Update your jokes. They are too stale.

I couldn't find AdBlock for Vivaldi. I don't trust the built-in stuff from commercial vendors.

Vivaldi has also implemented Google's "manifest v3" for some reason. That's precisely the thing I want to avoid - but Vivaldi apparently embraces.

P.S. Googled it. ... Oof. They use Chrome's extensions?! No own extension store??? So Vivaldi is merely a dressed up Chrome? Disappoint.

Any decent Firefox alternative appeared?

I've long started dreading Fx upgrades. It's an unpleasant feeling. Time to move on.

Is there any Firefox-based browser appeared that is suitable as a "workhorse browser" like e.g. older Firefox/Mozilla/Navigator versions?

Something that just works without idiotic animated everything or sliding menus BS? no pop-ups announcing "new features"(tm)? and please no pastel or gradient BS?

Year of Wayland on Linux is any minute now. Thus it's never too early to throw away the "old junk"(tm), that works and is used daily by millions, that is inevitably going to be replaced by... jam tomorrow.

What's going to happen first: Wayland or AGI?

Interesting idea. Though probably a PC-in-a-dock would have been a better idea.

Keyboards (and mice) were always the most disposable parts of a PC - for a reason.

I mean, with this device, you now can spill coffee on your PC too.

Plus all the hygienic hazards. (I would never want to use keyboard/mouse of some of my colleagues.)

The correct title should have been "GNOME devs are still idiots". With "now joined by Mozilla Inc." added.

Why is this even news? These idiots had removed Alt+Tab from early GNOME3 by default. And it took weeks of debates on the mail lists by Ubuntu people to force the idiots to put it back.

What else did you expect?

The whole discussion feels weird.

Whole of Africa (1.5B pop) and Asia/India (4.8B pop) since the beginning were IPv6. There were never enough IPv4 addresses for them to begin with.

And here we have another tempest in a teacup whether IPv6 was/is success or not.

Google's Gemini AI Is Coming To Your TV

I wish all the luck to Google - to locate my TV in a landfill (or a recycling yard) where I have sent it to several years ago.

The other angle/question I had for some time: How much closed source software is really "closed", when one could try to brute-guess the prompt that was used to generate it?

How much security benefits closed source software would still have remaining?

P.S. AI-powered reverse-engineer (to automate all those tedious repetitive 99% of work) may be a fun topic too.

I'm happy that the USB-A is being phased out. Mainly because there are still too many fancy over-beautified USB-A plugs that are (a) large and (b) block neighboring USB ports.

So far, this wasn't a problem with USB-C, since it's too small to be f*cked up by the marketing.

P.S. But I guess it's only matter of time before they find a way to screw over USB-C too. "Progress."

P.P.S. Let's not forget that some companies still insist on using "USB 2.0 Mini" connector. In the past we had to stack Serial<->PS2<->USB adapters for the mice and the keyboards. In future we might need to stack adapters to connect those few remaining USB-Whatever oddballs.

My personal experience with charts for long sets of data: Excel starts going slow after I cross the magic 16K lines threshold - LO Calc basically becomes unusable when I cross the magic 10K lines threshold. Delete few hundred lines - and performance is back. Put them back - and the slowness (Excel)/the unusableness (LO Calc) is back.

... OMG. Great idea for a MCU movie: avengers & co as congressmen and senators try to pass a bill.

Iron Man can filibuster as long as it takes!* while Tony sleeps in the suit and Jarvis speaks for him.

Movie goers are the alpha testers.

I haven't even had a mac in decade+ now, but from my vague recollections MacOS images are generally come with their own file systems. (I've tried to recall an image format for MacOS that is a plain dumb block device - and couldn't. There is no /dev/loop on macs.)

And from this follows: there is a ton of ways one could fuck up performance with a shoddily implemented custom file system for a particular disk image format.

All of medtech has hard "expiry date". At the very least, accounts for mechanical/etc wear. Device may not be deployed after the expiry date.

If it were only to prop up the sales, the manuf could have simply shortened the "expiration" of their devices. They could have even installed some cheaper non-critical elements to justify the shorter life cycle.

I'd guess they done that already, but now want to extract even more from system.