Allowing people to be whatever they want is a a LOT different than forcing your beliefs on people.
You mean forcing people to tolerate things that they don't believe are right but you do isn't forcing your beliefs on them?
Forcing to tolerate? What the fuck does that even mean? Not letting you beat people up you don't like? If you don't like something go away.
including his former employer, a Minnesota-based PoS repair shop.
After all, it was a "Piece-of-Shit" repair shop.
Now try it with Windows, I dare you.
LOL. I wouldn't.
a legal case can EASILY be made
Ha! Is that your standard for winning arguments? Not much, not much...
It's not always about winning an argument, it's about understanding others' POVs. You should try it some time.
The PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES is advocating for FIRING people for exercising their first amendment rights.
The President does not lose his First Amendment rights, when he becomes President.
That is government suppression of free speech.
Nope. As long as he is not doing anything about it in his official capacity, it is not.
That may by YOUR opinion, but a legal case can EASILY be made that he is using his OFFICE to suppress speech.
Is just being female or non-white enough to trigger people now?
Yes.
Despite all appearances, your boss is a thinking, feeling, human being.