Animated Ads in a Subway Near You 304
prostoalex writes "A company called Sub Media claims a successful launch of motion-picture ads in New York subway. The ad agency, created by a PhD in Astrophysics, prints ads on Kodak transparencies, so that when the train speeds up, the resulting images create a full-blown motion picture. The first ever ad of this was run for Target in NY, and there is another one planned for Discovery Channel."
Danger! Danger! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Danger! Danger! (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Danger! Danger! (Score:2)
Flipbook (Score:1)
Wow... (Score:1, Funny)
Already done in Japan (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Already done in Japan (Score:2, Interesting)
Already done in Athens, Greece, as well (Score:3, Informative)
yet another reason to use a car (Score:1, Troll)
Re:yet another reason to use a car (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:yet another reason to use a car (Score:2)
Re:yet another reason to use a car (Score:2)
You do realize that the advertising subsidizes the cost of the subway, right?
Personally I would rather have advertising than higher subway rates.
Re:yet another reason to use a car (Score:2)
I just wish there were some pager or something you could wear which would vibrate when you got to your stop; I'm one of those people who can get so lost in a book that I'll occassionally miss my stop.
Sad, sad, sad. (Score:2)
This is just a revamp of an old advertising system. I personally think it's cool. At least it's not like the intrusive annoying "planted advertisers" that Sony is putting around city streets with their cameras posing as tourists.
Driving a car won't help that.
Personally, I enjoy a good book on transit, so I never really pay attention to transit ads anymore anyways. I can't do that if I'm driving a car...
Re:yet another reason to use a car (Score:4, Funny)
That's why I close my eyes when I drive. Thank God for my Excursion [cars.com] and the custom rambar on the front.
Related Globe article (Score:4, Informative)
(Google cache link, since the original story is now archived)
In the not so distant implant future... (Score:1)
Re:In the not so distant implant future... (Score:2)
Discovery Channel ad is already up..... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Discovery Channel ad is already up..... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Discovery Channel ad is already up..... (Score:2)
What river runs across Manhattan between 14th and 23rd streets?
Re:Discovery Channel ad is already up..... (Score:2)
Isn't it Shark week EVERY week on Discovery???
I'd have been more worried if the ad HADN'T been for shark week. Then something would be seriously wrong.
Re:Discovery Channel ad is already up..... (Score:2)
Phew... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Phew... (Score:2)
And how does this sell a product? (Score:1)
Re:And how does this sell a product? (Score:4, Insightful)
Once every subway tunnel in the world has these though, people will just mentally filter the ads out like they do with 95% of other advertising.
OB Book reference. (Score:1)
-C
Like the rest of the country has subways? (Score:1, Informative)
In fact, the ad wasn't even on the NYC subway system -- it was on the PATH (Port Authority Trans-Hudson) trains, which is run by the Port Authority of New York and NJ. The subway is run by the MTA.
subway ads... (Score:1)
video clip: blatant karma whoring (Score:1)
http://www.forbes.com/2002/08/15/0815subway.
problem (Score:4, Funny)
Re:problem (Score:2)
Re:problem (Score:4, Funny)
Apparently, the hoodlums spray paint a bunch of individual pictures right next to each other so that passengers on a train speeding by are greeted with a pleasant short film about pimping and whoring. The effect has been likened to a giant "flip book."
~GoRK
Re:problem (Score:2)
Don't you mean... (Score:2, Funny)
ObSimon&Garfunkle (Score:4, Funny)
The article headline didn't go as far with it as they could have.
"And the words of the PROFITS are written on the subway walls..."
-l
Re:ObSimon&Garfunkle (Score:2)
Originally, it was Simon & Garfunkle:
Rush cribbed the line for "Spirit of Radio":
*: At which point, they shine the lights on the audience, which promptly goes wild. Guess where I was last Tuesday? :-)
Who looks out the window? (Score:2, Insightful)
Is it just me or is this a stupid idea? Almost no one who rides the subway is actively looking out the windows at the subway walls. Hell, many of the subway seats actually face away from the walls, towards the inside of the car. That picture at the top of the ABCNews.com article is priceless: all those images are flickering by behind the commuters! Yeah, they can look out the opposite window, but what incentive is there for people to do that? It's not like TV where there's something interesting to watch and then a commerical pop up. There's nothing interesting on the subway walls so who's going to be looking there? Everyone either zones out or brings something to read on the subway.
Advertisers must be getting desperate...
GMD
Re:Who looks out the window? (Score:5, Interesting)
As much as I hate the ads plastered everywhere these days, I think this isn't a half-bad idea. A lot of the people riding the subway have nothing better to do. As you note, they often "zone out". Those people will probably view the ad, especially if it's interesting (think of the possibilities of a long-running story type campaign). Here's a situation where a lot of people have nothing better to do-- as opposed to pop up ads where I'm trying to do something else but the ads interrupt me.
Re:Who looks out the window? (Score:2)
So there's this new law of the universe that says that looking at advertising is better than doing nothing. Frankly I'm just fine standing somewhere without being sold to, and I don't think that the default use of public space (how many subways are privately funded?) is best dedicated to commerce. Call me a communist, but I don't think that people on the subway "have nothing better to do".
Re:Who looks out the window? (Score:2)
If you have something better to do, or want to ignore the ads, you can certainly do that. My point was that I prefer ads in this environment-- where I can choose to ignore them. It's like ads in a magazine. I can skip to the next page, or I can read it if it catches my attention.
Re:Who looks out the window? (Score:2)
Oh, come on. You and I know very well that advertisers aren't going to do anything nearly so cool with this as those `possibilities' of which you speak. Do a long-running storyline? And risk alienating that large chunk of the population with the memory of your typical goldfish? I think not. It's going to be lowest common denominator, as per always.
And yes, I am a whiny bitch. Thank you for noticing.
Re:Who looks out the window? (Score:2)
I look out the window. (Score:3, Funny)
As for the incentive, of course there's the initial novelty, but it's also more interesting than reading the 'Injured? Call 1-800-BIG-MONEY!' ad that's by the subway car's interior roof, or the budweiser ad that's on the subway car's interior wall.
Personally, I like the ads, and if I don't want to see them, that's why God invented the concept of not looking.
I look at the other passengers (Score:2)
Re:Who looks out the window? (Score:2)
Ads in books, now THAT'd be annoying.
Re:Who looks out the window? (Score:2)
I always gaze out the window on the subway. It's better than re-reading the ads on the inside of the subway car a dozen times, or getting in a fight with some guy because you were facing his general direction and he thinks you were staring at him...
In particular, when I take the PATH uptown I make a point of turning towards the ad so I can see the zoetropic activity. Is it just an ad? Yes. Is it of worse quality than the average 15-second TV commercial? Yes.
Is it a novel, attention-getting gimmick? Sure is
they should do the exterior of the train as well (Score:2)
okay, okay, not as cool.
Re:they should do the exterior of the train as wel (Score:2)
I meant paint them in a way so that as they moved it animated like the images in the tunnel...
coming soon to a gangland subway line near you... (Score:4, Funny)
"Yeah Joe....we just arrested another bum for pleasuring himself on the subway. We really need to get the public works dept. down there to clean the spray paint off those ads."
Re:coming soon to a gangland subway line near you. (Score:2)
While they do manage to tag some of the most 'daring' locations, I don't imagine they'd have the patience to tag the hundreds of signs along the tunnel.
--
Re:coming soon to a gangland subway line near you. (Score:2)
A series of frames would be tough. Better to tag one frame with a subliminal message, then watch the hijinks ensue.
Hmmm. That would make for an interesting experiment. Replace one frame of an ad with the word "thirsty", and see how many people head for a Coke machine as soon as they get off the train. Or see how many thugs get really nervous after getting the subliminal message "sharpened screwdriver".
Some evil genius could have a field day with this! I'd try it on the Pittsburgh subway myself, but nobody would see it. :-)
Re:coming soon to a gangland subway line near you. (Score:2)
subway ads (Score:2)
Keep in mind also, that this was demoed on the PATH line between New York and New Jersey which, until recently, was relatively ad-free. It changed a year or so ago with the installation of closed-circuit TV monitors that show powerpoint-style ads and subway information (next train in x mintues, etc.) The article says that the PATH lost 50 million last year despite raising fares by 50%. They're desperate for cash.
Personally, i'll deal with the ads if I still get to get to jersey for a buck and change. It's a helluva lot cheaper than the commuter busses, that's for sure.
Triv
Way OT: PATH operating costs (Score:2)
Do you know what it would cost if fares alone covered the cost of operating the trains?
I heard a press conference the other day by our state's transportation department head talking about building a commuter rail line similar to the PATH trains and he made a comment that I found interesting, that few if any transportation projects ever deliver a return on investment (ie, economic value relative to their cost).
Would the PATH trains even be economically viable if fares paid for the operating costs? I mean, nobody wants to pay $50 each way to work.
Re:subway ads (Score:2)
PATH has relied on advertising for as long as I can remember. Stationary ads have been in stations and in cars -- it's only the PATHVISION closed-circuit TV system (actually it's running on a Windows system -- I've seen error dialog boxes pop up on the screens on several occasions) that's relatively new (~3 years?)
The main reason PATH lost so much money last year was due to the loss of their station at World Trade Center -- not only did they not get the ad revenue from pasting Bloomberg TV ads on every flat surface, but also because the thousands of people who were accustomed to taking the PATH train from New Jersey to Lower Manhattan had to find an alternate route.
Some continued taking the PATH across the river, getting off in the Village or Midtown and taking MTA subways downtown. Others started taking ferries across the river. Many chose to stay on NJ Transit's commuter trains all the way to Penn Station NYC, rather than switching to the PATH at Newark
Re:subway ads (Score:2)
Triv
So how we gonna block these ads? (Score:2)
Re:So how we gonna block these ads? (Score:2)
Why the FUCK can't I make a joke without some dumbshit taking it seriously? It wouldn't be so bad if they wouldn't take it to such extremes. "You think the RIAA's charging too much for CDs? That must mean you're unwilling to pay for anything! You're the reason that society is bad!!"
On the Path Train... (Score:2, Informative)
Sample image (Score:3, Funny)
I would hate to be Target's 'Guest' (Score:2)
I saw this! (Score:3, Interesting)
I told my wife about it 'cause I think it spooked everybody on the train. Something about the way the adds "move" gives you really bad vertigo. You expect everything outside the Path to be dark and moving by at a good pace, instead you look out the window and see gay men and women dancing around red and white bullseyes wearing tight white bellbottoms and goofy smiles. It's like riding a train into the twilight zone.
But, I suppose it will sell a lot of addspace.
I cant wait to see what the taggers (Score:2)
Leet (Score:2)
I predict the first
" MAKE "
(blink)
" MONEY "
(blink)
" FAST "
ad will appear by the end of the year.
I prefer the gizmos at DIA (Score:2)
I suppose it's only a matter of time until United books ad space there, but it hasn't happened yet.
The answer (Score:2)
Station 2
See it (Score:5, Informative)
In Tokyo too (Score:2)
the value of education (Score:4, Funny)
I guess a degree is pretty powerful, if it can start its own company....
The company's Web site (Score:2)
Gator (Score:4, Funny)
"We don't want to go into details about how it will work but I will say that customers who order our free Ray Ban sunglasses will be in the thousands and the impressions will be many"
While many are buzzing about being able to get Free Rayban glasses the NY Transit authority is quite upset.
"This is going to eat into our subway ad revenues. It's theft and we plan on pressing legal action"
They should have displays *inside* the subway (Score:2)
displays on the trains, which show news, weather, and of course lots of ads.
I don't see the point of putting the displays on the tunnel walls, except for a "gee whiz" factor which quickly evaporates.
ads are everywhere (Score:5, Insightful)
Kodak Kodak Kodak! (NASDAQ:EK) (Score:2)
Done long ago (Score:5, Interesting)
For all of you New Yorkers who rode the D train from Brooklyn into Manhattan in the late 70's and early 80's, this is old hat. I don't know when they pulled the plug on this, but between Dekalb Ave. and the Manhattan Bridge some artist had done exactly this along the abonded Myrtle Ave. stop. It depicted a 1950's style rocket ship taking off and landing.
I must have watched this a 1,000 times on way in to high school. Of course, this was art and not an ad.
Re:Done long ago (Score:2)
I'm pretty sure the D train animation wasn't backlit, either...
Re:Done long ago (Score:2)
Re:Done long ago (Score:2, Interesting)
Bradbury predicted this (Score:2)
I believe that elongated ads were first dreamed up by Ray Bradbury in Farenheit 451. You were only able to see them for what they were while traveling on the extremely fast mass transit. At least it sticks out in my mind that way- its been a long time since I read it.
Re:Bradbury predicted this (Score:2)
Great book though, personally my favorite from Bradbury. Pedestrian hunting was my favorite part...
We have something similar here (Score:2)
Not a new idea.... (Score:4, Interesting)
Subliminal advertising possiblities!?! (Score:2)
Running In Reverse? (Score:2)
Ok, so it appears that they've basically hung a series of still images along the subway route. As you go zipping by, they blur together to form a continuous animated image. Same concept as a flipbook: draw a picture on a series of pages and flip them quickly so the images appear to be in motion. (yes, same way a film strip works, etc.)
Fine. But this should only work in one direction. Passengers riding from point A to point B will see the animation correctly. But a passenger traveling from B to A is going to get the animation in reverse as they will be passing the same pictures in reverse order.
I don't particularly want to see an animated feminine hygiene ad... but I really don't want to see an animated feminine hygiene ad in reverse.
Re:Running In Reverse? (Score:2)
Already done in Buenos Aires, Argentina last year. (Score:2)
Ray Bradbury did it as well (Score:4, Interesting)
Bradbury, et al., suggested using a material that was common years ago but may not be so common now - it was a type of reflector that showed a picture when viewed one way and another picture when viewed from a slightly different angle. You could flip back and forth by rotating the reflector. Their idea was that if you're going to have an animation museum, the museum itself should be animated. But since they were specifically aiming at kids, they set up the entry just for the kids.
What happened depended on how tall you were. If you were an adult, you saw these static cartoon adult characters, i.e., Goofey, Donald, etc. following you along as you walked down the hall to the exhibit. But if you were a kid, or you lowered your eyes to kid-height, what you saw were an animated Huey, Dewey and Louie running in and out of the cartoon adult's legs.
You are probably thinking of... (Score:5, Interesting)
On a similar note, I recently bought a complete set of Popular Mechanics Do-it-Yourself encyclopedias (published in 1968), and one project that was detailed was a picture done in a similar manner, except instead of lenticular lens plastic being used, three pictures were used. Two of the pictures were cut into strips that were glued back-to-back and in order. Then a third picture was placed in the frame, and via grooves sawed in the top and bottom of the frame edge, the strips were placed perpendicular to the main picture. This basically allowed three different "views" in one picture frame as you looked at it from the left, the right, and "head-on". The project was described as using portraits: A left portrait, a right portrait, and a frontal face portrait.
I hate ads, but I don't hate this (Score:2)
I also hated elevator ads, until I worked in a highrise building. When you are bored out of your mind and you have nothing to do, ads can pass the time. I commute every day on the subway in Toronto and having ads on the tunnel walls would pass the time. Advertising is definately not a panacea, but in this case everybody wins. I don't see what there is to complain about.
Now as far as Microsoft funding UofWestern...;)
Now that should be able to be patented. (Score:2)
Although all of us know how it works in concept, it isn't an obvious thing to come up with. Someone had to come up with the idea and do testing. I suspect they have to syncronize a flash behind each frame with the train so you don't just end up with a blur, etc. etc. etc.
*This* is what the patent system was invented for, not for use by people to protect their "I think I'll write a program to do X which is almost like everything else you've ever seen before".
Re:Now that should be able to be patented. (Score:2)
Additionally, Keith Haring did such in the NYC subway in Manhatten, on the N line at 7th Ave and 50th St, wayyyy back 1980... I heard that one was done in Soho as well, but haven't seen it...
reminds me of something I saw in Tokyo (Score:2)
Bored Commuter? (Score:2)
BTW, the idea isn't that new, I remember reading about an art installation I think in Berlin a couple of years back who did exactly the same thing.
But I guess leave it to marketing to turn something interresting and good into something just bland.
Odd quote from the end of the article (Score:2)
Guess this guy doesn't live in the U.S. Raise your hand if you're from a major U.S. city that doesn't have a subway system. It's called urban sprawl, folks -- when you build horizontally instead of vertically, subways become prohibitively expensive (in the short run, which is all that matters to those who have the power to build them).
How it works - microlouver miniblinds (Score:2)
It's a type of transparent screen filters with properties like microscopic vertical blinds. When affixed to the front of any backlit image, the filter restricts the viewing angle to a few degrees. From any other angle than almost perpendicular, the screen appears completely dark. The moving subway ads have the same type of screen filters attached, which means that the frame only becomes visible when it is nearly perpendicular to the train window, and it rapidly flickers out of sight as you move past it.
The persistance of vision means the eye is tricked into seeing these brief glimpses of each frame as a continous motion picture sequence, although the blank inter-frame interval is presumably much longer than that of normal television, and the framerate is presumably lower.
Technology aside, ads do get ever more obnoxious and intrusive, on the net and off the net. Other posts in this thread have briefly touched on future ad-blanking augmented reality applications, and I believe there will be a market for such things as we move ever closer to the nightmare situation of animated, personalized, intrusive ads everywhere, as depicted beautifully in Minority Report.
One day every inner-city billboard will be plastered with animated ads, as the cost of printing flexible, brught polymer displays will plummet in the next decade.
Milano, Italy (Score:2)
They look like movies from the beginning of the century, just outside the subways' windows.
Cute, and in the long run boring.
On the plus side, there's no audio to accompany them (which instead happens in some stations). It easier to look somewhere else than not to listen.
Re:Why not just have TV's (Score:2)
This, on the other hand, would be much more challenging to put out of action. Whether or not that's a good thing depends on how you feel about omnipresent advertising.
Re:Why not just have TV's (Score:2)
The problem with showing commercials on LCD's is that people'll tune them out.
I said it before and I'll say it again: How much do they think my wimpy organic mind can retain?