articles (Score:2)
I'll miss phrack, but the released a new article about once every 18 months. It had been suffering from neglect for a while now.
Re:All-time Top 10 Articles (Score:2)
It's far more meaningful than some 'security' course I had in college...
Re:All-time Top 10 Articles (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:All-time Top 10 Articles (Score:2)
Oh, and I like your sig
Goodbye Old Friend (Score:5, Interesting)
I will not deny that this news comes as a bit of a shock. All things must end, therefore in a saddened state I say goodbye to you old teacher and friend. You will be missed.
A sad day (Score:3, Interesting)
I am really sad to see it go. The articles were way better than those in 2600, and it was well written and funny too.
Seems that alle the good zines are gone or dying a similar death (Confidence remains high, B4B0, HUGI, Veracity and others). This seems to be the state of the hacker scene today as well. It's all become either commercial or totally lame.
This is a sad, sad day for me as it doens't look like anyone else is starting a zine of comparible quality. Please for the love of god start something not meant for lame ass high school newbies with "safe", cool hacking "tutorials". Telnetting to port 25 is NOT advanced. Phrack, you WILL be misses
Re:A sad day (Score:3, Interesting)
That's how I always read Phrack -- on a 300 baud connection to an upstate New York web site called OSUNY (Ohio Scientific Users of New York). My computer was 40-column and Phrack was 80-column, so I would print out each issue and save it in a binder along with the cDc g-philes.
It's been a long long time since I cared about such things. Are there any good hack/phreak groups left? Who's teaching the next generation?
Re:A sad day (Score:2)
la120 terminals and no, not 300 baud, 110! 300 baud was
just a touch fast for me
what % of people on
mirror dot (Score:3, Informative)
Pass the torch - don't kill the tradition (Score:5, Interesting)
What's different about the current batch of editors was their intense arrogance and unusualy patronizing attitude towards the scene. Phrack hasn't been about the computer underground for years. The last ten years have turned Phrack into a prestigious journal for security research.
The anarchistic underground roots of phrack have been whitewashed away by the latest batch of editors. Go and read the issues from 1980s, early 90s.
The reason this happened was that when the scene moved to the Internet in the mid 90s the MIT hacker memes battled it out against "war games" hacker meme of the 80s. Hacker still has an 80s meaning for the general public, but the MIT hacker meme clearly won amongst the technically savy. The "cracker" and "script kiddy" memes were part of a process that turned Phrack's underground past into an embarrassment.
So Phrack gradually turned against it's own roots. It's not for the hacker community by the hacker community anymore. Far from it. The current incarnation of Phrack actually spreads hypocritical anti-hacker memes between it's covers. It's BY $150-an-hour-security-consultants FOR our-reputation-in-the-security-industry.
Phrack has been hijacked by sellouts.
Aside from their snobbish elitist attitude, what have the recent editors of Phrack contributed? The articles are written by others. Try reading the "linenoise" section written by the Phrack editors sometime. Degrading newbies never gets old for these guys. Ha ha! you're all so stupid! We're so uber elite!
So now what's happened is that these guys are so old school, so been-there-done-that, patronizing assholes that they've decided it's time for Phrack to die rather than evolve.
Here's an alternative to killing off a 20+ year tradition: run a competition amongst would-be editors who can publish the best next issue of phrack. Then allow the PUBLIC to vote amongst alternatives as to whom succeeds the current editors.
The team that manages to hack together the best edition of phrack 64 wins.
Phrack is dead. Long live phrack!
Re:Pass the torch - don't kill the tradition (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Pass the torch - don't kill the tradition (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
EOT (Score:3, Informative)
Re:EOT (Score:2)
Re:EOT (Score:2)
Re:EOT (Score:2)
Re:EOT (Score:2)
Re:EOT (Score:2)
Textfiles.com (Score:2)
PHRAK back issues [textfiles.com]
Plenty of mirrors, and, huh.. there *used* to be a torrent..
Re:Textfiles.com (Score:2)
Stay tuned. Or at least, stick around.
Phrack dies from slashdotting.... (Score:2)
Again? (Score:2)
SoupIsGood Food
Re:what are other resources? (Score:1)
Re:heh.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Judging by the release rate of the last few years "apathy" on the part of the Phrack editors seems to be the order of the day, but that's perhaps a little unfair. There have been scores of papers published that would have been worthy of Phrack at its best in that time. The problem is that everyone writing such papers can just as easily create their own website and publish their works there. Why wait for what might be several months to see you work published for what little kudos being published in Phrack still has left and risk someone else stealing your fifteen minutes of fame?
Re:heh.. (Score:2, Informative)
the release i saw in bugtraq (i think, they all end up in the same folder) said they are going to goto hardcover and e-zine format
(not trying to be a karma whore, the mysql died apparently on them:)
in the email to bugtraw@securityfocus.com:
----
Deadline: 10 July 2005 at 11:59pm
http://www.phrack.org/cfp_fi
Netcraft confirms. (Score:4, Funny)
One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered hax0r community when IDC confirmed that Phrack market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all k-l33t readers. Coming on the heels of a recent Netcraft survey which plainly states that Phrack has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. Phrack is collapsing in complete disarray, as fittingly exemplified by failing dead last in the recent International Blue Boxing Competition.
You don't need to be an Erik Bloodaxe to predict Phrack's future. The hand writing is on the wall: Phrack faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for Phrack because Phrack is dying. Things are looking very bad for Phrack. As many of us are already aware, Phrack continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood.
There can no longer be any doubt: Phrack is dying.
Re:Finally (Score:2)
Re:not so (Score:2)
Case in point: Slashdot
it doesnt work because (Score:2)