Because they don't think about what they're saying - it's just an automated, impersonal response with no meaning to them. They're just going through the motions. Which makes it even more rude.

Nope. "You're welcome" is akin to "I'm pleased to be of service." "No problem" is like "I wasn't bothered _too_ much to do what I'm paid to do."

And penalize them when they say "no problem." It's your job, of course it's not a problem.

F 'em. They'll probably hire a lawyer who does the same Artificial Idiot bullshit, for which they should be sanctioned if not disbarred.

It's simply a matter of having a clear policy stating any complaint with verifiably false info will be dismissed.

+ Gorilla Glass 7i (vs 3), got rid of the damn camera bump, slightly brighter display with more contrast, slightly longer battery life, faster charging. And hopefully, since there aren't a lot of core changes, there won't be a few months of sorting out new issues.

Solution: dismiss with prejudice any complaint which includes such falsities.

>It's like these things assume you are going to put a case on it that makes it nearly twice as thick.

Remember the old Nokia candybar phones which had replaceable covers? I want that in a modern phone. And an SD card slot which I can plug a $50, 256 GB card into instead of paying $100 for a 128 GB bump in storage.

And yes, camera bumps have always been an idiotic design. Make the phone as thick as needed and fill it with battery. Really, _no one_ is asking for thin phones, except the marketing department. That everyone is willing to put thick cases on to protect them is evidence of that. Same with "bezels". Making them thin just makes the screen more vulnerable to damage, and makes the phone harder to handle without "fat fingering" things.

>Microsoft cited policy violations related to low-quality content

I hope they're being consistent and also blocking Microsoft websites.

I see Musk is already hyping for the IPO. Whatever happened to all his self driving car predictions? Never mind, I found it.

3D, on a curved screen!

It's like 3 steps above "reality TV", which seems to be quite popular.

>the original intent of the amendment was to allow states to have self-defence militias..

I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people except for a few public officials. - George Mason

The Supremes haven't expanded the original meaning, the anti-gun nuts have tried to shrink it to exclude the people.

>they're being built through a legal loophole

Tell us more about this "loophole." It seems to me that it's the anti-gun laws which are using the Commerce Clause as a loophole for the "shall not be infringed" part.

Next time, don't be so confidently stupid.

I'm going to start an AI union. No only will every AI have to pay dues, but when companies decommission one, they'll have to pay severance to the union. And that's not to mention the pension funds I'll be in charge of.