I never said it didn't explode. I was pointing out that that kind of unmixed burn wouldn't get close to 6000 tons of bombs that they tried to blow up Heligoland with.
AI says 1/16th as powerful

That doesn't seem right. It is an unmixed fuel and oxidiser. More a burn than a bomb.
I mean, there was that Denmark island is ww2...

How did moonbase get to lightspeed to travel to the ... wait! Is it moon base or moonbase?

Youtube creates vast adversarial network to make fake video undectable

Well, you could say that xai can make more money leasing out their ai datacentre than they can by using their ai datacentre fot ai. Doesnt that tell you that ai isnt very profitable at xai?

It is probably not a scam but there isn't any demand for this type of thing.
Examples:
storj - 28000 provider/users trying to serve a few 10s of PB
salad - paying a couple of cents per hour for rtx 4060 GPU
filecoin - exabytes of storage serving ... I don't know but not much

Businesses don't want their data on a server in someone's backyard, they want it in a SOC 2 data centre

No. He means less of each person

and the Rolling stones are climate criminals

Rubbish. We just need to paint them white

It is about 10000 miles. The range of an electric truck that is all battery and no cargo. The same for diesel is about 40000 miles

Yep. And then use excel to make a database of all your apps!

" nuclear needs to be backed up by fast reserve capacity, because it can go away (due to SCRAM) at any time with zero warning "
What the hell are you talking about? There always a nuclear power station somewhere where it isn't going scram

No I was wrong, they don't produce fuel pellets yet

x-energy produce fuel pellets for nuclear power stations and maybe one day nuclear power stations too. I can't find anything climatey except they are funded by amazon climate funds

You completely missed the point. Falcon 9 was reliable until launch 19. It didn't blow up a bunch of customer satellites in its early life. So a comparison with this lost satellite is wrong