data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/92ec3/92ec3a8bb51cd25da9a36d7360c786d62625a43b" alt="The Internet The Internet"
Google Adds Location Targeted Searching 326
miradu writes "Many Slashdot users may remember that the winner of last year's Google programming contest's entry was a location specific search. Now, Google has made a version of Daniel's idea available to use on Google Labs. Google Search By Location lets you search for things near some zipcode, or city/state. It then gives you a map with each search result pinned on it. V"
Useful service (Score:5, Interesting)
On the other side of things, Google stands to make a killing here. Google can sell a new class of ads to people like plumbers, who don't need a webpage. In fact, they could possibly host a minimal web page for those kind of advertisers who just want to show some simple text and services.
Hey, perhaps Google wants to give me some kind of idea fee???
Re:Useful service (Score:2)
Re:Useful service (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Useful service (Score:5, Funny)
Don't feel bad. I live in Northern Virginia, where about two-thirds of all roads are named "Glebe". There's North, South, East, and West Glebe Road. North Glebe runs roughly north, while South Glebe runs east-west. West Glebe goes south, and is south of South Glebe. All of them have different route numbers, and the route numbers change.
Re:Useful service (Score:3, Informative)
I believe I hit it on the 4th try.
Re:Useful service (Score:5, Funny)
Wait, I have a better idea: why not put together a collection of local info (maybe print it also) and call that, say, Yellow Pages?
In other words, I call "prior art".
Re:Useful service (Score:5, Insightful)
So? I didn't see anyone mentioning that Google was going to try to patent the idea. They're not Amazon.com.
Re:Useful service (Score:2)
Because they might have to rename it to NIS [wikipedia.org]?
Re:Useful service (Score:2)
Yellow Pages don't allow flexible queries, like, potentially, "show me all liquor stores along my route to/from work." If google pushes this far enough, this could be very widely useful for things we struggle to imagine, right now.
Already done... (Score:2, Interesting)
It is an online yellow pages. Each listed company has a small 'web-page' that provides a link to the actual external web-page, if available, as well as a mapquest map, address and main contact phone number.
I use that site ALL the time looking up potential service vendors for the company I work for.
Re:Already done... (Score:2)
Great, but... (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Great, but... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Great, but... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Great, but... (Score:2)
Re:Great, but... (Score:5, Funny)
So you're searching for SARS victims?
Re:Great, but... (Score:2, Funny)
I tried "single geek" and found 4 billion results. Yippee me!
Re:Great, but... (the three Ls) (Score:5, Funny)
You should probably change the location to something other than "my parent's basement".
I know, i allways complane (Score:2, Insightful)
more then just the US?
With all the talk about Google being
'The' serch engine, id love to see
something like this applyed on a
world wide base.
mind you not knowing how it works
it may require ppl to put decent
contact info on there pages,
ie country name.
Re:I know, i allways complane (Score:2, Informative)
Re:I know, i allways complane (Score:2)
Unfortunately.. I'd love to see it world wide as well.
Re:I know, i allways complane (Score:2)
Google is US-centric!
Ok serious: This is a beta thing, and second they probably want to roll it out in a area where its easier to sell ads based on location.
Re:I know, i allways complane (Score:2)
No! [scott.aq]
Aah, finally found a place to post that web server based in antarctica. What a relief!
Re:I know, i allways complane (Score:2)
Re:I know, i allways complane (Score:2)
Still needs work: (Score:4, Funny)
It's a great idea but the heuristics need work:
"Your search for money grubbing scumbags near Lindon, UT did not match any documents within 15 miles."
Re:Still needs work: (Score:5, Funny)
"Your search for money grubbing scumbags near Lindon, UT did not match any documents within 15 miles."
That's because your spelling is wrong: it's
money grubbing SCOumbags
Easy to fix (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Easy to fix (Score:2)
Don't feel bad... (Score:2)
"Your search for intelligent executive branch leadership near Washington, DC did not match any documents within 15 miles."
OMG! Google got slashdoted! (Score:5, Funny)
The server encountered a temporary error and could not complete your request.
Please try again in a minute or so.
Does anyone have a link to the google cache of this page?
er.... nevermind...
Re:OMG! Google got slashdoted! (Score:5, Funny)
From the Google Search By Location FAQ [google.com]
Re:OMG! Google got slashdoted! (Score:5, Funny)
Is it better to slashdot google or google slashdot?
Re:OMG! Google got slashdoted! (Score:2)
The server encountered an error and could not complete your request.
If the problem persists, please mail google@google.com and mention this error message and the query that caused it.
Apparently they dont want to hook me up with any prostitutes in my area. Cock blockers.
What? (Score:2, Insightful)
Uh Oh (Score:3, Funny)
Oh, it's location by imbedded street addresses (Score:2, Interesting)
What you thought. (Score:2)
Re:Oh, it's location by imbedded street addresses (Score:2)
And I don't think its mere coincidence that Google is launching this at the same time Yahoo is launching [yahoo.com] a competitor [yahoo.com] to Google's Froogle [froogle.com] service.
Wouldn't lat/long be more elegant? (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Wouldn't lat/long be more elegant? (Score:3, Insightful)
I'm not going to hold my breath on that one. Give it a hundred years or so.
Re:Wouldn't lat/long be more elegant? (Score:3, Insightful)
using a city name in your website/URL name? (Score:2, Interesting)
Google's evolution (Score:4, Funny)
or, using google-patriot act search, type in a person's name, and you get all the secret cameras in their home, their entire geneology, pictures from their past, and other weird things that only the conspiracy theorists know...
Or, even better, using google for moms, a google that scans the computer for cookies to find out what site her kid has been visiting via a cookie scan or something.
I dunno, but eventually it's going to seem like an invasion of privacy with these search engines, but then again, once you put something online without any protection, it *is* public domain.
Yeah, let's try that (Score:2, Interesting)
Alright, let's try that.
First, a quick search of most active username on kazaa.
Ah, there we have it. Now, let's find some info on this bastard.
-- --
Google 'Search by location' search term: kazaaliteuser@kazaa.com
Google 'Search by location' region: USA
Google found 2.304.942 search results:
Alabama
A. Allan
1425 21st Street
Yahoo Yellow Pages (Score:5, Interesting)
Dan East
Re:Yahoo Yellow Pages (Score:5, Informative)
~Berj
Yahoo Yellow Pages - Not the same thing (Score:4, Informative)
Um, quite a bit of difference, theoretically. How about searching for parks, lakes, fire hydrants, mailboxes, phone booths, one-way streets, registered sex offenders, gullible people, etc.
Re:Yahoo Yellow Pages (Score:3, Informative)
Unfortunately, I was about to try some searches to see what other usefull things it could do other than yellow pages searches, when the site came to grinding halt. Sure enough, the story had just made the front page for non subscribers
For yellow page type
A search for... (Score:5, Funny)
Overloaded... (Score:2)
I wonder if it's because the feature needs performance tuning, or if it simply hasn't been deployed to handle a Slashdotting's worth of load yet.
Either way, I'm sure it'll be a learning experience for the project team.
Given Google's amazing general search capability, though, I won't be prepared to call this new Location feature a comparable success until I can search for "winning lottery ticket" near my zip code and get driving directions...
Xentax
How about Google takes over Real Estate. (Score:5, Interesting)
I tried the search and it failed on my quite a few times, but the potential is huge. The first thing that came to my mind was real estate.
I've gone out looking for land with realtors that can't even find the lots they're supposed to be showing, and look how much they take in transaction fees for their "service." It' not like they do the Escrow themselves. I suppose it's a bit different for houses, but for land sales they act like they're doing you a favor.
Not only that, but I've gone in with aerial photos and maps from the County that all come off of county maintained computer databases and the realtors inevitably insist their little hand drawn map that doesn't even accurately map the parcels is the more accurate solution.
This could be the beginning of something huge for Google.
labs.google.com IS NOT google.com (Score:5, Informative)
Scott
Re:labs.google.com IS NOT google.com (Score:2)
Somebody hasn't looked outside in the last 15 minutes.
Re:labs.google.com IS NOT google.com (Score:3, Informative)
Of course, you're right, that doesn't mean it's scaled. It's likely on ten machines, not a few thousand.
Already got it. (Score:5, Informative)
Multimap's main use is simple as an online map, and it's used heavily here in the UK, but they do show pin-marks on the location of any services they know about.
They only show links to certain categories of service (hotels, and the like), but limited though it is, the search by location service has been available for some time.
Re:Already got it. (Score:2)
Re:Already got it. (Score:2)
The novel part is that it gleans all of its information from web pages. Not from listing services with well formatted address fields.
Needs some work (Score:2)
Bizarre.
What if's (Score:5, Insightful)
I wonder how they will be enforcing the zip code registration. The main drive behind google and the page rank thing was to take search engine optimization off the page and out of the hands of the web master so as to avoid keyword stuffing and not-quite-honest optimization techniques.
But it seems sort of hard to determine the "location" of a website without input from the people behind the site. There are possibilities for abuse.
But maybe there's no incentive to be listed in the wrong zip code... well, maybe there is.
If you do a lot of business on the web or by mail, and your physical location doesn't matter, you might post 100 versions of your site, each with the zip code of a large metropolitan area. But then how many people would do that?
Ah hell, I don't know. I'm rambling...
Re:What if's (Score:2)
Far too many. It's already rampant on job sites where you can search by location. Those annoying link-portal sites will also offer "localized exposure" services or some other buzzphrase.
This still needs work. (Score:3, Insightful)
When searching for 'food' with my office location I received the following results;
-Food allergy and intolerances, fact sheet
-Oriental grocery stores list for my area
-Sources of free or low cost
-Food science publications & journals
-Thoughts on Food Safety
-History of Hannakuh foods
-Oriental grocery stores list (again)
-foodandwine.com's best new chefs list
Admittedly, 'food' is a pretty lame search, but I would've hoped to see a couple restaurants and grocery stores in the list.
Amazing... (Score:2)
A San Diego Version (Score:2, Informative)
I got the latitude and longitude data from the Census for zip codes and created a HUGE reference tables for the distances between zip codes. Lots of math in the search code.
It's not new (Score:2, Informative)
Wonderful, great! (Score:2)
The day they figure out a way to stop the keyword spammers will be a very, very good day for the Internet as a whole. Location targetted searching... er.. yawn.. any business out there that wants us to visit already has their city on their website anyways.
Maybe not such a good thing? (Score:5, Interesting)
"Google currently does not allow outsiders to gain access to raw data because of privacy concerns. Searches are logged by time of day, originating I.P. address (information that can be used to link searches to a specific computer), and the sites on which the user clicked. People tell things to search engines that they would never talk about publicly -- Viagra, pregnancy scares, fraud, face lifts. What is interesting in the aggregate can seem an invasion of privacy if narrowed to an individual."
Please note, this isn't a troll, and I'm not wearing a tin-foil hat (maybe I should?). Imagine the following scenario: a bomb goes off in the US. By tracing searches for "anarchist cookbook" to zipcodes within the area of the bomb blast, the FBI could have access to information that makes TIA look like a better alternative.
Maybe this isn't such a good feature after all...
Re:Maybe not such a good thing? (Score:5, Insightful)
But all this info IP address, variable values, and sites on which the user clicked....
isn't that all just from most standard web server log?
Technically doesn't
Re:Maybe not such a good thing? (Score:2)
Don't blame them, after all they can earn huge amounts of money on this, but that does not mean that we should not be worried.
I think thi
Re:Maybe not such a good thing? (Score:2)
I already said this for the post below yours, but it bears repeating.
Yes, web sites keep logs of a lot of this stuff. I guess it's even possible that slashdot could store a bunch of info about logged in users with regards to links that they've clicked on, etc.
However, we are talking about Google here. For most people, Google is the starting point for any web traversing they'll do that doesn't involve bookmarked-sites.
I'll try to provide a decent
Re:Maybe not such a good thing? (Score:2, Interesting)
How is this done? The result links don't point to redirections...
Re:Maybe not such a good thing? (Score:4, Interesting)
That is, people are upset that they can't manipulate listings on Google for money. (Hint: Buy a fucking ad.) Forgive me if that makes me want to ignore Google-Watch.
Google's privacy policy is well defined. If you've got a problem with it, holler. Your scenario would pretty clearly violate their policy. If you've got some other way that they should do their business without losing features, holler.
Till then, quit hinting.
Re:Maybe not such a good thing? (Score:2)
If it's just web logs, then while do they need that cookie on your computer with the unique ID and an expiry set to 2038?
I can understand tracking search terms, but not when those searches are correlated to a unique cookie ID. What value is it to google be able to answer the question "what searches did the computer with cookie ID XYZ perform?" I don't think you'll find an answer to that question that doesn't make you want to buy reams of tin foil.
Re:Maybe not such a good thing? (Score:2)
If you're worried, disable cookies for google. It will work just fine.
unstoppable force (Score:2, Redundant)
nope... (Score:5, Funny)
ph
Re:nope... (Score:2)
Congratulations, you've slashdotted Google! (Score:2, Funny)
After a lot of trying, you've finally slashdotted Google! lol
I keep getting server errors when I try searching for things like donuts or my own webpage. Either that, or it thinks Irving,TX is a black hole. Hmm, don't answer that.
RB
Did Daniel Get any $$ for this? (Score:2, Interesting)
No useful service.... (Score:3, Funny)
Regards, Martin
Pigeonrank II(?) (Score:2)
These are the jokes, folks, these are the jokes...
The Future for this Search (Score:2)
All roads lead to Gates
MapQuest MapBlast (Score:2)
For a second I thought of MapBlast!
Which is now owned by the evil empire (MSFT).
Its getting harder and harder to avoid their
tentacles these days.
Bush can use this (Score:2)
Search Term: Osama
Location: Afghanistan
Then its a simple matter of tying the "I'm Feeling Lucky" button to a GPS controlled cruise missile.
Watch the neighborhood (Score:2, Interesting)
Could it work another way? (Score:2)
How does Google search by location work? Google search by location takes a new approach to helping users find geographic information on the web. For this experiment, we've done something new by analyzing the entire content of a page to extract hints or, what we call "signals," about the geographic nature of a page. From this information, Google determines the corresponding physical location and returns results that match the geographic range you specify (e.g., "nea
Still Some Bugs? (Score:3, Informative)
Searching for Microsoft and Redmond [google.com] in the search and location fields yields nothing.
From Google's regular search engine I get these results [google.com].
I think they still have some work cut out for them. Granted, it's a great feature, but nothing earth-shattering, since the concept of "yellow pages" has been online for a very long time.
Some notable YP type engines that I might suggest:
- Yahoo Yellow Pages [yahoo.com]
- InfoSpace [infospace.com]
- Bigfoot [bigfoot.com]
Wrong (Score:2)
Babes | Chicks | Hot Teens | Nude | Sexy
Re:Most popular /. search so far (Score:2, Funny)
Re:Most popular /. search so far (Score:2)
1. Donuts on eBay
Find donuts at low prices. With over 5 million items for sale every day, you'll find all kinds of unique things on eBay - the World's Online Marketplace.
www.ebay.com
Re:I'm more worried.. (Score:5, Insightful)
Google self-censors already, anyway -- by altering their PageLink algorithm when certain dishonest sites try rigging Google's system for better page results. This sort of self-censorship is a Good Thing.
If you want a completely "open" search engine, you're probably going to keep looking. Other engines are increasingly giving into advertising boosting search results, and probably nobody has the breadth and depth of Google's database. You might not like the fact that they have to comply with the law in order to keep returning results at all, but believe me, they don't like it either, and they do all they can to remain honest.
Re:I'm more worried.. (Score:2)
Anybody will remove links to sites after a legitimate DMCA request. Either that or they go out of business. It's not up to Google.
Last I checked (Score:2)
Kjella
Re:I'm more worried.. (Score:2)
Go watch Chinatown.
It isn't really Google's fault. Find a way to guaruntee the lawyers won't give them a "nose job" and I'm sure all those sites would reappear.
Note that even though they took down the Kazaa Lite search listing they still found a subversive way to pass the url along.
KFG
Subversive? Hardly... (Score:2)
Note that even though they took down the Kazaa Lite search listing they still found a subversive way to pass the url along.
I wouldn't call it subversive - just enter "Kazaa Lite" into Google's search box, and hit the button. KazaaLite's main site comes up as the first hit! :-)
Re:I'm more worried.. (Score:2)
My main concern is that the 3 examples given were shoddy "censorship". What about other censorships done by Google that we havent been informed.
The thougt I'm trying to convey is that "everybody" uses google. Because they control what sites 'exist', they can make sites disappear. It's sort of like controlling somebodys language. If they dont know the word to convey something, how can they describe it? That's what Orwell was worried about.
After I describe it
Re:Looking for telecommuters? (Score:4, Informative)
Don't mod this guy up.
He is stealing someone else's post
Original post [slashdot.org] Damn plagerist.Re:Looking for telecommuters? (Score:2)
Marking something like that as redundant/off-topic will most likely be over ruled in M2.
Re:Me (Score:2)
It may be news-worthy -- for the US. It is not interesting to 90% of humankind until there are plans to expand it out of the US.
Perhaps time to start an "International edition" of /.?
Re:WMD? (Score:2)
(yeah this is old, but still funny)