Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Yes, probably. And they likely can do even bett (Score 1) 235

Making claims without valid data.
Truth is, there is a concerted push to be dependent on tech bros technology, including thumbing the scale on economy and things like Vehicle insurance.
https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2026/05/14/how-oligarchs-dominate-our-democracies-and-preserve-inequality/
https://www.oxfamamerica.org/explore/issues/economic-justice/is-the-us-witnessing-the-rise-of-oligarchy/

Let me remind you Insurance companies are for profit. If they want to keep their job, they will not price themselves outside of the market.
https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/052015/what-main-business-model-insurance-companies.asp

Comment Re: Oh Noes! (Score 1) 77

No one said flock was violating, although one could deem its controls insufficient to track abuse and sue based on that.
The argument was the police use, not flock itself.
Now if flock is insecure (which it is), then it is also liable for leaks and manipulation of facts. The chain of custody is broken by default.

Comment Re:They distilled human knowledge (Score 5, Insightful) 108

I believe restricting data is the answer to make a much better model. "AI", is just a search and compile engine. It doesnt think like people assume, it doesnt rationalize, it doesnt even understand what it is looking at.
For example, researching RNA, if you "teach" it the basics, and see if it "learns" on its own to get itself to where we are today, it wont know what to do. It cant come up with a theory and then logic through how to validate.
It CAN however, link likenesses together after learning how to. And the less slop it has to deal with, the more efficient and accurate it can be.

Anthropic is just trying to buff up its IPO release, which is likely this year or early next year.

Slashdot Top Deals

Never trust anyone who says money is no object.

Working...