Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Firefly Movie Gets The Green Light

Posted by simoniker on Wed Mar 03, 2004 11:32 PM
from the big-screen-says-hello-to-reevers dept.
An anonymous reader writes "According to FireflyFans.net and Ain't It Cool News, Universal has greenlit production of 'Serenity,' the motion picture based on Joss Whedon's cancelled TV series 'Firefly.' Both sites point to an article from Variety that says the film will start production in June, and be ready for release in 2005." The informative Whedonesque weblog is also monitoring developments regarding this much-deserved resurrection.
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold:
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • firefly (Score:5, Insightful)

    by panxerox (575545) * on Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:34PM (#8460166)
    OIC firefly is good enough for a dvd set and good enough for a movie but not good enough for a series. Sometimes I wonder about the people making the decisions. Are they making a decision to not do a series because of business reasons or just well because they say so and those weenie viewers arent going to change our minds because they might get it in their heads that they matter. Yes I'm bitter. Its like they say "come here viewers come check out this great new series!" then they go "SUCKERS !! haha no show for you !!".
    • Re:firefly (Score:5, Insightful)

      by eatenn (572604) <{ten.doglacol} {ta} {eetnne}> on Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:55PM (#8460299)
      (http://localgod.net/)
      "OIC firefly is good enough for a dvd set and good enough for a movie but not good enough for a series."

      Financially speaking, I would say that Firefly may actually be better suited to movies than television. Whedon's shows are excellent... and also extremely expensive. Having to spend huge amounts of money for 22 episodes every year means that the corporate heads demand a pretty big payback pretty damn quick. Fox couldn't really afford for viewers to ease into the show (and God knows a Friday night time-slot didn't help). It's for similar reasons that Buffy left the WB and Angel was recently cancelled.

      As a motion picture though, they spend the big bucks once and reap the benefits for months in merchandise, rentals, etc. You don't get that kind of a pay-off with TV (at least not that quickly). I love Whedon's serial storytelling, but I'm excited to see how he adapts to the big screen.

      [ Parent ]
      • Re:firefly by Issue9mm (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @12:12AM
        • Re:firefly (Score:5, Insightful)

          by teraph (147902) on Thursday March 04 2004, @12:31AM (#8460458)
          Hopefully he's improved on his big-screen capabilities since the original Buffy and Alien 4. Ick.

          Well, it's hard to tell what the original scripts were like. A good script can become awful between the day it's bought and the day it's released in a theater.

          You have a half-dozen suits, directors, and editors to screw it up. (We're assuming here that the original script was good.)

          seeing how he much time he's taken in perfecting the series runs he's had, I have little doubt that Serenity will be spectacular.

          Yes. His TV shows are probably the better indicator of the quality of his writing, since that is where he has the most control. Everything he has done for film has had multiple hands, for good or ill. (And he's repeatedly stated his disappointment at both the Buffy movie and Alien Resurrection. He was once mis-identified as having written an episode of "Boy Meets World" and he expressed more pride in that incorrect credit than his writing of Resurrection.)

          It's possible that the Firefly film will suck, maybe because he fails to produce a good script, maybe because Universal selects someone else to direct, maybe because the producers demand bad changes.

          That's why he's better in TV. Head writers (who are almost always the producers) are nearly Gods with regard to how their scripts read and show up on screen. The network has some input, but much of it is Standards and Practices stuff (i.e., the censors).

          In film, the producers own the script and can do as they please. And then the director is in control the moment shooting starts (with input from the producers).

          Film writing is good money, but it's very little control. (Unless you make it yourself.)
          [ Parent ]
        • Re:firefly (Score:5, Insightful)

          by eatenn (572604) <{ten.doglacol} {ta} {eetnne}> on Thursday March 04 2004, @12:34AM (#8460478)
          (http://localgod.net/)
          Hopefully he's improved on his big-screen capabilities since the original Buffy and Alien 4. Ick.

          Yeck. Being president of the Joss Whedon Stalker Club, I may be a little biased, but I've read Whedon's draft of the Buffy movie (which he didn't direct), and the version that actually made it to the theatres... Whedon's draft is much better. Apparently Donald Sutherland insisted on writing his own dialog, the studio wanted it to be more of a teen comedy, and the director didn't understand the material. It's the nature of the business that scripts get fucked with by a series of producers, directors, and studio heads who are constantly looking for ways to fit a monkey into the story somehow.

          Whedon has also stated that no one hates Alien 4 more than he does. He had other people dictating what he was supposed to write.

          I've also had the experience in film school having one of my scripts approved for production and then butchered beyond all recognition. It ain't fun.

          [ Parent ]
          • Re:firefly (Score:5, Informative)

            by gilroy (155262) on Thursday March 04 2004, @02:56AM (#8461048)
            (http://www.adfinemfidelis.net/mongrel/ | Last Journal: Friday August 23 2002, @11:47PM)
            Blockquoth the poster:

            Whedon has also stated that no one hates Alien 4 more than he does. He had other people dictating what he was supposed to write.

            The IMDb has an interesting trivia point about this, on the entry for Angel [imdb.com] :

            In the episode "Fredless", when talking about the Aliens series, a character says, "He's always had a thing for those 'Aliens' movies. Except for that last one they made - I think he dozed off." Series creator Joss Whedon wrote the script for Alien: Resurrection (1997), although it was heavily rewritten.

            [ Parent ]
          • Re:firefly by Udo Schmitz (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @05:10AM
        • He is the director this time (Score:4, Insightful)

          by Per Abrahamsen (1397) on Thursday March 04 2004, @03:08AM (#8461089)
          (http://www.dina.kvl.dk/~abraham/)
          The Buffy movie has a very different feel than the series, which Joss claim is because the director had a different vision than Joss did.

          Alien 4 feel a lot more like City of Lost Children than an Alien movie. Again, the directors influence. One other write with a Usenet presense (I believe it wa Peter A. David) claimed he got into Buffy by wathing Alien 4, and seeing a good script being burried behind a misunderstood direction, and got currios about the writer.

          Titan AE was actually pretty good, but I don't know how much of Joss writting was involved. There was a couple of places that were clearly Joss though. The intelligent guard, and Planet Bob were Joss trademark humor.

          This time Joss gets to both write and direct the movie according to the Variety article, so we will be able to judge directly his abilities as a movie maker. From the few Buffy episodes he has written and directed himself (like Hush and Once More With Feeling), I believe we are in for a treat.
          [ Parent ]
        • Re:firefly (Score:4, Interesting)

          by Snaller (147050) on Thursday March 04 2004, @07:45AM (#8461896)
          (Last Journal: Tuesday June 26, @08:41AM)
          Hopefully he's improved on his big-screen capabilities since the original Buffy and Alien 4. Ick

          If you knew the background you would know that they are not him. He was just a little guy who should shut up then. In interviews he has pretty much indicated that Donald Sutherland was an arrogant prick who though he was gods gift to the universe and who readily changed the script ("Improved" it Sorbo style) (which is probably why he never accepted improvisation on the TV series), and the director didn't see it Joss's way either and wanted to improve it etc. Same thing with resurection:
          "("I asked the director, "Can you just explain to me why he's doing this? Why is he going for this gun?" And the editor, who was French, turned to me and said, with a little leer on his face, [adopts gravelly, smarmy, French-accented voice] "Because eets een the screept." And I actually went and dented the bathroom stall with my puddly little fist. I have never been angrier. But it's the classic, "When something goes wrong, you assume the writers a dork. And that's painful."

          But now, not only does he write, he also directs, and his buddy Chris Buchanan is one of the executive producers - I'd say its a safe bet that this time he has much more control. Of course not ultimate, because universal is paying and could demand scenes with half nake showgirls twirling their tassles - one can only hope they stay away and let Whedon win them that Oscar we know he is capable of :)
          [ Parent ]
      • Re:firefly by TheCyko1 (Score:3) Thursday March 04 2004, @01:02AM
        • Re:firefly (Score:5, Interesting)

          by TheLoneDanger (611268) on Thursday March 04 2004, @02:48AM (#8461019)
          It was Mandarin, except for one part when the engine breaks down and the ship broadcasts a warning that oxygen's low, check life support etc. That was Cantonese spoken fluently. I assume they just asked someone Chinese to say what they wanted "in Chinese" and that person just assumed Cantonese (which is fairly prevalent in North America).

          The inconsistency bugged me a bit, but I was happy to actually understand what was being said for once (I only know a little Mandarin, and it was butchered so badly that the only one I could make out was mei-mei).

          Interestingly enough, Jayne's actor seemed to speak Mandarin a bit better than everyone else. In the DVD extras he talks about it a bit, and I assume he practiced it more.
          [ Parent ]
          • Re:firefly by kalidasa (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @01:32PM
      • Re:firefly (Score:4, Interesting)

        by Udo Schmitz (738216) on Thursday March 04 2004, @05:02AM (#8461434)
        (Last Journal: Tuesday October 09, @06:49AM)
        Whedon's shows are excellent... and also extremely expensive.

        I always hear that, but noone ever gives any numbers? Did you pull that "fact" out of your ass, or can you give me any prove for that claim? I'm pretty sure any StarTrek show is far more expensive. Still the FX look worse. The planet sceneries sometimes look like in the classic series.

        [ Parent ]
        • Re:firefly by Anonymous Coward (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @02:48PM
        • Firefly cost. by I am Jack's username (Score:2) Wednesday March 10 2004, @05:00AM
      • Re:firefly by jafac (Score:3) Thursday March 04 2004, @02:44PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:firefly by Cecil (Score:3) Thursday March 04 2004, @12:21AM
      • Re:firefly by B3ryllium (Score:1) Thursday March 04 2004, @04:09AM
    • Re:firefly by Anonymous Coward (Score:1) Thursday March 04 2004, @12:32AM
    • Re:firefly (Score:4, Informative)

      by PowerPill (687850) on Thursday March 04 2004, @12:55AM (#8460569)
      Fox had never zipped up the deal for a complete season of Firefly so right from the start it was a nail biter for Joss. Fox didn't even allow the premiere (Serenity) to be the premiere because they thought it lacked a certain pace. If you take notice, Fox generally takes the approach of more action right at the get go = better ratings over elegantly gripping television. So yes, it was that Whedon's vision didn't quite fit Fox's business model or formula rather. All of this is actually touched on in the box set.
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:firefly (Score:4, Insightful)

        by mbourgon (186257) on Thursday March 04 2004, @08:27AM (#8462035)
        (http://slashdot.org/)
        All of this is actually touched on in the box set.

        Touched on isn't the word I'd use. It's heavily talked about during both Serenity (the Pilot) & The Train Job. Joss certainly doesn't hold back during the commentary. Never has the "commentary may not reflect the studio's views" warning been more apt.
        [ Parent ]
    • 2 replies beneath your current threshold.
  • Strange. (Score:5, Funny)

    by nefele (654499) on Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:35PM (#8460175)
    So they actually decided to make a movie about a web browser?
    Oh, wait...
  • Obligatory. (Score:5, Funny)

    by Trejkaz (615352) on Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:35PM (#8460177)
    (http://trypticon.org/)
    Serenity Now!!
    • Re:Obligatory. by anagama (Score:3) Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:57PM
      • Re:Obligatory. by Trejkaz (Score:2) Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:59PM
      • Re:Obligatory. (Score:5, Informative)

        by TheLoneDanger (611268) on Thursday March 04 2004, @12:52AM (#8460561)
        Full opening theme lyrics:

        Take my love, take my land,
        Take me where I can not stand.
        I don't care, I'm still free;
        You can't take the sky from me.

        Take me out to the black,
        Tell them I ain't coming back.
        Burn the land and boil the sea;
        You can't take the sky from me.

        There's no place I can be,
        Since I've found Serenity.
        But you can't take the sky from me.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Obligatory. by NeuroKoan (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @01:54AM
          • Re:Obligatory. by TheLoneDanger (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @02:23AM
            • Re:Obligatory. by NeuroKoan (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @02:29AM
              • Re:Obligatory. by B3ryllium (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @04:12AM
              • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • Re:Obligatory. by Keebler71 (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @08:48AM
          • Re:Obligatory. by Daniel Dvorkin (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @09:51AM
          • Re:Obligatory. by LoveMuscle (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @01:40PM
          • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
        • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
      • Re:Obligatory. by B3ryllium (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @04:18AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • Curse of the F's (Score:5, Funny)

    by KoopaTroopa (549540) on Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:36PM (#8460185)
    (http://cs.unc.edu/~culp/)
    They're really naming it Serenity to avoid being prematurely cut off during production. This would surely have happened had the name started with 'F'.

    Firefly - cancelled
    Family Guy - cancelled
    Futurama - cancelled

    Someone ought to cancel Fox.

  • New Series (Score:5, Interesting)

    While a movie would be nice, I would rather have the series returen. Firefly was one of the few shows I've watched that I really like and made it a point to watch, instead of just watching it if it was on like most other shows.

    • Re:New Series (Score:4, Interesting)

      by blincoln (592401) on Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:43PM (#8460227)
      (Last Journal: Sunday March 21 2004, @11:14PM)
      While a movie would be nice, I would rather have the series returen.

      Allegedly Whedon's plan is to use a successful film as a springboard for a follow-up series.

      I would be happy with him either keeping it in theatres or switching back to TV, as long as he gets to finish the story one way or another.

      Also, is it me, or is this "press release" more of a series of writer's notes?

      To that end, he said he went out of his way while penning the "Serenity" script to make sure that it is accessible to auds who never tuned into "Firefly."

      "Auds"? Obviously this is short for "audience," but still. Let's move on.

      Series was a space oater set 500 years in the future, tracking the journeys of the crew aboard the Serenity.

      Ah yes, a "space oater." I'm fond of those.

      Chris Buchanan of Mutant Enemy, Whedon's shingle, and Mendel exec Alissa Tager are exec producing.

      "Whedon's shingle," uh huh...
      [ Parent ]
      • Re:New Series by steeef (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @12:25AM
      • Re:New Series by NOLAChief (Score:1) Thursday March 04 2004, @01:41AM
        • Re:New Series by fenix down (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @11:19AM
      • Hollywoodspeak by Udo Schmitz (Score:1) Thursday March 04 2004, @05:15AM
      • Re:New Series by Snaller (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @08:13AM
        • Re:New Series by Chris Mattern (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @09:06AM
          • Re:New Series by Snaller (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @04:39PM
      • Re:New Series by primordial ooze (Score:1) Thursday March 04 2004, @08:34AM
        • Re:New Series by Tetsujin28 (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @12:36PM
          • Re:New Series by primordial ooze (Score:1) Thursday March 04 2004, @01:02PM
            • Re:New Series by Tetsujin28 (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @01:29PM
              • Re:New Series by primordial ooze (Score:1) Thursday March 04 2004, @01:38PM
          • Re:New Series by kalidasa (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @01:37PM
            • Re:New Series by Tetsujin28 (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @02:33PM
      • Re:New Series by Chris Mattern (Score:3) Thursday March 04 2004, @09:03AM
      • Re:New Series by llefler (Score:3) Thursday March 04 2004, @12:34PM
      • n00b by irokitt (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @04:05PM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:New Series (Score:5, Insightful)

      by prockcore (543967) on Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:47PM (#8460252)
      I would rather have the series returen

      Joss Whedon should call up USA. With Monk and Dead Zone it's obvious that USA isn't afraid to back a strange-yet-brilliant show.

      Or maybe FX (Nip Tuck, The Shield) or Bravo (Keen Eddie, Touching Evil).

      Cable is really the only place you can find good shows that don't dumb down to the common denominator.

      Fox is just stupid. How much money are they making from the Firefly dvds and Family Guy dvds? Compare that with how much money you would expect an any reality TV DVD to make.

      In a couple of years, fox is going to have to reach all the way back to In Living Colour in order to make DVD sales... because no one wants to buy anything that they currently air.
      [ Parent ]
    • Re:New Series by patternjuggler (Score:1) Thursday March 04 2004, @12:38AM
      • Re:New Series (Score:5, Informative)

        by Platinum Dragon (34829) on Thursday March 04 2004, @01:16AM (#8460640)
        (http://platinumdragon.ca/ | Last Journal: Monday May 23 2005, @01:59AM)
        Can someone point out what was especially good about it? I'll grant without having seen more than half an episode that it was better than Enterprise or any other show in the genre on tv currently, but that's not saying much.

        I'll take a shot at this one. I've been catching the episodes on Canada's SPACE channel, and to me the series definitely had a fairly solid setting and mood in its first season, which is rare for a sci-fi series.

        The show fuses sci-fi space conventions with Wild West-era characters and environments. The whole "space Western" thing is not subtle, but that might actually be a good thing. I've found that when sci-fi producers try to be "subtle", their works ends up coming across as obvious and pretentious, like the ST:TNG episodes that tried to disguise the contemporary parallels, then beat you over the head with The Contemporary Moral Message. The Western aspects aren't taken so far as to be implausibly anachronistic; the six-shooters and shotguns seem to fire some kind of directed energy instead of projectiles, and there is still advanced technology. It just so happens the super-cool machines have some rust and loose screws, which only adds to the plausibility. I still have some trouble conceiving of just what volume of space the series takes place within, but then again, technobabble is kept at a minimum, which is a plus.

        What little CGI I really took notice of looked pretty darn good, which isn't difficult to do nowadays--but then, compare Firefly to Babylon 5's first season and a half, and Starhunter. Also, there is no sound in space scenes. This threw me at first, but it's also accurate. For all the lack of adherence to anything resembling physics and scientific accuracy, I found this to be a nice touch.

        Firefly worked really well in a contained-episode format, instead of the plot arcs that damn near everyone tries to shoehorn into shows now. Thing is, Whedon has shown a tendency to start with just such a pure episode format, then eventually move the series into multi-episode or even full-season arcs. This makes the short life of the series even rougher, because the creative team didn't even have a chance to really go places with the show.

        Incidentally, J. Michael Straczynski's Crusade series died under similar conflicts with its network (demands for more sex and violence, episode juggling harming continuity), and it appeared to be developing in a similar fashion. JMS had the pressure of following up Babylon 5 with an expected second strong effort right from the start. When TNT demanded new episodes be shot and aired before the originally-shot episodes could see airtime, there was little chance the series' potential would be realized early on, or allowed to develop.

        I wonder how amazing Firefly could have been in further seasons, given time to settle in. I say it again, the series felt quite well-realized for a first-season sci-fi program, and it got cut off at the knees by a network known more for trashy "reality" TV and amusing cartoons than fantasy and science fiction.
        [ Parent ]
        • Speaking of B5 by Rand Race (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @10:13AM
        • Re:New Series by stonecypher (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @03:01PM
        • Re:New Series by Richard Jones (Score:1) Thursday March 04 2004, @07:58PM
      • Re:New Series by ShinyBrowncoat (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @11:08AM
      • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
    • Re:New Series by mshiltonj (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @05:38AM
  • Why do I get the feeling.... (Score:5, Insightful)

    by ImTwoSlick (723185) on Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:38PM (#8460197)
    ... that they like to cancel great TV shows, just to make a few extra bucks on a movie they know people have been dying to see.
  • Thanks to Firefly... (Score:5, Funny)

    by devphil (51341) on Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:40PM (#8460212)
    (http://www.devphil.com/)


    ...I am terrified of people in business suits wearing bright blue gloves.

    On the up side, I know now how to say "Fuck everyone in the universe to death!", "Shut up," and my favorite, "Holy mother of God and all her wacky nephews!" in Mandarin Chinese.

  • Serenity? (Score:4, Informative)

    by Daetrin (576516) on Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:40PM (#8460213)
    I hope they're referencing the ship and not the battle the ship was named for. If it's the battle we'll miss out on most of our favorite characters :(
    • Re:Serenity? by eatenn (Score:3) Thursday March 04 2004, @12:02AM
      • Re:Serenity? (Score:5, Interesting)

        by Chris Carollo (251937) on Thursday March 04 2004, @01:30AM (#8460699)
        Alan Tudyk, who plays Wash, reportedly stole the Big Red Button that was used during the episode "Out of Gas", and left it with Joss, telling him to "hit it when his miracle arrived" and they would all return.
        [ Parent ]
        • Re:Serenity? by ruprechtjones (Score:1) Thursday March 04 2004, @04:40AM
    • Re:Serenity? by Udo Schmitz (Score:1) Thursday March 04 2004, @05:20AM
  • Go Browncoats! (Score:5, Funny)

    by torgosan (141603) * on Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:43PM (#8460226)
    (http://slashdot.org/)
    Shiny!
  • Script on Kazaa (Score:1, Funny)

    by grub (11606) <slashdot@grub.net> on Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:46PM (#8460246)
    (http://www.grub.net/blog/index.html | Last Journal: Wednesday June 27, @08:48AM)

    The script is already leaked:

    Overlord Busche: You vile Freedonian varmints, give us all rights to yer planetary oil then destroy yer WMD and we won't be shootin' ya with our Laser Cannons..
    Sahdamm: but.. Freedonia ain't got no WMD, your people confirmed it!
    Busche: Prepare to liberate Freedonia! Jebus commands it!
    • Sahdamm? by Cyno01 (Score:1) Thursday March 04 2004, @12:15AM
      • Re:Sahdamm? by RexxFiend (Score:1) Thursday March 04 2004, @11:17AM
    • 1 reply beneath your current threshold.
  • won't be that great as movie (Score:4, Insightful)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:47PM (#8460254)
    The movie won't be able to depend on knowledge of the TV series because there isn't a large enough fanbase. That means they will have to condense a lot into 90 minutes. Firefly is so good because of the time allowed to develop the characters in a TV series. So while non-fans may have some visual effect treats and see SOME of the flavor of the show, it won't be able to touch the series; and fans will be disappointed because the movie will have to be introductory and won't pick up where the show left off.

    TV show movies that do well are those that ran a long time and therefor have a large fanbase.

    This will just be another scifi movie.

  • AWESOME (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Cirrius (304487) on Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:48PM (#8460257)
    I recently picked up the box set to check out the series, and this is great news...I was surprised how good the series was and perplexed as to why such a show was canceled.
  • Don't Wander Around Best Buy (Score:5, Funny)

    by Ralph Wiggam (22354) on Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:51PM (#8460274)
    (http://www.fufme.com/)
    Seeing the article made me want to buy the DVD set. I liked the concept of the show a lot, but didn't catch many of them. In Star Trek, everyone has neatly groomed hair and they're always nice to each other. Firefly seemed to be about normal, flawed people who happen to fly around in space.

    Anyway, I go to BestBuy.com to see how much it costs. Only 40 bucks is a good deal. Here's the messed up part. On the web site, and presumably on the store shelves, the Firefly DVD set is listed under "Horror". Their subgroups under horror are "Comedies, Occult, Vampires, Zombies, and General Horror". At least it's not under Zombies.

    -B
  • Converts after cancellation (Score:5, Insightful)

    by loftydog (562124) * on Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:52PM (#8460277)

    Fox did everything it could to kill this show.

    First, they aired the episodes in a random order so there was no continuity

    Second, they changed the time it was aired, then changed the day, all within a span of three weeks

    Third, and most insulting, is that they assumed the demographic watching Firefly would switch to watching Fastlane, as some of the numbers from Nielson were similar

    Sadly, I've had more people become "fans" of the show after the cancellattion by loaning them the DVDs, with most of them not being scifi fans.

  • Cast announced (Score:4, Insightful)

    by redkingca (610398) on Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:53PM (#8460285)
    I don't see Ron Glass("the shepard") listed in the returning cast list. I wonder what is going on there? While not my favourite character, the shepard seems to have a more shady past than any.
    from the press release:
    ...The Serenity cast will include such returning "Firefly" cast members as Nathan Fillion as Captain Malcolm 'Mal' Reynolds, Gina Torres as Zoe Warren, Morena Baccarin as Inara Serra, Jewel Staite as Kaylee Frye, Adam Baldwin as Jayne Cobb, Sean Maher as Dr. Simon Tam and Summer Glau as River Tam.
    • Re:Cast announced by torgosan (Score:2) Wednesday March 03 2004, @11:56PM
    • Kaylee... by MachDelta (Score:3) Thursday March 04 2004, @12:04AM
      • Re:Kaylee... (Score:4, Interesting)

        by brandonY (575282) on Thursday March 04 2004, @03:21AM (#8461121)
        Yeah, she was amazingly hot. On the DVD, they point out that Whedon, in his infinite wisdom, told her that she could be on the show, but she would have to gain 20 pounds so she would look like a real human. Bless the man.
        [ Parent ]
      • Re:Kaylee... by goodEvans (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @11:36AM
    • Guess Mr. Glass will be in by Udo Schmitz (Score:2) Thursday March 04 2004, @05:33AM
    • cast list by Savatte (Score:1) Thursday March 04 2004, @10:53AM
      • Re:cast list by redkingca (Score:1) Thursday March 04 2004, @04:47PM
      • Re:cast list by dgagley (Score:1) Thursday March 04 2004, @07:30PM
  • Josh Whedon the genius.. (Score:2, Interesting)

    by GonzoTech (613147) on Thursday March 04 2004, @12:02AM (#8460334)
    Josh Whedon is a genius. Buffy the Vampire Slayer, Angel, and Firefly were all wonderful shows. Firefly and Angel were both cancelled way to early.. but especially Firefly. Only one season? I guess Americans are too hung up on shows like Fear Factor, Survivor, American Idol, and any other show that uses very childish antics to develop a fan base. I for one hope that Josh Whedon will continue with wonderful writing, concepts, and work - maybe people will catch on and see what we have seen for years (A brilliant mind in an industry full of flakes.)
  • Probably offtopic, but... (Score:3, Interesting)

    by JayBlalock (635935) on Thursday March 04 2004, @12:13AM (#8460384)
    Why is it there's going to be a Firefly film, but still no Babylon 5 movie?
  • All I can say is... ...ahem...

    WHOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!! WHOOOOOOOO!!!

    Seriously, if you have no idea what the fuss is about, buy/borrow/steal the DVDs and watch them. The only downside was watching half way through an excellent season, and realizing you would never get to see everything resolved.

    If nothing else, the movie will be a chance to give the series the ending it deserved. If it leads to a resurrection of the series, even better.
  • Hallelujah! (Score:3, Interesting)

    by bbsguru (586178) on Thursday March 04 2004, @12:22AM (#8460420)
    (http://www.dotloose.com/ | Last Journal: Wednesday August 18 2004, @03:23PM)
    The long months in the wilderness are at an end, brethren! And on the day I finished re-viewing the last of the DVD extras for the umpteenth time!

    This is great news. Note that it is Universal now, not Fox, so there really could be another series at the end of the trail here.

    Since the DVD set came out, I have introduced the series to a dozen 'Fly newbies, all of whom are as swept away as I was. It's just too fanastic a program to let it go, and no maybe (just maybe?) we won't have to.

    Shiny!

    • Re:Hallelujah! by DragonTHC (Score:1) Thursday March 04 2004, @01:21AM