Tiny RC Tanks That Fight 254
Daniel Rutter writes "I've just reviewed a couple of Konami's Combat DigiQs - tiny little remote controlled tanks that can shoot each other. You can stage a two-, three- or four-tank battle, every tank for himself or in teams of two, on a coffee table. They rock."
Cool! (Score:4, Informative)
Oh well. I guess I'll go back to playing with Lego and my good 'ol Speak-n-Spell.
Re:Cool! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:Cool! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Cool! (Score:2)
Re:Cool! (Score:3, Funny)
And don't come back in till the cops confiscate all your PVC pipe.
Re:Cool! (Score:2)
- it's black
- when it fails it doesn't shatter, it cracks
- it is a (very little) bit lighter
- it's just as strong
P.S. - I learned about the second benefit of ABS over PVC the hard way - when I was 15. SO GET OUT AND START LEARNING ABOUT MATERIAL SCIENCES
Re:Cool! (Score:2)
Re:Cool! (Score:2)
Re:Cool! (Score:3, Funny)
Son, I dunno about you, but when I'm in that situation, I'm too, um, engaged to worry about the look on her face.
And I don't call mine a pea shooter, either.
Re:Cool! (Score:2)
Re:Cool! (Score:2)
Re:Cool! (Score:2)
Just like the the "60's" didn't start until half way through the decade, and the 70's didn't start until 73 or so, the 80's didn't either. (Culturally)
Aw, screw kids! (Score:5, Insightful)
I've solved this problem by continuing to buy toys for myself - and now I've got money!
Fact is that as a kid I don't think I would have appreciated the coolness of this. A friend of mine had one of those helicopters that flew in circles, and model rocketry stuff, and I liked it but I thought it was all part of being a kid.
Now I own a Vectron Flying Saucer [techtv.com] and a bunch of other cool stuff, and I still play with at much as if I were a kid. But now I realized how awesome it is scientifically, and the fact that things weren't always this cool.
Somehow wanting something for thiry years makes it that much sweeter. Makes me look forward to being eighty.
-------
Re:Cool! (Score:3, Insightful)
Okay, I know, there are legions of spoiled kids whose parents can't stop buying expensive gifts for them.
And now for English (Score:4, Informative)
Re:And now for English (Score:5, Informative)
without the space in the title [konami.co.jp]
Re:And now for English (Score:5, Funny)
God Bless Engrish! [engrish.com]
Re:And now for English (Score:2)
Demo anata ha watashi ga nihonjin ka amerikajin ka. Anata ha aho...
Re:And now for English (Score:2, Funny)
laser tag (Score:4, Informative)
http://www.thinkgeek.com/cubegoodies/toys/5776
It's laser tag though. Office Fun!
Re:laser tag (Score:5, Informative)
I think these look better than the thinkgeek ones. (Score:2)
From reading the manual, I think the ones linked can change channels, TG's site warns you to get different channel models for multiplayer, which makes me think it can't be changed, which sucks.
These are farily sophisticated, with changing behavior according to damage taken, and a couple of modes to ignore "friendly fire".
I don't know how the price compares, the TG ones are $60 each, I think that's in the ballpark.
The question I have is: are the beams compatible
Re:laser tag (Score:2)
I play with a small RC car that has a camera attached to it quite often, and its fun as hell to see the world, or my apartment, from that point of view (ever wonder what a cockroach sees?). Playing laser tag like that would rock even more than from overhead.
Re:laser tag (Score:2)
WmD (Score:5, Funny)
Re:WmD (Score:5, Funny)
Re:WmD (Score:2)
Cool, that works with both pronounciations.
These kind of "office toys" play havoc with one's productivity in the office. I have bought a couple of toys (namely a Mini MP5 Gun [iwantoneofthose.com] and a Rubber Band Gun [iwantoneofthose.com], and both caused much merriment, and less work. I know I could kiss work goodbye if I had one of these babies!
Re:WmD (Score:2)
This is stolen off another site.. (Score:3, Informative)
Re:This is stolen off another site.. (Score:3, Funny)
Re:This is stolen off another site.. (Score:3, Interesting)
robi
Jesusgeeks... (Score:2)
The kids will love it (Score:5, Funny)
Re:The kids will love it (Score:4, Funny)
If the tanks were a little bigger, they could pretend that the minesweeper guy is Geraldo, and drive him out of the country - finally give that minesweeper a purpose in life (other than to be melted by magnifying glasses)
Re:The kids will love it (Score:2, Funny)
Don't forget to throw rocks from hundreds of miles away!
Re:The kids will love it (Score:2)
Re:The kids will love it (Score:5, Insightful)
If they bring it to show their friends at class, they'll probably be suspended for bringing [libertysearch.com] a weapon [worldnetdaily.com] to school [lp.org].
Sorry to rain on the funniest damn comment I've read in months... but that's the sad fact of "zero tolerance".
-S
Re:The kids will love it (Score:2)
Re:The kids will love it (Score:2)
robi
Re:The kids will love it (Score:2)
Re:The kids will love it (Score:2)
Re:The kids will love it (Score:4, Informative)
Many different substances can be explosive given the right amount of oxygen surrounding the flammable particles. It's a fairly common trick that middle school science teachers do to wake up their students [meigsmagnet.org].
Re:The kids will love it (Score:4, Interesting)
[howstuffworks.com]
http://www.howstuffworks.com/question150.htm
Bzflag is cooler :-) (Score:2, Funny)
I think the BZFlag guys get the award for "most modifier goodies"- it made my dizzy, reading all the different kinds of flags there are. Forget a 'gunner', you need a 'flag checker'.
Driver:"Ooo, ooo! A flag! [steer steer steeer]"
Flag Checker(slow motion): "nnnooooooOOOO!"
-BOINK- BROADCAST MESSAGE: "Team A ran over Hippie Flag, now shooting Daisies"
I wish they'd do collaborative roles, so you really COULD have a driver, gunner, etc..that would ROCK.
Who remembers playing Bolo on
Re:Bzflag is cooler :-) (Score:2)
Re:Bzflag is cooler :-) (Score:2)
YES! That's the one! It was sweet. You had a limited budget of "stuff" and could spread it between ammmo capacity, speed, and armour if I remember correctly...and holy cow did the bad guys get tough after a while :-)
Man, I miss all the cool old Mac games...NetTrek, Bolo, Spectre, Cannon Fodder, Brickles, Solar
Realism? (Score:5, Funny)
Really. (Score:2)
Re:Realism? (Score:2)
Cats! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Cats! (Score:5, Funny)
Duh! Cats have no opposable thumbs! How the HELL do you think they're going to use a remote control?!
Re:Cats! (Score:3, Funny)
What I'm trying to say, just get one of those stun batons.
Logo??? (Score:2, Informative)
eeek! (Score:3, Funny)
ultimate coolness would be... (Score:4, Interesting)
Yeah of course we have videogames, but it would be much cooler to have the game happening in real-life 3D on a small table in the living room.
a couple of things (Score:2, Informative)
but their ranges are pretty amazing.
They use a similar protocol to the digiq's,
which are IR controlled cars.
You can get them at Fry's.
They are loads of fun
I can't wait... (Score:3, Interesting)
Man (Score:2)
Now what we need... (Score:2)
Just join the AAA! (Score:2)
See Steve Jackson Games: Car Wars [sjgames.com]
Re:Now what we need... (Score:2)
Your likely to get a lot of the flame melting your rear end. The tail of your car creates a real low pressure zone, and even creates some forward air flow. If you've ever been in a convertable and had your hair fly forward into your face, you know what I'm talking about.
Great. More things to spamvertise.... (Score:3, Interesting)
"I read the whole article!" - Sun Tszu (Score:5, Interesting)
Any /.ers care to take on the challenge?
"Knowledge is half the battle!" - GI JOE (he would have read the whole article, then gone off to kick Cobra Commander's ass...)
I have two of these!!! (Score:4, Informative)
The advantages these little things have over the other MiniRC craze are:
No ugly/fragile antenna (IR Control)
Better cosmetic detail of the bodies. A couple little plastic pieces to glue on for added effect are included.
The IR Weapons onboard complete the ultimate childhood fantasy of having your little plastic army men fight.
Good control unit with swapable modules so you can use the same radio to control all the different types of tanks...
The IR control is pretty good as far as range is concerned as long as you have line of sight. You have to mind that you point the control unit in the general direction of the tank... I've been stalled and hit a couple times because I didn't pay attention. There are cool little LED special effects and shaking when your opponent hits you with a shot...
These things will have you building little obstacles and battlefields pretty soon after playing a couple rounds...
Glad somebody wrote a review on these Konami tanks... Very cool... There are also hobbyists who make larger 1/15 scale versions but they cost hundreds... You can get two of these for about $100 plus shipping from Japan right now.
Procreation & Marriage Now Justifiable (Score:5, Funny)
Thanks
Re:Procreation & Marriage Now Justifiable (Score:2)
Now I have to register a new
I've got 'em, they're sweet (Score:4, Informative)
Cool features I haven't seen mentioned here yet:
They are a bit pricey, but the WWII Winter set includes two tanks, plus obstacles to hide behind and decals.
The only other downside is that they're a little fragile.
Re:I've got 'em, they're sweet (Score:2)
The turret only moves about 30-40 degrees to the right and left. But since you can back up easily, you can still fire in the opposite direction.
Alright..... (Score:2)
Who here has a Warhammer 40k map? I mean, the scale is practically perfect. Certainly close enough to make one heck of a battleground.
Now if I could only find someone near me.... hmmmmmm.
Tanks (Score:2, Interesting)
But, you need AIR SUPPORT! (Score:2, Interesting)
Interactive Toy Concepts [interactivetoy.com]
This company has everything from blimps to B2 bomber, and more.
one of the games you can play with it... (Score:2)
Ogg Support (Score:3, Funny)
Loving the Translation (Score:2, Funny)
Please enjoy yourself using this manual.
I sure hope you DON'T use that manual to enjoy yourself! You might want to try reading it first. Or maybe printing it out. =)
Re:Loving the Translation (Score:2)
Sorry but... (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:Sorry but... (Score:2)
Re:Sorry but... (Score:2)
you know what would kick ass? (Score:2, Insightful)
Oooohhhh.... (Score:2)
RC Tanks have been around for ages (Score:5, Funny)
He sat inside it, a radio signal came in, and in response to that message, he shot at Germans.
Re:Awesome! (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Awesome! (Score:2, Funny)
3D Scorched Earth (Score:5, Interesting)
However i've had massive problems with every 3D version i've tried. Not only is my first guess almost always rather off because of the complications of the third dimension, but adjusting the shot takes a long time as well. It just takes way too long and isn't as much fun.
Of course hopefully the toy tanks wouldn't take so long to render, and it would be really easy to multi-thread and have them all shooting at once :)
Re:3D Scorched Earth (Score:5, Funny)
You quickly get in pointed in the right direction and it becomes 2D again.
Helps to have RainMan on your team, though. Definately 38.7 degrees with 2.147 kilograms of powder. Definately. Practically 21 seconds to impact. They are definately not going to be happy when this bad boy lands on them. Definately.
Re:3D Scorched Earth (Score:5, Informative)
Indirect fire is what artillery does, the round goes through a high ballistic trajectory, but you want the round to travel in as low a trajectory as possible; the higher the round travels, the more likely that it will be picked up by a counter-mortar radar which can calculate the point of origin so the opposing force can shoot back at you. the FO, Forward Observer see's the traget, and tells the FDC, Fire Direction Computer, the approximate grid co-ordinates of the traget, his direction to the target, and what the target is. The FDC then calculates what direction to point the guns in, what elevation to point at, and what charge to use, how much powder. the guns then aim at a two stakes in the ground and fires, usualy one round from the number two gun in the center. If the round hits with-in the burst-radious of the target, then all the guns fire, if not the FO tells the FDC how many meters to left or right, or to add or subtract, the FDC re-computes and 2 gun re-shoots. as soon as the target is hit the unit moves, and re-sets up. This is called shoot and scoot, because if you're still there, the other guys are going to reach out and touch you if they can.
Re:Awesome! (Score:5, Funny)
"Stuff that matters."
The normal editors must be on vacation...
Re:Awesome! (Score:2)
If you could define the parameters/dimensions of the battlefield, you could easily place virtual powerups, viewable through your monitor, perhaps some kind of radar system. It could be the ultimate in toys. Now instead of tanks, lets use radio controlled, flying cockroaches [wireheading.com] and you have the potential for one hell of a
Bolo! (Score:2)
That was an awesome Tank Program... anyone that remember it know if there is a more recent version(win or linux)?
Re:Playthings of our fears... (Score:2)
I'll ignore some of your rhetoric, but I will say:
You're a little late to the party.
http://www.thortrains.net/armymen/armymen3.htm [thortrains.net]
Re:Playthings of our fears... (Score:2)
> one-sided political analysis of what the US has done in
> the past and nothing more.
And you probably won't ever hear one. About the most 'thought' the typical protester can manage is "I hate Bush. Bush wants to topple Saddam. Therefore Saddam has to be good." There ARE reasons to be against Gulf War II but you won't hear any of them from the usual suspects who are still stuck in Jan 2001.
[OT] My answer to Saddam... (Score:2)
There's no question that, all other things unchanged, the world would be a better place without Saddam Hussein. What I don't like is the other things in the world we've changed by removing him this way. (this quote stolen from another poster, my apologies for not quoting him/her)
Nobody's arguing that Saddam's a nice guy. What many of the anti-war protesters are arguing is telling the UN security council to "STFU" and plodding ahead just the same.
That damage to world relations, I believe, is fa
Re:[OT] My answer to Saddam... (Score:2)
There is nothing even remotely democratic about the UN because to much power is involved with the permanat members of the security concil veto. Considering that France and Russia have an outstanding credit balance of $9 Billion each, it's not hard to imagine that they may have let economic considerations influence their ve
Re:[OT] My answer to Saddam... (Score:3)
Still, even if this is their real concern, ignoring them, and the principles the UN was founded on, is not the right course of action. Why hasn't our "fine" president stood forth with this debt as the prime reason for their opinion?
You also didn't approach the issue of why we've been told there's so much urgency: weapons of mass destruction. We don't have proof of them, no matter how much o
Re:Genius ideas... (Score:2)
So yeah, we were complicit in the deaths of lots of Iraqi children. The sanctions *weakened* the Iraqi people, forcing them to depend on a brutal dictator to survive. And who's fault was that? Ours. The sanctions made Saddam stronger.
Re:Genius ideas... (Score:2)
Yes, I do mean the members of the UN which insisted on continued sanctions. They weren't exactly united behind the idea.
The UN wanted to end them depending on Saddam's behavior. It was the brilliant move of Bush I and Clinton to give Saddam *no* incentive to change by stating, quite clearly, that the sanctions would remain in power so long as he was in charge.
I never said that the U.S. was the only country to blame. You assumed that. And you know what happens when you assume things.
I think so... (Score:2)
-Zipwow
Re:These tanks could be an interesting choice... (Score:5, Informative)
looks just like a real (scale) plane
flies well
is relatively inexpensive and easy to make
Pick any two!
Even so, some people do do R/C combat with scale models ... but it's a lot of work making the planes and keeping them flying :)
R/C plane combat is certainly done. Some is done with infrared `guns', like this [hobbyzonesports.com], some is done trying to cut a ribbon trailing behind the other plane [georgiacombat.com], and some is done by literally trying to bump the other plane out of the sky.
In all cases, even when you're not trying to, the planes tend to collide quite often. So you need planes that are very resiliant, and that usually means that they aren't going to be scale models of anything -- instead, you concentrate on them flying reasonably well and being tough.
Re:These tanks could be an interesting choice... (Score:2)
Still, fun.
Re:Those aren't toys! (Score:5, Funny)