The EU being unresponsive to the desires of its populations is exactly why the UK left.
Not on this earth. The UK left because of diffuse and non-concrete fears that large waves of refugees might enter the country, coupled with latent racism against Polish immigrants.
... Not to mention 30 years of vicious, ultra-conservative propaganda against the EU. Just like Fox News in the USA is polluting the political discourse with crappy propaganda, the British tabloids have been spewing nonsense about the EU.
And the fact that both are owned by Rupert Murdoch should tell you a lot...
I think you are naïve. Some people will want to punish the UK, some may not.
But it ultimately comes down to this: the British people chose to leave. Fair enough.
It is now in the interest of the entire EU to negotiate as hard as they can with the UK and get the best deal out of Brexit FOR THE EU. And NOT for the UK.
Here is a very simple example: why should "we" (I am a European) accept a country where banks and financial institutions run amok and without any supervision? Where these same banks can launder money, trade in Euros, turn a blind eye when oligarchs drop millions of pounds and dollars in discreet numbered accounts?
What makes you think that the EU is going to respect these banks and allow them to trade freely with the rest of Europe?
Can you hear that sound? It's the sound of a hundred thousand British bankers crapping their pants at the same time. A true distrubance in the force...
Let me be the first to point out that:
Q1: the UK have had a place at the negociating table for years. If British people don't like the EU decisions, they only have themselves to blame, because they did not negotiate properly. Period.
(As an aside, I am fscking tired of freaking politicians, British or French or otherwise, who complain about EU decisions: DO YOUR JOB YOU MORONS! And negotiate in the best interest of your countries!!)
Q2: See Q1. Immigration is a subject like any other and should be negotiated within the EU itself.
I don't follow European news, but I doubt that very much. The UK is ~14% of the total GDP of the EU (second largest in the EU): it dropping out without replacing the existing trade deals would be a massive economic blow to the EU. The EU may want to punish the UK for leaving, but I doubt they'd do it at the risk of collapsing the EU economy.
Ah, yes, but anywhere from 40% to 50% of all UK exports (I believe the exact figure is around 43%) are sent to the EU.
A 14% drop in GDP is painful.
A 40+% drop? Ouch. Kiss bye bye to your economy, baby, it's going down the drain.
Oh, and most of the EU is getting pissed, and itching for a fight. Even The Guardian pointed that out. The negociations are not going to be pretty, that's for sure.
Oh come on, Linus and Theo are both very well known for trolling other people relentlessly... That's part of the fun of these two characters...
Until you find yourself their target, that is.
Walnut Creek! Ha, you mixed up FreeBSD and OpenBSD (not to mention it has been closed for years, as far as I know).
Since this is the last CD release, yes, I think it's worth ordering it. It's going on a special shelf with all the other CDs I have collected over the years...
OpenBSD? Good Heavens! It's still around?
What have you used it for lately?
Let's see: simple web server, firewall, laptop, firewall, router, secure storage, firewall, another laptop, home computer, router, firewall, security console, monitoring and I think I forgot a couple...
OpenBSD is rock solid and a pleasure to use. Try it, you may like it.
- Custom officer : Do you have a github account?
- Me: Sure, it's x x x
- Custom officer (takes one look at the github page, does a double-take): right this way sir.
yadda yadda yadda.
And if you really don't like Linux, there is always the BSD. Nope, no systemd there, no sirree.
So anyway... yeah, you have no idea what you are talking about.
After years of insults and demeaning comment,s Microsoft suddenly realizes:
1. That Linux (and open source) has won (see AWS, any successful start-up in the past 5 years).
2. That lean command-line tools are probably a lot more efficient to manage servers than a GUI (see also: OpenSSH, coming soon to a Windows server near you... finally).
Now, let me say this: Dear Microsoft, I already know bash and ksh. I have no need for a bloated, incoherent new shell on my machines.
I know you mean well, thanks, but no thanks. As far as I am concerned, I will never, ever, use your OS ever again.
Now, let's go back to the subject (err... flame war) at hand: systemd. What the fsck?
I went for Mac OS X, but I also use Slackware and OpenBSD.
Now, the "main computer" is also tricky since my laptop is a Macbook Air, but the home server, on which I also spend a large amount of time through OpenSSH, is running Slackware.
MacBook Pro with one additonal 19" screen. Firefox + MacVim, except when I use PyCharm (with the vim plugin).
Most of my work is spent in iTerm2 and tmux anyway, since I have anywhere from 2 to 20+ SSH sessions opened. Also: pkgsrc.
MacBook Air 11", no additional screen. Otherwise, pretty much identical. Lots and lots and lots of USB3 external HDD.
One of the very first Linux distribution is still alive and kicking (without systemd!).
Great work Patrick & crew, I'll make sure I'll order a DVD soon!
"Intelligence without character is a dangerous thing." -- G. Steinem