Slashdot videos: Now with more Slashdot!
We've improved Slashdot's video section; now you can view our video interviews, product close-ups and site visits with all the usual Slashdot options to comment, share, etc. No more walled garden! It's a work in progress -- we hope you'll check it out (Learn more about the recent updates).
I have a legit copy of CS5 and I had no interest in 6, and if my only choice is this subscription crap I'm going to be using CS5 for a long, long, long time before I migrate to a different product.
I'm looking for a technological solution that will allow me to distribute the documents (with word processing formatting in tact), in "electronic format", complying with the letter of the court order, but also make it impossible or as difficult as possible to print the documents or share the electronic version.
I'd rather not get into a discussion on the morality of copyright as the cost to produce the material was far greater than the single copy price and had I known I'd be facing this court order, I'd have refused to create it to begin with. Total demand is around 5 copies and getting 20% of that means losing a lot of money."
I forgot to add that in Genesis 19:32, that same righteous man tricks is daughters into thinking he's the last man on earth so he can knock up his own daughters.
This is the same Lot that is such a wonderful person god goes out of his way to spare him from the burning of soddom. Yet god kills his wife just for looking back at the city where her friends and relatives are dying and screaming.
Lot is really god's kind of fellow.
A really ignorant programming teacher at a local community collage her has found a way to decide the halting problem. A student asked her what sort of things you could validate with an asp.net validator. She said anything. He gave an example of a halting problem and she said yes.
In the words of one of her colleagues, "she's as dumb as a brick", so if she can decide the halting problem, can't someone smarter come up with a general solution?
As far as your nondeterminism allowing you to simultaneously try each path, make copies of yourself, etc. It's just confusing, it makes NP harder to understand, and really clouds what's actually going on. Look at it this way. Nondeterminism allows you to always choose the correct path. Every branch you come to, you have the magic ability to pick the correct path on the first try. I call it a magic ability, you call it a super power. Forget about trying to understand how you're trying all paths; the whole concept is a mathematical model, so why inflate it with bloat trying to explain something that need not be explained?
Second, by definition of NP-hard, given a polynomial-time solution to any NP-hard problem, you can solve *every* NP problem in polynomial time, so what you meant to say is The question of "P==NP?" really amounts to "is there a polynomial-time solution to any problem that has been rigorously proven to be NP-hard?