Facebook Gets New Integrated IM Client 79
Stitch_Surfs writes "Blognation is reporting that the IM client FriendVOX has gone live for Facebook. This is the first time that Facebook users (of which there are now some 32 million) can communicate with one another from directly within the Facebook application. This development, by UK-based Techlightenment, effectively closes the loop for any external applications to be used (or necessary) for communication among Facebook users.'It will be interesting to see how quickly FriendVox is adopted and could it ever replace Twitter by simply using the Facebook status. The other question is what will Facebook do if FriendVox ever became too popular? Would they seek to buy it or replicate it themselves? This is the real dilemma facing all Facebook developers living inside the Facebook walled garden, and recently this happened when a developer showed Facebook their new marketplace application which would run inside of Facebook. Inside of two weeks Facebook had suddenly launched their own marketplace!'"
Re:facebook future (Score:4, Insightful)
A) Learn to read things before you fill them out/agree to them, and
B) Resign any position that gives you signing authority at your current job.
hyperbole (Score:5, Funny)
Really? The first time they could communicate with each other? what were they doing on the site before?
Re: (Score:2)
Re:hyperbole (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh, damn.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
That said, it is a little bit of a hyperbole.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Facebook isn't creepy... (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
Oh good. (Score:2)
Popular instant messaging systems be damned, we need another way to send our friends links to shock sites that doesn't work with any others!
Re: (Score:2)
Popular instant messaging systems be damned, we need another way to send our friends links to shock sites that doesn't work with any others!
I am afraid to check the degree of their stupidity.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
I don't believe MySpaceIM uses XMPP, and that's quite the recent protocol. Then again, expecting them to follow any standards is like expecting Microsoft to follow pre-existing open standards they weren't involved in the creation for.
One wonders doesn't these companies stop a second and ask themselves why Google, a giant used XMPP as their root protocol on IM services and why they didn't code another closed one?
Google and Apple (as including XMPP on server,client) knows technologies doesn't have scalability and especially portability and open specs has no future in communications.
If AOL started IM just today, it would be XMPP based. The "MS" situation is different. MS needs to keep full feature service in their own Windows OS. With an
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
I was amazed!
Re: (Score:2)
this is just stinking PR, please...
Really suspicious amount of Facebook stories down to my countries news broadcast TV lately.
Slashdot-as usual gets victimised by someones professional PR agenda it seems.
I expect some big media scandal coming from Facebook soon. It is completely unexplainable to me, it must have some form of thing going on.
It is _really_ stinking PR since Facebook is not implementing XMPP, they are just coming up with a new propetioary closed protocol.
This is the Digg scheme. Post a PR crap to some blog, make it digg up by
Why. (Score:3, Insightful)
Don't get me wrong...from a business sense, I understand why it's being done. From a lot of my friend's point of view, I notice that a large portion of them like the idea of of the applications...but still. Slowly, Facebook is becoming more and more like MySpace....and that's definitely not good.
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
Then it was opened to anyone, step 1 towards Myspace - and now the applications and "friend networks" containing hundreds of faceless friends have destroyed the utility of the site and made Facebook into Myspace Two. Some peoples' walls consist of over 50% "THX
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
I do like the idea of applications, but it is taken too far. I have apps like "CDs" and "Where I've Been"... You know, things that are actually reflections of who you are. The ones I hate are crap like "Super Poke", "Advanced Wall", "Graffiti", etc. The "fun" ones are stupid. I use Facebook to network, not to screw aroun
Re: (Score:2)
Just add a {display: block;} for any application you actually want to see, and you are all set.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, I'm much happier with the blanket rules (makes it feel like it's 2005 again).
MOD PARENT UP (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:seriously (Score:1)
Tell me when chatrooms make a come back, ok? Oh God, that's what this integrated IM thing is going to turn into.
Yay, it's "OKAY, EVERYBODY, ASL? =-)" all over again.
When you're done backfilling all the things that made AOL faaaaantastic, could you get around to fixing email spam?
Thanks, just wake me up again when web 3.0 gets here.
Re: (Score:1)
Ok, in what way is Facebook like AOL? I can't see any connection, or reason to suspect people left AOL for Facebook.
Developer talking here (Score:5, Insightful)
So, what you're saying is... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Developer talking here (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:1)
And Slashdot is...?
Antisocial social networks (Score:2)
This is great! Someday, maybe this tool will allow Facebook users to communicate with users on other websites. Imagine the possibilities!
Right now, the web is fragmented into many different isolated islands. Each service requires a different registration, uses different protocols, and are generally incompatible with one another. It's difficult for UserA on Facebook to communicate with U
Re: (Score:1)
The problem with email is it's "push" rather than "pull" - I have to assume who wants to know some details of my life, and then risk annoying people who don't want my spam. These websites became popular because people could choose what you wanted to read.
The only way to do with with email is to set up a mailing list, which takes up more ef
Meebo (Score:5, Interesting)
http://auburn.facebook.com/apps/application.php?id=2354779593 [facebook.com]
This Just In: FUNWALL! (Score:4, Funny)
Mosoto - Alpha Facebook IM Client (Score:1)
another IM client... (Score:2)
jabber/xmpp? (Score:3, Insightful)
that way any recent non-specific im client should be able to access it, and gtalk at the same time.
Re: (Score:1)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Not_Invented_Here [wikipedia.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah! And the best part is that you wouldn't even have to sign up for a Facebook account, and you wouldn't be targetted by Facebook advertising, and best of all Face book couldn't possibly make a single dime off of you!
Why _wouldn't_ the owners of the Facebook business not want to do that?
Site Down... (Score:2)
at least it's not myspace (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
A proper British take on Facebook (Score:3, Funny)
http://i174.photobucket.com/albums/w89/pickledpizza/facebook2.jpg [photobucket.com]
Just brilliant.
Re: (Score:1)
Question to Story submitter and Accepting editor (Score:2)
If this kind of junk makes into front page of slashdot second time in a month (check http://developers.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=07/09/23/0019224 [slashdot.org] which is there on APPLE topic with a referrer? URL), why the hell are you suggesting us to pay/subscribe to get rid of ads? I could care less about ads, there are 3 layers of disabled software which would allow me to erase them. We, subscribers pay so Slashdot wouldn't have t
Why not a Pidgin/Purple plugin then? (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)