Acoustic Levitation Works On Small Animals 182
anthemaniac writes "Researchers for at least two decades have used acoustic levitation to suspend light materials without a container. Wenjun Xie, a materials physicist at Northwestern Polytechnical University in China, has previously used ultrasound fields to levitate globs of iridium and mercury, very heavy materials. Now the scientist has performed the feat with live animals. From the story: 'Xie and his colleagues employed an ultrasound emitter and reflector that generated a sound pressure field between them. The emitter produced roughly 20-millimeter-wavelength sounds, meaning it could in theory levitate objects half that wavelength or less.' Apparently the ants, spiders and ladybugs endured the trick just fine, but the fish didn't do so well due to lack of water."
Biological heating effects? (Score:5, Interesting)
As an aside, I seem to remember that former Admiral Bobby Inman served on the board of directors for (SAIC) and was involved in some acoustic work along these lines, but I think they were focusing on inanimate objects. I could be wrong about that, but it came out of a conversation I had years ago with members of the science directorate.
Re:Biological heating effects? (Score:5, Informative)
And is it possible for animals to have cavities or structures with a resonant frequency equal to that of the emitted waves? That's where the real danger lies, I think.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
"My new hoverboard was a lot of fun, until my duodenum imploded."
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Unless you had a very small car, absolutely nothing. It's got nothing to do with the amount of energy used, but the wavelength of the soundwaves used.
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Your sig (Score:2, Funny)
The defunct business next door to my house has signs saying "$500 reward leading to the arrest and conviction of persons destroying this property." There was what looked like a very weatherbeaten, unmaintained house and a large tin structure that looked like it too had not been maintained in years; gutters falling, etc.
Then last March 12th two F2 tornados tore through here. It ripped the hell out of both structures (again, I too
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Fish difficulties? Not for me. (Score:5, Funny)
It's even easier to get fish to levitate in water if you never feed them.
Not for me either (Score:4, Funny)
One stick of dynamite does the job a lot quicker.
Re:Not for me either (Score:4, Funny)
Oeddy!!! (Score:2)
Oeddy, is that you??? Man, it's been a long time. Better give Dr. Siggy a call: he says it has been a long time since you've surfed his couch. Too long, I think.
Re: (Score:2)
One stick of dynamite does the job a lot quicker
Attempts at levitating large creatures such as whales using this method have so far proved unsuccessful.
Re:Not for me either (Score:5, Funny)
Oh? Quite successful [perp.com], considering the large amount of airborne blubber that resulted. At least for a few seconds, anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
Don't worry (Score:5, Informative)
I've experience acoustic levitation (Score:2)
When I left, I was 5 feet off the ground. Even 30+ years later, I can listen to Raw Power and get the same effect.
I for one... (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re:I for one... (Score:5, Funny)
WHAT???
That explains a lot... (Score:2)
Harry Potter III (Score:2)
Come on, it wasn't that good of a movie! You also aren't going to have any levitating without that little Putin elf guy, anyway.
Re: (Score:2)
I I I I forrrrr oonnnnnnne wellllcommmmmme ourrrrr levvvvitatttttinggg annnnt overrrrrrlorrrdddsss.
Farscape (Score:1)
Thats nothing (Score:5, Funny)
When I let out a ripper of a fart I swear he hovered right there for about 15 seconds.
(Incidentally, after that event he never lay on my back again)
Pythons? (Score:2)
Yeah right (Score:1)
I bet it was from the levitaiton. That's why they used fish. Needed another excuse
50 Hz? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:50 Hz? (Score:5, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Anyways, off to catch critters to put between my speakers
Re: (Score:3, Interesting)
About this loud [youtube.com].
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
TimJowers
http://www.serviza.com/ [serviza.com] : Join the Open Source revolution. Easily and Quickly.
Re:50 Hz? (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
What's the pressure to which the sound will simply bounce off of a person? Probably alot. The advance from levitating fluff to ants probably had to greatly raise the dB. Maybe in quicksand or dirt something could move a human. Like with earthquakes. I'm utterly impressed by news articles and computer articles which have little to no scientific information. I guess the author doesn't really understand what is happening and the audience doesn't really care. Or maybe I totally missed something.
TimJowers
http:// [serviza.com]
Re: (Score:1)
Technicality (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Technicality (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Actually, I suspect that a ladybird needs a levitator like a fish needs an aqualung, but I get your drift.
Diminutive! (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Ahem... (Score:2)
Oh my god! It's full of nerds!
Fish joke? (Score:1)
Is that even funny??
Bad day for arachnaphobics (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Rock Music (Score:2)
Nothing new (Score:3, Funny)
Everybody knows... (Score:2, Funny)
He's never owned a cat then. (Score:2)
That's acoustic levitation if I ever saw it.
Marvin the depressed ant (Score:5, Funny)
I'm just walking along, minding my own ant business, and all of sudden some jackass decides to levitate me. Oh, that's right, it's so funny to pick on the ants. Everyone picks on the ants. We're just trying to make a living and feed the queen...she gets to drink nectar. Think the rest of us get any nectar? Not us worker ants. You try running around blind trying to follow a scent trail during allergy season. We get stepped on, eaten by other bugs and birds...don't get me started. And then there's the nursery, those ingrates never get enough. Like it's not bad enough putting up with their crap along comes to the dominant species and thinks it's just SO funny to levitate us. Suppose I should be glad they didn't roast us under a magnifying glass like the neighbor kid. Little delinquent. I'll be he grows up to be a career criminal. It's all so meaningless.
Cities in Flight! (Score:2)
I'll believe it (Score:5, Funny)
Steven Wright Quote (Score:2)
YouTube video... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
feh. (Score:2)
video please (Score:2)
Small Sounds (Score:2)
Re:levitating humans (Score:2)
20mm wavelength seems to be 17KHz (at sealevel in air), which isn't very "ultra" sound. To levitate the 3 meters radius of adult humans (with extended arms/legs), we'd need 6m wavelength.
Which is about 57Hz.
How much power...well lots. Area of human (one side) about 1sq. m. mass, (order of magnitude) 100Kg, say 1KN force required = 1Megapascal. That's 10bar pressure, implying an acoustic pressure of 10dB above atmospheric..or 203dB into 4pi space.
Imagine you had a 'regular' hifi speaker, radiating into half space..and that it behaved in a perfectly linear manner to power input (no chance!) at the typical 1% efficiency of electrical-to-acoustic conversion, you' need to hit it with, oh,
Re: (Score:2)
How much power does, say, Pavarotti's loudest singing in the 57Hz range (50-60Hz) deliver at, say, 10m? Maybe we're talking kilopavarottis.
Re: (Score:2)
You mean KPa? Clearly the SI unit of pressure. The Pavarotti - (Pa). Everyone knows Pascal wasn't much of a singer.
Forget levitation (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
No, they use lawyers.
On the other hand, Congress uses sound to screw things, at least when there's a "Yea/Nay" voice vote.
Who cares about levitating - what about military?? (Score:2)
The first thing I wondered while watching is: why can't you flip that device upsidedown, increase the power, and make the ultimate hovercraft? This technology seems like it has military applications written all over it. And one poster has already mentioned Bobby Inman worked on this technology back in the 80's. Bobby Inman [wikipedia.org] is definitely military (intelligence though, not R&D or skunkworks).
I'm not suggesting some super secret conspir
effect on whales and dolphins (Score:2)
I'm not saying that the navy was doing levitation experiments, but wouldn't you expect it to look something like that if they were?
Just occurred to me that, even if
Re: (Score:2)
I think you are right about the defenses part of it though. In fact, recently, somewhere near Africa (I think) there was a cruise ship that was attacked by pirates (real pirates). They used some kind of acoustic defense to repel the
Re: (Score:2)
The system you are referring to was an open-air sonic defense, nothing to do with water other than it is sometimes mounted on ships. http://defense-update.com/products/l/LRAD.htm [defense-update.com]
The suggestion I made was referring to the possiblity that it could be used as an under-water torpedo defense. The pirates were using fast-attack boat
Seems like derivation from Bernoulli effect (Score:3, Informative)
Some readers seem to mix up infra and ultra. Ultrasound is high frequency sounds.
References:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernoulli_Effect
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultrasound
Oh no, not again... (Score:2)
I'm sure there's a whale joke in there somewhere...
Re: (Score:1)
Since when?
Re:Small Aminals? (Score:4, Informative)
So technically it IS an animal, and is closely related to crabs. .
Re: (Score:2)
Spiders are animals, sorry to burst your bubble.
Re:Small Aminals? (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
hehehehe
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Small Aminals? (Score:4, Informative)
Actually it's an arachnid, not an insect.
(But I'd really like to know what an aminal is.)
Re: (Score:2)
It's what my daughter used to call an animal when she was three.
Or how you pronounce it if you want to make yourself sound special...
Re:Small Aminals? (Score:4, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
Now if they were floating little bits of lichen, or colonies of algae, yes, you could be insulted.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Troll)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Small Animals? (Score:2)
this seems an awful lot like dimagnetic levitation. it is theoretically possible to levitate pretty much anything, but you need really, reall
Re:Small Aminals? (Score:5, Funny)
And this ladies and gentlemen is why we need better education funding and resources with a greater focus on math and science in schools, not to mention spelling and grammar.
Re: (Score:2, Interesting)
"...has previously used ultrasound fields to levitate globs of iridium and mercury, very heavy materials."
A 1 gram 'glob' of mercury is equal in weight to 1 gram of feathers. Iridium and mercury may have a higher density, but they are not intrinsically heavy.
When even the author of an article is confused about basic physical properties you have to worry, IMHO.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
And this ladies and gentlemen is why we need better education funding and resources with a greater focus on math and science in schools, not to mention spelling and grammar.
Actually, this is why we need better funding for planned parenthood...
Re: (Score:2)
And there was me thinking that using differing styles of brackets when nested was merely to emphasise the distinction as a convenience to the reader rather than a strict grammatical requirement...
Re:Small Aminals? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Funny, when I heard "small animal," I assumed something on the order of protozoa and bacteria. Something down where it's a little harder to discern from plantlife and viruses, unless you refamiliarize yourself with the actual criteria for the animal kingdom.
"Animals are a major group of organisms, classified as the kingdom Animalia or Metazoa. In general they are multicellular, capable of locomotion and responsive to their environment, and feed by consuming other organisms. Their body plan becomes fixed
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)