Since they started advertising, I have been using blockers.
Because it is the easiest attack vector to hit people, and the advertisers dont give a shit.

You are missing a word there, likely on purpose.
We are a Constitutional democratic republic.

Are people actually enamored by the virtues of a search engine?
I feel like Im taking crazy pills.

I saw it, I was like "oh, microsoft promoting a PC build from a third party. Thats interesting"

>Increases in automation are going to help identify the Wallys of the world and fire them.

That is what they said about computers, that is what they said about printing press, that is what they said about factories and robots.

They say this to keep the working persons income down, they say this to suppress the employee.

I would tell you to mind your history, but a bot is only told what to do. It doesnt think for itself.

The Prejudice of technology, always forward, never backwards!

Remember when they moved low level IT jobs to India, and then moved them back after a few years?

basically this. But the best part is the cost will continue to increase, because to run these farms is very expensive.

> If you are any good at thinking I mean, thats probably a 33-66% likelihood judging by todays sampling of people on the internet. (Maybe 90% of those are bots, but the people who can tell us that, wont).

So now that you understand the companies running these single answer to a search engine question UI sites (fake AI), then you understand their end goal. Manipulate, manipulate, manipulate. The answer will differ by next year depending on who owns the interface. We already see tons of examples of that now. But how many people actually question it? That number is less than what it should be.

Interesting, here in Arizona, CenturyLink isnt doing anything good. Old copper, no fiber expansion, just sitting here collecting money and dust until they are sold.

Now with nuance!

Have to agree, with the uncertainty in the market, I would think that would be the greater driver to this than "AI".

Feels another "sell AI" excuse, especially with tariffs now? LOL, okay... have fun with wasting money.

First, they already filter most resumes and applications.
Second, if a company is too busy to interview someone, then they are too busy to care about you as an employee.
Third, there is no AI that is good enough to handle this, in fact I would use it as a way to hack into the company.

There are ways to prevent ads.

To 86 someone, means to toss out.

The same idiots crying about this are the same ones that said 8646.

Its a red herring and another distraction to what is actually happening to our country.

The joke above is good, but its terribly dumb that its even a joke.

I believe the student has a valid case.

If you believe the student is paying for a piece of paper over learning, then the ultimate point of college is an abject failure.

The students are there to learn, apply the knowledge through testing and validation by a seasoned learned individual, and then move on with their knowledge into the real world. If a learned individual is not learned, then they have bamboozled everyone into believing something they are not. Which means that the learned, and the college are at fault. The accreditation is based on other factors. They do not vette and validate every learned individual(teacher), bu the Universities course design, and metrics at the top level.

it is for the college to vette them. So, I think they have a case.