AOL To Be Purchased By T-Online? 232
Sique writes "The german newspaper Sueddeutsche Zeitung reports on its website, that the german ISP T-Online wants to buy AOL. The article is titled American Dream, but the actual wording is german. Ask the fish for help." There's also the article in Der Spiegel about the potential purchase as well; you can also check out T-Online's site.
Not surprising... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Not surprising... (Score:5, Interesting)
As an employee, I wish they would - AOL consumed Time Warner because they had artificially high stock prices and decided it was time for something with real value. They've been dragging us down ever since.
Don't get me wrong - the press is really hard on AOL. Yes, customers are leaving, but they still have the most customers and charge the highest price. They are still making tons of cash, they're just making less and less of it.
While I wish the company would split, I don't see how another ISP could buy out the largest ISP in the world. Wishful thinking.
Full disclosure: I don't read German, I didn't read the article, so maybe I'm missing something.
Re:Not surprising... (Score:3, Interesting)
Don't forget also that last week EMI and Time Warner were in talks to merge their music divisions
AOL/Time Warner demerger on the cards
Re:Not surprising... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Not surprising... (Score:2)
Re:Not surprising... (Score:2)
Re:Not surprising... (Score:3, Interesting)
I see AOL as the Apple of the space. If you wind back to the days of the original Mac Apple was making its money from being the easy to use personal computer and charging a premium for doing so. AOL is in pretty much exactly the same niche and with the same limitatations.
The Mac
Re:Not surprising... (Score:2)
I guess you are not an analretentive cretinous fuck which does his best to make sure his children never ever get any sexual education. That is the market AOL is fishing in Europe now - the tight parental control one. Providing the parents with the means to spy on their children net access and censor it.
And frankly there is plenty of people who buy it.Re:Not surprising... (Score:2)
My kid is 2.5, exactly what type of sex education do you think is appropriate for that age? Just curious...
Why would I subscribe to AOL just to stop him encountering that type of information?
I do use the parental control freature on my TV, I stop my parents from tuning in to Fox news. I see
Re:Not surprising... (Score:2)
Re:Not surprising... (Score:2)
Re:Not surprising... (Score:2)
I should have clarified - I'm an employee of Time Warner (specifically Turner Broadcasting). I personally wouldn't mind getting rid of AOL, but that is my opinion. Although it's not so obvious, th
D'OH!!! (Score:2)
I even managed to say something nice about AOL - which must be a first on slashdot!
But more to the point - Time Warner content is not going to save AOL. People don't want a premium service when they can get what they
Please release IM, let IM go... (Score:4, Insightful)
If this is more than an American Dream, let's hope that an outcome will be that AOL will loosen their grip on the IM market. The closed model they've been trying to enforce has been holding back a world of possibilities for Jabber and IM client development.
Re:Please release IM, let IM go... (Score:2)
Actually, by most recent estimates, there are more users on MSN than AIM these days. Perhaps it was Windows Messanger being integrated into XP.
Re:Please release IM, let IM go... (Score:2)
Re:Please release IM, let IM go... (Score:2)
Quick source. [cox.net]
Re:Please release IM, let IM go... (Score:3, Interesting)
oh, I don't know, maybe tens of millions of people paying $23.95/month for internet service, a large userbase with disposable cash to advertise to, and a nearly ubiquitous brand name?
Sure, AOL is starting to crumble and the TimeWarner merger turned out badly, but there is still a huge amount of possiblity for AOL. Given the right management and strategy.
Re:Not surprising... (Score:2, Funny)
So.. (Score:5, Funny)
Rus
Re:So.. (Score:1)
why not "GoT" ??
Re:So.. (Score:2, Funny)
Re:So.. (Score:2)
Re:So.. (Score:2)
That's good, but even better is the simpler and cleaner "Amerika Online". OK, how do you say "You've got mail" in German? Babelfish says "Sie haben Post", but it probably says a lot of stupid things in other languages. I for one know that every phrase that is machine-translated to German should start with "Achtung". Danke...
Uh Huh (Score:3, Funny)
I want to buy AOL, too. I just don't have the money for it...
Talisman
Re:Uh Huh (Score:2)
Re:Uh Huh (Score:2, Funny)
hacker haven just got larger (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:hacker haven just got larger (Score:3)
Both AOL's and T-Online's abuse departments aren't that bad. If you know some people who work there and inform them directly about abuse, they'll react quickly and correctly.
What's wrong on both ISPs is the way abuse notifications are being handled officially, that is, if you don't know any people there and inform them via official addresses. abuse@aol.net seems to be equivalent with /dev/null -
They're all alike (was: Re:hacker haven ...) (Score:5, Funny)
Honestly, when it comes to security or any other area that requires basic brain function I'd say the big ISPs are a all the same: Utterly useless.
It's countless times I've called the T-Online Hotline, asked if their mail server was down or the TDSL dialin node was down or some other informal question and every time I've gotten something like this:
Blockhead:"What's your error message?"
Me:"I don't think my error messages are of any use to you."
Blockhead:"What Mailer do you use?"
Me:"*SIGH* K-Mail."
Blockhead:"We only support Outlook or Netscape."
[Meanwhile down in Hell: Satan marks up another Eternity Candidate]
Me:"I know.(I'm not gonna explain to him that E-Mail is a Service while Outlook and Netscape are Mailers and what that all means) I actually just wanted to know if you Mailserver is down."
Blockhead: "What Windows do you use?"
Me: "I use Linux."
Blockhead: "Oh. Well, we don't support Linux." (NOTE THE SIGNIFICANCE: We're in Germany, so he's actually heard the word 'Linux' before)
[Back in Hell: Satan marks Mr. Blockhead up for extra special skinning, boiling and chainsaw subdividing treatment upon arrival.]
Me: "I know.(I'm certainly NOT gonna explain the difference between an Internet Service and an OS to him) I just wanted to know if you Mailserver is down... Could I speak to second level please?"
Blockhead: "Well, all I can say is that due to our troubletickets the Mailserver is up and running and second level won't tell you anything different."
Me: "Thank you very much".
*KLICK* *Duuuuu* (german dialtone)
I seriously doubt it is _any_ better with AOL right now.
Comment removed (Score:4, Funny)
Message from Steve (Score:2, Funny)
Speaking of sales people (Score:2)
I use to do support for a major competing DSL provider and we'd get all kinds of stories that sales told customers. Trust me when I say that sales will promise whatever you want to get the sale. Why? They get commission whether they lied to you or not, and if it's easier to make a sale by lying then they'll lie to customers all day long.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Speaking of sales people (Score:2)
If you're using anything not supported don't expect to call support and ask them anything, even if it is just a simple "is the network down?" question. Why? They could lose their jobs for helping you.
You'd be shocked the number of people I had to tell "sorry, we don't support 64megs" and en
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Speaking of sales people (Score:2)
just remember, the "I don't care about my job" mentally is taught to them. They come in as average IT folks and are taught to ignore and avoid helping customers, and if they do and caught they're fired, or at least reprimanded.
Here's a story about that: I once had a customer call complaining about pop-ups even then they weren't surfing and blamed it on our software and
Comment removed (Score:5, Interesting)
Re: (Score:2)
Why would anyone want to buy AOL? (Score:1)
Re:Why would anyone want to buy AOL? (Score:3, Insightful)
Well, first off, T-Online sure is making money and this whould be a way of buying a huge amount of customers. T-Online wants to grow and will have a hard time doing so by just attracting new customers, must people are online somewhere allready, so it's either convincing people to switch to T-Online wich will costs loads of marketing money and will require massive
Re:Why would anyone want to buy AOL? (Score:2)
AOL actually makes quite a bit of money. AOLs problem is that they do have a good growth projection meaning that they aren't a good investment as their business model and profits are stagnant. When the advertising market returns, and unfortunately it appears to be returning quickly - AOL will be in the money again.
Already denied... (Score:5, Informative)
According to Heise online [heise.de] this has already been denied by T-Online [heise.de] (sorry, German only).
Basically, what they are saying in that news article is that some spokesman from T-Online claims buying AOL would be "economical nonsense". But T-Online has about 4 billion Euro cash with which they'd like to buy some companies. And while T-Online is the biggest online provider of Europe it is largely unknown outside of Europe, thus buying AOL would make sense to some people because T-Online likes to expand and conquer markets outside of Europe.
Re:Already denied... (Score:3, Funny)
Those Germans really need a new business model.
Re:Already denied... (Score:2)
> But T-Online has about 4 billion Euro cash with which they'd like to buy some companies. I thought they had a debt of billions because of the UMTS licences?
No, that was the german Telecom or whatever name they're now using. T-Online is a child of the german Telecom and to some degree independent... at least on the paper ;-)
T-Online is an ISP, and most hackers I know avoid it like the devil avoids holy water. But the majority of normal Germans use T-Online. T-Online is to Germany what AOL once was
Pretty soon you'll be hearing... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Pretty soon you'll be hearing... (Score:2, Funny)
Ja, und wie sagt man "spam" auf Deutsch?
Re:Pretty soon you'll be hearing... (Score:2)
No. Mull is the white stuff you have in your first aid package to cover wounds sterilly. The actual word is Muell.
Re:Pretty soon you'll be hearing... (Score:2)
German AOL's Creation (Score:2, Interesting)
Incredible (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Incredible (Score:2)
Why the surprise? AOL served its purpose by getting hundreds of millions of people online and aware of the internet. It is a dead duck and many people have made tons of money.
Re:Incredible (Score:2)
AOL bought Time-Warner, not the other way around.
The Germans (Score:3, Interesting)
Consider - worlds largest post company - Deutsche Post. The airline that carries the most passengers - Lufthansa. The Germans own a good many of the biggest companies in the auto industry. And Deutsche Telecom (which I believe includes T-Online) is one of the world's largest telecomms.
I think people fail to realise how powerful the German business sector is. If Germany was the same size of the USA, I'm sure it would be the top dog at the moment, not the USA. And now that the European European Union is creating the biggest single global market, Germany should be able to increase it's economy even further as it is at the heart of Europe.
Re:The Germans (Score:2)
As my old advisor (in Germany) told me, he could not find anyone to work on his horse farm because almost all unemployed people he could find were paid more to sit at home on the couch than he could afford to pay at his part-time positions. The t
Deutschland uber alles! (Score:3, Funny)
Go get 'em, Werner! Raus! Raus! Mach Schnell!
Q: Why are French roads lined with trees?
A: So the German army can match in the shade!
Re:The Germans (Score:3, Informative)
The only reason that G
Offtopic:The Germans (Score:2)
As I hold Lufthansa stock I would be happy if it was as you say - but I seriously doubt LH carries the most passengers. Last time I checked the worlds largest airline company was United Airlines. I am happily proven wrong on the point, however.
Alex
Re:The Germans (Score:3, Funny)
Burns plays hardball, managing to repurchase the plant for only $50 million.
The Germans reluctantly agree...
Horst: [threatingly] We Germans aren't all smiles und sunshine.
Burns: [recoils in mock horror]
Oooh, the Germans are mad at me. I'm so scared! Oooh, the Germans!
[hiding behind Smithers] Uh oh, the Germans are going to get me!
Horst: Stop it!
Man 2: Stop, sir.
Burns: Don't let the Germans come after me.
Oh no,
Re:The Germans (Score:3, Interesting)
All I can say is this:
German business is a blatant economic force to be reckoned with, if you're an American business. Germans are hot on your heels in pretty much every sector, and then some...
It is only after actually living here for a while that I've come to sense a value in the characterization of Germans by Americans.
The West is a Wilde place sometimes
Re:The Germans (Score:2)
Re:The Germans (Score:4, Insightful)
One problem with these figures is the exchange rate between Euro and the US$. 18 months ago, when one Euro was 0.86 US$, your figures were "correct".
Nowadays one Euro is woth about 1.15 US$. Suddenly the GDP measured in US$ per capita jumped up nearly 30%. So did germany close the gap while being in recession? No!
Another problem about the GDP is that the US (AFAIK) gives it an uplift due to the quality increase. This isn't done in Europe.
Regards, Martin
P.S. Let's not play "my ecconomy is bigger than yours". For my part, there are a lot of things, i think the US is doing better. But there are a lot of things too, i consider worse.
Re:The Germans (Score:2)
Re:The Germans (Score:2)
Yes, but as it is with all benchmarks: everyone is cheating ;-).
Regards, Martin
Re:The Germans (Score:2)
No, it doesn't. Once you remove the few percent of top earners in the US from the calculations, the figures look very different. The US has much more peaks at the top end than Germany, which inflates simple per-capita income. Face it, Bill Gates' or Warren Buffett's income doesn't benefit you personally one bit--you neither travel more nor have more leisure time because of it. There are figures available that normalize the data in various ways.
T
Re:The Germans (Score:4, Insightful)
So Britain went for the quick fix short term gains by throwing pretty much their entire social net out the window in the image of their masters across the pond. The Germans OTOH in their typical stubbornness and reluctance to change cling on to their economic model from the '80s, leading to respective blips and dips in the growth charts. Still, they're aware that change is required. I'd say wait another ten years before gloating. The '90s are hardly a solid economic barometer, lots of wanky business went on there (ahem, AOL?!). Besides, sooner or later the outrageous British defence spending is going to come home to roost. I'd say in the not-too-distant future "Operation Freedom" will show up as a big fat dip in the British bottom line, and some politicians will get a fair spanking.
Re:The Germans (Score:2)
Hey, don't give out the impression that the Germans are somehow an especially deserving case.
Don't forget the French, Italians, Americans, Australians, Spanish, Irish.
Re:The Germans (Score:2, Funny)
Re:The Germans (Score:2)
Well, I guess familiarity breeds contempt.
> Their national hobby is to invade the French.
Hey, just because it happened three times in the last 150 years...
Re:The Germans (Score:2)
Don't forget, two out of that three times the French declared war on us =P
Re:The Germans (Score:2)
> Larger than FedEx or UPS, or do those not count?
It appears so, except for the US market. Can't find any figures right now (naturally, when you're looking for them), but I've read various articles similar to this [businessweek.com] that refer to Deutsche Post having the largest marketshare worldwide. In the US you see them as DHL, which is pretty low profile, but standing to gain some ground after the Airborne purchase.
Re:The Germans (Score:2)
I like your first question. Daimler-Chrysler is a great German/American example I think of why mergers do not work, and larger companies are not that great. An inability to focus, and management by ego. Look at three of the most successful auto companies in the world right now, BMW, Honda, and Toyota. Each has gone their own way, refusing to lose focus by consuming or being consumed by other manufacturers. Two of the three seem to be constantly derided, well at least as of a few years ago, as being too
Funniest "fish" error ever (Score:3, Insightful)
Running AOL's profit/loss statements and investor reports through The Fish are about the only thing that could explain someone actually -wanting- AOL right now...
About the only thing I've ever found The Fish useful for was once confusing the crap out of a friend visiting Italy by making her think I 'spoke' formal Italian. That was good for a few days before another friend spoiled it and told her...
Hello? (Score:2)
While T-Online is profitable, Deutsche Telekom is not... I wonder (a) if T-Online has enough cash to buy AOL and (b) if European Authorities won't try to block this operation, given the size of the two companies...
Of course, if there are German Slashdot readers who have better info, I am ready to stand corrected!
Re:Hello? (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm not sure the European authorities would block the deal as T-online so far is almost completely restricted to activity in Germany while AOL has very few customers there, so a merger would not change the diversity in any market significantly... but it's still a big ris
Re:Hello? (Score:3, Insightful)
Right.
While T-Online is profitable, Deutsche Telekom is not...
Wrong. Deutsche Telekom [which has the 4 divisions T-Online (Internet), T-Mobile (cell phone service), T-Com (fixed line service, basically the German fixed line network), and T-Systems (something like extended IT services)] is quite profitable right now. They still have huge amount of depths though from the times they purchased expensive 3G UMTS licenses and bought Voicestream
T-Mobile already linked with AOL (Score:2)
We just signed up for a T-Mobile phone for our daughter -- would you believe they've taken all the pay phones out of the school gym? She's going to be going to Europe on a school trip, and T-Mobile's phones are the only ones compatible with the European standard. Why waste money on phone
english translation (Score:5, Informative)
"American Dream"
T-online has lots of money and high ambitions, one option is the take-over of AOL
For years it was a duel that electrified the internet public. Deutsche Telekom with T-online vs. the conqueror from the US: AOL.
The opponents used all means to fight for markets in europe, including law-suits, dumping prices and advertising campaigns. A Particular twist was added when the (german) media company Bertelsman headed by Thomas Middelhoff, worked together with the Americans.
Today, all has changed. Since Spring 2000 Bertelsmann is not involved with AOL anymore and Middelhoff is a partner with Investcorp in London.
He searches for investment opportunities in the entire world and has particularly good contacts to the US, where he is on the board of the NYT. From the deals of the 90s he still knows many people at Time Warner, who euphorically bought AOL 4 years ago but is now unhappy with the online-business.
Time Warner already dropped AOL from the name and are apparently thinking of seeling large parts of the company. The most likely candidate is according to sources of the SZ the T-online AG who has been striving for international expansion for a while, but not achieved its aims in this area.
One idea is for the germans to hold 80% of AOL shares while 30% stay with Time Warner, a cooperation that would change the media-landscape. It would happen due to the deal-making of Middelhoff.
It is the old Bertelsmann Boss and now Investment banker who has aided the talks between T-online and Time-Warner. Information from T-online sources suggest that a meeting between TW boss Richard PArsons and T-online Boss Thomas Holtrop has already occured.
The suggested price-tag is ~1 Bn Dollars. That's a long way away from the former astronomical valuations of the company once promoted by Middelhoff friend Steve Case.
At it's maximum AOL bought Time Warner for 112 Bn Dollar. Recently AOL lost customers, currently there are about 25 Million.
It woudl be easy for Holtorp and Col to pay for the deal. T-online still has 4 Bn Euros. This capital needs a targe so that publicly traded T-online corp can achieve its ambitious growth targets.
Middelhoff was not available for comment. A t-online spokes-person didn't want to commen on the rumours: "Every quarter we're asked "What are you doing with your money?"
Fundamentally there are two major parts of strategy. One is inorganic growth, by purchases and by waiting on consolidation of the market,.
A deal with AOL would have the particular advantage that T-online would get a foot-hold in the american market. Co-operations with sister-firm T-mobile are important as the companies work together on "T-Zones" where T-online supplise contents, which could be important for the US investments of T-mobile.
The Project AOL is top secret. A final decision has not been made. There are risks, in particular in terms of regulators. In Germany AOL never made major inroads. It is likely that after a merger AOL germany would disappear.
On Tuesday T-online has declared a quarterly profit for the first time. T-online now has 12.9 Mn customers, 9% more than last year. 4/5 of these live in Germany, so it's time for a jump. Yes, t-online is on the look-out says Holtrop, and it would not be years until he has something to announce...
Re:english translation (Score:2)
Nein noch nicht (Score:2)
As if Bush and Wolfowitz wouldn't declare war on Germany... pfft ;)
Would be neat though to see that annoying little yellow man get replaced with a volks... Wait those beetles are just as annoying. Mercedes? Ok so we could turn the little man into a gangster with a gold chain emblem around his neck and have the rappers chip in on this...
Commercial with Master P scene one
ehhhhhhhhhh
Nope wouldn't cut it... Snoop?
foshizzlemahnizzleyougotsmailbizzle
Hrmm nah... JayZ?
A to the izzO...
Damnit all we have lef
NNNNooooooooo Not *that* jingle! (Score:4, Funny)
God I hate that jingle.
Simon
Re:NNNNooooooooo Not *that* jingle! (Score:2)
Not a big effect (Score:3, Insightful)
Disclosure: I work for a telecom company with a pretty successful ISP and wireless unit that obviously competes with both T-Mobile and AOL. This is my personal opinion, though, and I don't represent it as being that of my employer.
These two fit together well, if for no other reason than that they're both pretty bad about responding to security complaints. T-Online is notorious as a simultaneous source of scanning/exploit activity and a sink for abuse reports. AOL doesn't fare much better. Also, they'll probably end up keeping the brand name AOL since most of their customers could be easily confused by that sort of switch (most still don't know that Voicestream got bought by T-Mobile). So the sum effect of this would be that another company gets owned by Deutsche Telekom. Works for me: when I tell friends who really owns T-Mobile, more than one has decided they'd like to go with a domestic provider, even if it's not my employer.
My real question is, will Catherine Zeta Jones be in the new commercials? :)
Re:Not a big effect (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Not a big effect (Score:2)
Yes they do. A huge ISP and a huge wireless provider. I can already access AIM from my t-mobile phone. The possibilities here are endless, think of all the teeny-boppers with AOL accounts and t-mobile phones.
T-Online is notorious as a simultaneous source of scanning/exploit activity and a sink for abuse reports. AOL doesn't fare much better.
on the scanning part: yeah, and who's not?
on the sink for abuse part: yeah, and who's not?
Seriously, I have the email address of no
Re:Not a big effect (Score:2)
The Register got the story (short).... (Score:4, Informative)
Obligatory Simpsons Quote (Score:3, Funny)
GERMANS:
D.Telekom CEO denies T-Online in talks on AOL (Score:5, Informative)
Oh, this should be good.... (Score:3, Interesting)
In contrast, though I may think AOL is nothing more than training wheels for the real Internet, I see maybe one or two spams a year from them, and the moron responsible quickly disappears once a report is made to AOL abuse.
Given these two obviously contrasting views, I think a buyout is going to be most interesting to watch. I wonder if Steve Case has taught himself German yet?
Re:Oh, this should be good.... (Score:2)
Blame babblefish (Score:4, Funny)
A lot of customers (Score:2)
"With over 11,849 million customers..."
Maybe they *do* have the cash to buy AOL...
(yes, I know that's 18.849 million US)
Write to your congress critter to stop this! (Score:4, Funny)
Tell him or her that you don't want to see any further loss of American jobs in important sectors of the economy -- like producing endlessly wasteful sign-up CD-ROMs, policing the speech of adults as if they were children, and shoveling load after load of unwanted ads down the throat of miserable subscribers!
(P.S. Dear Germans: would you mind buying Microsoft, too?)
Re:Write to your congress critter to stop this! (Score:2)
AOL, from loss to loss (Score:3, Informative)
Now they're in decline. Why would anyone want to acquire them, except as a distressed company? Their "content"? Yeah, right.
Re:AOL, from loss to loss (Score:2)
Doesn't matter who buys it... (Score:2)
Re:T-Online related to T-Mobile? (Score:2, Informative)
Yepp. Both companies are part of Deutsche Telekom. (T-Mobile 100%, T-Online 75%).
See the Deutsche Telekom site [telekom3.de]for more info.
Re:do everyone a favor (Score:2)
AOL is good for getting your parents/grandparents online, and no one is forcing you to use it, so I don't see any reason to bash them.