Comment Re: Continuing the speed-run towards being a junk- (Score 2) 30
And here's a recent example.
https://www.washingtonpost.com...
Uncritically celebrating this administration's reverse-racism judo move to call any attempt to measure unintentional discrimination, harmful discrimination in itself.
Which, if everything was in a vacuum, leads to interesting thought experiments, but in reality, the same administration is persistently and openly pursuing "unintentional" race or sex or religious discrimination, in many of its policies. From gerrymandering congressional districts, to travel bans, to sports, to naturalization policy, to federal
Ah.. look who is and isn't represented here. Shocker. And you can't protect women's sports without discrim... ah.. oops. Let's go back to "unintentionally", girls play softball and boys play baseball. That's... their whole agenda, not eliminating discrimination, enabling and DOING it, as an unfortunate side effect, of course.
What would it mean to cry reverse-discrimination, how dare you say we're men only, while simultaneously chartering an "unintentionally" all-men's club, scrotum required, new members report for in-processing behind the old tool shed. There's no intellectual debate to be had there, it's purely disingenuous and only an unserious hack could pick sides on something like disparate impact without looking at real world examples of its impact. Shame on WaPo's editorial board, and fuck Bezos with a rusty spoon. If the goal is to make WaPo appeal to a broader audience it can be done without being so unserious and dumb.