Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

[ Create a new account ]

Gmail Mis.delivered?

Posted by ScuttleMonkey on Sun Jan 22, 2006 03:22 PM
from the new-excuses-for-not-getting-an-email dept.
An anonymous reader writes "Google doesn't make many mistakes but when it does, boy, are they doozies! The latest is that Gmail doesn't care about periods in usernames. So mail sent to anonymous.coward@gmail.com is also delivered to anonymouscoward@gmail.com, even though these are two separate mail accounts. Google admits Gmail doesn't see periods, but no word on a fix yet." Update: As may users have pointed out Ars has since corrected the story, stating that the original submitter was mistaken and the email was just improperly addressed.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Gmail Mis.delivered? | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 321 comments (Spill at 50!) | Index Only | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • Google is Sexist! (Score:5, Funny)

    by biocute (936687) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:23PM (#14534134)
    (http://xmoo.com/)
    I can't believe Google is disrespecting users with periods.

    Since there is no word on a fix yet, it would be interesting if Microsoft rolls out a 3rd party patch which warns Gmail users when the recipient email address has periods in it.
  • Shame really (Score:3, Insightful)

    by LiquidCoooled (634315) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:25PM (#14534140)
    This couldv been a really neat feature.
    I could signup a generic slashdot@gmail.com type account and then pass around multiple variations to different sites.
    Depending upon the variation received I could determine which site leaked my mail.

    I think the only way to rectify this is to start accounting for the period.
    The cat is out of the bag so to speak.
    • Re:Shame really (Score:5, Informative)

      by StonedRat (837378) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:36PM (#14534212)
      (http://shitsoftware.com/ | Last Journal: Friday January 28 2005, @01:10PM)
      Gmail already has this feature if you own slashdot@gmail.com you can also use slashdot+anything@gmail.com
      [ Parent ]
    • Sigh... This really is a FEATURE (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:39PM (#14534225)
      Headline here should be corrected; this isn't a huge gmail flaw; seasoned users know it as a feature.

      Secret gmail feature #1: you can add and remove periods from your username with no change in mail routing. There is no collision with other accounts since only one account (stripped of periods) is allowed to exist.

      Scret gmail feature #2: you can append a plus and any string to your account name and it will still be routed to you. Try creating filters by giving out your address this way: eg example+spam@gmail.com will be delivered to username 'example'

      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Shame really by MooUK (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:55PM
    • Re:Shame really by AngryNick (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:59PM
    • Re:Shame really by SeaFox (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @08:02PM
    • Re:Shame really by Varun Soundararajan (Score:1) Monday January 23 2006, @07:03AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Shame really (Score:5, Informative)

      by comcn (194756) on Sunday January 22 2006, @04:27PM (#14534471)
      (Last Journal: Sunday January 22 2006, @08:35PM)
      The '.' character in an email address violates RFC, but no one seems to really care.

      er, no. Only that if you want to begin or end the local part with a ".", then you have to quote the local part. i.e. some.body@domain.example is fine, but .somebody@domain.example must be stated as ".somebody"@domain.example

      RFC 2822, 3.4.1 "Addr-spec specification" (italics mine):

      An addr-spec is a specific Internet identifier that contains a locally interpreted string followed by the at-sign character ("@", ASCII value 64) followed by an Internet domain. The locally interpreted string is either a quoted-string or a dot-atom. If the string can be represented as a dot-atom (that is, it contains no characters other than atext characters or "." surrounded by atext characters), then the dot-atom form SHOULD be used and the quoted-string form SHOULD NOT be used. Comments and folding white space SHOULD NOT be used around the "@" in the addr-spec.
      [ Parent ]
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • '.' character in local part does NOT violate RFC by e_AltF4 (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:35PM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Not two accounts (Score:5, Informative)

    by rritterson (588983) * on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:25PM (#14534144)
    From what I understand, it's not two seperate accounts (i.e. ab@gmail.com and a.b@gmail.com are only one account and you can't register both, and you get mail that comes to either).

    In addition, you can use it as a feature to filter mail. (i.e. if I'm abcdefg@gmail.com I can give out abcd.efg@gmail.com to friends and abc.defg@gmail.com to random websites, then filter the incoming mail automatically).

    Feature, not a bug, in my opinion.
  • What date is it? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Incadenza (560402) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:26PM (#14534152)
    Bloopers like this make me check the calender, sounds like perfect April 1st Slashdot news.
  • Yep (Score:4, Informative)

    by BitterAndDrunk (799378) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:26PM (#14534155)
    (http://fringles.blogspot.com/)
    I addressed this w/Gmail a long time ago. I have two first names (e.g. Mike Roger) and mikeroger@gmail.com was taken. . . so I grabbed mike.roger@gmail.com

    It's a damn shame mikeroger doesn't have a racier life, it would be awesome.

    Google's response, btw, was that I'd secured both mikeroger@gmail.com and mike.roger@gmail.com and could switch between the two as I wanted. Obviously, this is incorrect.

    The bright side is I seem to have blown the original email user away w/volume; he used to receive about 1 email every 3 days as opposed to my 20-30 (not including spam).

    The down-side is he subscribed to XM ENTERTAINMENT's porn newsletter.

    • Re:Yep by bfdhud (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:31PM
    • Re:Yep by rts008 (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:33PM
    • Re:Yep (Score:5, Funny)

      by strobexii (601986) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:35PM (#14534203)
      The down-side is he subscribed to XM ENTERTAINMENT's porn newsletter.

      Don't worry, I just got him back big time! I subscribed you to about a dozen porn newsletters. He'll be completely inundated with porn spam in no time! No need to thank me, helping other people is its own reward.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:Yep by LiquidCoooled (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:39PM
      • erm, no by BitterAndDrunk (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:49PM
    • Re:Yep by Vicsun (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:48PM
      • Re:Yep by elmegil (Score:3) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:58PM
        • Re:Yep by starwed (Score:3) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:05PM
      • *rolls eyes* by BitterAndDrunk (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:53PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Nope by mlewan (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:12PM
    • Re:Yep by Chanc_Gorkon (Score:3) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:41PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Yep by OS24Ever (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @06:19PM
    • 3 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Awesome, I can steal email by insomniac8400 (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:28PM
  • Update? (Score:5, Informative)

    by Parham (892904) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:29PM (#14534167)
    There is an update at the top of the article:

    Update: Ryan Coleman has since admitted he was mistaken, and that the e-mails he received addressed to ryancolemand@gmail.com were misaddressed.
    • Re:Update? by Esion Modnar (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:37PM
    • Re:Update? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by earnest murderer (888716) on Sunday January 22 2006, @04:39PM (#14534527)
      In other news, a gentleman by the name of Due Diligence was found dead on a downtown street, apparently trampled to death.

      When asked about it Angry Mob (currently confined at digg.com) replied "Never let the truth get in the way of a good story".

      Seriously, this was a pretty big fuckup regurgitating some random assholes blog entry without checking *anything*. I expect this at digg.com where inflamitory and baseless rule the day. Slashdot can claim to merely be a discussion of "news" and not necessarily journalism itself. Ars, I expected more.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:Update? by Jesus_666 (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @05:59PM
      • Re:Update? by Art Tatum (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @07:45PM
      • D'oh! by Caesar (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @08:02PM
        • Re:D'oh! by NaDrew (Score:2) Tuesday January 24 2006, @05:02AM
  • Identity theft? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by SuperDuG (134989) <be AT eclec DOT tk> on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:29PM (#14534170)
    (http://www.eclec.tk/ | Last Journal: Tuesday December 25 2001, @03:37PM)
    Since in its infinite wisdom most webservices allow password resets to happen via email. Wouldn't it just be a matter of time to find out soemone's email address and then have the "oops I lost my password" feature on a number of websites utilized?

    I wonder how many slashdot accounts, internet domains, and amazon accounts are linked via an @gmail.com address.

    This is most certainly not a "little" problem by any means...

  • Old news! (Score:5, Informative)

    by travail_jgd (80602) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:30PM (#14534173)
    This has been known for a while in the user community. In fact, this tutorial [outer-court.com] is 18 months old, and demonstrates the "feature".
  • by njord (548740) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:31PM (#14534184)

    I don't see the problem with that, I thought it was common knowledge. The way I see it, how often is a period essential, or dangerous? I don't think there are many domains with say, joesmith@domain.com and joe.smith@domain.com pointing to different people. I see the period as a way of reducing typing errors.

    Also, you can do things like this:

    http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answe r=12096&topic=1564 [google.com]

    I don't want to sound trollish, but this hardly sounds like story material to me.

    njord

  • by bennomatic (691188) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:32PM (#14534188)
    (http://www.tuneforge.com/)
    I was wondering why I get so much spam. My email address is *.*@gmail.com.

    :-P

  • my email by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:32PM
    • Google replies (Score:5, Funny)

      by dangitman (862676) on Sunday January 22 2006, @04:36PM (#14534513)
      Please stop posting my email address on Slashdot. Think of all the evil spammers!

      What is this "Slashdot" you speak of? We only see a site called "Slash"

      [ Parent ]
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Old news (Score:3, Insightful)

    by RedWizzard (192002) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:33PM (#14534194)
    This has been the case since day 1. The only problem is if Google has been allowing people to register addresses that differ only because of the position of periods. Certainly they generally don't - I've tried to register several variations of my gmail address without success. It looks like the case discussed in this article is a isolated incident.
    • Re:Old news by Anonymous Freak (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:40PM
      • Re:Old news by Mr. Slippery (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:04PM
        • Re:Old news by Anonymous Freak (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:10PM
          • Re:Old news by Quino (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:20PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • This is all wrong (Score:5, Informative)

    by Lanzaa (761994) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:34PM (#14534199)
    (Last Journal: Wednesday September 29 2004, @12:06AM)
    The person made a mistake. He was getting someone elses mail for a different reason. You cannot make two account that are the same.

    Here is his blog post saying he made the mistake.
    http://fitrans.blogspot.com/2006/01/oops-formerly- found-in-my-inbox-odd.html [blogspot.com]
  • Fixed? (Score:5, Informative)

    Uhm... I just tried this. It doesn't work - you can't register username if user.name is taken, nor can you register user.name if username is taken.
    • Re:Fixed? by MooUK (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:58PM
    • Re:Fixed? by cookedchicken (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:21PM
    • Re:Fixed? by gabe824 (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @05:19PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • aha! (Score:4, Funny)

    by bazorg (911295) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:35PM (#14534206)
    they turned evil! It had to happen!
  • Wow. (Score:3, Interesting)

    by LeeTax0r (933146) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:37PM (#14534214)
    This explains why I've been getting email from some guy telling me I'm his lab partner in some class and that I need to contact him to get info on the final assignment. I wrote to him, "Who do you think I am and what class are you talking about?". He says, "I'm Quincy. I set next to you in IST 326. We have an assignment due soon!" I say, "Uh. I don't think so, since I'm not in any IST program. Are you sure you have the right email?" The guy: "Yes, daviddunlap@gmail.com, right?" Me: "No, not at all. david.dunlap@gmail.com." I thought all this time that the guy just didn't know how to use email. Boy, was I wrong.
    • Re:Wow. by caffeination (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:50PM
    • Re:Wow. by svanstrom (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @05:08PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:Wow. by MedManDC (Score:1) Monday January 23 2006, @12:24AM
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • by jbarr (2233) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:39PM (#14534228)
    (http://jimstips.com/)
    This is absolutely not mis-delivery or a mistake on Google's part!

    See Gmail's Help page on this at:

    http://mail.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answe r=10313&query=dot&topic=0&type=f [google.com]

    (You may need to be logged into Gmail account to see this.)

    Simply put, the period only matters when logging in. Gmail considers some.user@gmail.com and somuser@gmail.com as the same when delivering email, but if the account was oopened as some.user, then you have to use some.user as the login--someuser will not work. Send an email to some.user@gmail.com, somuser@gmail.com, or so.me.us.er@gmail.com, and it'll get delivered to the same account, but you will only be able to login as some.user@gmail.com

    Google's intent was to cut down on addressing mistakes as well as spam.

    From the user's perspective, actually a good thing because it means that you "lock in" similar addresses so some.user and someuser aren't two different accounts. It also means that the actual number of accounts is less because of this.

    -Jim

    http://gmailtips.com/ [gmailtips.com]
  • Now my t-shirt makes sense! (Score:5, Funny)

    by rfernand79 (643913) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:41PM (#14534235)
    I read your Email [thinkgeek.com].
  • Does it work both ways? by Jason1729 (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:47PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Well, that explains a lot. (Score:5, Funny)

    by ral8158 (947954) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:47PM (#14534273)
    Someone must have a version of my G-Mail account with a period in it. Apparently, they're very into penis enlargement...
  • Your neighbour got mail, huh? by ceeam (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:47PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • New Guy here.. by danee boy (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:47PM
  • More bad news for Sean Penn by bk4u (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:53PM
  • ohhhhh SHIT!!!! by Jafafa Hots (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:54PM
  • It's not a period... (Score:5, Funny)

    by bdwoolman (561635) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:55PM (#14534307)
    (http://www.bdwoolman.net/)
    It is a G spot.
  • I wonder... by Richard_at_work (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:56PM
  • Inaccurate Story by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:56PM
  • Google Makes Plenty of Mikstakes by PingXao (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:56PM
    • Oh by Life700MB (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @05:13PM
  • Mod Slashdot -1 Flame (Score:3, Informative)

    by null etc. (524767) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:58PM (#14534329)
    Remove this story, as it's total b.s. BTW it was posted on digg 3 days ago, by which time it had been identified as b.s. Way to go slashdot!
  • That explains a lot... by ErnieD (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:01PM
  • by SquareOfS (578820) on Sunday January 22 2006, @04:06PM (#14534366)
    I don't know what this story is talking about, but the dot-ignoring delivery has been publicly known from day 1, and I just conducted the experiment of attempting to register a whole bunch of stupidly dotted variations on my username, and Gmail wouldn't let me register them.

    So apparently they're doing the smart thing, and not including the dots when they do a uniqueness test on new usernames.

    Maybe once upon a time in the very beginning they didn't, but I don't think that's the case now.
  • Experts Exchange.. by mikael (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:07PM
  • Please explain (Score:3, Funny)

    by FishandChips (695645) on Sunday January 22 2006, @04:12PM (#14534406)
    (Last Journal: Thursday January 12 2006, @10:28AM)
    Google doesn't make many mistakes but when it does, boy, are they doozies

    I'm not American and I'm not sure I understand. What is a "doozy" and should I be worried if I have one? I'm hoping it isn't the kind of thing I can catch just from using the internet.
  • Beta by Heembo (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:17PM
    • Re:Beta by Brianech (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @08:51PM
      • Re:Beta by smash (Score:2) Monday January 23 2006, @01:48AM
        • Re:Beta by Brianech (Score:1) Wednesday January 25 2006, @06:10PM
      • Re:Beta by Heembo (Score:2) Monday January 23 2006, @09:37PM
  • Just tried a few things... by non0score (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:19PM
  • This is a FEATURE... (Score:3, Informative)

    by ares284 (782465) on Sunday January 22 2006, @04:23PM (#14534454)
    Uh, as long as I've had Gmail (a few months since it came out), I have known about this, and it was said to be a FEATURE. You want to know how? Well, I created a filter that sends all email TO: firstlast@gmail.com to a spam label, and this way only people who email first.last@gmail.com (notice the period) will go to my inbox. It's a feature, much like the firstlast+tag@gmail.com. Some sites don't accept the +tag part though. So, in other words, sign up to websites that may spam you by using firstlast@gmail.com and it will be filtered to a spam label (if you set it up that way) but tell your friends your address is first.last@gmail.com. You could also do it vice-versa. Accept email only as firstlast@gmail.com but if an address has first.last@gmail.com, it is then marked as spam. If they "fix" this, I will be quite upset. I've been using it extensively. -Ares
  • Why leave this article? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by angryLNX (679691) on Sunday January 22 2006, @04:29PM (#14534477)
    Why is this article being left on the front page? It has been seen to be completely invalid, and is giving people the wrong idea. Great, you put a correction up, but the correction negates everything the article contains. Get rid of it.
  • Ars technica doesn't make many mistakes by dangitman (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:30PM
  • OLD NEWS! by digiital (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:38PM
  • But there is ANOTHER dot problem... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by waytoomuchcoffee (263275) on Sunday January 22 2006, @04:45PM (#14534551)
    Anything sent to my email address with dots added NEVER gets to me.

    My wife too. We both have very early gmail accounts (within the first month or so). Back in the early days, were different people allowed to sign up for different dot-variation names? If so, the obvious fix would have been to remove the dot functionality on those combinations to avoid having email sent to the wrong accounts. Which may be what happened with our accounts. That would suck if true, as missing this functionality is a big loss.
  • I get these by dotjerky (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @05:06PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • I experienced this first-hand. I was surprised to see a registration confirmation in my inbox for Lavalife when I have never even been to the site and already have a girlfriend. Awkward, to say the least. It let me log on to his acccount information, and it turns out he's a married guy in Australia looking for a little "fun" on the side. If I were as sneaky as him, he'd be in the doghouse for a few months...
  • It seems that this *IS* an issue for some people.. by lordsegan (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @05:49PM
  • Gmail name change? by Jules Mercuri (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @05:51PM
  • A note on e-mailing yourself by Temporal (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @06:13PM
  • Doh! by davidmcg (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @06:22PM
  • this is new? by TimeSpeak (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @06:38PM
  • Only 1/2 fixed... by sjmacko29 (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @07:12PM
  • Gmail has been around how long? by nmaster64 (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @07:26PM
  • Another doozie by alleycat0 (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @08:14PM
  • Tested it by Feanturi (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @08:21PM
  • I get other's email all the time. by ayeco (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @08:28PM
  • how does crap like this make the front page? by halo112358 (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @09:37PM
  • gmail invitaion by codepunk (Score:2) Monday January 23 2006, @12:45AM
  • THIS IS DEFINETELY A BUG by aashah40 (Score:1) Monday January 23 2006, @01:04AM
  • Been there, done that. by Stephen Samuel (Score:2) Monday January 23 2006, @01:33AM
  • Having a secret life by bjoeg (Score:1) Monday January 23 2006, @03:16AM
  • old news by miro f (Score:1) Monday January 23 2006, @04:14AM
  • Officially confused by TintinX (Score:2) Monday January 23 2006, @04:44AM
  • That explains... by Jesrad (Score:2) Monday January 23 2006, @06:27AM
  • Old news by diemuzi (Score:1) Monday January 23 2006, @07:48AM
  • This has always been the case. by thisisauniqueid (Score:1) Monday January 23 2006, @08:34AM
  • Another bug in gmail by Ogotai (Score:1) Monday January 23 2006, @09:58AM
  • Re:What's wrong? by Spazntwich (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:26PM
    • Re:What's wrong? by mr i want to go home (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @03:47PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Re:What's wrong? (Score:3, Funny)

    by Skater (41976) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:30PM (#14534177)
    (http://rjmarq.org/ | Last Journal: Thursday October 02 2003, @07:19PM)
    I have a friend from college that I met through a mistakenly delivered email. She was trying to send to someone with the email address like "rjm987@someotherschool.edu", but she accidentally put a space between the "m" and the "9", so the system delived it to one of my class accounts with the username "rjm". We became good friends and still email each other now and then, a decade later.

    So, it can be a great way to meet new people!
    [ Parent ]
  • Re:It's beta? (Score:3, Insightful)

    by DaHat (247651) on Sunday January 22 2006, @03:44PM (#14534255)
    (http://www.brendansstudentloans.com/)
    Oh please, it's rare that Google ever move from a beta version to a gold version.

    Granted, officially it's a public beta, sadly very few treat it that way and rely on it for their primary email contact.
    [ Parent ]
    • Re:It's beta? by TubeSteak (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:08PM
      • Re:It's beta? by nwbvt (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @06:28PM
  • Re:Need new moderation tag by xMonkey (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:11PM
  • Re:True!! by Chimera252 (Score:1) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:15PM
  • Re:It's beta? by Lispy (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @04:29PM
  • Re:It's beta? by nwbvt (Score:2) Sunday January 22 2006, @06:23PM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • 26 replies beneath your current threshold.