Comment BLUE PENIS vs SPACEX (Score 5, Insightful) 32
The comparison is inevitable and made by ever media outlet commenting on the launches. SpaceX actually accomplishes things (orbital insertion, LEO sats, military missions, CRS and Crew missions to the ISS among them. Blue Penis has a cartoon of a guy in a big cowboy hat pretending to be another cartoon guy, while taking people on a long-ride to absolutely nothing.
If you'd like to experience near weightlessness you can pay $28M to win a seat at an auction at fly to "the edge of space", or buy $300 worth of SCUBA gear, leave out most of the weight in your BCD, and enjoy the same. The sights are better.
Why people pander to this effort is beyond me. All it does is waste a lot of people's time, money, and fuel to get these rich clowns up to "almost nothing" for "almost no time" where they accomplish "nothing" and are merely passengers on an almost-space vessel -- not astronauts. That's been discussed on
> “The crew who flew to space this week on an automated flight by Blue Origin were brave and glam, but you cannot identify as an astronaut,” continued Duffy's post about the proper terminology regarding what they achieved. “They do not meet the FAA astronaut criteria
Useless, pointless, expensive. Please, compare that to SpaceX, ULA, or the Chinese and other countries' programs.