Do you even understand what you're saying here?
Yes.
Affirmative action is having a lower bar for some skin colors,
No it's not. It's about having the same bar. If the bar is higher for black people (it really does appear to be) then you need to lower the bar actively to make it the same.
It does matter, because we're often on the same side. There's a difference between SJW complaints coming from the right versus the left.
Are we? I have a hard job taking anyone seriously who uses the term "SJW" (unless ironically or in reply to someone already talking about). It's a mishmash of random things, more or less "shit I hate on the internet" with weird overtones, like SJW do X, you're an SJW therefore you do X.
Always puts a smile on my face when someone challenges me for a citation, because I've always got em :)
Hmm that seems unlikely. Actually that seems really, really unlikely. Fine, I'll bite. Well, you need to wipe that smile off your face because that citation doesn't remotely support your original point. Let me remind me of your original claim:
You're going to sit there and tell me with a straight face that it's ok to have[...]
I did not "sit there and tell you anything". That quote has nothing to do with me or anything I said. So, pics or GTFO and stop making stuff up about me because you think it's likely I said it. I didn't. Now it's time to be honest and for you to admit that you were flat out wrong and have no evidence of me saying any such things. On the other hand, I am an SJW and that's just guilt by accusation...
"Feminism" is overly broad, I'm not against it as a concept, I'm against it where it seeks inequality.
It doesn't. There's a few whackjobs out on the fringes, but it you categorise every movement by the most extreme members then everyone looks like an idiot. The goal of feminism is equality for men and women.
I'm unclear on how what counts as it on the progressive left
How the fucks am I supposed to know precisely what boogey men you believe constitute the "progressive left"? But this is exactly what I'm talking about it. You're not interested in my point, you're trying to find some segment of the political landscape you think is nutty enough then generalising that to the whole.
I can see how this is going to unroll. I will lay out the principles, then you'll chime in with either "nuh uh, this nutcase did X" (or even better "you personally did X") therefore you're wrong about everything. I'm not going to engage in that waste of breath. If you do something, anything to show you're interested in discussing this in good faith, then I'll continue. Until that point I will not take the effort.