China Forms New Body To Review Ethics Risks of Video Games (scmp.com) 68
China has established a new body that reviews ethical issues in video gaming, marking the country's latest attempt to tighten control over the world's biggest games market. From a report: The recently formed Online Games Ethics Committee has so far evaluated an initial batch of 20 video game titles, according to a report on Friday from state broadcaster China Central Television (CCTV). This was the first time the committee's existence was made public. Without elaborating, the CCTV report said the ethics committee rejected nine games for publication in the domestic market, while ruling that certain content be modified in the 11 other games that were reviewed.
The report neither revealed which government department the ethics committee was directly under nor identified the 20 games that the body processed. The creation of the Online Games Ethics Committee has come amid concerns over internet addiction, childhood myopia and unsuitable content in China's US$38 billion video games market, which has led Beijing to tighten its control over the industry and freeze the approval of new titles this year.
The report neither revealed which government department the ethics committee was directly under nor identified the 20 games that the body processed. The creation of the Online Games Ethics Committee has come amid concerns over internet addiction, childhood myopia and unsuitable content in China's US$38 billion video games market, which has led Beijing to tighten its control over the industry and freeze the approval of new titles this year.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:first (Score:4, Insightful)
"Ethical issues"?
Are the article writers afraid to say "government censorship" because they're worried about getting their press credentials pulled and being thrown into prison now that Hong Kong has been turned over to the Communist oligarchy?
Re: (Score:2)
No, they mean ethical issues such as making free games pay-to-win and highly addictive, or getting kids to gamble on loot boxes. You know, the same shit we are trying to deal with.
China does censor games, but that's not what this is about.
Re: (Score:1)
Welcome to Socialist Communist Governance (Score:3)
Not what the public school unions taught you ?
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
They're a totalitarian single party entho-oligarchy.. but the rest of that is correct.
Re: (Score:2)
Not what the public school unions taught you ?
No, but this kind of thing is Jack Thompson's wet dream. Authoritarians are going to be authoritarian no matter what their motivation.
Re: (Score:2)
Better to review the ethics of (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
They already smacked that scientist doing CRSPR to a baby down pretty hard. It seems to have been a clear signal.
Violent Video Games Parody Video (Score:3)
Seems somewhat appropriate:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
What's that sound? (Score:5, Insightful)
So you're telling me a nation that has a well documented history of being possible one of the, if not the biggest, abuser of human rights is going to tell us about the 'ethics risk' of video game. China; a nation that to this day is known to execute political prisoners and religious minorities and sell their organs on the black market is unironically going to talk about ethics?
What's the sound? It's the sound of a million pots screaming toward the kettle factory at mach speed.
Re: (Score:1)
"Ethics" as defined by the Chinese government.
Re: (Score:2)
Were these atheists raised under a Western culture, where they believed that these rights were "God given" rights, and therefore universal? "God given" isn't just an expression. When these rights were being philosophically debated as universal, being atheist would have had you burnt at the stake. There was no such thing as cultural relativism at that time. There was either the truth represented by God, or something that was false, the devil. If something is universal, that means it represent the truth, which means that it stems from God.
This idea of universal rights, pretty much came from the west, and the US and much of the west until maybe the Trump were basically trying to force these rights on other cultures. It was almost like a political crusade to change the world.
"God given" was a turn of phrase meaning "natural" and inherent. It's not something that was granted, it was something that you always had. The men who wrote the Constitution were deists which means that, while they believe a god existed and created this world, beyond that he didn't have much control. Many deists, especially the more hard core ones, were actually accused of being atheists themselves.
Re: (Score:2)
While China is one of the worst the same argument can be made about many countries. The US and UK both murder people without any due process, yet also pontificate on human rights issues. The UK is a surveillance state but feels able to lecture others on freedom.
For China though this is actually a very positive and welcome development. In the west we have loot box gambling and highly addictive "free to play" games that constantly encourage you to spend money on them. We are starting to address the problem an
Re: (Score:2)
While China is one of the worst the same argument can be made about many countries. The US and UK both murder people without any due process, yet also pontificate on human rights issues.
China is the only one of those nations that will execute people for cheating on their taxes, break them up for parts, and sell the organs to the highest bidder. And that's what they do to their citizens. Next, shall we talk about Tibet? There can be no reasonable question whether China is the worst abuser of human rights on the planet. They make us look like girl scouts. They make Russia look like an also-ran.
Re: (Score:1)
Yes, you are right. But what is the point of saying that? Does it make their efforts to curb the worst behaviour of video game companies any less worthy?
If we can't even admit that they did something positive then our efforts to get them to fix the human rights abuses probably won't be very effective.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, you are right. But what is the point of saying that? Does it make their efforts to curb the worst behaviour of video game companies any less worthy?
Yes. It's hypocritical bullshit and they deserve zero praise.
Re: (Score:2)
That sounds like you think that "China" is one single entity with a single mind guiding every aspect of its behaviour, and that no individual parts can be good or well intentioned without being hypocritical.
What amount of influence do you think the people looking at companies selling gambling services to kids have over arrests of political dissidents, for example?
Re: (Score:2)
So you're telling me a nation that has a well documented history of being possible one of the, if not the biggest, abuser of human rights is going to tell us about the 'ethics risk' of video game. China; a nation that to this day is known to execute political prisoners and religious minorities and sell their organs on the black market is unironically going to talk about ethics?
I think there's a huge gulf in word use. In China, I get the impression they're concerned about harmonious social development - what they do to prisoners and ethnic/religious minorities is to that end, and what they want for video games is about that end. I suspect the very word "ethics" itself in this context should be translated as "how people and behavior should regulate themselves and be regulated to further harmonious social development". In that sense there's no contradiction.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:Nice that folks (Score:1)
Re: (Score:3)
Re:Yes thats what Im talking about (Score:2)
lets get this straight.. (Score:1)
the state (i.e. government run) broadcaster finally revealed the secret formation and existence of a government entity whose sole purpose is to censor or outright reject video games for the domestic prc market based on ETHICS, all while providing no actual details about this "committee"....
sounds about right. welcome to the "peoples republic (haha) of china"
New Game (Score:3)
Gov. Lacky: Wang, there's a new game called RAP, could you please look into it?
Wang: (dutifully does his duty) Boss Lacky, RAP is will lead impressionable youngsters into untold acts of perfidy.
BL: Yes, but is there anything wrong with it?
Wang: Dunno, I thought perfidy was fairly wrong.
BL: Small potatoes, Wang...by the way, what does RAP stand for, some sort of rap karaoke game, figures the Japanese would be behind it?
Wang: Nope, it stands for Rage Against the Party.
BL: Wang, please issue a new edict, "Due to the immoral values promoted by the game RAP, it will be taken off the market and anyone caught playing it will submit to some gentle re-integration into proper society." And Wang, make sure the cattle prods are set to Bowel Evacuating High.
Re: (Score:2)