OpenBSD 4.0 Released 201
Undeadly Halloween writes, "On October 18th, OpenBSD celebrated its 11th birthday and ten years of punctual biannual releases. Now it's time for OpenBSD 4.0, which includes tons of new drivers for wireless, network, and storage chips. Consider helping the project by buying the new goodies (CD set, t-shirt, poster, Audio CD). And discover what's new and what battles developers must face daily to support new hardware in the traditional interview featuring nearly 20 developers."
Nice. (Score:2, Interesting)
Now supporting the Amish (Score:3, Funny)
"OpenBSD/armish"
I read that as OpenBSD/amish. You can imagine the visions that swirled through my head at that point.
Re: (Score:1)
Whew... On the press release, under "New/extended platforms", it says:
"OpenBSD/armish"
I read that as OpenBSD/amish. You can imagine the visions that swirled through my head at that point.
I think the BSD mascot would go down real well in Amish communities.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
You know as well as I do that he's talking about Chuck.
Re: (Score:1)
Duh. A pitchfork.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
it fits though (Score:2)
Let me repeat: CVS. In 2006.
The CVS replacement is already here. We call it Subversion or SVN. It works like CVS, but with several nasty defects removed. Most of us are hoping that CVS will pass into history, to be remembered only on wikipedia.
If you want to reimplement a version control system, you could pick something non-free that doesn't already have a free clone. You could pick BitKeeper or ClearCase, neither of which are 100% sucky or obsolete.
So yes, "a
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Classic question (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
If you were attempting to troll, *looks at userid* that was pretty pathetic.
Re: (Score:2)
Check this [laughingsquid.com] cool picture as well.
I could use a security-enhanced toaster at my office though...
Re: (Score:2)
Laptop Vendors need to step up (Score:1, Insightful)
What would Broadcom or Intel do if Dell or Hewlett Packard told them to provide documentation for each of the chips in the laptops or desktops. If it became a business decision, no Dell laptops with a non-documented Broadcom c
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
make them change their minds later. The key is to make this as visible an issue
as possible.
Talk to the chip manufacturers.
Talk to the OEMs.
Talk to the people who do the purchasing for your company. If you're lucky,
they might start asking the right questions when they place an order. That's
the kind of thing that makes Dell/HP/etc take notice.
Binary drivers and get them out of the kernel (Score:2)
Other options is for OS people sacrifice any ability to work in their field and sign life-long NDA's and non-com's to gain acess to the info or have bounties to raise the millions to BUY the information a
A closed-source driver (Score:2)
real patriots run BSD (Score:1)
open unix rocks, and so does freedom
The best feature of OpenBSD... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
This is a dream for those of us forced to have to run linux executables
No... the best feature is the research (Score:3, Insightful)
N
Re: (Score:2)
Hmmmm, not sure I'd go that far. The OpenBSD group is very good at taking current (or legacy) software and improving it (often by an order of magnitude, however you'd measure that). However, I don't expect to see anything like ZFS [sun.com] coming from them anytime soon.
DTrace [opensolaris.org], though, hmmmm, maybe...
Re: (Score:2)
Sun is in situation whne it does some things because it cannot do anything else. They have lost focus many years ago - and have bumpy road ahead of them trying to regain it.
On other side, OpenBSD is moved by need. The development is advanced by people with specific set of needs and goals. They do not lose focus - loss of focus would mean absence of developers wi
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I don't know what kind of "real work" you do, but I develop software and dtrace is like a gift from above when you really need it. Even if you do have the source to everything, you can't just jump on a mailing list when the software that isn't working is stuff you wrote yourself. And even with source, sometimes it's easier to trace through some system calls to get a feel for what's going wrong than it is it meditate over the
Re: (Score:2)
OS/2 OpenBSD comparison silly (Score:2)
That is a silly comparison. OS/2 tried to compete against Windows, OpenBSD does not try to compete against Linux. OpenBSD does its own thing and doesn't really care what others do. It helps to keep in mind that the OpenBSD folks are a little more mature (obviously referring to the community at large and excluding Theo
Re: (Score:2)
Just like OS/2 could run Windows executables.
I seem to recall having to reboot into some sort of virtual machine to run Windows under OS/2. However with OpenBSD Linux emulation, I can run a Linux executable as though it was a native one. The difference is that they they run on a more secure operating system and (at least with FreeBSD and NetBSD Linux emulation) they sometimes run faster. Now that the Sun JDK is running native on FreeBSD and NetBSD, the last reason I have for running Linux binaries on a
Audio CD? (Score:2)
Why wont hardware vendors give out documentation? (Score:2)
Re:Why wont hardware vendors give out documentatio (Score:2)
WiFi cards. May run into issues with the FCC since they are are supposed to be not "easily modifiable by the end user".
Graphics cards. May use technology from another company that is under an NDA.
DMCA. Intel has released all the documentation for their graphics chips except for the MacroVision part.
And last but not least, cost. It costs money to release documentation. Frankly for most companies the Linux OpenBSD market isn't worth it.
The simple answer is no. If you build an all Intel system then you
Re: (Score:2)
microcode: a binary piece that is loaded directly into the hardware
binary blob: a binary piece that is loaded directly into the kernel
microcode is fine. any OS on any arch can do that (provided it has the appropriate hardware, natch). you bought a kick ass RAID card? sweet. Vendor 'designed' it to run only on i386. you want to put it into your sparc box.
if the vendor requires a binary blob, you're screwed. so you take it back and get your money back.
if
Re: (Score:2)
He was complaining about the WiFi chipset that the one laptop per child program was using. At run time it loads a binary file into the wifi chipset that gets executed on an arm core. He was using the term binary blob for that even though it was NOT being loaded into the kernel or even executing on the host CPU. I don't see the difference between this and the code being in flash except it is cheaper and will run faster out of ram than flash. So you see i
The documentation sucks (Score:2)
It'll have to be another donation (Score:3, Funny)
CD Set - More toxic landfill
Posters - see t-shirts above
Audio - got to be kidding
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Even since OpenBSD started to "theme" each release I've been disappointed in the merchandise. The artwork is great, but it's just something I wouldn't want to hang on my wall or wear in public.
Thankfully you can still order stuff from old releases. My personal favourite is the poster from 2.9 [openbsd.org], which is simple and illustrates exactly what OpenBSD is about but professional enough you could hang it your office. I'd buy something every release if they were more like that.
Old T-shirt is much better, Puffy is not for me (Score:2)
And Pufferix? Come on, wasn't there a Linux distro that got into major trouble over the -ix postfix? And that was without the visual representation of the cartoon character.
So, anyway, what I'm saying: get rid of the stale Puffy, get back to the roots with The Daemon.
Re: (Score:2)
Do you mean this [openbsd.org] one?
This shirt was unavailable for a short while, but it's been available again for some time now.
Re: (Score:2)
Hardware Crypto Accelerators (Score:2)
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
WooHoo! (Score:2)
Congrats on a great new release!
Why no torrent download? (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.0/i386/MD5 [openbsd.org]
ftp://ftp.openbsd.org/pub/OpenBSD/4.0/i386/CKSUM [openbsd.org]
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Because it would save Theo a heck of a lot of bandwidth?
Re: (Score:2)
This would drain users bandwidth without saving Theo any - it would be a cd-only option, since bittorrent is too big to support on a floppy. Most everyone netinstalls via floppy, so it's work that would benefit few and would not do what you suggest, got anything
Re: (Score:2)
Base protocol is stable thru last 4 years or so.
It is advanced features which are changing: UDP support, traffic encryption, DHT decentralized network, various accelerations and improvements.
But simple client doesn't have to (and doesn't) support all that.
As Linux distros have showed over time, BitTorrent is one of the simplest ways to manage mirrors. Or to put it plainly: BT replaces mirroring and removes need for management. Throw RSS into t
Re: (Score:2)
Get a life man. protocol != implementation.
There are BT protocol implementations in C [sourceforge.net], C++ [rakshasa.no] and Java [sf.net].
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Hm. So what BSD then uses for compiling??? Isn't it GNU Compiler Collection licensed under GPL?
If you are licensing zealot - FSF/GNU would welcome you any time. They are full of it. BSD folks au contraire are pragmatical - and use whatever fits best their needs. (And that's actually why they use BSD license: it fits their needs and it is extremely pragmatical.)
Including BT client into disto make sense just to pilot it and see would people use it at all. And if there would be interest (and normally th
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
The gcc is one of the last remaining non-BSD licensed bits in OpenBSD, OpenBSD has
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
See for instance http://www.webster.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?sourceid =Mozilla-search&va=Biannual+ [webster.com] which says biannual means "occurring twice a year" compare with biennial http://www.webster.com/dictionary/biennial+ [webster.com] "occurring every two years"
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Gotta love that precision.
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Name it, and stop trolling.
OpenBSD is a normal Unix system (most software compiles), supports FreeBSD and Linux binary emulation. Has Wine in ports, etc.
Re: (Score:2)
I doubt the great majority of Unix users make use of Wine, anyhow.
Re: (Score:2)
Cisco IP Communicator
Any brand of SQL based tools. Take your pick!
Re: (Score:2)
It also doesn't run Solidworks, Halo, or Microsoft Word!
Yes so it doesn't run a high end commercial RDBMS! Good grief and you claim it is a niche operating system for that reason!
I don't use OpenBSD but good grief folks their are people that do and find it very useful. If you don't then don't use it but stop complaining about it!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Well, I suppose you could just keep on complaining about how OpenBSD doesn't run Oracle or you could ring up good old Larry and get him to start supporting it. Either way, complaining about how it's not useful for your purposes is about as useful as someone complaining that they can't haul around two tons of construction equipment in a Prius. Right tool for the right job and all that. This isn't your tool.
Re: (Score:2)
Why do you think I said it was not useful since it doesn't support any of the tools *I* need to run? geeezz Some people are just not very bright!
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's like someone working for a Winmodem manufacturer complaining they don't work well under *nix. Duh, write some supporting drivers since you are the one with the documentation and are the ones supporting the product. The documentation for the OS is already out there and available for
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
And really, any server you need highly secured (ProPolice, W^X, Systrace, etc.).
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Could you please name what applications you need to run, and at which point they stop?
If it's not too much hardware dependant, maybe there is a way to run it on OpeBSD. It even has linux/freebsd/solaris/others binary compatibility (to some extent).
Post your problem and I'll try to help you (if you want, of course).
heh (Score:4, Informative)
For example, our Internet connection at work is managed by OpenBSD. If I rebooted our firewall, no one would notice, because the backup would kick in and it would preserve state for everything, even pre-existing TCP connections. You could be streaming music and it wouldn't even skip. How can I do that with Linux again?
"I can't run any of the stuff I need to run under OpenBSD, so why the heck should I even care about it?"
Hm. Whenever I have that problem, I just download the Linux version and run it under binary emulation.
Re: (Score:2)
keepalived [keepalived.org].
But, you know, your elitist attitude was fun too. Please, continue.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Out of curiosity, how are you implementing failover with different external IP addresses? Or is this for outbound connections only, such as internet enabling an office?
Re: (Score:2)
You are correct that failover would be impossible with different external IP addresses. However, the only thing outside the cluster that notices any difference is the switch, which sees the MAC address start appearing on another physical port. CARP (common address redundancy protocol) creates what is basically a shared virtual NIC, with a s
Re: (Score:2)
OpenBSD on the desktop is pretty limited
It is limited to some extent but I use it without any great problem. I guess I'm probably fairly typical of a lot of computer users in the programs that I use. OpenOffice, Firefox, Thunderbird, Mplayer, Xmms, Bittorrent and maybe a few others on a very occasional basis. That's perfectly good enough for my purposes: the only thing I feel is a limitation to me, is the lack of Flash support (more because of some poor website design really).
So, limited? Yes, in some w
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
At work, our P4 OpenBSD firewalls running OpenBGPD can handle the 100 megabit connection.
Re: (Score:2)
seriously, did you think you HAD to post on every slashdot topic or something?
why dont you go waste your time elsewhere, no one cares about your opinion on OpenBSD.
Re: (Score:2)
Why the heck should anyone here care about you or your needs? Mentally balanced people who don't find something meets their needs, THINK TO THEMSELVES, "this does not meet my needs" and then move on to find something which does. Meanwhile, the mentally ill rant in the streets about religion, as if people who already adhere to that-particular-brand-of-crazy need to be re-convinced or otherwise as if people w
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
1. Make an ISO of the install files, with the appropriate structure (4.0/sparc64).
2. Use 4.0/sparc64/miniroot40.fs as the boot file with NetBSD's mksunbootcd, to modify the ISO you just made.
3. Burn the modified ISO and "boot cdrom" and install OpenBSD/sparc64 to your hearts content.
Re: (Score:2)
He wants to install on a VAX though. So he is much more limited with his options than i386.
BTW, if you are going to burn your own bootable i386 OpenBSD CD, you are better off using the cdrom4
Re: (Score:2)
True, I suppose I should have said "use cdrom40.fs," but I call it a floppy image since the installation notes refer to it as: "The i386 boot and installation 2.88MB floppy image"
I call it a floppy image too. (???)
Re: (Score:2)
Oh sorry, I thought you were refering to the floppy images which are named floppy?.fs.
I just noticed that you linked to instructions (unlike all the others I've seen), which use the cdrom??.fs.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
CVS reimplementation???? (Score:2)
CVS has already been replaced by subversion (SVN). CVS sucks horribly. Subversion only sucks a little bit.
I could see doing a BitKeeper or ClearCase reimplementation maybe. Let CVS pass into history.
OpenBSD/amish indeed...
Re: (Score:2)
I don't recall there being any claims of smaller memory footprint, nor of speed boosts in OpenRCS.
One way they are making it more secure by not using i
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
I can't blame Theo at all for how he responds to greedy bastards like that.
BSD vs GPL ... (Score:2)
Although I prefer *BSD to Linux for anything beyond consumer desktop type usage (ok, maybe embedded too), think Apple made a wise choice to go BSD rather than Linux, believe that
Re: (Score:2)
GPL is good for preventing code-hoarding, but BSD is better for being truly free of all encumbrances (other than acknowledging antecedents).
Re: (Score:2)
It's not like the numbering system is confusing, works better than the Linux one.
Re: (Score:2)
You should learn to read that evidence you found about Theo outing Intel and Sun. It's over them being lying dicks, not for not donating. Intel claims to support open source and yet doesn't actually do shit to really help open source, they give lip service. Theo doesn't like that, so he talks to them, they ignore him, then he fumes about it, he tries to get them to change their ways, they ignore him still, then he tells anyone who will listen how they do not cooperate,
Re: (Score:2)
Theo's real gripe is in Sun talking like it's pro-open source and never giving out proper documentation or assistance to his project. Sun gave some hardware running Solaris to the pkgsrc p