Ingram Micro To 'Stop Doing Business' With Broadcom, Downgrade To 'Limited Engagement' On VMware (theregister.com) 12
The Register's Simon Sharwood reports: Tech distribution behemoth Ingram Micro will stop doing business with Broadcom and its VMware range in many territories next year. In a statement sent to The Register, an Ingram spokesperson told us: "We were unable to reach an agreement with Broadcom that would help our customers deliver the best technology outcomes now and in the future while providing an appropriate shareholder return." That decision means that from "early January 2025, Ingram Micro will no longer be doing business with Broadcom and have limited engagement with VMware in select regions."
The distie told us this change is not material to its business, and customers and other vendors have been informed. "For us and the more than 1,500 vendors and 161,000 customers we work with, the future of business is focused on transforming relationships, not just transacting sales," the spokesperson explained. Ingram's decision is a challenge to Broadcom, which after acquiring VMware decided to emphasize services delivered through the channel for many customers. However, The Register has heard from VMware users who felt Ingram struggled to handle the increased responsibilities it assumed under this arrangement. We've been told of slow responses, and that Ingram struggled to replicate the expertise that pre-acquisition VMware's support teams delivered. Banter on social media suggests similar experiences were not uncommon.
Ingram's decision means VMware's channel has more change to digest, after a year in which Broadcom cancelled its partner program and created a new one that excluded some existing partners. Some of those partners ran small VMware-powered clouds, and faced being unable to secure licenses â" meaning their customers would have faced unwelcome disruption. Broadcom hastily created a scheme under which small resellers outside its cloud partner program could acquire licenses from bigger players. Another change to Broadcom's plans saw it cordon off 2,000 VMware customers to work with directly, rendering them off limits to its channel. It then diluted that decision by deciding it will work direct with only 500 VMware users. Resellers that don't have relationships with distributors other than Ingram will now need to make friends -- fast.
The distie told us this change is not material to its business, and customers and other vendors have been informed. "For us and the more than 1,500 vendors and 161,000 customers we work with, the future of business is focused on transforming relationships, not just transacting sales," the spokesperson explained. Ingram's decision is a challenge to Broadcom, which after acquiring VMware decided to emphasize services delivered through the channel for many customers. However, The Register has heard from VMware users who felt Ingram struggled to handle the increased responsibilities it assumed under this arrangement. We've been told of slow responses, and that Ingram struggled to replicate the expertise that pre-acquisition VMware's support teams delivered. Banter on social media suggests similar experiences were not uncommon.
Ingram's decision means VMware's channel has more change to digest, after a year in which Broadcom cancelled its partner program and created a new one that excluded some existing partners. Some of those partners ran small VMware-powered clouds, and faced being unable to secure licenses â" meaning their customers would have faced unwelcome disruption. Broadcom hastily created a scheme under which small resellers outside its cloud partner program could acquire licenses from bigger players. Another change to Broadcom's plans saw it cordon off 2,000 VMware customers to work with directly, rendering them off limits to its channel. It then diluted that decision by deciding it will work direct with only 500 VMware users. Resellers that don't have relationships with distributors other than Ingram will now need to make friends -- fast.
I'm done with VMware (25 years) (Score:3)
I'm a consultant and own the firm. We are migrating our SMBs to Proxmox. I spent quite a while (25 years) getting to grips with VMware and I am absolutely livid (and also mildly sanguine!)
The world turns and we all have to adjust. I do find it rather distasteful how many people and businesses like me and ours have been treated without any consideration - we were their experts and we are now running away in droves.
A short term profit will be all they get.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Large enterprises are bailing too. Broadcom really doesn't seem to care. After seeing how they shafted Computer Associates customers, it wasn't surprising to see how they ran roughshod over VMWare customers.
Good riddance.
The jackpot is all they wanted (Score:2)
They wanted that initial jackpot and then the residual revenue in perpetuity for the one or two companies that won't move off the software for some reason. This is how CA, now owned by Broadcom, managed to survive after 1993.
Why no Broadcom effect? (Score:2)
When Broadcom shows any kind of credible interest in an acquisition, it should cause the valuation of that target to drop like a fucking stone and clients to start fleeing while the fleeing is good.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
I was thinking "Wouldnt it be the other way around?". Apparently not. Intel is only(!) worth 88bil.
How TF is broadcom woth 1.12 tril dollars?
Re: (Score:2)
When Broadcom shows any kind of credible interest in an acquisition, it should cause the valuation of that target to drop like a fucking stone and clients to start fleeing while the fleeing is good.
If Broadcom shows interest in an acquisition, making that purchase cheaper might not become the deterrent you expect.
Someone has to say it: F Broadcom (Score:1)
VMware whom? Twenty years ago sure. But now. F Broadcom.