Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
If he priced his stuff at $6 a pop I would have read the catalog. But $12? Now you're taking advantage.
It was a pretty good yarn and honestly I wanted that MMO to exist pretty badly. That would be AWESOME
They want to end-around first sale doctrine, that's fine. I'll just forego their products.
This is about First Sale Doctrine, not whether or not I'll resell my stuff. I use Steam so it's moot anyhow.
There are simply not enough taxable dollars in that lofty 1% realm to honestly make a difference. It makes for great popular sentiment as it supposedly impacts those "other" people. I also haven't heard a single viable argument as to how it is better to have that money get into the hands of a government that has shown a complete inability to manage money rather than let that money continue to flow into the economy.
Actually, there's enough to reverse most of the ballooning deficit strictly by reinstating the Bush tax cuts. Furthermore, the best argument is the one that every deficit hawk all over the tubes are stating: current debt levels are untenable and need to be reversed.
But yeah, it's helpful to pretend this is an intractable problem and "both sides are doing it". But it's a lie and repeating it makes you a liar.
I imagine we call them ERPs to jack up the price and set up a business model where there's continuous fucking^W servicing of the customer.
Honestly, after working within them for the past decade, I can't imagine anyone would want to calcify their business with such a tightly coupled morass requiring continuous upgrades.
I like to think of it as "nobody has a monopoly on bad ideas".
The larger point, progressives want to expand the power of the state, is a little fallacious.
That really ties into paternalism, how hard/soft do you like it (if at all), and where is it appropriate. Those questions/answers don't fall on either side of the political spectrum, I think. (e.g. Republicans believe in hard paternalism when it comes to a woman's body, whilst Democrats tend to believe in paternalism when it comes to health care)
Sorry I wasn't more clear.
RE: taxation - I only agree because the top 10% pays zero (ZERO) taxes in America, with our 35% tax rate.
Making that more sane is the first step, but no matter what happens corporations have to step up and pay for doing business in America. Period.
You're just spreading FUD.